Unraveling middle childhood attachment-related behavior sequences using a micro-coding approach

Autoři: Nadja Bodner aff001;  Guy Bosmans aff002;  Jasmien Sannen aff003;  Martine Verhees aff003;  Eva Ceulemans aff001
Působiště autorů: Quantitative Psychology and Individual Differences Research Group, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium aff001;  Clinical Psychology Research Group, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium aff002;  Parenting and Special Education Research Unit, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium aff003;  Clinical Child and Family Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands aff004
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224372


Attachment theory states that children learn to trust in their parent’s availability and support if they repeatedly experience that their parents respond sensitively to their needs during distress. Attachment is thus developed and shaped by day-to-day interactions, while at the same time, each interaction is a momentary expression of the attachment relation. How attachment-related behaviors of mother and child follow upon each other during interactions in middle childhood, and how these sequences differ in function of attachment quality, has hardly been studied up to now. To fill this gap, we analyzed the micro-coded interaction of 55 mother-child dyads (27 girls, 28 boys, mean age: 10.3) after a standardized stress-induction. Results reveal that all mother-child dyads show a loop between positive mother and child behaviors. This pattern is complemented with a loop of negative mother and child behaviors in low-trust and more avoidantly attached children: these children tend to handle negative mother behavior less well as they show more negative behavior and less positive behavior in response to negative maternal behavior. More anxiously attached children also show less positive behavior, but react positively on collaborative interactions. The micro-coded interactions thus reveal important insights that inform practitioners and advance attachment theory.

Klíčová slova:

Anxiety – Behavior – Coding mechanisms – Emotions – Children – Infants – Mothers – Parenting behavior


1. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss: Vol1.Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1969.

2. Cassidy J. Emotion Regulation: Influences of Attachment Relationships. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1994;59: 228–249. doi: 10.2307/1166148 7984163

3. Ainsworth MDS, Blehar MC, Waters C, Wall S. Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Oxford,UK: Erlbaum; 1978.

4. Waters E. The “Goodness” of Attachment Assessment: There Is A “Gold Standard” But It Isn’t As Simple As That. [Internet]. 2002. Available: http://www.psychology.sunsb.edu/attachment/measures/content/attachment_validity.html

5. Brumariu LE, Giuseppone KR, Kerns KA, Van de Walle M, Bureau J-F, Bosmans G, et al. Middle Childhood Attachment Strategies: validation of an observational measure. Attach Hum Dev. 2018; 1–23. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2018.1433696 29402188

6. Mayseless O. Ontogeny of Attachment in Middle Childhood—Conceptualization of Normative Changes. In: Kerns KA, Richardson RA, editors. Attachment in Middle Childhood. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2005. pp. 1–23.

7. Stoolmiller M. Synergistic interaction of child manageability problems and parent-discipline tactics in predicting future growth in externalizing behavior for boys. Dev Psychol. 2001;37: 814–825. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.37.6.814 11699755

8. Beebe B, Jaffe J, Markese S, Buck K, Chen H, Cohen P, et al. The origins of 12-month attachment: A microanalysis of 4-month mother–infant interaction. Attach Hum Dev. 2010;12: 3–141. doi: 10.1080/14616730903338985 20390524

9. Biringen Z, Robinson JL, Emde RN. Emotional Availability Scales (3rd ed.). Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins; 1998.

10. Boldt LJ, Kochanska G, Grekin R, Brock RL. Attachment in middle childhood: predictors, correlates, and implications for adaptation. Attach Hum Dev. 2016;18: 115–140. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2015.1120334 26673686

11. Lyons-Ruth K, Hennighausen K, Holmes B. Goal-corrected partnership in adolescence coding system (GPACS): Coding manual, Version 2. Unpublished manual,. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA.; 2005.

12. Obsuth I, Hennighausen K, Brumariu LE, Lyons‐Ruth K. Disorganized Behavior in Adolescent–Parent Interaction: Relations to Attachment State of Mind, Partner Abuse, and Psychopathology. Child Dev. 2014;85: 370–387. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12113 23621826

13. Bakeman R, Gottman JM. Observing interaction: an introduction to sequential analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1997.

14. Dishion TJ, Spracklen KM, Andrews DW, Patterson GR. Deviancy training in male adolescent friendships. Behav Ther. 1996;27: 373–390. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(96)80023-2

15. Van keer I, Ceulemans E, Bodner N, Vandesande S, Van Leeuwen K, Maes B. Parent-child interaction: A micro-level sequential approach in children with a significant cognitive and motor developmental delay. Res Dev Disabil. 2019;85: 172–186. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.11.008 30572148

16. Del Giudice M. Attachment in Middle Childhood: An Evolutionary-Developmental Perspective. In: Bosmans G, Kerns K, editors. Attachment in middle childhood: Theoretical advances and new directions in an emerging fieldNew Directions for Child and Adolescent Development. 2015. pp. 15–30.

17. Koehn AJ, Kerns KA. The Supervision Partnership as a Phase of Attachment. J Early Adolesc. 2016;36: 961–988. doi: 10.1177/0272431615590231

18. Vandevivere E, Braet C, Bosmans G. Under Which Conditions Do Early Adolescents Need Maternal Support? J Early Adolesc. 2015;35: 162–169. doi: 10.1177/0272431614529364

19. Zimmermann P, Mohr C, Spangler G. Genetic and attachment influences on adolescents’ regulation of autonomy and aggressiveness. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009;50: 1339–1347. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02158.x 19769585

20. Bosmans G, Braet C, Heylen J, De Raedt R. Children’s Attentional Processing of Mother and Proximity Seeking. PLOS ONE. 2015;10: e0124038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124038 25927921

21. Bosmans G. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Children and Adolescents: Can Attachment Theory Contribute to Its Efficacy? Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2016;19: 310–328. doi: 10.1007/s10567-016-0212-3 27576548

22. Dujardin A, Santens T, Braet C, De Raedt R, Vos P, Maes B, et al. Middle Childhood Support-Seeking Behavior During Stress: Links With Self-Reported Attachment and Future Depressive Symptoms. Child Dev. 2016;87: 326–340. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12491 26822450

23. Dwyer KM. The Meaning and Measurement of Attachment in Middle and Late Childhood. Hum Dev. 2005;48: 155–182. doi: 10.1159/000085519

24. Hamaker EL, Ceulemans E, Grasman RPPP, Tuerlinckx F. Modeling Affect Dynamics: State of the Art and Future Challenges. Emot Rev. 2015;7: 316–322. doi: 10.1177/1754073915590619

25. Kochanska G. Mutually Responsive Orientation between Mothers and Their Young Children: Implications for Early Socialization. Child Dev. 1997;68: 94–112. 9084128

26. Spangler G, Zimmermann P. Emotional and adrenocortical regulation in early adolescence: Prediction by attachment security and disorganization in infancy. Int J Behav Dev. 2014;38: 142–154. doi: 10.1177/0165025414520808

27. Bosmans G, Kerns KA. Attachment in Middle Childhood: Progress and Prospects. In: Bosmans G, Kerns K, editors. Attachment in middle childhood: Theoretical advances and new directions in an emerging field New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development. 2015. pp. 1–14.

28. Spangler G, Grossmann KE. Biobehavioral organization in securely and insecurely attached infants. Child Dev. 1993;64: 1439–1450. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02962.x 8222882

29. Bodner N, Kuppens P, Allen NB, Sheeber LB, Ceulemans E. Affective family interactions and their associations with adolescent depression: A dynamic network approach. Dev Psychopathol. 2018;30: 1459–1473. doi: 10.1017/S0954579417001699 29151387

30. Jaccard P. Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura. Bull Société Vaudoise Sci Nat. 1901;37: 547–579.

31. Jaccard P. The Distribution of the Flora in the Alpine Zone. New Phytol. 1912;11: 37–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x

32. Biringen Z. Emotional availability: Conceptualization and research findings. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2000;70: 104–114. doi: 10.1037/h0087711 10702855

33. Cohen J. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20: 37–46. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104

34. Landis JR, Koch GG. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics. 1977;33: 159. doi: 10.2307/2529310 843571

35. Bakeman R, McArthur D, Quera V, Robinson BF. Detecting sequential patterns and determining their reliability with fallible observers. Psychol Methods. 1997;2: 357–370. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.2.4.357

36. Ridenour TA, Greenberg MT, Cook ET. Structure and validity of people in my life: A self-report measure of attachment in late childhood. J Youth Adolesc. 2006;35: 1037–1053. doi: 10.1007/s10964-006-9070-5 17476310

37. Bosmans G, Braet C, Koster E, De Raedt R. Attachment Security and Attentional Breadth toward the Attachment Figure in Middle Childhood. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2009;38: 872–882. doi: 10.1080/15374410903258926 20183670

38. Brenning K, Soenens B, Braet C, Bosmans G. An adaptation of the experiences in close relationships scale-revised for use with children and adolescents. J Soc Pers Relatsh. 2011;28: 1048–1072. doi: 10.1177/0265407511402418

39. Brenning K, Soenens B, Braet C, Bosmans G. Attachment and depressive symptoms in middle childhood and early adolescence: Testing the validity of the emotion regulation model of attachment. Pers Relatsh. 2012;19: 445–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01372.x

40. Brenning K, Soenens B, Braet C, Bal S. The Role of Parenting and Mother-Adolescent Attachment in the Intergenerational Similarity of Internalizing Symptoms. J Youth Adolesc. 2012;41: 802–816. doi: 10.1007/s10964-011-9740-9 22193358

41. Albatineh AN, Niewiadomska-Bugaj M. Correcting Jaccard and other similarity indices for chance agreement in cluster analysis. Adv Data Anal Classif. 2011;5: 179–200. doi: 10.1007/s11634-011-0090-y

42. Kochanska G, Boldt LJ, Goffin KC. Early Relational Experience: A Foundation for the Unfolding Dynamics of Parent-Child Socialization. Child Dev Perspect. 2018; doi: 10.1111/cdep.12308 31131018

43. Allen JP, Tan JS. The Multiple Facets of Attachment in Adolescence,. In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR, editors. Handbook of attachment, Third Edition: theory, research, and clinical applications. 3rd Edition. New York: Guilford Press; 2016. pp. 399–415.

44. Beijersbergen MD, Bakermans‐Kranenburg MJ, IJzendoorn MHV, Juffer F. Stress Regulation in Adolescents: Physiological Reactivity During the Adult Attachment Interview and Conflict Interaction. Child Dev. 2008;79: 1707–1720. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01220.x 19037944

45. Cassidy J, Kobak RR. Avoidance and its Relation to Other Defensive Processes. Clinical Implications of Attachment. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum; 1988. pp. 300–323.

46. Target M, Fonagy P, Shmueli-Goetz Y. Attachment representations in school-age children: the development of the child attachment interview (CAI). J Child Psychother. 2003;29: 171–186. doi: 10.1080/0075417031000138433

47. Granqvist P, Sroufe LA, Dozier M, Hesse E, Steele M, van Ijzendoorn M, et al. Disorganized attachment in infancy: a review of the phenomenon and its implications for clinicians and policy-makers. Attach Hum Dev. 2017;19: 534–558. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2017.1354040 28745146

48. Lecompte V, Moss E. Disorganized and controlling patterns of attachment, role reversal, and caregiving helplessness: Links to adolescents’ externalizing problems. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2014;84: 581–589. doi: 10.1037/ort0000017 25265220

49. Marvin R, Cooper G, Hoffman K, Powell B. The Circle of Security project: Attachment-based intervention with caregiver-pre-school child dyads. Attach Hum Dev. 2002;4: 107–124. doi: 10.1080/14616730252982491 12065033

50. De Winter S, Salemink E, Bosmans G. Interpretation bias in middle childhood attachment: Causal effects on attachment memories and scripts. Behav Res Ther. 2018;102: 16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.12.004 29289759

51. De Winter S, Bosmans G, Salemink E. Exploring the Causal Effect of Interpretation Bias on Attachment Expectations. Child Dev. 2017;88: 131–140. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12587 27346554

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 10