Illness beliefs and emotional responses in mildly disabled stroke survivors: A qualitative study

Autoři: Claire Della Vecchia aff001;  Marie Préau aff002;  Camille Carpentier aff002;  Marie Viprey aff001;  Julie Haesebaert aff001;  Anne Termoz aff001;  Alexandra L. Dima aff001;  Anne-Marie Schott aff001
Působiště autorů: Univ. Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, HESPER EA 7425, Lyon, France aff001;  GRePS Lyon 2 Université, University of Lyon, Bron, France aff002;  Aix-Marseille Université, INSERM UMR 912 SESSTIM, Marseille, France aff003;  Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Santé Publique, Lyon, France aff004
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie: Research Article



As acute stroke services improve, more persons experience mild stroke and need to cope daily with hidden disabilities, which may be influenced by how they perceive stroke, cognitively and emotionally.


To investigate cognitive illness beliefs and emotional responses in persons with mild stroke and their possible influences on daily coping.


Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 persons with mild stroke, on average 7.5 months (±0.89) after stroke occurrence. A thematic analysis on verbatim transcripts was guided by the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation.


All participants experienced difficulties constructing an illness identity at both acute and chronic phase. Behavioral risk factors were less accepted as causes of stroke. Lack (or inappropriate timing) of information from healthcare providers led to limited medication knowledge and low perceived control of stroke recurrence which generated anxiety, fear, and low involvement in coping. Participants who considered stroke a chronic condition experienced more difficulties. Perceived support from relatives and healthcare providers was beneficial for participation in recovery and health behaviour change.


Despite having mildly disabilities, participants reported difficulties developing illness beliefs conducive to coping, and dealing with their emotional responses. These elements should be considered in tailored programs to improve coping with hidden disabilities post-stroke.

Klíčová slova:

Behavioral and social aspects of health – Cognitive impairment – Disabilities – Emotions – Fatigue – Health care providers – Mental health and psychiatry – stroke


1. WHO. Global burden of stroke. 2002.

2. Terrill AL, Schwartz JK, Belagaje SR. Best Practices for The Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Team: A Review of Mental Health Issues in Mild Stroke Survivors. Stroke Res Treat. 2018;2018. doi: 10.1155/2018/6187328 29973980

3. Johansson B, Rönnbäck L. Mental Fatigue and Cognitive Impairment after an Almost Neurological Recovered Stroke. ISRN Psychiatry. 2012;2012. doi: 10.5402/2012/686425 23738208

4. Carlsson GE, Möller A, Blomstrand C. A qualitative study of the consequences of “hidden dysfunctions” one year after a mild stroke in persons <75 years. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26: 1373–1380. 15742983

5. Carlsson GE, Möller A, Blomstrand C. Consequences of mild stroke in persons <75 years—a 1-year follow-up. Cerebrovasc Dis Basel Switz. 2003;16: 383–388. doi:72561

6. Urs Fischer, Adrian Baumgartner, Marcel Arnold, Krassen Nedeltchev, Jan Gralla, Gian Marco De Marchis, et al. What Is a Minor Stroke? Stroke. 2010;41: 661–666. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.572883 20185781

7. Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke. 1988;19: 1497–1500. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.12.1497 3201508

8. Wolf TJ, Baum C, Conner LT. Changing face of stroke: implications for occupational therapy practice. Am J Occup Ther Off Publ Am Occup Ther Assoc. 2009;63: 621–625.

9. Gabet A, de Peretti C, Lecoffre C, Olié V. Évolution des admissions en soins de suite et de réadaptation (SSR) après une hospitalisation pour accident vasculaire cérébral, France, 2010–2014. Rev DÉpidémiologie Santé Publique. 2017;65: S33. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2017.01.079

10. Hu X, Heyn PC, Schwartz J, Roberts P. What Is Mild Stroke? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98: 2347–2349. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.004 28460850

11. Leventhal H, Phillips LA, Burns E. The Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM): a dynamic framework for understanding illness self-management. J Behav Med. 2016;39: 935–946. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9782-2 27515801

12. Richardson EM, Schüz N, Sanderson K, Scott JL, Schüz B. Illness representations, coping, and illness outcomes in people with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychooncology. 2017;26: 724–737. doi: 10.1002/pon.4213 27412423

13. Hagger MS, Orbell S. A Meta-Analytic Review of the Common-Sense Model of Illness Representations. Psychol Health. 2003;18: 141–184. doi: 10.1080/088704403100081321

14. Brandes K, Mullan B. Can the common-sense model predict adherence in chronically ill patients? A meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2014;8: 129–153. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2013.820986 25053132

15. Weinman J, Petrie KJ, Moss-morris R, Horne R. The illness perception questionnaire: A new method for assessing the cognitive representation of illness. Psychol Health. 1996;11: 431–445. doi: 10.1080/08870449608400270

16. Moss-Morris R, Weinman J, Petrie K, Horne R, Cameron L, Buick D. The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychol Health. 2002;17: 1–16. doi: 10.1080/08870440290001494

17. Broadbent E, Donkin L, Stroh JC. Illness and treatment perceptions are associated with adherence to medications, diet, and exercise in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2011;34: 338–340. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1779 21270191

18. Eames S, Hoffmann T, Worrall L, Read S. Stroke patients’ awareness of risk and readiness to change behaviors. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18: 481–489. doi: 10.1310/tsr1805-481 22082699

19. Phillips LA, Diefenbach MA, Abrams J, Horowitz CR. Stroke and TIA survivors’ cognitive beliefs and affective responses regarding treatment and future stroke risk differentially predict medication adherence and categorised stroke risk. Psychol Health. 2015;30: 218–232. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2014.964237 25220292

20. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19: 349–357. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 17872937

21. Kivits J, Balard F, Fournier C, Winance M. Les recherches qualitatives en santé. Armand Colin; 2016.

22. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3: 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

23. Schott A, Viprey M, Termoz A, Della Vecchia C, Perreton N, Bravant E, et al. [abstract] Dramatic improvement of acute ischaemic stroke management in the Rhone area between 2007 and 2016: a population based before after prospective study. Eur Stroke J. 2018;3: 3–204.

24. van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19: 604–607. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.5.604 3363593

25. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc; 1990.

26. Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, Olson K, Spiers J. Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Int J Qual Methods. 2002;1: 13–22. doi: 10.1177/160940690200100202

27. Bardin L. L’analyse de contenu. PUF; 2007.

28. Santos CO, Caeiro L, Ferro JM, Albuquerque R, Figueira ML. Denial in the first days of acute stroke. J Neurol. 2006;253: 1016–1023. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-0148-5 16598613

29. Strange D, Takarangi MKT. Memory Distortion for Traumatic Events: The Role of Mental Imagery. Front Psychiatry. 2015;6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00027 25755646

30. Debeer E, Raes F, Claes S, Vrieze E, Williams JMG, Hermans D. Relationship between cognitive avoidant coping and changes in overgeneral autobiographical memory retrieval following an acute stressor. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2012;43: S37–S42. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.04.002 23200429

31. Hermans D, Defranc A, Raes F, Williams JMG, Eelen P. Reduced autobiographical memory specificity as an avoidant coping style. Br J Clin Psychol. 2005;44: 583–589. doi: 10.1348/014466505X53461 16368035

32. Cameron JI, Gignac MAM. “Timing It Right”: A conceptual framework for addressing the support needs of family caregivers to stroke survivors from the hospital to the home. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;70: 305–314. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.10.020 18155388

33. Rodgers H, Bond S, Curless R. Inadequacies in the provision of information to stroke patients and their families. Age Ageing. 2001;30: 129–133. doi: 10.1093/ageing/30.2.129 11395342

34. Sarre S, Redlich C, Tinker A, Sadler E, Bhalla A, McKevitt C. A systematic review of qualitative studies on adjusting after stroke: lessons for the study of resilience. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36: 716–726. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.814724 23883420

35. Louie SWS, Liu PKK, Man DWK. The effectiveness of a stroke education group on persons with stroke and their caregivers. Int J Rehabil Res Int Z Rehabil Rev Int Rech Readaptation. 2006;29: 123–129. doi: 10.1097/01.mrr.0000191851.03317.f0 16609323

36. Reeves Mathew J, Fritz Michele C., Woodward Amanda T., Hughes Anne K., Coursaris Constantinos K., Swierenga Sarah J., et al. Michigan Stroke Transitions Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019;12: e005493. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005493 31296043

37. Daviet J-C, Bonan I, Caire JM, Colle F, Damamme L, Froger J, et al. Therapeutic patient education for stroke survivors: Non-pharmacological management. A literature review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2012;55: 641–656. doi: 10.1016/ 23000090

38. Kim J-I, Lee S, Kim J-H. Effects of a web-based stroke education program on recurrence prevention behaviors among stroke patients: a pilot study. Health Educ Res. 2013;28: 488–501. doi: 10.1093/her/cyt044 23515115

39. Christensen ER, Golden SL, Gesell SB. Perceived Benefits of Peer Support Groups for Stroke Survivors and Caregivers in Rural North Carolina. N C Med J. 2019;80: 143–148. doi: 10.18043/ncm.80.3.143 31072940

40. Wolf TJ, Baum CM, Lee D, Hammel J. The Development of the Improving Participation after Stroke Self-Management Program (IPASS): An Exploratory Randomized Clinical Study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23: 284–292. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1155278 27077987

41. Norlander A, Carlstedt E, Jönsson A-C, Lexell EM, Ståhl A, Lindgren A, et al. Long-Term Predictors of Social and Leisure Activity 10 Years after Stroke. PLoS ONE. 2016;11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149395 26901501

42. Beckley MN. The influence of the quality and quantity of social support in the promotion of community participation following stroke. Aust Occup Ther J. 2007;54: 215–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00643.x

43. Chen X, He Y, Meng X, Zhou L. Factors associated with perceived participation three months after being discharged from a tertiary hospital. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31: 1257–1266. doi: 10.1177/0269215516684178 28786334

44. Fallahpour M, Tham K, Joghataei MT, Jonsson H. Perceived participation and autonomy: aspects of functioning and contextual factors predicting participation after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43: 388–397. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0789 21448554

45. Leventhal H, Meyer D, Merenz D. The common sense model of illness danger. Medical Psychology. 1980;II.

46. De Simoni A, Shanks A, Balasooriya-Smeekens C, Mant J. Stroke survivors and their families receive information and support on an individual basis from an online forum: descriptive analysis of a population of 2348 patients and qualitative study of a sample of participants. BMJ Open. 2016;6. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010501 27053271

47. Theunissen NCM, de Ridder DTD, Bensing JM, Rutten GEHM. Manipulation of patient-provider interaction: discussing illness representations or action plans concerning adherence. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;51: 247–258. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00224-0 14630381

48. Sultan S, Attali C, Gilberg S, Zenasni F, Hartemann A. Physicians’ understanding of patients’ personal representations of their diabetes: accuracy and association with self-care. Psychol Health. 2011;26 Suppl 1: 101–117. doi: 10.1080/08870441003703226 21337260

49. Choi-Kwon S, Lee SK, Park HA, Kwon SU, Ahn JS, Kim JS. What stroke patients want to know and what medical professionals think they should know about stroke: Korean perspectives. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;56: 85–92. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.12.011 15590227

50. Apostolidis T. Représentations sociales et triangulation: une application en Psychologie sociale de la Santé. Psicologia: Toria e Pesquisa. 2006;22(2): 211–226.

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 10
Nejčtenější tento týden