Management strategies for vaccinated animals after an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease and the impact on return to trade

Autoři: Richard Bradhurst aff001;  Graeme Garner aff002;  Iain East aff002;  Clare Death aff002;  Aaron Dodd aff001;  Tom Kompas aff001
Působiště autorů: Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia aff001;  Epidemiology and One Health, Animal Health Policy Branch, Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, Canberra, ACT, Australia aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie: Research Article


An incursion of Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in a previously FMD-free country can cause significant economic damage from immediate and prolonged closure of FMD-sensitive markets. Whilst emergency vaccination may help contain disease, the presence of vaccinated animals complicates post-outbreak management and the recovery of FMD-free status for return to trade. We present enhancements to the Australian Animal DISease (AADIS) model that allow comparisons of post-outbreak management strategies for vaccinated animals, for the purposes of securing the earliest possible return to trade. Two case studies are provided that compare the retention of vaccinated animals with removal for waste/salvage, and the impact on recovery of FMD-sensitive markets per OIE guidelines. It was found that a vaccinate-and-retain strategy was associated with lower post-outbreak management costs, however this advantage was outweighed by significantly higher trade losses. Under the assumptions of the study there was no cost advantage to salvaging the removed vaccinated animals.

Klíčová slova:

Australia – Epidemiology – Infectious disease control – Livestock – Sheep – Vaccination and immunization – Veterinary diseases – Foot and mouth disease


1. Matthews K. A review of Australia’s preparedness for the threat of foot and mouth disease. Australian Government Department of Agriculture and Water Resources 2011,

2. Buetre B, Wicks S, Kruger H, Millist N, Yainshet A, Garner G, et al. Potential socio-economic impacts of an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in Australia. Research Report 13.11, October 2013, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES). Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

3. Animal Health Australia. Disease strategy: Foot-and-mouth disease (Version 3.4). Australian Veterinarian Emergency Plan (AUSVETPLAN), 3rd Ed., 2014. Standing Council on Primary Industries, Canberra ACT.

4. OIE. Infection with foot and mouth disease virus. Chapter 8.8. In:Terrestrial Animal Health Code Edition 25, 2016. World Organisation for Animal Health.

5. Pluimers FH, Akkerman AM, van der Wal P, Dekker A, Bianchi A. Lessons from the foot and mouth disease outbreak in the Netherlands in 2001. Rev. sci. tech. Off int. Epiz. 2002; 21(3):711–721.

6. Paton DJ, de Clerq K, Greiner M, Dekker A, Brocchi E, Bergmann I, Sammin DJ, Gubbins S, Parida S. Application of non-structural protein antibody tests in substantiating freedom from foot-and-mouth disease virus infection after emergency vaccination of cattle. Vaccine 2006; 24(42–43):6503–6512. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.06.032 16872727

7. Abdalla A, Beare S, Cao L, Garner MG. Heaney A. Foot and mouth disease: Evaluating alternatives for controlling a possible outbreak in Australia. ABARE eReport 05.6. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2005.

8. Roche SE, Garner MG, Wicks RM, East IJ, de Witte K. How do resources influence control measures during a simulated outbreak of foot and mouth disease in Australia? Prev Vet Med. 2014; 113(4):436–446. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.12.003 24412502

9. Garner MG, Bombarderi N, Cozens M, Conway ML, Wright T, Paskin R, East IJ. Estimating Resource Requirements to Staff a Response to a Medium to Large Outbreak of Foot and Mouth Disease in Australia. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2016; 63(1):109–121. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12239 24894407

10. Tomassen FH, de Koeijer A, Mourits MC, Dekker A, Bouma A, Huirne RB. A decision-tree to optimise control measures during the early stage of a foot-and-mouth disease epidemic. Prev Vet Med. 2002; 54(4), 301–324. 12163248

11. Keeling MJ, Woolhouse ME, May RM, Davies G, Grenfell BT. Modelling vaccination strategies against foot-and-mouth disease. Nature 2003; 421:136–142. doi: 10.1038/nature01343 12508120

12. Backer JA, Hagenaars TJ, Nodelijk G, van Roermund HJ. Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease I: epidemiological consequences. Prev Vet Med. 2012; 107(1–2):27–40. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.05.012 22749763

13. Dürr S, Fasel-Clemenz C, Thür B, Schwermer H, Doherr MG, zu Dohna H. et al. Evaluation of the benefit of emergency vaccination in a foot-and-mouth disease free country with low livestock density, Prev Vet Med. 2014; 113(1):34–46, doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.10.015 Roche SE, Garner MG, Sanson RL, Cook C, Birch C, Backer JA, et al. Evaluating vaccination strategies to control foot-and-mouth disease: a model comparison study. Epidemiol Infect. 2015; 143(6):1256–1275.

14. Sanson RL, Rawdon T, Owen K, Hickey K, van Andel M, Yu ZD. Evaluating the benefits of vaccination when used in combination with stamping out measures against hypothetical introductions of foot-and-mouth disease into New Zealand: a simulation study. N Z Vet J. 2017; 65(3):124–133. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2016.1263165 27870922

15. Akashi H. The 2010 foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in Miyazaki Prefecture. Journal of Disaster Research. 2012; 7(3):252–257. doi: 10.20965/jdr.2012.p0252

16. Sakamoto K. Mechanism of FMD outbreaks and its control in Asian region. Journal of Disaster Research, 2012; 7(3):258–263. doi: 10.20965/jdr.2012.p0258

17. Geale DW, Barnett PV, Clarke GW, Davis J, Kasari TR. A review of OIE country status recovery using vaccinate-to-live versus vaccinate-to-die foot-and-mouth disease response policies II: waiting periods after emergency vaccination in FMD free countries. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2015; 62:388–406. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12165 24131661

18. Caporale V, Giavanni A, Zepeda C. Surveillance strategies for foot and mouth disease to prove absence of disease and absence of virus circulation. Rev sci tech Off Int Epiz. 2012; 31(3): 747–759. doi: 10.20506/rst.31.3.2156 23520730

19. Paton DJ, Füssel A-E, Vosloo W, Dekker A, De Clercq K. The use of serosurveys following emergency vaccination, to recover the status of “foot-and-mouth disease free where vaccination is not practised”. Vaccine 2014; 32(52):7050–7056. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.064 25444827

20. Bradhurst RA, Roche SE, East IJ, Kwan P, Garner MG. (2015). A hybrid modelling approach to simulating foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in Australian livestock. Front Environ Sci. 2015; 3(17). doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2015.00017

21. Bradhurst RA, Roche SE, East IJ, Kwan P, Garner MG. Improving the computational efficiency of an agent-based spatiotemporal model of livestock disease spread and control. Environ Model Softw. 2016; 77:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.11.015

22. Animal Health Australia. Operational procedures manual: Decontamination (Version 3.2). Australian Veterinary Emergency Plan (AUSVETPLAN), 3rd Ed., 2008. Primary Industries Ministerial Council, Canberra, ACT.

23. McClaskey J, Fox J, Nutsch A, Kastner J, Marsh TL, Doering O et al. Economic and cost considerations. In: Carcass Disposal: A Comprehensive Review. Report of the National Agricultural Biosecurity Center Consortium, USDA APHIS Cooperative Agreement Project, Kansas State University. 2004

24. BDA Group. The full cost of landfill disposal in Australia. BDA Group, Canberra, Australia. Prepared for the Australian Department of the Environment and Energy 2009

25. MLA. Market snapshot–Beef, MLA Industry Insight Series, Meat and Livestock Australia 2016.

26. Garner MG, Allen RT, Short C. Foot-and-mouth disease vaccination: a discussion paper on its use to control outbreaks in Australia. Bureau of Resource Sciences, Canberra, Australia. 1997.

27. JBS. Processing Facilities. JBS Australia Pty Ltd. 2017.

28. Cutler R, Holyoake P. The structure and dynamics of the pig meat industry. Research report prepared for Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra, ACT, Australia. 2007.

29. Australian Pork Ltd. Market reporting. 2017.

30. StataCorp. STATA Intercooled software v14.0. Stata Corporation. 2017.

31. Feir-Walsh BJ, Toothaker LE. An empirical comparison of the ANOVA F-test, normal scores test and Kruskal-Wallis test under violation of assumptions. Educ Psychol Meas. 1974; 34(4):789–799.

32. Schmider E, Ziegler M, Danay E, Beyer L, Buhner M. Is It Really Robust? Reinvestigating the robustness of ANOVA against violations of the normal distribution assumption. Methodology. 2010; 6(4):147–151. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241/a000016

33. RStudio Team (2015). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 10
Nejčtenější tento týden