The French adaptation and validation of the Partners in Health (PIH) scale among patients with chronic conditions seen in primary care


Autoři: Émilie Hudon aff001;  Maud-Christine Chouinard aff002;  Cynthia Krieg aff001;  Mireille Lambert aff002;  Heithem Joober aff001;  Sharon Lawn aff004;  David Smith aff004;  Sylvie Lambert aff005;  Catherine Hudon aff001
Působiště autorů: Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada aff001;  Centre intégré universitaire de Santé et de Services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada aff002;  Département des sciences de la santé, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada aff003;  Flinders Human Behaviour & Health Research Unit (FHBHRU), Flinders University College of Medicine and Public Health, Bedford Park, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia aff004;  École des sciences infirmières, Université McGill, Montréal, Québec, Canada aff005;  Département de médecine de famille et de médecine d’urgence, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada aff006;  Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada aff007
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224191

Souhrn

Objective

Measuring self-management helps identify the degree of participation of people in the management of their chronic conditions and guides clinicians in determining person-centred priorities for providing support. The Partners in Health scale, a self-report generic questionnaire, was developed to capture the self-management of patients with chronic conditions. This study aimed to translate the Partners in Health scale into French and to examine its psychometric properties in French-speaking people with chronic conditions followed in primary care.

Methods

The Partners in Health scale was translated into French using Hawkins and Osborne’s method (2012). Content validity was evaluated through cognitive interviews (Think Aloud Method). Internal consistency was measured at baseline with Cronbach’s alpha. Test-retest reliability was evaluated at baseline and two weeks later using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Concurrent validity was measured at baseline with the Self-efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease (SEM-CD) and the Patient Activation Measure (PAM), using Spearman correlations.

Results

Cognitive interviews were conducted with 10 participants. During these interviews, most items were clearly understood and accepted as formulated; only a few terms were modified. To evaluate the psychometric properties of the French-language version of the Partners in Health scale, 168 participants (male = 34.5%; mean age = 58 years; mean number of chronic conditions = 4.1) completed the questionnaire at baseline and 47 of them completed the questionnaire two weeks later by telephone. Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency was 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.81–0.88). The intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.58–0.87). Concurrent validity with spearman’s coefficient correlation of Self-efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease and Patient Activation Measure was 0.68 and 0.61 respectively.

Conclusion

The French-language version of the Partners in Health scale is a reliable and valid questionnaire for the measure of self-management in persons with chronic conditions seen in primary care.

Klíčová slova:

Cognition – Cross-cultural studies – Health care providers – Patients – Primary care – Psychometrics – Questionnaires – Telephones


Zdroje

1. World Health Organization. Noncommunicable diseases Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2017 [Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs355/en/.

2. Blok AC. A middle-range explanatory theory of self-management behavior for collaborative research and practice. Nursing Forum. 2017;52(2):138–46. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12169 27438773

3. Barlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, Turner A, Hainsworth J. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: A review. Patient Education and Counseling. 2002;48(2):177–87. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00032-0 12401421

4. Schulman-Green D, Jaser S, Martin F, Alonzo A, Grey M, McCorkle R, et al. Processes of self-management in chronic illness. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2012;44(2):136–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01444.x 22551013

5. Battersby MW, Ask A, Reece MM, Markwick MJ, Collins JP. The Partners in Health scale: The development and psychometric properties of a generic assessment scale for chronic condition self-management. ‎Australian Journal of Primary Health. 2003;9(3):41–52.

6. Petkov J, Harvey P, Battersby M. The internal consistency and construct validity of the partners in health scale: Validation of a patient rated chronic condition self-management measure. Quality of Life Research. 2010;19(7):1079–85. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9661-1 20437206

7. Smith D, Harvey P, Lawn S, Harris M, Battersby M. Measuring chronic condition self-management in an Australian community: Factor structure of the revised Partners in Health (PIH) scale. Quality of Life Research. 2016;26(1):149–59. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1368-5 27432251

8. Battersby M, Harris M, Smith D, Reed R, Woodman R. A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of the Flinders Program of chronic condition management in community health care services. Patient Education and Counseling. 2015;98(11):1367–75. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.003 26146240

9. Miller WR, Lasiter S, Ellis RB, Buelow JM. Chronic disease self-management: A hybrid concept analysis. Nursing Outlook. 2015;63(2):154–61. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2014.07.005 25241136

10. Unger WR, Buelow JM. Hybrid concept analysis of self-management in adults newly diagnosed with epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior. 2009;14(1):89–95.

11. Penarrieta-de Cordova I, Barrios FF, Gutierrez-Gomes T, Pinonez-Martinez Mdel S, Quintero-Valle LM, Castaneda-Hidalgo H. Self-management in chronic conditions: Partners in health scale instrument validation. Nurs Manage (London). 2014;20(10):32–7.

12. Lenferink A, Effing T, Harvey P, Battersby M, Frith P, Van Beurden W, et al. Construct validity of the Dutch version of the 12-Item Partners in health scale: Measuring patient self-management behaviour and knowledge in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PloS One. 2016;11(8):e0161595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161595 27564410

13. Chiu TML, Tam KTW, Siu CF, Chau PWP, Battersby M. Validation study of a Chinese version of Partners in health in Hong Kong (C-PIH HK). Quality of Life Research. 2017;26(1):199–203. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1315-5 27216940

14. Battersby MW, Kit JA, Prideaux C, Harvey PW, Collins JP, Mills PD. Implementing the flinders model of self-management support with aboriginal people who have diabetes: Findings from a pilot study. ‎Australian Journal of Primary Health. 2008;14(1):66–74.

15. Baxter C, Morello A, Smith D, Norton L, Bentley D. A preliminary investigation of the Partners in Health scale measurement properties in patients with end stage renal disease. ‎Australian Journal of Primary Health. 2017;23(3):288–93. doi: 10.1071/PY16095 28076747

16. Walker RC, Marshall MR, Polaschek NR. A prospective clinical trial of specialist renal nursing in the primary care setting to prevent progression of chronic kidney: A quality improvement report. BMC Family Practice. 2014;15(1):155.

17. Fotu M, Tafa T. The Popao model: A Pacific recovery and strength concept in mental health. Pacific Health Dialog. 2009;15(1):164–70. 19585747

18. Convery E, Meyer C, Keidser G, Hickson L. Assessing hearing loss self-management in older adults. International journal of audiology. 2018;57(4):313–20. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1390268 29081257

19. Hawkins M, Osborne RH. Health literacy questionnaire: Translation and cultural adaptation procedure. Australia: Deakin University; 2012.

20. Maindal HT, Kayser L, Norgaard O, Bo A, Elsworth GR, Osborne RH. Cultural adaptation and validation of the Health literacy questionnaire (HLQ): Robust nine-dimension Danish language confirmatory factor model. SpringerPlus. 2016;5(1):1232. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2887-9 27536516

21. Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Verbal reports as data. Psychological rewiew. 1980;87(3):215.

22. Hofmeyer A, Sheingold BH, Taylor R. Do you understand what I mean? How cognitive interviewing can strengthen valid, reliable study instruments and dissemination products. International Journal of Educational Research. 2015;11(4):261.

23. Kilpatrick SJ, Papile L-A, Macones GA. Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 8 ed. Washington, SC: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2017.

24. Terwee CB, Bot SD, Boer MRd, Windt DAvd, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2007;60(1):34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 17161752

25. Polit DF. Statistics and data analysis for nursing research. 2nd ed. Boston, Canada: Pearson; 2010. xii, 440 p. p.

26. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. 5 ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2015.

27. Poitras M-E, Fortin M, Hudon C, Haggerty J, Almirall J. Validation of the disease burden morbidity assessment by self-report in a French-speaking population. BMC Health Services Research. 2012;12:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-35 22333434

28. Hudon C, Lambert M, Almirall J, Cook M, editors. The reliability of the french version of the Patient Activation Measure. 40th Annual meeting of North American Primary Care Research Group 2012; New Orleans.

29. Hudon C, Chouinard M-C, Bélanger A, Fortin M, Freund T, Almirall J, et al. The Self-efficacy for managing chronic disease scale–French version: A validation study in primary care. European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare. 2014;2(4):533–8.

30. Richard AA, Shea K. Delineation of self‐care and associated concepts. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2011;43(3):255–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01404.x 21884371

31. Hinkin TR. Scale development principles and practices. Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry. 2005:161–79.

32. Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney ER, Tusler M. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): Conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health services research. 2004;39(4p1):1005–26.

33. Wilde MH, Garvin S. A concept analysis of self‐monitoring. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2007;57(3):339–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04089.x 17233653

34. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Ritter PL, Laurent D, Hobbs M. Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Effective Clinical Practice. 2001;4(6):256–62. 11769298

35. Bayliss EA, Ellis JL, Steiner JF. Subjective assessments of comorbidity correlate with quality of life health outcomes: Initial validation of a comorbidity assessment instrument. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2005;3(1):51.

36. Statistic IS. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. IBM Corp2015.

37. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2007;60(1):34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 17161752

38. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. 3rd revised ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson; 2015. xix, 892 pages p.

39. Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 1970;1(3):185.

40. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 1993;46(12):1417–32. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n 8263569

41. Leppink J, Pérez-Fuster P. We need more replication research: A case for test-retest reliability. Perspectives on Medical Education. 2017;6(3):158–64. doi: 10.1007/s40037-017-0347-z 28390030


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 10