Contractile properties of superficial skeletal muscle affect postural control in healthy young adults: A test of the rambling and trembling hypothesis

Autoři: Sunghoon Shin aff001;  Matija Milosevic aff002;  Chul-min Chung aff001;  Yungon Lee aff001
Působiště autorů: School of Kinesiology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea aff001;  Graduate School of Engineering Science, Department of Mechanical Science and Bioengineering, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Japan aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223850


The rambling and trembling analysis separates the center of pressure (COP) fluctuations into two components: rambling (supraspinal contribution) and trembling (muscle stiffness / reflexive properties contribution). We examined whether the trembling component is correlated to the contractile properties (muscle stiffness and contraction time) of lower limb superficial skeletal muscles to experimentally test the rambling and trembling hypothesis. We hypothesized that muscle stiffness and contraction time, would be: (a) more correlated with; and (b) have a greater impact on the trembling component compared to the rambling component. Thirty-two healthy young adults were recruited for the study and tensiomyography was used to assess mechanical muscle responses to a single electrical stimulus to calculate muscle stiffness and contraction time based on radial muscle belly displacement measurements of lower limb muscles unilaterally. Moreover, upright postural control was assessed using a force plate to record ground reaction forces and moments and calculate the COP fluctuations during two 30 seconds trials. From the COP fluctuations, rambling and trembling time series were extracted, and all fluctuation time series were described using a number of different time-domain and frequency-domain parameters in both the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions. Our results demonstrated that both muscle stiffness and contraction time were moderately correlated with time-domain and frequency-domain parameters of the trembling component, as compared with those of the rambling component which was not as well correlated. Moreover, they also predicted the trembling component better. Overall, these results imply that postural control during quiet stance is, in part, related to intrinsic muscle stiffness in the lower extremities. Moreover, we showed that the rambling and trembling hypothesis is effective in separating postural sway fluctuations during upright posture to extract the contributions of muscle stiffness / reflexive properties (trembling), and likely the supraspinal contribution (rambling).

Klíčová slova:

Foams – Muscle analysis – Muscle components – Muscle contraction – Postural control – Skeletal muscles – Stiffness – Vision


1. Horak FB, Macpherson JM. Postural orientation and equilibrium. Handbook of physiology. 1996;1:255–92.

2. Duarte M, Freitas SM. Revision of posturography based on force plate for balance evaluation. Brazilian Journal of physical therapy. 2010;14(3):183–92. 20730361

3. Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.

4. Kandel ER. Principles of neural science2013. doi: 10.1126/science.1239052

5. Zatsiorsky VM, Duarte M. Instant equilibrium point and its migration in standing tasks: rambling and trembling components of the stabilogram. Motor control. 1999;3(1):28–38. 9924099

6. Zatsiorsky VM, Duarte M. Rambling and trembling in quiet standing. Motor control. 2000;4(2):185–200. 11500575

7. Danna-Dos-Santos A, Degani AM, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML. Is voluntary control of natural postural sway possible? Journal of motor behavior. 2008;40(3):179–85. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.40.3.179-185 18477531

8. De Freitas PB, Freitas SM, Duarte M, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM. Effects of joint immobilization on standing balance. Human movement science. 2009;28(4):515–28. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2009.02.001 19342114

9. Mochizuki L, Duarte M, Amadio AC, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML. Changes in postural sway and its fractions in conditions of postural instability. Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 2006;22(1):51–60. 16760567

10. Bennett BC, Abel MF, Granata KP. Seated postural control in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2004;29(20):E449–E54. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000142005.21714.32 15480122

11. Sosnoff JJ, Shin S, Motl RW. Multiple sclerosis and postural control: the role of spasticity. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2010;91(1):93–9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.09.013 20103402

12. Shin S, Sosnoff JJ. Spinal cord injury and seated postural control: a test of the rambling and trembling hypothesis. Motor control. 2017;21(4):443–56. doi: 10.1123/mc.2016-0014 27834583

13. Milosevic M, Gagnon DH, Gourdou P, Nakazawa K. Postural regulatory strategies during quiet sitting are affected in individuals with thoracic spinal cord injury. Gait & Posture. 2017;58:446–52.

14. Milosevic M, Yokoyama H, Grangeon M, Masani K, Popovic MR, Nakazawa K, et al. Muscle synergies reveal impaired trunk muscle coordination strategies in individuals with thoracic spinal cord injury. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2017;36:40–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.06.007 28734171

15. Vette AH, Masani K, Sin V, Popovic MR. Posturographic measures in healthy young adults during quiet sitting in comparison with quiet standing. Medical Engineering and Physics. 2010;32(1):32–8. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.10.005 19884033

16. Dahmane R, Valenčič V, Knez N, Eržen I. Evaluation of the ability to make non-invasive estimation of muscle contractile properties on the basis of the muscle belly response. Medical and biological engineering and computing. 2001;39(1):51–5. doi: 10.1007/bf02345266 11214273

17. Dahmane R, Djordjevič S, Šimunič B, Valenčič V. Spatial fiber type distribution in normal human muscle: histochemical and tensiomyographical evaluation. Journal of biomechanics. 2005;38(12):2451–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.10.020 16214493

18. Vain A, Kums T, Ereline J, Pääsuke M, Gapeyeva H. Gastrocnemius muscle tone, elasticity, and stiffness in association with postural control characteristics in young men. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. 2015;64(4).

19. Macgregor LJ, Hunter AM, Orizio C, Fairweather MM, Ditroilo M. Assessment of skeletal muscle contractile properties by radial displacement: the case for tensiomyography. Sports Medicine. 2018:1–14.

20. Rusu LD, Cosma GG, Cernaianu SM, Marin MN, Rusu PA, Ciocănescu DP, et al. Tensiomyography method used for neuromuscular assessment of muscle training. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2013;10(1):67.

21. Paillard T, Noé F. Techniques and Methods for Testing the Postural Function in Healthy and Pathological Subjects. BioMed Research International. 2015;2015:15. doi: 10.1155/2015/891390 26640800

22. Shin S, Motl RW, Sosnoff JJ. A test of the rambling and trembling hypothesis: multiple sclerosis and postural control. Motor Control. 2011;15(4):568–79. 22113097

23. Prieto TE, Myklebust JB, Hoffmann RG, Lovett EG, Myklebust BM. Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 1996;43(9):956–66. doi: 10.1109/10.532130 9214811

24. McLaughlin MJ, Sainani KL. Bonferroni, Holm, and Hochberg corrections: fun names, serious changes to p values. PM&R. 2014;6(6):544–6.

25. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for statistical computing. 2018.

26. Winter DA, Patla AE, Prince F, Ishac M, Gielo-Perczak K. Stiffness Control of Balance in Quiet Standing. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1998;80(3):1211–21. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.3.1211 9744933.

27. Collins JJ, De Luca CJ, Burrows A, Lipsitz LA. Age-related changes in open-loop and closed-loop postural control mechanisms. Experimental Brain Research. 1995;104(3):480–92. doi: 10.1007/bf00231982 7589299

28. Loram ID, Lakie M. Human balancing of an inverted pendulum: position control by small, ballistic-like, throw and catch movements. The Journal of Physiology. 2002;540(3):1111–24. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013077 11986396

29. Loram ID, Kelly SM, Lakie M. Human balancing of an inverted pendulum: is sway size controlled by ankle impedance? The Journal of physiology. 2001;532(3):879–91.

30. Milton J, Cabrera JL, Ohira T, Tajima S, Tonosaki Y, Eurich CW, et al. The time-delayed inverted pendulum: Implications for human balance control. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science. 2009;19(2):026110. doi: 10.1063/1.3141429 19566270

31. Horak F. Postural Control. 2009. p. 3212–9.

32. Morasso PG, Schieppati M. Can muscle stiffness alone stabilize upright standing? Journal of neurophysiology. 1999;82(3):1622–6. doi: 10.1152/jn.1999.82.3.1622 10482776

33. Pinter IJ, Van Swigchem R, Van Soest AKJ, Rozendaal LA. The dynamics of postural sway cannot be captured using a one-segment inverted pendulum model: a PCA on segment rotations during unperturbed stance. Journal of neurophysiology. 2008.

34. Edwards WT. Effect of joint stiffness on standing stability. Gait & posture. 2007;25(3):432–9.

35. Rozendaal L, van Soest A, editors. Joint stiffness requirements in a multi-segment stance model. Proceedings of XXth ISB Conference, Cleveland; 2005.

36. Rozendaal L, van Soest A. Stabilization of a multi-segment model of bipedal standing by local joint control overestimates the required ankle stiffness. Gait & Posture. 2008;28(3):525.

37. Tanabe H, Fujii K, Kouzaki M. Intermittent muscle activity in the feedback loop of postural control system during natural quiet standing. Scientific reports. 2017;7(1):10631. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10015-8 28878227

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 10