Subsidy strategy of pharmaceutical e-commerce platform based on two-sided market theory

Autoři: Chenshuo Li aff001;  Zhe Huang aff001
Působiště autorů: School of Business Administration, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China aff001
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224369


With the development of economic globalization and information technology, enterprises pay more attention to the sustainable development of their e-commerce. Under this trend, we study the subsidy strategy commonly used by pharmaceutical e-commerce platforms in two-sided market. Based on the two-sided market theory, we set up the two-sided user's utility function and formulate the subsidy strategy as the decision of platform profit optimization. We show that the platform chooses to subsidize consumers only if the net income from consumer is lower than the total revenue of drug retailers and platforms in each transaction; the maximum profit for platform increases with the intensity of the network externality. This study provides theoretical support and decision-making suggestions for the pharmaceutical e-commerce platforms to capture the market share, obtain higher profits and ultimately achieve the sustainable development goal.

Klíčová slova:

Decision theory – Drug research and development – Drug users – Economics – Game theory – Internet – Pharmacoeconomics – Theoretical pharmacology


1. Armstrong M. Competition in two-sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics.2006; 37(3):668–691.

2. Armstrong M, Wright J. Two-sided markets, competitive bottlenecks and exclusive contracts. Economic Theory. 2007; 2:358–380.

3. Bilotkach V, Rupp N. G. Buyer subsidies in two-sided markets: Evidence from online travel agents. The Economics of International Airline Transport. 2012; 4:339–374.

4. Borcka R, Wrede M. Subsidies for intracity and intercity commuting. Journal of Urban Economics. 2009 Jul; 66(1): 25–32.

5. Caillaud B, Jullien B. Chicken & egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. The RAND Journal of Economics. 2003 Feb; 34(2):309–328.

6. Chao Y, Derdenger T. Mixed bundling in two-sided markets in the presence of Installed base effects. Management Science. 2013 Aug; 59(8):1904–1926.

7. Chen Z, Li J, Liu Z, Zheng Z. Incentive contracts for capacity restoration under risk of supply disruption. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2018 Jul:1–17.

8. CMH. Pharmaceutical retail terminal market scale grows steadily [EB/OL].2017; 12, 18. Retrieved from:

9. Dou G, Dou G, Xu X. One-side value-added service investment and pricing strategies for a two-sided platform. International Journal of Production Research. 2016 Feb; 54(13):1–14.

10. Emmanuel F, Hagiu A. Strategic interactions in two-sided market oligopolies. Ssrn Electronic Journal. 2008 Jul:8–11.

11. Fan R, Dong L. The dynamic analysis and simulation of government subsidy strategies in low-carbon diffusion considering the behavior of heterogeneous agents. Energy Policy. 2018 Jun; 117:252–262.

12. Hagiu A. Pricing and commitment by two-sided plat-forms. The Rand Journal o fEconomics. 2006 Sep; 37:720–737.

13. Hagiu A, Halaburda H. Information and two-sided platform profits. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2014; 34:25–35.

14. Howell B. Unveiling‘invisible hands’: Competition in two-sided health care markets. Social Science Electronic Publishing. 2006: 35–35.

15. Jin C, Wang X, Junmei L. Analysis on the optimal subsidy strategy of government in green supply chain. Advanced Materials Research. 2011 Apr; 224: 147–151.

16. Kelly B. D. The pass-through of subsidies to price. Journal of World Trade. 2014 Apr; 48(2): 295–295.

17. Kim S. How can we make a socially optimal large-scale media platform? Analysis of a monopolistic Internet media platform using two-sided market theory. Telecommunications Policy. 2016 Sep; 40(9): 899–918.

18. Lin M, Li S, Whinston A. B. Innovation and price competition in a two-sided market. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2011 Oct; 28(2): 171–202.

19. Lin M, Wu R, Zhou W. Endogenous network effects, platform pricing and market liquidity. Social Science Electronic Publishing. 2014; 18: 424.

20. Ma J, Sui X, Li L. Measurement on the Complexity Entropy of dynamic game models for Innovative enterprises under Two kinds of government subsidies. Entropy. 2016 Nov; 18(12): 424.

21. Muzellec L, Ronteau S, Lambkin M. Two-sided internet platforms: A business model lifecycle perspective. Industrial Marketing Management. 2015 Feb; 45:139–150.

22. Richards T. J., & Hamilton S. F. Food waste in the sharing economy. Food Policy 2018 Feb, 75: 109–123.

23. Rochet J. C, Tirole J. Two-sided markets: An overview. Toulouse. 2004; 51(11):233–260.

24. Rochet J. C, Tirole J. Two-sided markets: A progress report. The RAND Journal of Economics.2006 Sep; 37(3): 645–667.

25. Shih M, Wu T, Wei H. Unlicensed LTE pricing for tiered content delivery and heterogeneous user access. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 2018 Apr; 99, 1.

26. Wang Y, Tang J, Jin Q, Ma J. On studying business models in mobile social networks based on two-sided market. The Journal of Supercomputing. 2014 Dec; 70(3):1297–1317.

27. Wang P, Zhang R, Tang B, Yuan M. Pricing model and influential factors analysis of drug trade service platform. LISS 2013 Dec: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Science: 221–226.

28. Wei M. M, Yao T, Jiang B, Young S. T. Profit seeking vs. survival seeking: An analytical study of supplier's behavior and buyer's subsidy strategy. Production and Operations Management. 2013 Mar; 22(2): 269–282.

29. Zhang N. Tapio Levä, Heikki hämmäinen. Value networks and two-sided markets of internet content delivery. Telecommunications Policy. 2014 May; 38(5/6): 460–472.

30. Zhang Q. Research on Medicine E-business Platform Model Based on Value-chain and Value-net Theory. International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing 2007 Sep.

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 10