Financial inclusion and intimate partner violence: What does the evidence suggest?


Autoři: Lotus McDougal aff001;  Jeni Klugman aff002;  Nabamallika Dehingia aff001;  Amruta Trivedi aff001;  Anita Raj aff001
Působiště autorů: Center on Gender Equity and Heath, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States of America aff001;  Georgetown Institute for Women, Peace and Security, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America aff002;  Department of Education Studies, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States of America aff003
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223721

Souhrn

Financial inclusion is an area of growing global interest in women’s empowerment policy and programming. While increased economic autonomy may be expected to reduce the prevalence of intimate partner violence, the mechanisms and contexts through which this relationship manifests are not well understood. This analysis aims to assess the relationship between women’s financial inclusion and recent intimate partner violence using nationally-representative data from 112 countries worldwide. Levels of both financial inclusion and recent intimate partner violence varied substantially across countries (ranging from 2–100%, and 1–46%, respectively), and across regions. In multivariate global analyses, increased levels of women’s financial inclusion were associated with lower levels of recent intimate partner violence after accounting for asset-based enablers of economic autonomy and gender norms; this relationship was lost upon the inclusion of measures of national context (i.e., development and fragility). These results underscore that the relationship between financial inclusion and recent intimate partner violence is complex, follows many pathways, and is affected by context. In low and middle income countries, asset-based enablers of economic autonomy, gender norms and national context explained much of the relationship between financial inclusion and recent intimate partner violence. In those low and middle income countries with high levels of controlling behavior by male spouses, financial inclusion was associated with higher levels of recent intimate partner violence. These findings further suggest that initiatives that aim to prevent intimate partner violence by way of increased economic autonomy may be ineffective in the absence of broader social change and support, and indeed, as seen in countries with higher levels of men’s controlling behavior, backlash may increase the risk of violence. Efforts to improve women’s financial inclusion need to recognize that its relationship with intimate partner violence is complex, and that it requires an enabling environment supportive of women’s rights and autonomy.

Klíčová slova:

Asia – Behavior – Cell phones – Decision making – Finance – Intimate partner violence – Labor economics – Money supply and banking


Zdroje

1. UN Data [Internet]. 2017 [cited June 11, 2018]. Available from: http://data.un.org/Default.aspx.

2. World Health Organization. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: WHO, 2013.

3. Demirguc-Kunt A, Klapper L, Singer D, Ansar S, Hess J. The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring Financial Inclusion and the Fintech Revolution. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2018.

4. United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York, NY: United Nations, Contract No.: A/RES/70/1.

5. Ellsberg M, Arango DJ, Morton M, Gennari F, Kiplesund S, Contreras M, et al. Prevention of violence against women and girls: what does the evidence say? Lancet. 2015;385(9977):1555–66. Epub 2014/12/04. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61703-7 25467575.

6. Abramsky T, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C, Devries K, Kiss L, Ellsberg M, et al. What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:109. Epub 2011/02/18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-109 21324186; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3049145.

7. Arango DJ, Morton M, Gennari F, Kiplesund S, Ellsberg M. Interventions to prevent or reduce violence against women and girls: A systematic review of reviews. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2014.

8. Kim JC, Watts CH, Hargreaves JR, Ndhlovu LX, Phetla G, Morison LA, et al. Understanding the impact of a microfinance-based intervention on women's empowerment and the reduction of intimate partner violence in South Africa. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(10):1794–802. Epub 2007/09/01. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.095521 17761566; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1994170.

9. Buller AM, Hidrobo M, Peterman A, Heise L. The way to a man's heart is through his stomach?: a mixed methods study on causal mechanisms through which cash and in-kind food transfers decreased intimate partner violence. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:488. Epub 2016/06/10. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3129-3 27278935; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4898371.

10. Bourey C, Williams W, Bernstein EE, Stephenson R. Systematic review of structural interventions for intimate partner violence in low- and middle-income countries: organizing evidence for prevention. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1165. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2460-4 26597715; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4657265.

11. Ganle JK, Afriyie K, Segbefia AY. Microcredit: Empowerment and disempowerment of rural women in Ghana. World Development. 2015;66:335–45.

12. Stevenson B, Wolfers J. Bargaining in the shadow of the law: Divorce laws and family distress. Q J Econ. 2006;121(1):267–88. PubMed PMID: WOS:000236766000008.

13. Schuler SR, Hashemi SM, Badal SH. Men's violence against women in rural Bangladesh: undermined or exacerbated by microcredit programmes? Development in practice. 1998;8(2):148–57. Epub 2002/09/26. doi: 10.1080/09614529853774 12293700.

14. Vyas S, Watts C. How does economic empowerment affect women's risk of intimate partner violence in low and middle income countries? A systematic review of published evidence. Journal of International Development. 2009;21(5):577–602. doi: 10.1002/jid.1500

15. Heise LL, Kotsadam A. Cross-national and multilevel correlates of partner violence: an analysis of data from population-based surveys. The Lancet Global Health. 2015;3(6):e332–e40. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00013-3 26001577

16. Hanmer L, Klugman J. Exploring women's agency and empowerment in developing countries: where do we stand? Feminist Economics. 2016;22(1):237–63.

17. Klapper L, El-Zoghbi M, Hess J. Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: The role of financial inclusion. Washington, DC: CGAP, 2016.

18. Prina S. Banking the poor via savings accounts: Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Development Economics. 2015;115:16–31.

19. Dupas P, Robinson J. Savings Constraints and Microenterprise Development: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Kenya. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 2013;5(1):163–92. doi: 10.1257/app.5.1.163

20. Suri T, Jack W. The long-run poverty and gender impacts of mobile money. Science. 2016;354(6317):1288–92. doi: 10.1126/science.aah5309 27940873

21. Aker JC, Boumnijel R, McClelland A, Tierney N. Payment Mechanisms and Antipoverty Programs: Evidence from a Mobile Money Cash Transfer Experiment in Niger. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 2016;65(1):1–37. doi: 10.1086/687578

22. Raj A, Silverman JG, Klugman J, Saggurti N, Donta B, Shakya HB. Longitudinal analysis of the impact of economic empowerment on risk for intimate partner violence among married women in rural Maharashtra, India. Soc Sci Med. 2018;196:197–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.042 29197753

23. Michau L, Horn J, Bank A, Dutt M, Zimmerman C. Prevention of violence against women and girls: lessons from practice. Lancet. 2015;385(9978):1672–84. Epub 2014/12/04. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61797-9 25467577.

24. Heise LL. Violence against women: an integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women. 1998;4(3):262–90. Epub 2002/09/26. doi: 10.1177/1077801298004003002 12296014.

25. Jewkes R, Flood M, Lang J. From work with men and boys to changes of social norms and reduction of inequities in gender relations: a conceptual shift in prevention of violence against women and girls. Lancet. 2015;385(9977):1580–9. Epub 2014/12/04. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61683-4 25467578.

26. Global Database on Violence against Women [Internet]. UN Women. 2018 [cited 20 June 2018]. Available from: http://evaw-global-database.unwomen.org/en.

27. ILOSTAT [Internet]. 2019 [cited March 2019]. Available from: www.ilo.org/ilostat.

28. Gallup, Inc. and the International Labour Organization. Towards a better future for women and work: Voices of women and men. 2017.

29. Women, Peace and Security Index 2017/18: Tracking Sustainable Peace through Inclusion, Justice and Security for Women [Internet]. GIWPS and PRIO. 2017. Available from: https://giwps.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Index-2017-2.xlsx.

30. ICF International Inc. MEASURE DHS STATcompiler. [cited 2018 June 1]. Available from: www.statcompiler.com.

31. UNDP. Human Development Reports [cited 2019 14 Jan]. Available from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/data#.

32. United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Indices and Indicators: 2018 Statistical update. New York: UNDP, 2018.

33. World Bank. World Bank Open Data 2017 [cited 2017 October 20]. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/.

34. World Bank. Harmonized List of Fragile Situations FY 18. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2018.

35. Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistical Use (M49) [Internet]. United Nations Statistics Division. 1999 [cited June 15, 2018]. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/.

36. The World Bank. World Bank Country and Lending Groups, FY 2019 2018. Available from: https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups.

37. Barro R, Lee J-W. A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics. 2013;104:184–98.

38. The World Bank. Country and Lending Groups 2012 [cited 2012 28 September]. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications/country-and-lending-groups.

39. Roy S, Hidrobo M, Hoddinott J, Ahmed A. Transfers, behavior change communication adn intimate partner violecne: Post-program evidence from rural Bangladesh. Rev Econ Stat. 2018;Just accepted MS:1–45. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00791.

40. Sardinha L, Najera Catalan HE. Attitudes towards domestic violence in 49 low- and middle-income countries: A gendered analysis of prevalence and country-level correlates. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0206101. Epub 2018/11/01. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206101 30379891; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6209205.

41. Bayissa FW, Smits J, Ruben R. The multidimensional nature of women's empowerment: Beyond the economic approach. Journal of International Development. 2018;30:661–90.

42. Mahmud S, Shah NM, Becker S. Measurement of Women's Empowerment in Rural Bangladesh. World Dev. 2012;40(3):610–9. Epub 2012/03/01. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.08.003 23637468; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3639002.

43. Pratley P. Associations between quantitative measures of women's empowerment and access to care and health status for mothers and their children: A systematic review of evidence from the developing world. Soc Sci Med. 2016;169:119–31. Epub 2016/10/23. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.001 27716549.

44. Narayan D, editor. Measuring Empowerment: Cross-disciplinary perspectives. Washington, DC, USA: The World Bank; 2005.

45. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. SDG Indicators: Metadata repository: United Nations; 2019 [cited 2019 6 September]. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/.

46. World Bank. 2017 Global Findex Questionnaire. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank, 2017.

47. Treas J. Money in the bank: Transaction costs and the economic organization of marriage. Am Sociol Rev. 1993;58(5):723–34. doi: 10.2307/2096283

48. Mahle LR. A purse of her own: The case against joint bank accounts. Texas Journal of Women and the Law. 2006;16(1):45–102.

49. Hudson VM, Caprioli M, Ballif-Spanvill B, McDermott RJ, Emmett CF. The heart of the matter: The security of women and the security of states. International Security. 2009;33(3):7–45. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2009.33.3.7.

50. Klugman J, Quek Y. Women's financial inclusion and economic opportunities in fragile and conflict-affected states: An overview of challenges and prospects. Georgetown Institute for Women, Peace and Security, 2018.

51. Holloway K, Niazi Z, Rouse R. Women's economic empowerment through financial inclusion: A review of existing evidence and remaining knowledge gaps. New Haven, CT: Innovations for Poverty Action: Financial Inclusion Program, 2017.

52. Demirguc-Kunt A, Klapper L, Singer D. Financial Inclusion and Inclusive Growth. Policy Research Working Paper WPS No 4080. Washington D.C.: World Bank Group; 2017.

53. Field E, Pande R, Rigol N, Schaner S, Moore CT. On her account: Can strengthening women’s financial control boost female labor supply? Bonn, Germany: Growth and Labour Markes in Low Income Countries Programme, 2017 Contract No.: Working Paper No. 32.

54. Gammage S, Kes A, Winograd L, Sultana N, Hiller S, Bourgault S. Gender and digital financial inclusion: What do we know and what do we need to know? Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women, 2017.


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 10