Force perceptual bias caused by muscle activity in unimanual steering


Autoři: Yusuke Kishishita aff001;  Yoshihiro Tanaka aff002;  Yuichi Kurita aff001
Působiště autorů: Hiroshima University, 1-4-1, Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan aff001;  Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso‑cho, Showa‑ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan aff002;  JSPS Research Fellow, JSPS, Tokyo, Japan aff003;  JST, PRESTO, Hiroshima, Japan aff004
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223930

Souhrn

This study sought to investigate whether force perceptual bias was affected by differences in posture while steering an automobile using a psychophysical experiment to examine the relationship with muscle activity. The human perceptual characteristics of weight and force are known to be nonlinear, and a perceptual bias can occur, that is, bias that causes a perception of something that is larger or smaller than the actual scale. This is considered to be caused by physical and/or psychological conditions. Sense of effort is believed to be one influential factor. It is known to correlate with muscle activity intensity, and bias may be caused by muscle activity changes. In the current study, we hypothesized that force perceptual bias would depend on posture due to the intensity of muscle activity changes caused by changing postures during steering operation. By investigating this hypothesis, we can clarify the relationship between sense of effort and muscle activity. To investigate this issue, we conducted a psychophysical experiment to confirm postural dependence, and estimated muscle activity using a three-dimensional musculoskeletal model simulation with postural and arm force data during the experiment. In addition, prediction of bias was conducted based on a simulation in the psychophysical experiment using these data. The results revealed that bias existed, as measured by differences in postures. Additionally, a significant moderate correlation was found between the predicted bias and the actual bias, indicating the existence of a relationship between muscle activity and bias.

Klíčová slova:

Fatigue – Musculoskeletal system – Perception – Psychophysics – Sensory perception – Skeletal joints – Torque – Steering


Zdroje

1. Lindsay P, Norman D, editors. Human information processing: an introduction to psychology. Academic Press; 1977.

2. Stevens S, editor. Psychophysics: introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social Prospects. John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1975.

3. Jones L. Perception of force and weight: Theory and research. Psychol Bull. 1986;100:29–42. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.29 2942958

4. De Camp J. The influence of color on apparent weight. A preliminary study. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1917;2(8):347–370. doi: 10.1037/h0075903

5. Gandevia S, McCloskey D. Sensations of heaviness. Brain. 1977;100(2):345–354. doi: 10.1093/brain/100.2.345 884488

6. Joseph M. Muscle fatigue degrades force sense at the ankle joint. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 1999;24:223–233.

7. Nicolas V, Matthieu B. Muscular fatigue and its effects on weight perception. Gait & Posture. 2008;28:521–524.

8. Newberry A, Griffin M, Dowson M. Driver perception of steering feel. J Automobile Engineering. 2007;221:405–415. doi: 10.1243/09544070JAUTO415

9. Steven S. On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review. 1957;64(3):153–181. doi: 10.1037/h0046162

10. Takemura K, Yamada N, Kishi A, Nishikawa K, Nouzawa T, Kurita Y, et al. A subjective force perception model of humans and its application to a steering operation system of a vehicle. In: IEEE International Conference of Systems, Man, and Cybernetics; 2013;3675–3680.

11. Fechner G, editor. Elements of psychophysics. Translated by Holt Helmut E., Rinehart and Winston, U.S.; 1966.

12. Kishishita Y, Takemura K, Yamada N, Hara T, Kishi A, Nishikawa K, et al. Prediction of perceived steering wheel operation force by muscle activity. IEEE Transactions on Haptics. 2018;11:590–598. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2018.2828425 29993646

13. van Polanen V, Tibold R, Nuruki A, Davare M. Visual delay affects force scaling and weight perception during object lifting in virtual reality. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2019;121:1398–1409. doi: 10.1152/jn.00396.2018 30673365

14. Flanagan J, Wing A, Allison S, Spenceley A. Effects of surface texture on weight perception when lifting objects with a precision grip. Perception & Psychophysics. 1995;282–290. doi: 10.3758/bf03213054 7770320

15. Sakajiri T, Tanaka Y, Sano A. Relation between gravitational and arm‑movement direction in the mechanism of perception in bimanual steering. Experimental Brain Research. 2013;231:129–138. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3676-0

16. Jones L, Hunter I. Effect of fatigue on force sensation. Experimental Neurology. 1983;81:650–650. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(83)90332-1

17. McCloskey D, Brookhart J, Mountcastle V, Brooks V, Geiger S, editors. Corollary discharges: motor commands and perception. American Physiological Society; 1981.

18. McCloskey D, Gandevia S, Potter E, Colebatch J. Muscle sense and effort: motor commands and judgments about muscular contractions. Advances in Neurology. 1983;39:151–167. 6229157

19. Proske U, Allen T. The neural basis of the senses of effort, force and heaviness. Experimental Brain Research. 2019;237:589–599. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5460-7 30604022

20. Cafarelli E, Bigland-Rilchie B. Sensation of static force in muscles of different length. Experimental Neurology. 1979;65:511–525. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(79)90040-2 467557

21. Morree H, Klein C, Marcora S. Perception of effort reflects central motor command during movement execution. Psychophysiology. 2012;49:1242–1253. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01399.x 22725828

22. Delp S, Anderson F, Arnold A, Loan P, Habib A, John C, et al. Opensim: opensource software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2007;54(11):1940–1950. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2007.901024

23. Thelen D. Adjustment of muscle mechanics model parameters to simulate dynamic contractions in older adults. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2003;25:70–77. doi: 10.1115/1.1531112

24. Holzbaur K, Murray W, Delp S. A model of the upper extremity for simulating musculoskeletal surgery and analyzing neuromuscular control. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2005;33(6):829–840. doi: 10.1007/s10439-005-3320-7 16078622

25. Zajac F. Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. 1989;17(4):359–411. 2676342

26. Lieber R, Bodine-Fowler S. Skeletal muscle mechanics: implications for rehabilitation. Physical Therapy. 1993;73(12):844–856. doi: 10.1093/ptj/73.12.844 8248293

27. Lanczos C, editor. The variational principles of mechanics. Dover Publications, NewYork; 1949.

28. Kahrimanovic M, Tiest W, Kappers A. The shapeweight illusion. In: EuroHaptics’10 Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Haptics; 2010.p.17–22.

29. Pick A, Cole D. Measurement of driver steering torque using electromyography. Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control. 2006;128:960–968. doi: 10.1115/1.2363198

30. Jones L. Perceptual constancy and the perceived magnitude of muscle forces. Experimental Brain Research. 2003;151:197–203. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1434-4 12768260

31. Hood B. Gravity rules for 2- to 4-year olds? Cognitive Development. 1995;10:577–598.

32. Winter J, Allen T, Proske U. Muscle spindle signals combine with the sense of effort to indicate limb position. The Journal of Physiology. 2005;568(Pt 3):1035–1046. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.092619 16109730

33. Ross H, Brodie E, Benson A. Mass-discrimination in weightlessness and readaptation to earth’s gravity. Experimental Brain Research. 1986;65:358–366.

34. Young L, Oman C, Merfeld C, Watt D, Roy S, DeLuca C, et al. Spatial orientation and posture during and following weightlessness: human experiments in Spacelab Life Sciences 1. Journal of Vestibular Research. 1993;3:231–239. 8275259

35. Luu B, Day B, Cole J, Fitzpatrick R. The fusimotor and reafferent origin of the sense of force and weight. Journal of Physiology. 2011;589(13):3135–3147. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.208447 21521756

36. Brooks J, Allen T, Proske U. The senses of force and heaviness at the human elbow joint. Experimental Brain Research. 2013;226:617–629. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3476-6 23525562

37. Phillips D, Kosek P, Karduna A. Force perception at the shoulder after a unilateral suprascapular nerve block. Experimental Brain Research. 2019. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05530-1 30929033

38. Monjo F, Shemmell J, Forestier N. The sensory origin of the sense of effort is context-dependent. Experimental Brain Research. 2018;236:1997–2008. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5280-9 29730751

39. Hogan N. Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1984;681–690. doi: 10.1109/TAC.1984.1103644

40. Baratta R, Solomonow M, Zhou B, Letson D, Chuinard R. Muscular coactivation: The role of the antagonist musculature in maintaining knee stability. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1988;16:113–122. doi: 10.1177/036354658801600205

41. Gribble P, Mullin L, Cothros N, Mattar A. Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2003;89(5):2396–2405. doi: 10.1152/jn.01020.2002 12611935

42. Osu R, Franklin D, Kato H, Gomi H, Domen K, Yoshioka T, et al. Short- and long-term changes in joint co-contraction associated with motor learning as revealed from surface EMG. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2002;88(2):991–1004. doi: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.2.991 12163548


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 10