Reading-out task variables as a low-dimensional reconstruction of neural spike trains in single trials

Autoři: Veronika Koren aff001;  Ariana R. Andrei aff003;  Ming Hu aff004;  Valentin Dragoi aff003;  Klaus Obermayer aff001
Působiště autorů: Neural Information Processing Group, Institute of Software Engineering and Theoretical Computer Science, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany aff001;  Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Germany aff002;  Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, Texas, United States of America aff003;  Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America aff004
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie: Research Article


We propose a new model of the read-out of spike trains that exploits the multivariate structure of responses of neural ensembles. Assuming the point of view of a read-out neuron that receives synaptic inputs from a population of projecting neurons, synaptic inputs are weighted with a heterogeneous set of weights. We propose that synaptic weights reflect the role of each neuron within the population for the computational task that the network has to solve. In our case, the computational task is discrimination of binary classes of stimuli, and weights are such as to maximize the discrimination capacity of the network. We compute synaptic weights as the feature weights of an optimal linear classifier. Once weights have been learned, they weight spike trains and allow to compute the post-synaptic current that modulates the spiking probability of the read-out unit in real time. We apply the model on parallel spike trains from V1 and V4 areas in the behaving monkey macaca mulatta, while the animal is engaged in a visual discrimination task with binary classes of stimuli. The read-out of spike trains with our model allows to discriminate the two classes of stimuli, while population PSTH entirely fails to do so. Splitting neurons in two subpopulations according to the sign of the weight, we show that population signals of the two functional subnetworks are negatively correlated. Disentangling the superficial, the middle and the deep layer of the cortex, we show that in both V1 and V4, superficial layers are the most important in discriminating binary classes of stimuli.

Klíčová slova:

Action potentials – Animal behavior – Coding mechanisms – Learning – Neural networks – Neurons – Permutation – Single neuron function


1. Hubel D. H., & Wiesel T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. The Journal of physiology, 160(1), 106–154. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 14449617

2. Adesnik H., & Naka A. (2018). Cracking the Function of Layers in the Sensory Cortex. Neuron, 100(5), 1028–1043. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.032 30521778

3. Gao P., & Ganguli S. (2015). On simplicity and complexity in the brave new world of large-scale neuroscience. Current opinion in neurobiology, 32, 148–155. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.04.003 25932978

4. Saxena S., & Cunningham J. P. (2019). Towards the neural population doctrine. Current opinion in neurobiology, 55, 103–111. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2019.02.002 30877963

5. Shadlen M. N., & Newsome W. T. (1994). Noise, neural codes and cortical organization. Current opinion in neurobiology, 4(4), 569–579. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(94)90059-0 7812147

6. Zohary E, Shadlen MN, Newsome WT, Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance, Nature 1994;370:140. doi: 10.1038/370140a0 8022482

7. Britten K. H., Newsome W. T., Shadlen M. N., Celebrini S., & Movshon J. A. (1996). A relationship between behavioral choice and the visual responses of neurons in macaque MT. Visual neuroscience, 13(1), 87–100. doi: 10.1017/s095252380000715x 8730992

8. Shadlen M. N., Newsome W. T. (1998). The variable discharge of cortical neurons: implications for connectivity, computation, and information coding. The Journal of neuroscience, 18(10), 3870–3896. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-10-03870.1998 9570816

9. Destexhe A., Rudolph M., & Paré D. (2003). The high-conductance state of neocortical neurons in vivo. Nature reviews neuroscience, 4(9), 739. doi: 10.1038/nrn1198 12951566

10. Faisal A. A., Selen L. P., & Wolpert D. M. (2008). Noise in the nervous system. Nature reviews neuroscience, 9(4), 292. doi: 10.1038/nrn2258 18319728

11. Beck J.M., Ma W.J., Pitkow X., Latham P.E., Pouget A.: Not noisy, just wrong: the role of suboptimal inference in behavioral variability. Neuron 2012, 74:30–39. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.016 22500627

12. Körding K. P., & Wolpert D. M. (2004). Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature, 427(6971), 244.

13. Boerlin M., Machens C. K., & Denève S. (2013). Predictive coding of dynamical variables in balanced spiking networks. PLoS computational biology, 9(11), e1003258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003258 24244113

14. Chalk M., Gutkin B., & Deneve S. (2016). Neural oscillations as a signature of efficient coding in the presence of synaptic delays. Elife, 5, e13824. doi: 10.7554/eLife.13824 27383272

15. Koren V., & Denève S. (2017). Computational Account of Spontaneous Activity as a Signature of Predictive Coding. PLoS computational biology, 13(1), e1005355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005355 28114353

16. Denève S., & Machens C. K. (2016). Efficient codes and balanced networks. Nature neuroscience, 19(3), 375. doi: 10.1038/nn.4243 26906504

17. Denève S., Alemi A., & Bourdoukan R. (2017). The brain as an efficient and robust adaptive learner. Neuron, 94(5), 969–977. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.05.016 28595053

18. Holdgraf C. R., Rieger J. W., Micheli C., Martin S., Knight R. T., & Theunissen F. E. (2017). Encoding and decoding models in cognitive electrophysiology. Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 11, 61. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2017.00061 29018336

19. Glaser J. I., Benjamin A. S., Farhoodi R., & Kording K. P. (2019). The roles of supervised machine learning in systems neuroscience. Progress in neurobiology. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.01.008 30738835

20. Panzeri S., Harvey C. D., Piasini E., Latham P. E., & Fellin T. (2017). Cracking the neural code for sensory perception by combining statistics, intervention, and behavior. Neuron, 93(3), 491–507. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.036 28182905

21. Vapnik V. N., & Vapnik V. (1998). Statistical learning theory (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley.

22. Dayan P., & Abbott L. F. (2001). Theoretical neuroscience (Vol. 806). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

23. Hansen BJ, Chelaru MI, Dragoi V, Correlated variability in laminar cortical circuits, Neuron. 2012 Nov 8;76(3):590–602 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.029 23141070

24. Britten KH, Newsome WT, Shadlen MN, Celebrini S, Movshon JA: A relationship between behavioral choice and the visual responses of neurons in macaque MT. Visual Neurosci. 1996, 13(1), 87–100. doi: 10.1017/S095252380000715X

25. Pettersen K. H., Devor A., Ulbert I., Dale A. M., & Einevoll G. T. (2006). Current-source density estimation based on inversion of electrostatic forward solution: effects of finite extent of neuronal activity and conductivity discontinuities. Journal of neuroscience methods, 154(1), 116–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.12.005 16436298

26. Maier A., Aura C. J., & Leopold D. A. (2011). Infragranular sources of sustained local field potential responses in macaque primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(6), 1971–1980. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5300-09.2011 21307235

27. Kühn N. K., & Gollisch T. (2019). Activity Correlations between Direction-Selective Retinal Ganglion Cells Synergistically Enhance Motion Decoding from Complex Visual Scenes. Neuron.

28. Gold J. I., & Shadlen M. N. (2007). The neural basis of decision making. Annual review of neuroscience, 30. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038 17600525

29. Gilbert C. D., & Sigman M. (2007). Brain states: top-down influences in sensory processing. Neuron, 54(5), 677–696. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.019 17553419

30. Mante V., Sussillo D., Shenoy K. V., & Newsome W. T. (2013). Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex. nature, 503(7474), 78. doi: 10.1038/nature12742 24201281

31. Fellous J. M., Rudolph M., Destexhe A., & Sejnowski T. J. (2003). Synaptic background noise controls the input/output characteristics of single cells in an in vitro model of in vivo activity. Neuroscience, 122(3), 811–829. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2003.08.027 14622924

32. Vreeswijk C. V., & Sompolinsky H. (1998). Chaotic balanced state in a model of cortical circuits. Neural computation, 10(6), 1321–1371. doi: 10.1162/089976698300017214 9698348

33. Meyer A. F., Williamson R. S., Linden J. F., & Sahani M. (2017). Models of neuronal stimulus-response functions: elaboration, estimation, and evaluation. Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 10, 109. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00109 28127278

34. Blasdel G., & Campbell D. (2001). Functional retinotopy of monkey visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 21(20), 8286–8301. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-20-08286.2001 11588200

35. Blasdel G. G., & Fitzpatrick D. (1984). Physiological organization of layer 4 in macaque striate cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 4(3), 880–895. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-03-00880.1984 6200586

36. Augustin M., Ladenbauer J., Baumann F., & Obermayer K. (2017). Low-dimensional spike rate models derived from networks of adaptive integrate-and-fire neurons: comparison and implementation. PLoS computational biology, 13(6), e1005545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005545 28644841

37. Schwalger T., Deger M., & Gerstner W. (2017). Towards a theory of cortical columns: From spiking neurons to interacting neural populations of finite size. PLoS computational biology, 13(4), e1005507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005507 28422957

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 10
Nejčtenější tento týden