The effect of a hiding box on stress levels and body weight in Dutch shelter cats; a randomized controlled trial


Autoři: W. J. R. van der Leij aff001;  L. D. A. M. Selman aff002;  J. C. M. Vernooij aff004;  C. M. Vinke aff003
Působiště autorů: Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Shelter Medicine Programme, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands aff001;  Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands aff002;  Department of Animals in Science and Society, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands aff003;  Department of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands aff004
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223492

Souhrn

While staying in an animal shelter, cats may suffer from chronic stress which impairs their health and welfare. Providing opportunities to hide can significantly reduce behavioural stress in cats, but confirmation with physical parameters is needed. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of a hiding box on behavioural stress levels (scored by means of the Cat-Stress-Score) and a physical parameter, namely body weight, during the first 12 days in quarantine for cats newly arrived cats at a Dutch animal shelter. Twenty-three cats between 1 and 10 years of age were randomly divided between the experimental (N = 12) and control group (N = 11) with and without a hiding box. Stress levels were assessed on days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 12 according to the non-invasive Cat-Stress-Score (CSS). Body weights were measured on days 0, 7 and 12. Finally, adoption rates and length of stay (LOS) were determined. Major findings of the study are: (1) the mean Cat-Stress-Score decreased with time for all cats, but cats with a hiding box showed a significant faster decrease in the CSS, reaching a lower CSS-steady state seven days earlier than the control group; (2) nearly all cats in both groups lost significant body weight during the first two weeks; (3) hiding boxes did not significantly influence weight loss; (4) no differences were found in the adoption rates and the LOS between both groups. Hiding enrichment reduces behavioural stress in shelter cats during quarantine situations and can therefore be a relatively simple aid to shelter adaptation. It offers no prevention however against feline weight loss, which indicates a serious health risk for shelter cats.

Klíčová slova:

Animal behavior – Animal welfare – Body weight – Cameras – Cats – Randomized controlled trials – Stress signaling cascade – Weight loss


Zdroje

1. HAS Hogeschool HAS Kennistransfer & Bedrijfsopleidingen Den Bosch, Faculteit Diergeneeskunde Utrecht. Feiten & Cijfers Gezelschapsdierensector 2015. [Internet]. ‘s Gravenhage: Ministerie van Economische Zaken; 2015 [cited 2018 Jun 8]. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2015/11/03/feiten-cijfers-gezelschapsdierensector-2015.

2. Bradshaw JWS, Casey RA, Brown SL. The Behaviour of the Domestic Cat. 2th ed. Oxfordshire, UK, 2012. ISBN 9781845939922.

3. McCobb EC, Patronek GJ, Marder A, Dinnage JD, Stone MS. Assessment of stress levels among cats in four animal shelters. JAVMA 2005 Febr 15; 226(4):548–55. doi: 10.2460/javma.2005.226.548 15742695

4. Newbury S, Blinn MK, Bushby PA, Cox CB, Dinnage JD, Griffin B, et al. Guidelines for Standards of Care in Animal Shelters. [Internet]. The Association of Shelter Veterinarians; 2010 [cited 2016 March 1]. https://www.sheltervet.org/assets/docs/shelter-standards-oct2011-wforward.pdf

5. Logan JG, Barksdale DJ. Allostasis and allostatic load: expanding the discourse on stress and cardiovascular disease. J Clin Nurs 2008 Apr;17(7B):201–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02347.x 18578796

6. Amat M, Camps T, Manteca X. Stress in owned cats: behavioural changes and welfare implications. J Feline Med Surg. 2016 Aug;18(8):577–86. doi: 10.1177/1098612X15590867 26101238

7. Sabioncello A, Gotovac K, Vidovic A, Gagro A, Markotic A, Rabatic S, et al. The immune system under stress. Period Biol. 2004 Sept 18;106(4):317–23.

8. Moberg G, Mench JA. The biology of animal stress: basic principles and implications for animal welfare. 1th ed. UK: Oxon, New York: CABI; 2000.

9. Griffin JFT. Stress and immunity: a unifying concept. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1989 Febr;20(3): 263–312. doi: 10.1016/0165-2427(89)90005-6 2655270

10. Pesavento PA, Murphy BG. Common and emerging infectious diseases in the animal shelter. Vet Pathol. 2014 Nov 21;51(2):478–91. doi: 10.1177/0300985813511129 24265288

11. McEwen BS. Protection and Damage from Acute and Chronic Stress. Allostasis and allostatic overload and relevance to the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1032:1–7. doi: 10.1196/annals.1314.001 15677391

12. Vinke CM, Godijn LM, van der Leij W.J.R. Will a hiding box provide stress reduction for shelter cats? Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2014 Nov;160(1):86–93. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.09.002

13. Ottway DS, Hawkins DM. Cat housing in rescue shelters: a welfare comparison between communal and discrete-unit housing. Animal Welf. 2003;12(2):173–89.

14. Tanaka A, Wagner DC, Kass P, Hurley KF. Associations among weight loss, stress, and upper respiratory tract infection in shelter cats. JAVMA 2012 March 1;240 (5): 570–76. doi: 10.2460/javma.240.5.570 22332626

15. Gourkow N, Fraser D. The effect of housing and handling practices on the welfare, behaviour and selection of domestic cats (Felis sylvestris catus) by adopters in an animal shelter. Animal Welf. 2006; 15(4):371–77.

16. Hall JA, Barstad LA, Connor WE. Lipid composition of hepatic and adipose tissues from normal cats and from cats with idiopathic hepatic lipidosis. J Vet Intern 1997 Jul-Aug;11(4):238–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1997.tb00097.x 9298479

17. Biourge VC, Groff JM, Munn RJ, Kirk CA, Nyland TG, Madeiros VA, et al. Experimental induction of hepatic lipidosis in cats. Am J Vet Res. 1994 Sept;55(9):1291–1302. 7802398

18. Carlstead K, Brown JL, Strawn W. Behavioral and physiological correlates of stress in laboratory cats. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1993 Nov;38(2):143–58. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(93)90062-T

19. Kry K, Casey R. The effect of hiding enrichment on stress levels and behaviour of domestic cats (Felis sylvestris catus) in a shelter setting and the implications for adoption potential. Animal Welf. 2007 Aug;16(3):375–83.

20. Bestuur Dierentehuis De Dierenborgh. Jaarverslag 2013 (annual report 2013). Velp: Dierentehuis De Dierenborgh. 2014.

21. Nederlandse overheid. Burgerlijk Wetboek Nr.5 artikel 8. [Internet]. https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0005288/2018-09-19. [Accessed 03–22, 2019]. Besluit houders van dieren artikel 3.12 en 3.13. [Internet]. https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0035217/2018-07-01#Hoofdstuk3. [Accessed 07–25, 2019].

22. DiGangi BA, Graves J, Budke CM, Levy JK, Tucker S, Isaza N. Assessment of body weight for age determination in kittens. J Feline Med Surg. 2019 Apr 15;1–8. doi: 10.1177/1098612X19844846 30982390

23. Gunn-Moore D, Moffat K, Christie LA, Head E. Cognitive dysfunction and the neurobiology of ageing in cats. J Small Anim Pract. 2007 Oct;48(10):546–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2007.00386.x 17617164

24. Kessler MR, Turner DC. Stress and adaptation of cats (Felis silvestris catus) housed singly, in pairs and in groups in boarding catteries. Animal Welf. 1997;6(3):243–54.

25. Suresh K. 2011. An Overview of Randomization Techniques: An Unbiased Assessment of Outcome in Clinical Research. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011 Jan-Apr;4(1): 8–11. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.82352 21772732

26. Urbaniak GC, Plous S. Research Randomizer (Computer software, Version 4.0). [Internet]. Social Psychology Network; 2013 [cited 2015 Oct 25]. http://www.randomizer.org/

27. UC Davis University Koret Shelter Medicine Program. Spot Cleaning Cat Cages. [Internet]. https://www.sheltermedicine.com/library/resources/?utf8=%E2%9C%93&site=sheltermedicine&search%5Bslug%5D=spot-cleaning-cat-cages. [Accessed 22th March 2019].

28. UK Cat Behaviour Working Group—Universities Federation for Animal Welfare. An ethogram for behavioural studies of the domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus L.). England: Potters Bar, UFAW Animal Welfare Research Report 8; 1995.

29. Lehner PN. Sampling methods in behavior research. Poult Sci. 1992 Apr;71(4):643–49. doi: 10.3382/ps.0710643 1594516

30. FEDIAF The European Pet Food Industry. Nutritional Guidelines for Complete and Complementary Pet Food for Cats and Dogs. [Internet]. http://www.fediaf.org/images/FEDIAF_Nutritional_Guidelines_Update_December_2018.pdf [Accessed 27th March 2019].

31. Pfeiffer DU. Chapter 4: Designing Epidemiological Studies. In: Veterinary Epidemiology: An Introduction. 1st ed., Chichester, U.K.; Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. p. 33–42.

32. Sargeant JM, O’Connor AM, Gardner IA, Dickson JS, Torrence ME, Dohoo IR, et al. The Reflect Statement: reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials in livestock and food safety: explanation and elaboration. Zoonoses and Public Health 2010 Febr 10;57(2):105–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01312.x 20070652

33. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/. [Accessed 22th March 2019]

34. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team. Nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1–141. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlme/index.html. [Accessed 27th March 2019].

35. Kessler MR, Turner DC. Effects of density and cage size on stress in domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus) housed in animal shelters and boarding catteries. Anim Welf. 1999;8:259–67.

36. Stella JL, Croney CC, Buffington CT. Behavior and welfare of domestic cats housed in cages larger than U.S. norm. JAAWS. 2017 May 8;20(3)296–312. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2017.1317252 28481121

37. Hartke JR, Hayes KA, Buffington CA, Mathes LE, Rojko JL. Acute feline leukemia virus infection causes altered energy balance and growth inhibition in weanling cats. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1995 Oct 13;9(1): 11–19.

38. Brosschot JF, Verkuil B, Thayer JF. Generalized unsafety theory of stress: unsafe environments and conditions, and the default stress response. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018 March 7;15(3)1–27. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030464 29518937

39. Dantas-Divers LMS, Crowell-Davis SL, Alford K, Genaro G, D’Almeida JM, Paixao RL. Agonistic behavior and environmental enrichment of cats communally housed in a shelter. JAVMA 2011 Sept 15;239(6):796–802. doi: 10.2460/javma.239.6.796 21916762

40. Uetake K, Goto A, Koyama R, Kikuchi R, Tanaka T. Effects of single caging and cage size on behavior and stress level of domestic neutered cats housed in an animal shelter. Animal Science Journal 2013;84:272–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2012.01055.x 23480709

41. Stella J, Croney C, Buffington T. Environmental factors that affect the behavior and welfare of domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus) housed in cages. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2014 Nov;160:94–105. doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.08.006


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 10