Antenatal and intrapartum interventions for reducing caesarean section, promoting vaginal birth, and reducing fear of childbirth: An overview of systematic reviews

Autoři: Valerie Smith aff001;  Louise Gallagher aff001;  Margaret Carroll aff001;  Kathleen Hannon aff001;  Cecily Begley aff001
Působiště autorů: School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland aff001
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224313


Concern has been expressed globally over rising caesarean birth rates. Recently, the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) called for help from governmental bodies, professional organisations, women’s groups, and other stakeholders to reduce unnecessary caesareans. As part of a wider research initiative, we conducted an overview of systematic reviews of antenatal and intrapartum interventions, and reports of evidence based recommendations, to identify and highlight those that have been shown to be effective for reducing caesarean birth, promoting vaginal birth and reducing fear of childbirth. Following registration of the review protocol, (PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018090681), we searched The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, CINAHL and EMBASE (Jan 2000-Jan 2018) and searched for grey literature in PROSPERO, and on websites of health professional and other relevant bodies. Screening and selection of reviews, quality appraisal using AMSTAR-2, and data extraction were performed independently by pairs of at least two reviewers. Excluding reviews assessed as ‘critically low’ on AMSTAR-2 (n = 54), 101 systematic reviews, and 10 reports of evidence based recommendations were included in the overview. Narrative synthesis was performed, due to heterogeneity of review methodology and topics. The results highlight twenty-five interventions, across 17 reviews, that reduced the risk of caesarean, nine interventions across eight reviews that increased the risk of caesarean, eight interventions that reduced instrumental vaginal birth, four interventions that increased spontaneous vaginal birth, and two interventions that reduced fear of childbirth. This overview of reviews identifies and highlights interventions that have been shown to be effective for reducing caesarean birth, promoting vaginal births and reducing fear of childbirth. In recognising that clinical practices change over time, this overview includes reviews published from 2000 onwards only, thus providing contemporary evidence, and a valuable resource for clinicians when making decisions on practices that should be implemented for reducing unnecessary caesarean births safely.

Protocol Registration: PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018090681. Available from:

Klíčová slova:

Antenatal care – Birth – Database searching – Fear – Labor and delivery – Pain management – Pregnancy – Systematic reviews


1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstetric Care Consensus No. 1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 693–711. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d 24553167

2. Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, Heaman M, Sauve R, Kramer MS. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. Can Med Assoc J. 2007; 4: 455–460.

3. van den Berg A, van Elburg R, van Geijn HP, Fetter WPF. Neonatal respiratory morbidity following elective caesarean section in term infants. A 5-year retrospective study and a review of the literature. EJOG Reprod Biol. 2001; 98: 9–13.

4. Lobel M, Deluca RS. Psychological sequelae of caesarean delivery: review and analysis of their causes and implications. Soc Sci Med. 2007; 64: 2272–84. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.02.028 17395349

5. Kenny C, Devane D, Normand C, Clarke M, Howard A, Begley C. A cost-comparison of midwife-led compared with consultant-led maternity care in Ireland (the MidU study). Midwifery. 2015; 31:1032–1038 doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.06.012 26381076

6. EURO-PERISTAT Project with SCPE and EUROCAT. European Perinatal Health Report. Nov 2018. Retrieved from, March 2019.

7. Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, Ye J, Mikolajczyk R, Deneux-Tharaux C, et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? Reproductive Health, 2015; 12: 57 doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0043-6 26093498

8. Panda S, Begley C, Daly D. Clinicians' views of factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies. PLoS ONE. 2018a 13:7: e0200941.

9. Panda S, Begley C, Daly D, Karlström A, Larson B, Back L, Hildingsson I. Factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section in Sweden—a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2018b; 18(1): 377. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2007-7 30223780

10. Nilsson C, Hessman E, Sjöblom H, Dencker A, Jangsten E, Mollberg M, et al. Definitions, measurements and prevalence of Fear of Childbirth: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2018, 18(1): 28 doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1659-7 29329526

11. Dencker A, Nilsson C, Begley C, Jangsten E, Mollberg M, Patel H, et al. Causes and outcomes in studies of fear of childbirth: a systematic review. Women and Birth. 2018, pii: S1871– doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.004

12. Visser GHA, Ayres-de-Campos D, Barnea ER, de Bernis L, Di Renzo GC, Vidarte MFE,et al. FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section epidemic. The Lancet. 2018, 382: 10155, 1286–1287.

13. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009; 21: 339.

14. Horey D, Weaver J, Russell H. Information for pregnant women about caesarean birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004, 1:CD003858.

15. Khunpradit S, Tavender E, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Wasiak J, Gruen RL. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011, 6:CD005528

16. Lundgren I, Smith V, Nilsson C, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Nicoletti J, Devane D, et al. Clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15:16. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0441-3 25652550

17. Nilsson C, Lundgren I, Smith V, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Nicoletti J, Devane D, et al. Women-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): A systematic review. Midwifery. 2015, 31(7): 657–63. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.04.003 25931275

18. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017; 358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008 28935701

19. Gourounti K, Sandall J. Admission cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart rate: effects on neonatal Apgar score, on the rate of caesarean sections and on the rate of instrumental delivery—a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stand. 2007; 44(6), 1029–35.

20. Catling-Paull C, Johnston R, Ryan C, Foureur MJ, Homer CS. Non-clinical interventions that increase the uptake and success of vaginal birth after caesarean section: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2011l 67(8):1662–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05662.x 21535091

21. Van den Berg I, Bosch JL, Jacobs B, Bouman I, Duvekot JJ, Hunik MG. Effectiveness of acupuncture-type interventions versus expectant management to correct breech presentation: a systematic review. Complement Ther Med. 2008; 16(2), 92–100. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2008.01.001 18514911

22. Wilcox CB, Nassar N, Roberts CL. Effectiveness of nifedipine tocolysis to facilitate external cephalic version: a systematic review. BJOG. 2011; 118(4): 423–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02824.x 21199292

23. Weaver J, Browne J, Aras-Payne A, Magill-Cuerden J. A comprehensive systematic review of the impact of planned interventions offered to pregnant women who have requested a caesarean section as a result of tokophobia (fear of childbirth). JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012; 10(28 Suppl): 1–20.

24. Madden K, Middleton P, Cyna AM, Matthewson M, Jones L. Hypnosis for painmanagement during labour and childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016, Issue 5. Art. No.: CD009356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009356.pub3 27192949

25. Bond DM, Middleton P, Levett KM, van der HamDP, Crowther CA, Buchanan SL, et al. Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks’ gestation for improving pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD004735.

26. Dowswell T, Carroli G, Duley L, Gates S, Gülmezoglu AM, Khan-Neelofur D, et al. Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD000934. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000934.pub3 26184394

27. Hapangama D, Neilson JP. Mifepristone for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD002865. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002865.pub2 19588336

28. Grivell RM, Alfirevic Z, Gyte GML, Devane D. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD007863. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007863.pub4 26363287

29. Gülmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P, Heatley E. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012, Issue 6. Art. No.: CD004945. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub3 22696345

30. Hofmeyr GJ, Xu H, Eke AC. Amnioinfusion for meconium-stained liquor in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD000014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000014.pub4 24453049

31. Han S, Middleton P, Crowther CA. Exercise for pregnant women for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD009021. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009021.pub2 22786521

32. Alfirevic Z, Keeney E, Dowswell T, Welton NJ, Medley N, Dias S, et al. Which method is best for the induction of labour? A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2016; 20(65). doi: 10.3310/hta20650 27587290

33. Dowswell T, Middleton P, Weeks A. Antenatal day care units versus hospital admission for women with complicated pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD001803. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001803.pub2 19821282

34. Vogel JP, Osoti AO, Kelly AJ, Livio S, Norman JE, Alfirevic Z. Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD007701.

35. Chen I, Opiyo N, Tavender E, Mortazhejri S, Rader T, Petkovic J, et al. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD005528.

36. World Health Organisation. Recommendations non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 10