Variation in activity rates may explain sex-specific dorsal color patterns in Habronattus jumping spiders

Autoři: Lisa A. Taylor aff001;  Collette Cook aff001;  Kevin J. McGraw aff003
Působiště autorů: Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America aff001;  Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America aff002;  School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America aff003
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223015


In many animals, color pattern and behavior interact to deceive predators. For mimics, such deception can range from precise (near-perfect mimicry) to only subtle resemblance (imperfect mimicry) and such strategies often differ by sex because of differing ecological selection pressures. In this field study, we examine variation in behavior and ecology that may be linked with sex differences in dorsal color pattern in three sympatric species of Habronattus jumping spiders (H. clypeatus, H. hallani, H. pyrrithrix). Males of these species have conspicuous dorsal patterning that is subtly reminiscent of the general color patterns of wasps and bees, while females are cryptic. We show that, compared with females, these conspicuous males exhibited increased leg-waving behavior outside of the context of courtship; such behavior is common in jumping spiders that mimic wasps and bees presumably because a mimic’s waving legs resemble antennae. Males of a fourth sympatric species (H. hirsutus) without conspicuous dorsal patterning did not exhibit increased leg-waving. These results are consistent with and offer preliminary support for the idea that male color and behavior may work together to deceive predators. We also examined whether higher movement rates of males (who must wander to find females) and/or different use of the microhabitat by the sexes could explain sexual dichromatism. We found that microhabitat use was similar for males and females, but males of all three conspicuously-colored species spent more time actively moving than females. To our knowledge, this is the first study to speculate that conspicuous male dorsal coloration in Habronattus may have a deceptive function, and to explore why dorsal coloration differs between the sexes.

Klíčová slova:

Animal behavior – Ants – Cryptic speciation – Deception – Imitation – Leaves – Predation – Wasps


1. Sourakov A (2013) Two heads are better than one: false head allows Calycopis cecrops (Lycaenidae) to escape predation by a jumping spider, Phidippus pulcherrimus (Salticidae). Journal of Natural History 47: 1047–1054.

2. Brodie ED (1989) Genetic correlations between morphology and antipredator behavior in natural populations of the garter snake Thamnophis ordinoides. Nature 342: 542–543. doi: 10.1038/342542a0 2586624

3. Forsman A, Appelqvist S (1998) Visual predators impose correlational selection on prey color pattern and behavior. Behavioral Ecology 9: 409–413.

4. Golding YC, Edmunds M, Ennos AR (2005) Flight behaviour during foraging of the social wasp Vespula vulgaris (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) and four mimetic hoverfiies (Diptera: Syrphidae) Sericomyia silentis, Myathropa florea, Helophilus sp and Syrphus sp. Journal of Experimental Biology 208: 4523–4527. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01932 16339871

5. Rota J, Wagner DL (2006) Predator mimicry: metalmark moths mimic their jumping spider predators. PLoS ONE 1: e45. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000045 17183674

6. McIver JD, Stonedahl G (1993) Myrmecomorphy—morphological and behavioral mimicry of ants. Annual Review of Entomology 38: 351–379.

7. Cushing PE (1997) Myrmecomorphy and myrmecophily in spiders: A review. Florida Entomologist 80: 165–193.

8. Ceccarelli FS (2008) Behavioral mimicry in Myrmarachne species (Araneae, Salticidae) from North Queensland, Australia. Journal of Arachnology 36: 344–351.

9. Nelson XJ, Card A (2015) Locomotory mimicry in ant-like spiders. Behavioral Ecology 27: 700–707.

10. Shamble PS, Hoy RR, Cohen I, Beatus T (2017) Walking like an ant: a quantitative and experimental approach to understanding locomotor mimicry in the jumping spider Myrmarachne formicaria. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284: 20170308. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0308 28701553

11. Nelson XJ, Jackson RR, Edwards GB, Barrion AT (2005) Living with the enemy: jumping spiders that mimic weaver ants. Journal of Arachnology 33: 813–819.

12. Penney HD, Hassall C, Skevington JH, Abbott KR, Sherratt TN (2012) A comparative analysis of the evolution of imperfect mimicry. Nature 483: 461–U110. doi: 10.1038/nature10961 22437614

13. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 443 p.

14. Slatkin M (1984) Ecological causes of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38: 622–630. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00327.x 28555984

15. Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed MP (2004) Avoiding attack: the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

16. World Spider Catalog. 2019. Natural History Museum Bern, online at, version 18.5, accessed on {2 March 2019}

17. Maddison WP (1995) Salticidae section of the Tree of Life Web Project, Version 01. Accessed 20 April 2019.

18. Clark DL, Morjan CL (2001) Attracting female attention: the evolution of dimorphic courtship displays in the jumping spider Maevia inclemens (Araneae: Salticidae). Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences Series B 268: 2461–2465.

19. Lim MLM, Li JJ, Li D (2008) Effect of UV-reflecting markings on female mate-choice decisions in Cosmophasis umbratica, a jumping spider from Singapore. Behavioral Ecology 19: 61–66.

20. Taylor LA, McGraw K (2013) Male ornamental coloration improves courtship success in a jumping spider, but only in the sun. Behavioral Ecology 24: 955–967.

21. Girard MB, Elias DO, Kasumovic MM (2015) Female preference for multi-modal courtship: multiple signals are important for male mating success in peacock spiders. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 282.

22. Wilson JS, Jahner JP, Forister ML, Sheehan ES, Williams KA, Pitts JP (2015) North American velvet ants form one of the world’s largest known Mullerian mimicry complexes. Current Biology 25: R704–R706. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.053 26294178

23. Maddison W, McMahon M (2000) Divergence and reticulation among montane populations of a jumping spider (Habronattus pugillis Griswold). Systematic Biology 49: 400–421. doi: 10.1080/10635159950127312 12116419

24. Hebets EA, Maddison WP (2005) Xenophilic mating preferences among populations of the jumping spider Habronattus pugillis Griswold. Behavioral Ecology 16: 981–988.

25. Elias DO, Land BR, Mason AC, Hoy RR (2006) Measuring and quantifying dynamic visual signals in jumping spiders. Journal of Comparative Physiology A Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology 192: 785–797.

26. Elias DO, Maddison WP, Peckmezian C, Girard MB, Mason AC (2012) Orchestrating the score: complex multimodal courtship in the Habronattus coecatus group of Habronattus jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 105: 522–547.

27. Griswold CE (1987) A revision of the jumping spider genus Habronattus F.O.P. Cambridge (Araneae: Salticidae), with phenetic and cladistic analyses. University of California Publications in Entomology 107: 1–344.

28. Jackson RR (1982) The behavior of communicating jumping spiders. In: Witt PN, Rovner JS, editors. Spider communication: mechanisms and ecological significance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

29. Sherratt TN (2002) The evolution of imperfect mimicry. Behavioral Ecology 13: 821–826.

30. Ruxton GD, Schaefer HM (2011) Alternative explanations for apparent mimicry. Journal of Ecology 99: 899–904.

31. Schaefer M, Ruxton G (2009) Deception in plants: mimicry or perceptual exploitation? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24: 676–685.

32. Cott HB (1940) Adaptive coloration in animals. London, UK: Methuen.

33. Stevens M, Merilaita S (2009) Defining disruptive coloration and distinguishing its functions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 364: 481–488. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0216 18990673

34. Webster RJ (2015) Does disruptive camouflage conceal edges and features? Current Zoology 61: 708–717.

35. Stevens M, Yule DH, Ruxton GD (2008) Dazzle coloration and prey movement. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 275: 2639–2643.

36. Scott-Samuel NE, Baddeley R, Palmer CE, Cuthill IC (2011) Dazzle camouflage affects speed perception. PLoS ONE 6: e20233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020233 21673797

37. Hamalainen L, Valkonen J, Mappes J, Rojas B (2015) Visual illusions in predator-prey interactions: birds find moving patterned prey harder to catch. Animal Cognition 18: 1059–1068. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0874-0 25947086

38. Maddison W, Hedin M (2003) Phylogeny of Habronattus jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae), with consideration of genital and courtship evolution. Systematic Entomology 28: 1–21.

39. Ioannou CC, Krause J (2009) Interactions between background matching and motion during visual detection can explain why cryptic animals keep still. Biology Letters 5: 191–193. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0758 19158025

40. Bartos M, Szczepko K, Stanska M (2013) Predatory response to changes in camouflage in a sexually dimorphic jumping spider. Journal of Arachnology 41: 381–386.

41. Kelley LA, Kelley JL (2014) Animal visual illusion and confusion: the importance of a perceptual perspective. Behavioral Ecology 25: 450–463.

42. Merilaita S, Dimitrova M (2014) Accuracy of background matching and prey detection: predation by blue tits indicates intense selection for highly matching prey colour pattern. Functional Ecology 28: 1208–1215.

43. Merilaita S, Tullberg BS (2005) Constrained camouflage facilitates the evolution of conspicuous warning coloration. Evolution 59: 38–45. 15792225

44. Hoefler CD, Jakob EM (2006) Jumping spiders in space: movement patterns, nest site fidelity and the use of beacons. Animal Behaviour 71: 109–116.

45. Blackburn GS, Maddison WP (2015) Insights to the mating strategies of Habronattus americanus jumping spiders from natural behaviour and staged interactions in the wild. Behaviour 152: 1168–1187.

46. Taylor LA, Powell EC, McGraw KJ (2017) Frequent misdirected courtship in a natural community of colorful Habronattus jumping spiders. Plos One 12.

47. Calver MC, Bradley JS (1991) Can microhabitat selection explain sex-related color morph frequencies in the grasshopper Acrida conica Fabricius? Animal Behaviour 41: 1101–1102.

48. Ahnesjo J, Forsman A (2006) Differential habitat selection by pygmy grasshopper color morphs; interactive effects of temperature and predator avoidance. Evolutionary Ecology 20: 235–257.

49. Merilaita S, Jormalainen V (1997) Evolution of sex differences in microhabitat choice and colour polymorphism in Idotea baltica. Animal Behaviour 54: 769–778. 9344431

50. Kjernsmo K, Merilaita S (2012) Background choice as an anti-predator strategy: the roles of background matching and visual complexity in the habitat choice of the least killifish. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 279: 4192–4198.

51. Hespenheide HA (1975) Reversed sex-limited mimicry in a beetle. Evolution 29: 780–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00873.x 28563103

52. Merilaita S, Lyytinen A, Mappes J (2001) Selection for cryptic coloration in a visually heterogeneous habitat. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 268: 1925–1929.

53. Hedin M, Lowder MC (2009) Phylogeography of the Habronattus amicus species complex (Araneae: Salticidae) of western North America, with evidence for localized asymmetrical mitochondrial introgression. Zootaxa: 39–60.

54. City of Phoenix. 2017. Rio Salado habitat restoration area. Accessed 28 November 2017.

55. Foelix RN (1996) Biology of Spiders. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

56. Landes DA, Obin MS, Cady AB, Hunt JH (1987) Seasonal and latitudinal variation in spider prey of the mud dauber Chalybion californicum (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae). Journal of Arachnology 15: 249–256.

57. Elgar MA, Jebb M (1999) Nest provisioning in the mud-dauber wasp Sceliphron laetum (F. Smith): body mass and taxa specific prey selection. Behaviour 136: 147–159.

58. Blackledge TA, Pickett KM (2000) Predatory interactions between mud-dauber wasps (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae) and Argiope (Araneae, Araneidae) in captivity. Journal of Arachnology 28: 211–216.

59. Camillo E (2002) The natural history of the mud-dauber wasp Sceliphron fistularium (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) in southeastern Brazil. Revista de Biologia Tropical 50: 127–134. 12298237

60. Cohen AA, McGraw KJ, Wiersma P, Williams JB, Robinson WD, Robinson TR, et al. (2008) Interspecific associations between circulating antioxidant levels and life-history variation in birds. American Naturalist 172: 178–193. doi: 10.1086/589456 18624664

61. Stevens M (2007) Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 274: 1457–1464.

62. Merilaita S (1998) Crypsis through disruptive coloration in an isopod. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 265: 1059–1064.

63. Cuthill IC, Stevens M, Sheppard J, Maddocks T, Parraga CA, Troscianko TS (2005) Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching. Nature 434: 72–74. doi: 10.1038/nature03312 15744301

64. Schaefer HM, Stobbe N (2006) Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 273: 2427–2432.

65. Chittka L, Osorio D (2007) Cognitive dimensions of predator responses to imperfect mimicry? Plos Biology 5: 2754–2758.

66. Powell EC, Taylor LA (2017) Specialists and generalists coexist within a population of spider-hunting mud dauber wasps. Behavioral Ecology 28: 890–898. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arx050 29622922

67. Jackson RR, Pollard SD (1997) Jumping spider mating strategies: sex among cannibals in and out of webs. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ, editors. Mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 340–351.

68. Nelson XJ (2014) Evolutionary implications of deception in mimicry and masquerade. Current Zoology 60: 6–15.

69. Kauppinen J, Mappes J (2003) Why are wasps so intimidating: field experiments on hunting dragonflies (Odonata: Aeshna grandis). Animal Behaviour 66: 505–511.

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 10