Outcomes of acute coronary syndrome patients with concurrent extra-cardiac vascular disease in the era of transradial coronary intervention: A retrospective multicenter cohort study

Autoři: Masaki Kodaira aff001;  Mitsuaki Sawano aff002;  Toshiki Kuno aff001;  Yohei Numasawa aff001;  Shigetaka Noma aff004;  Masahiro Suzuki aff005;  Shohei Imaeda aff002;  Ikuko Ueda aff002;  Keiichi Fukuda aff002;  Shun Kohsaka aff002
Působiště autorů: Department of Cardiology, Japanese Red Cross Ashikaga Hospital, Tochigi, Japan aff001;  Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan aff002;  Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York, United States of America aff003;  Department of Cardiology, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Tochigi, Japan aff004;  Department of Cardiology, National Hospital Organization Saitama Hospital, Saitama, Japan aff005
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223215



Extra-cardiac vascular diseases (ECVDs), such as cerebrovascular disease (CVD) or peripheral arterial disease (PAD), are frequently observed among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, it is not clear how these conditions affect patient outcomes in the era of transradial coronary intervention (TRI).

Methods and results

Among 7,980 patients with ACS whose data were extracted from the multicenter Japanese percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) registry between August 2008 and March 2017, 888 (11.1%) had one concurrent ECVD (either PAD [345 patients: 4.3%] or CVD [543 patients; 6.8%]), while 87 patients (1.1%) had both PAD and CVD. Overall, the presence of ECVD was associated with a higher risk of mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 1.728; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.183–2.524) and bleeding complications (OR: 1.430; 95% CI: 1.028–2.004). There was evidence of interaction between ECVD severity and procedural access site on bleeding complication on the additive scale (relative excess risk due to interaction: 0.669, 95% CI: -0.563–1.900) and on the multiplicative scale (OR: 2.105; 95% CI: 1.075–4.122). While the incidence of death among patients with ECVD remained constant during the study period, bleeding complications among patients with ECVD rapidly decreased from 2015 to 2017, in association with the increasing number of TRI.


Overall, the presence of ECVD was a risk factor for adverse outcomes after PCI for ACS, both mortality and bleeding complications. In the most recent years, the incidence of bleeding complications among patients with ECVD decreased significantly coinciding with the rapid increase of TRI.

Klíčová slova:

Cardiovascular diseases – Coronary angioplasty – Coronary heart disease – Death rates – Lesions – Myocardial infarction – Vascular diseases


1. Kirtane AJ, Doshi D, Leon MB, Lasala JM, Ohman EM, O'Neill WW, et al. Treatment of Higher-Risk Patients With an Indication for Revascularization: Evolution Within the Field of Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circulation. 2016;134(5):422–31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022061 27482004.

2. Bhatt DL, Peterson ED, Harrington RA, Ou FS, Cannon CP, Gibson CM, et al. Prior polyvascular disease: risk factor for adverse ischaemic outcomes in acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(10):1195–202. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp099 19339264.

3. Saw J, Bhatt DL, Moliterno DJ, Brener SJ, Steinhubl SR, Lincoff AM, et al. The influence of peripheral arterial disease on outcomes: a pooled analysis of mortality in eight large randomized percutaneous coronary intervention trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(8):1567–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.067 17045889.

4. Jeremias A, Gruberg L, Patel J, Connors G, Brown DL. Effect of peripheral arterial disease on in-hospital outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105(9):1268–71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.043 20403477.

5. Mukherjee D, Eagle KA, Kline-Rogers E, Feldman LJ, Juliard JM, Agnelli G, et al. Impact of prior peripheral arterial disease and stroke on outcomes of acute coronary syndromes and effect of evidence-based therapies (from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events). Am J Cardiol. 2007;100(1):1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.02.046 17599431.

6. Bhatt DL, Eagle KA, Ohman EM, Hirsch AT, Goto S, Mahoney EM, et al. Comparative determinants of 4-year cardiovascular event rates in stable outpatients at risk of or with atherothrombosis. JAMA. 2010;304(12):1350–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1322 20805624.

7. Mohareb M, Goodman SG, Yan RT, Bhatt DL, Elbarouni B, Deyoung JP, et al. Treatment and outcomes of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes in relation to burden of pre-existing vascular disease. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(3):2720–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.03.020 23601211.

8. Vagnarelli F, Corsini A, Lorenzini M, Ortolani P, Norscini G, Cinti L, et al. Long-term prognostic role of cerebrovascular disease and peripheral arterial disease across the spectrum of acute coronary syndromes. Atherosclerosis. 2016;245:43–9. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.11.014 26691909.

9. Berger JS, Petersen JL, Brown DL. Vascular disease burden and in-hospital outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in New York State. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(4):317–22. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.847459.108.847459 20031734.

10. Mukherjee D, Eagle KA, Smith DE, Kline-Rogers EM, Chetcuti S, Grossman PM, et al. Impact of extracardiac vascular disease on acute prognosis in patients who undergo percutaneous coronary interventions (data from the Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium [BMC2]). Am J Cardiol. 2003;92(8):972–4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00981-0 14556876.

11. Subherwal S, Peterson ED, Dai D, Thomas L, Messenger JC, Xian Y, et al. Temporal trends in and factors associated with bleeding complications among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data CathPCI Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(21):1861–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.045 22595404; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3908898.

12. Marso SP, Amin AP, House JA, Kennedy KF, Spertus JA, Rao SV, et al. Association between use of bleeding avoidance strategies and risk of periprocedural bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2010;303(21):2156–64. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.708 20516416.

13. Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabro P, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Zaro T, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9986):2465–76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6 25791214.

14. Steg PG, Bhatt DL, Wilson PW, D'Agostino R, Ohman EM Sr., Rother J, et al. One-year cardiovascular event rates in outpatients with atherothrombosis. JAMA. 2007;297(11):1197–206. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.11.1197 17374814.

15. Ohno Y, Maekawa Y, Miyata H, Inoue S, Ishikawa S, Sueyoshi K, et al. Impact of periprocedural bleeding on incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(14):1260–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.086 23770181.

16. Inohara T, Kohsaka S, Miyata H, Ueda I, Ishikawa S, Ohki T, et al. Appropriateness ratings of percutaneous coronary intervention in Japan and its association with the trend of noninvasive testing. JACC Cardiovascular interventions. 2014;7(9):1000–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.06.006 25234672.

17. Numasawa Y, Kohsaka S, Miyata H, Noma S, Suzuki M, Ishikawa S, et al. Gender differences in in-hospital clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions: an insight from a Japanese multicenter registry. PloS one. 2015;10(1):e0116496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116496 25635905; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4312045.

18. Feldman DN, Swaminathan RV, Kaltenbach LA, Baklanov DV, Kim LK, Wong SC, et al. Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007–2012). Circulation. 2013;127(23):2295–306. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000536 23753843.

19. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr., Ganiats TG, Holmes DR Jr., et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;130(25):e344–426. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000134 25249585.

20. Peterson ED, Dai D, DeLong ER, Brennan JM, Singh M, Rao SV, et al. Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(18):1923–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.005 20430263; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3925678.

21. Rao SV, McCoy LA, Spertus JA, Krone RJ, Singh M, Fitzgerald S, et al. An updated bleeding model to predict the risk of post-procedure bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report using an expanded bleeding definition from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry. JACC Cardiovascular interventions. 2013;6(9):897–904. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.016 24050858.

22. Knol MJ, VanderWeele TJ. Recommendations for presenting analyses of effect modification and interaction. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(2):514–20. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr218 22253321; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3324457.

23. VanderWeele TJ, Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ. Attributing effects to interactions. Epidemiology. 2014;25(5):711–22. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000096 25051310; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4219627.

24. Acharya T, Salisbury AC, Spertus JA, Kennedy KF, Bhullar A, Reddy HKK, et al. In-Hospital Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in America's Safety Net: Insights From the NCDR Cath-PCI Registry. JACC Cardiovascular interventions. 2017;10(15):1475–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.042 28797422.

25. Klein LW, Kolm P, Xu X, Krone RJ, Anderson HV, Rumsfeld JS, et al. A longitudinal assessment of coronary interventional program quality: a report from the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovascular interventions. 2009;2(2):136–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.09.012 19463415.

26. Kwok CS, Kontopantelis E, Myint PK, Zaman A, Berry C, Keavney B, et al. Stroke following percutaneous coronary intervention: type-specific incidence, outcomes and determinants seen by the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society 2007–12. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(25):1618–28. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv113 25896077.

27. Ueshima H, Sekikawa A, Miura K, Turin TC, Takashima N, Kita Y, et al. Cardiovascular disease and risk factors in Asia: a selected review. Circulation. 2008;118(25):2702–9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.790048 19106393; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3096564.

28. Achterberg S, Visseren FL, Kappelle LJ, Pruissen DM, Van Der Graaf Y, Algra A, et al. Differential propensity for major hemorrhagic events in patients with different types of arterial disease. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9(9):1724–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04437.x 21752184.

29. van Hattum ES, Algra A, Lawson JA, Eikelboom BC, Moll FL, Tangelder MJ. Bleeding increases the risk of ischemic events in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Circulation. 2009;120(16):1569–76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.858365 19805650.

30. Brilakis ES, Hernandez AF, Dai D, Peterson ED, Banerjee S, Fonarow GC, et al. Quality of care for acute coronary syndrome patients with known atherosclerotic disease: results from the Get With the Guidelines Program. Circulation. 2009;120(7):560–7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.877092 19652090.

31. Subherwal S, Patel MR, Kober L, Peterson ED, Jones WS, Gislason GH, et al. Missed opportunities: despite improvement in use of cardioprotective medications among patients with lower-extremity peripheral artery disease, underuse remains. Circulation. 2012;126(11):1345–54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.108787 22874581.

32. Ahmad Z. Statin intolerance. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113(10):1765–71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.02.033 24792743.

33. Shoji S, Kohsaka S, Kumamaru H, Sawano M, Shiraishi Y, Ueda I, et al. Stroke After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Era of Transradial Intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(12):e006761. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006761 30545258.

34. Lindholt JS, Søgaard R. Population screening and intervention for vascular disease in Danish men (VIVA): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2017;390(10109):2256–65. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32250-x

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 10
Nejčtenější tento týden