Emotionally expressed voices are retained in memory following a single exposure

Autoři: Yoonji Kim aff001;  John J. Sidtis aff002;  Diana Van Lancker Sidtis aff001
Působiště autorů: Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, New York, NY, United States of America aff001;  The Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research at Rockland Psychiatric Center, Geriatrics Division, New York, NY, United States of America aff002;  Department of Psychiatry, New York University Langone School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America aff003
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223948


Studies of voice recognition in biology suggest that long exposure may not satisfactorily represent the voice acquisition process. The current study proposes that humans can acquire a newly familiar voice from brief exposure to spontaneous speech, given a personally engaging context. Studies have shown that arousing and emotionally engaging experiences are more likely to be recorded and consolidated in memory. Yet it remains undemonstrated whether this advantage holds for voices. The present study examined the role of emotionally expressive context in the acquisition of voices following a single, 1-minute exposure by comparing recognition of voices experienced in engaging and neutral contexts at two retention intervals. Listeners were exposed to a series of emotionally nuanced and neutral videotaped narratives produced by performers, and tested on the recognition of excerpted voice samples, by indicating whether they had heard the voice before, immediately and after a one-week delay. Excerpts were voices from exposed videotaped narratives, but utilized verbal material taken from a second (nonexposed) narrative provided by the same performer. Overall, participants were consistently able to distinguish between voices that were exposed during the video session and voices that were not exposed. Voices experienced in emotional, engaging contexts were significantly better recognized than those in neutral ones both immediately and after a one-week delay. Our findings provide the first evidence that new voices can be acquired rapidly from one-time exposure and that nuanced context facilitates initially inducting new voices into a repertory of personally familiar voices in long-term memory. The results converge with neurological evidence to suggest that cerebral processes differ for familiar and unfamiliar voices.

Klíčová slova:

Emotions – Face recognition – Human learning – Learning – Long term memory – Memory – Sleep – Memory consolidation


1. Nygaard LC, Sommers MS, Pisoni DB. Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychological Sciences. 1994; 5(1): 42–46.

2. von Kriegstein K, Kleinschmidt A, Sterzer P, Giraud AL. Interaction of face and voice areas during speaker recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2005; 17(3): 367–376. doi: 10.1162/0898929053279577 15813998

3. Kreiman J, Sidtis D. Foundations of voice studies: An interdisciplinary approach to voice production and perception. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 2011.

4. Guthrie ER. Psychological facts and psychological theory. Psychological Bulletin. 1946; 43(1): 1–20.

5. Bee MA, Gerhardt HC. Individual voice recognition in a territorial frog (Rana catesbeiana). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2002; 269(1499): 1443–1448. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2041 12137573

6. Charrier I, Mathevon N, Jouventin P. Mother’s voice recognition by seal pups. Nature. 2001; 412(6850): 873.

7. Charrier I, Mathevon N, Jouventin P. How does a fur seal mother recognize the voice of her pup? An experimental study of Arctocephalus tropicalis. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2002; 205: 603–612. 11907050

8. Charrier I, Mathevon N, Jouventin P. Individuality in the voice of fur seal females: An analysis study of the pup attraction call in Arctocephalus tropicalis. Marine Mammal Science. 2003; 19(1): 161–172.

9. Insley SJ. Mother-offspring vocal recognition in northern fur seals is mutual but asymmetrical. Animal Behaviour. 2001; 61(1): 129–137. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1569 11170703

10. Aubin T, Jouventin P, Charrier I. Mother vocal recognition in Antarctic Fur Seal Arctocephalus gazella Pups: A Two-step Process. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(9): e0134513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134513 26331475

11. Searby A, Jouventin P, Aubin T. Acoustic recognition in macaroni penguins: An original signature system. Animal Behaviour. 2004; 67: 615–625.

12. Jouventin P, Aubin T, Lengagne T. Finding a parent in a king penguin colony: The acoustic system of individual recognition. Animal Behaviour. 1999; 57(6): 1175–1183. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1086 10373249

13. Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM. Recognition of other individuals’ social relationships by female baboons. Animal Behaviour. 1999; 58(1): 67–75. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1131 10413542

14. Therien JM, Worwa CT, Mattia FR, deRegnier RA. Altered pathways for auditory discrimination and recognition memory in preterm infants. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2004; 46(12): 816–824.

15. Van Lancker D, Kreiman J. Unfamiliar voice discrimination and familiar voice recognition are independent and unordered abilities. Neuropsychologia. 1987; 25(5): 829–834. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90120-5 3431677

16. Lattner S, Meyer ME, Friederici AD. Voice perception: Sex, pitch, and the right hemisphere. Human Brain Mapping. 2005; 24(1): 11–20. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20065 15593269

17. Schweinberger SR. Human brain potential correlates of voice priming and voice recognition. Neuroposychologia. 2001; 39(9): 921–936.

18. Stevenage SV. Drawing a distinction between familiar and unfamiliar voice processing: A review of neuropsychological, clinical and empirical findings. Neuropsychologia. 2018; 116: 162–178. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.005 28694095

19. Van Lancker D. Rags to riches: Our increasing appreciation of cognitive and communicative abilities of the human right cerebral hemisphere. Brain and Language. 1997; 57(1): 1–11. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1850 9126403

20. Ladefoged P, Ladefoged J. The ability of listeners to identify voices. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics. 1980; 49: 43–51.

21. Kleinsmith LJ, Kaplan S. Paired-associate learning as a function of arousal and interpolated interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1963; 65(2): 190–193.

22. Reuterskiöld C. The effects of emotionality on auditory comprehension in aphasia. Cortex. 1991; 27(4): 595–604. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80008-1 1782793

23. Cahill L, Haier RJ, Fallon J, Alkire MT, Tang C, Keator D, et al. Amygdala activity at encoding correlated with long-term, free recall of emotional information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 1996; 93(15): 8016–8021.

24. Bradley MM, Greenwald MK, Petry MC, Lang PJ. Remembering pictures: pleasure and arousal in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 1992; 18(2): 379–390.

25. Müller GE, Pilzecker A. Experimentelle Beiträge zur Lehre vom Gedächtnis. Z Psychol. 1990; 1: 1–300.

26. McGaugh JL. Memory: A century of consolidation. Science. 2000; 287: 248–251. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5451.248 10634773

27. Genzel L, Wixted JT. Cellular and systems consolidation of Declarative Memory. In: Axmacher N, Rasch B, editors. Cognitive Neuroscience of Memory Consolidation. Studies in Neuroscience, Psychology and Behavioral Economics. Springer; 2017. p. 3–16.

28. Dunsmoor JE, Murty VP, Davachi L, Phelps EA. Emotional learning selectively and retroactively strengthens episodic memories for related events. Nature. 2015; 520(7547): 345–348. doi: 10.1038/nature14106 25607357

29. Cahill L, McGaugh JL. Mechanisms of emotional arousal and lasting declarative memory. Trends in Neuroscience. 1998; 21(7): 294–299.

30. Hamann SB, Ely TD, Grafton ST, Kilts CD. Amygdala activity related to enhanced memory for pleasant and aversive stimuli. Nature Neuroscience. 1999; 2(3): 289–293. doi: 10.1038/6404 10195224

31. Canli T, Zhao Z, Brewer J, Gabrieli JD, Cahill, L. Event-related activation in the human amygdala associates with later memory for individual emotional experience. Journal of Neuroscience. 2000; 20(19): RC99. 11000199

32. Gaskell MG, Warker J, Lindsay S, Frost R, Guest J, Snowdon R, Stackhouse A. Sleep underpins the plasticity of language production. Psychological Science. 2014; 25(7): 1457–1465. doi: 10.1177/0956797614535937 24894583

33. Cairney SA, Lindsay S, Paller KA, Gaskell MG. Sleep preserves original and distorted memory traces. Cortex. 2018; 99: 39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.10.005 29145007

34. Hu P, Stylos-Allan M, Walker MP. Sleep facilitates consolidation of emotional declarative memory. Psychological Science. 2006; 17(10): 891–898. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01799.x 17100790

35. Payne JD, Stickgold R, Swanberg K, Kensinger EA. Sleep preferentially enhances memory for emotional components of scenes. Psychological Science. 2008; 19(8): 781–788. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02157.x 18816285

36. Stickgold R., & Walker M. P. Sleep-dependent memory triage: Evolving generalization through selective processing. Nat Neurosci. 2013; 16(2): 139–145. doi: 10.1038/nn.3303 23354387

37. Fenn KM, Shintel H, Atkins AS, Skipper JI, Bond VC, Nusbaum HC. When less is heard than meets the ear: change deafness in a telephone conversation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2011; 64(7): 1442–56. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.570353 21604232

38. Moreland RL, Zajonc RB. Exposure effects in person perception: Familiarity, similarity, and attraction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1982; 18(5): 395–415.

39. Baudouin JY, Gilibert D, Sansone S, Tiberghien G. When the smile is a cue to familiarity. Memory. 2000; 8(5): 285–292. doi: 10.1080/09658210050117717 11045237

40. Gerard HB, Green D, Hoyt M, Conolley ES. Influence of affect on exposure-frequency estimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1973; 28(1): 151–154. doi: 10.1037/h0035573 4780231

41. Van Lancker D, Ohnesorge C. Personally familiar proper names are relatively successfully processed in the human right hemisphere, or, the missing link. Brain and Language. 2002; 80(2): 121–129. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2564 11827439

42. Lavner Y, Gath I, Rosenhouse J. The effects of acoustic modifications on the identification of familiar voices speaking isolated vowels. Speech Communication. 2000; 30(1): 9–26.

43. Stanislaw H, Todorov N. Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers. 1999; 31(1): 137–149.

44. Pennebaker JW, Booth RJ, Boyd RL, Francis ME. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC2015. 2015. Austin, TX: Pennebaker Conglomerates (www.LIWC.net).

45. Coker DA, Burgoon J. The nature of conversational involvement and nonverbal encoding patterns. Human Communication Research. 1987; 13(4), 463–494.

46. Talmi D, McGarry LM. Accounting for immediate emotional memory enhancement. Journal of Memory and Language. 2012; 66(1): 93–108.

47. Talmi D, Schimmack U, Paterson T, Moscovitch M. The role of attention and relatedness in emotionally enhanced memory. Emotion. 2007; 7(1): 89–102. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.89 17352566

48. Legge GE, Grosmann C, Pieper CM. Learning unfamiliar voices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1984; 10(2): 298–303.

49. Hammersley R, Read JD. The effect of participation in a conversation on recognition and identification of the speakers' voices. Law and Human Behavior. 1985; 9(1): 71–81.

50. Wenndt SJ. Human recognition of familiar voices. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2016; 140(2):1172–1183. doi: 10.1121/1.4958682 27586746

51. Reuterskiöld C, Van Lancker Sidtis D. Retention of idioms following one-time exposure. Child Language Teaching and Therapy. 2012; 29(2): 219–231.

52. Brown R, Kulik J. Flashbulb memories. Cognition. 1977; 5(1): 73–99.

53. Neisser U, Winograd E, Bergman ET, Schreiber CA, Palmer SE, Weldon MS. Remembering the earthquake: Direct experience vs. hearing the news. Memory. 1996; 4(4): 337–357. doi: 10.1080/096582196388898 8817459

54. Finkenauer C, Luminet O, Gisle L, el-Ahmadi A, van der Linden M, Philippot P. Flashbulb memories and the underlying mechanisms of their formation: Toward an emotional-integrative model. Memory & Cognition. 1998; 26(3): 516–31.

55. Maguiness C, Roswandowitz C, Von Kriegstein K. Understanding the mechanisms of familiar voice-identity recognition in the human brain. Neuropsychologia. 2018; 116(Pt B): 179–193. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.039 29614253

56. Stevenage SV. Drawing a distinction between familiar and unfamiliar voice processing: A review of neuropsychological, clinical and empirical findings. Neuropsychologia. 2017; 116(Pt B): 162–178. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.005 28694095

57. Vitevitch MS. Change deafness: The inability to detect changes between two voices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2003; 29(2): 333–342. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.333 12760619

58. Van Lancker D, Cummings J, Kreiman J, Dobkin BH. Phonagnosia: A dissociation between familiar and unfamiliar voices. Cortex. 1988; 24(2): 195–209. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(88)80029-7 3416603

59. Gainotti G. How can familiar voice recognition be intact if unfamiliar voice discrimination is impaired? An introduction to this special section on familiar voice recognition. Neuropsychologia. 2018; 116(Pt B): 151–153. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.003 29627274

60. Holmes E, Domingo Y, Johnsrude I. Familiar voices are more intelligible, even if they are not recognized as familiar. Psychological Science, 2018; 29(10): 1575–1583. doi: 10.1177/0956797618779083 30096018

61. Johnsrude IS, Mackey A, Hakyemez H, Alexander E, Trang HP, Carlyon RP. Swinging at a cocktail party: voice familiarity aids speech perception in the presence of a competing voice. Psychological Science. 2013; 24(10): 1995–2004. doi: 10.1177/0956797613482467 23985575

62. Holeckova I, Fischer C, Giard MH, Delpuech C, Morlet D. Brain responses to a subject’s own name uttered by a familiar voice. Brain Research. 2006; 1082(1): 142–152. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.089 16703673

63. Tanaka YL, Kudo Y. Effects of familiar voices on brain activity. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2012; 18(Suppl 2): 38–44 doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2012.02027.x 22776531

64. Gregg MK, Samuel AG. Change deafness and the organizational properties of sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2008; 34(4), 974–991. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.974 18665739

65. Phelps EA. Human emotion and memory: Interactions of the amygdala and hippocampal complex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2004; 14(2): 198–202. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.015 15082325

66. Cahill L, Babinsky R., Markowitsch HJ, McGaugh JL. The amygdala and emotional memory. Nature. 1995; 377(6547): 295–296. doi: 10.1038/377295a0 7566084

67. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. In: Lang PJ, Simons RF, Balaban M, editors. Attention and emotion: Sensory and motivational processes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 1997. p. 97–135.

68. Davis M. The role of the amygdala in conditioned and unconditioned fear and anxiety. In: Aggleton JP, editor. The Amygdala, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 213–287.

69. Vuilleumier P, Pourtois G. Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotion face perception: evidence from functional neuroimaging. Neuropsychologia. 2007; 45(1): 174–194. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.003 16854439

70. Schupp HT, Flaisch T, Stockburger J, Junghöfer M. Emotion and attention: event-related brain potential studies. Progress in Brain Research. 2006; 156: 31–51. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56002-9 17015073

71. Van Lancker D, Canter GJ. Impairment of voice and face recognition in patients with hemispheric damage. Brain and Cognition. 1982; 1(2): l85–195.

72. Belin P, Zatorre RJ, Lafaille P, Ahad P, Pike B. Voice-selective areas in human auditory cortex. Nature. 2000; 403(6767): 309–312. doi: 10.1038/35002078 10659849

73. Van Lancker D. Personal relevance and the human right hemisphere. Brain and Cognition. 1991; 17(1): 64–92. 1781982

74. Van Lancker Sidtis D. Ancient of Days: The vocal pattern as primordial big bang of communication. In: Belin P, Frühholz S, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Voice Perception. Oxford University Press. 2018.

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 10