The pragmatic role of trust in young children’s interpretation of unfamiliar signals


Autoři: Olivier Mascaro aff001;  Dan Sperber aff002
Působiště autorů: Institute for Cognitive Sciences, CNRS UMR5304/Lyon 1 University, Bron, France aff001;  Social Mind Center, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224648

Souhrn

What role does children’s trust in communication play in their acquisition of new meanings? To answer, we report two experimental studies (N = 81) testing how three- to four-year-olds interpret the meaning of a novel communicative device when it is used by a malevolent and potentially deceptive informant. Children participated in a hiding game in which they had to find a reward hidden in one of two boxes. In the initial phase of the experiments, a malevolent informant always indicated the location of the empty box using a novel communicative device, either a marker (Study 1), or an arrow (Study 2). During that phase, 3- and 4-year-olds learned to avoid the box indicated by the novel communicative device. In the second phase of the test, the malevolent informant was replaced by a benevolent one. Nevertheless, children did not change their search strategy, and they kept avoiding the box tagged by the novel communicative device as often as when it had been produced by the malevolent informant. These results suggest that during the initial phase, children (i) did not consider the possibility that the malevolent informant might intend to deceive them, and (ii) did not ignore the unfamiliar communicative signal or treat it as irrelevant. Instead, children relied on the unfamiliar communicative signal to locate the empty box’s location. These results suggest that children’s avoidance of the location indicated by an unfamiliar signal is not unambiguous evidence for distrust of such signal. We argue that children’s trust in ostensive communication is likely to extend to unfamiliar communicative means, and that this presumption of trustworthiness plays a central role in children’s acquisition of new meanings.

Klíčová slova:

Behavior – Communication equipment – Communications – Frogs – Children – Learning – Social communication – Speech signal processing


Zdroje

1. Lewis D. Convention. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1969.

2. Coady CAJ. Testimony: A philosophical study. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992.

3. Harris PL, Koenig MA. Trust in testimony: How children learn about science and religion. Child Dev. 2006;77(3): 505–524. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00886.x 16686784

4. Clément F. To Trust or not to Trust? Children’s Social Epistemology. Rev Phil Psychol. 2010;1(4): 531–549.

5. Harris PL, Corriveau KH. Young children’s selective trust in informants. Phil T Roy Soc B: Biol Sci. 2011;366(1567):1179–1187.

6. Mills CM. Knowing when to doubt: developing a critical stance when learning from others. Dev Psychol. 2013;49(3): 404–418. doi: 10.1037/a0029500 22889395

7. Nurmsoo E, Robinson EJ, Butterfill SA. Children’s Selective Learning from Others. Rev Phil Psychol. 2010;1(4): 551–561.

8. Clément F, Koenig M, Harris P. The ontogenesis of trust. Mind Lang. 2004;19(4): 360–379.

9. Ma L, Ganea PA. Dealing with conflicting information: young children’s reliance on what they see versus what they are told. Dev Sci. 2010;13(1): 151–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00878.x 20121871

10. Robinson EJ, Whitcombe EL Children's suggestibility in relation to their understanding about sources of knowledge. Child Dev. 2003;74(1): 48–62. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00520 12625435

11. Mascaro O, Sperber D The moral, epistemic, and mindreading components of children’s vigilance towards deception. Cognition 2009;112(3): 367–380. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.012 19540473

12. Mascaro O, Morin O. Epistemology for Beginners: Two-to Five-Year-Old Children's Representation of Falsity. PloS one 2015;10(10): e0140658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140658 26484675

13. Heyman GD, Sritanyaratana L, Vanderbilt KE. Young children's trust in overtly misleading advice. Cog Sci. 2013;37(4): 646–667.

14. Jaswal VK, Croft AC, Setia AR, Cole CA. Young children have a specific, highly robust bias to trust testimony. Psychol Sci. 2010; 21(10): 1541. doi: 10.1177/0956797610383438 20855905

15. Vanderbilt KE, Liu D, Heyman GD. The development of distrust. Child Dev. 2011;82(5): 1372–1380. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01629.x 21824130

16. Mascaro O, Morin O, Sperber D. Optimistic expectations about communication explain children's difficulties in hiding, lying, and mistrusting liars. J Child Lang. 2016;44(5): 1041–1064. doi: 10.1017/S0305000916000350 27748210

17. Grice P. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1989.

18. Sperber D, Wilson D. Relevance: Communication and cognition. 2d ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 1995.

19. Origgi G. Is trust an epistemological notion? Episteme 2004;1(1): 61–72.

20. Carey S, Bartlett E. Acquiring a single new word. Papers and Reports on Child Lang Dev. 1978;15: 17–29.

21. Jaswal VK, Markman EM. Learning proper and common names in inferential versus ostensive contexts. Child Dev. 2001;72(3): 768–786. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00314 11405581

22. Gergely G, Bekkering H, Király I. Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature 2002;415(6873): 755–755.

23. Meltzoff AN. Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Dev Psychol. 1995;31(5): 838–850. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.31.5.838 25147406

24. Csibra G, Gergely G. Natural pedagogy. Trends Cog Sci. 2009;13(4): 148–153.

25. Mascaro O, Morin O. Gullible’s travel: How honest and trustful children become vigilant communicators. In: Einav S, Robinson E, editors. Trust and skepticism: Children's selective learning from testimony. Psychology Press; 2014. pp. 69–83.

26. Palmquist CM, Burns HE, Jaswal VK. Pointing disrupts preschoolers’ ability to discriminate between knowledgeable and ignorant informants. Cog Dev. 2012;27(1): 54–63.

27. Couillard NL, Woodward AL. Children’s comprehension of deceptive points. Br J Dev Psychol. 1999;17: 515–521.

28. Tomasello M, Call J, Gluckman A. Comprehension of novel communicative signs by apes and human children. Child Dev. 1997;68(6): 1067–1080. 9418226

29. Call J, Tomasello M. A nonverbal false belief task: The performance of children and great apes. Child Dev. 1999;70(2): 381–395. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00028 10218261

30. Vanderbilt KE, Heyman GD, Liu D. In the absence of conflicting testimony young children trust inaccurate informants. Dev Sci. 2014;17(3): 443–451. doi: 10.1111/desc.12134 24444426

31. Leekam SR, Solomon TL, Teoh YS. Adults’ social cues facilitate young children’s use of signs and symbols. Dev Sci. 2010;13(1): 108–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00862.x 20121867

32. Landrum AR, Mills CM, Johnston AM. When do children trust the expert? Benevolence information influences children's trust more than expertise. Dev Sci. 2013;16(4): 622–638. doi: 10.1111/desc.12059 23786479

33. Lane J. D., Wellman H. M., & Gelman S. A. (2013). Informants' traits weigh heavily in young children's trust in testimony and in their epistemic inferences. Child Dev. 84(4), 1253–1268. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12029 23240893

34. Boseovski JJ. Trust in testimony about strangers: Young children prefer reliable informants who make positive attributions. J Exp Child Psychol. 2012;111(3): 543–551. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.10.008 22115450

35. Liu D, Gelman SA, Wellman HM. Components of Young Children’s Trait Understanding: Behavior‐to‐Trait Inferences and Trait‐to‐Behavior Predictions. Child Dev. 2007;78(5): 1543–1558. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01082.x 17883447


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 10