Antimicrobial efficacy of commercially available endodontic bioceramic root canal sealers: A systematic review


Autoři: Marija Šimundić Munitić aff001;  Tina Poklepović Peričić aff002;  Ana Utrobičić aff003;  Ivona Bago aff004;  Livia Puljak aff005
Působiště autorů: Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Dental Polyclinic Split; School of Dental Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia aff001;  Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia aff002;  Cochrane Croatia, Central Medical Library, School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia aff003;  Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia aff004;  Department of Evidence Based Medicine and Health Care, Catholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia aff005
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223575

Souhrn

Background

Recently, a new generation of bioceramic root canal sealers has been introduced onto the market. Many in vitro studies have investigated the antimicrobial properties of these sealers, but their comparative efficacy in antimicrobial activity is still unknown.

Methodology

Three electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE and Embase via the OvidSP platform, and Web of Science, up to June 25, 2019. Studies were included irrespective of study design, type of publication and language. Reporting quality was assessed by two authors independently. Meta-analysis was not performed due to studies being highly heterogeneous.

Results

We included 37 studies that analysed the antimicrobial effects of bioceramic sealers. Most of them used a planktonic cell model, with the exception of nine studies which used biofilms. It was not possible to make direct comparison of results from studies and to give a clear conclusion about the comparative antimicrobial activity of these materials because the studies used heterogeneous sources and ages of microorganisms, setting and contact times of sealers, and antimicrobial tests. Furthermore, some materials showed completely different results when tested with different methods.

Conclusions

In conclusion, multiple in vitro studies have shown that bioceramic sealers may have various degrees of antimicrobial activity. However, it is still impossible to make conclusions about their comparative efficacy and to recommend the use of one over another in clinical practice because the studies available were conducted in different ways, which makes meta-analysis futile. A uniform methodological approach, consistent definitions and studies on humans are urgently needed in this field of research so that recommendations for practice can be made.

Klíčová slova:

Antibacterials – Bacterial biofilms – Biofilms – Confocal laser microscopy – Database searching – Enterococcus faecalis – Staphylococcus aureus – Bioceramics


Zdroje

1. Beyth N, Kesler Shvero D, Zaltsman N, Houri-Haddad Y, Abramovitz I, Davidi PM, et al. (2013) Rapid kill-novel endodontic sealer and Enterococcus faecalis. PLoS One 8: e78586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078586 24223159

2. Upadya MH, Kishen A (2010) Influence of bacterial growth modes on the susceptibility to light-activated disinfection. Int Endod J 43: 978–987. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01717.x 20722757

3. Shen Y, Qian W, Chung C, Olsen I, Haapasalo M (2009) Evaluation of the effect of two chlorhexidine preparations on biofilm bacteria in vitro: a three-dimensional quantitative analysis. J Endod 35: 981–985. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.030 19567319

4. Stojicic S, Shen Y, Haapasalo M (2013) Effect of the source of biofilm bacteria, level of biofilm maturation, and type of disinfecting agent on the susceptibility of biofilm bacteria to antibacterial agents. J Endod 39: 473–477. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.024 23522539

5. Gagliani MM, Gorni FG, Strohmenger L (2005) Periapical resurgery versus periapical surgery: a 5-year longitudinal comparison. Int Endod J 38: 320–327. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00950.x 15876296

6. Orstavik D, Pitt Ford TR (1998) Apical periodontitis. Microbial infection and host responses. Essential Endodontology: Prevention and treatment of apical periodontitis. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.

7. Hancock HH 3rd, Sigurdsson A, Trope M, Moiseiwitsch J (2001) Bacteria isolated after unsuccessful endodontic treatment in a North American population. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology & Endodontics 91: 579–586.

8. Bystrom A, Sundqvist G (1985) The antibacterial action of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic therapy. Int Endod J 18: 35–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1985.tb00416.x 3922900

9. Siqueira JF Jr., Magalhaes KM, Rocas IN(2007) Bacterial reduction in infected root canals treated with 2.5% NaOCl as an irrigant and calcium hydroxide/camphorated paramonochlorophenol paste as an intracanal dressing. J Endod 33: 667–672. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.01.004 17509403

10. Kapralos V, Koutroulis A, Orstavik D, Sunde PT, Rukke HV (2018) Antibacterial Activity of Endodontic Sealers against Planktonic Bacteria and Bacteria in Biofilms. J Endod 44: 149–154. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.023 29153733

11. AlShwaimi E, Bogari D, Ajaj R, Al-Shahrani S, Almas K, Majeed A. (2016) In Vitro Antimicrobial Effectiveness of Root Canal Sealers against Enterococcus faecalis: A Systematic Review. J Endod 42: 1588–1597. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.001 27623499

12. Wainstein M, Morgental RD, Waltrick SB, Oliveira SD, Vier-Pelisser FV, Figueiredo JA, et al. (2016) In vitro antibacterial activity of a silicone-based endodontic sealer and two conventional sealers. Braz Oral Res 30.

13. Heyder M, Kranz S, Volpel A, Pfister W, Watts DC, Jandt KD, et al. (2013) Antibacterial effect of different root canal sealers on three bacterial species. Dental Materials 29: 542–549. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.02.007 23523285

14. Farmakis ET, Kontakiotis EG, Tseleni-Kotsovili A, Tsatsas VG (2012) Comparative in vitro antibacterial activity of six root canal sealers against Enterococcus faecalis and Proteus vulgaris. J Investig Clin Dent 3: 271–275. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1626.2012.00159.x 23129142

15. Anumula L, Kumar S, Kumar VS, Sekhar C, Krishna M, Pathapati RM, et al. (2012) An Assessment of Antibacterial Activity of Four Endodontic Sealers on Enterococcus faecalis by a Direct Contact Test: An In Vitro Study. ISRN Dentistry 2012: 989781. doi: 10.5402/2012/989781 22888444

16. Morgental RD, Vier-Pelisser FV, Oliveira SD, Antunes FC, Cogo DM, Kopper PM. (2011) Antibacterial activity of two MTA-based root canal sealers. Int Endod J 44: 1128–1133. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01931.x 21895702

17. Al-Haddad A, Che Ab Aziz ZA (2016) Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Review. Int J Biomater: 9753210. doi: 10.1155/2016/9753210 27242904

18. Krell KF, Wefel JS (1984) A calcium phosphate cement root canal sealer—scanning electron microscopic analysis. J Endod 10: 571–576. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(84)80103-X 6394690

19. Haapasalo H (2015) Clinical use of bioceramic materials. Endodontic Topics 32: 97–117.

20. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M (2010) Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review—Part III: Clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endod 36: 400–413. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.009 20171353

21. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M (2010) Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review—Part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endod 36: 16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.006 20003930

22. Torabinejad M, Parirokh M, Dummer PMH (2018) Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview—part II: other clinical applications and complications. Int Endod J 51: 284–317. doi: 10.1111/iej.12843 28846134

23. Ber BS, Hatton JF, Stewart GP (2007) Chemical modification of proroot mta to improve handling characteristics and decrease setting time. J Endod 33: 1231–1234. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.012 17889696

24. Zhang W, Li Z, Peng B (2009) Assessment of a new root canal sealer's apical sealing ability. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology & Endodontics 107: e79–82.

25. Loushine BA, Bryan TE, Looney SW, Gillen BM, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, et al. (2011) Setting properties and cytotoxicity evaluation of a premixed bioceramic root canal sealer. J Endod 37: 673–677. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.01.003 21496669

26. Hess D, Solomon E, Spears R, He J (2011) Retreatability of a bioceramic root canal sealing material. J Endod 37: 1547–1549. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.016 22000460

27. Zhang H, Shen Y, Ruse ND, Haapasalo M (2009) Antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers by modified direct contact test against Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 35: 1051–1055. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.022 19567333

28. Zhang W, Li Z, Peng B (2010) Ex vivo cytotoxicity of a new calcium silicate-based canal filling material. Int Endod J 43: 769–774. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01733.x 20546044

29. Candeiro GT, Correia FC, Duarte MA, Ribeiro-Siqueira DC, Gavini G (2012) Evaluation of radiopacity, pH, release of calcium ions, and flow of a bioceramic root canal sealer. J Endod 38: 842–845. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.029 22595123

30. Wang Z (2015) Bioceramic materials in endodontics. Endodontic Topics 32: 3–30.

31. CfRa D (2009) Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in healthcare. York, UK: University of York

32. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6: e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 19621072

33. Gurel M (2016) Antimicrobial activities of different bioceramic root canal sealers on various bacterial species. International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences 2: 19–22.

34. Nezhadshamsi P, Forghan-parast K, Sahranavard Z (2014) Comparasion of the antibacterial effects of three endodontic root canal sealers (AH 26, AH Plus and MTA Fillapex) on Enterococcus faecalis. Iranian Journal of Public Health 43: 32.

35. Brezic A, Pezelj-Ribaric S, Baraba A (2017) Antibacterial effect of root canal filling materials Antibakterijski ucinak materijala za punjenje korijenskih kanala. Acta Stomatologica Croatica 51 (1): 79.

36. Del Carpio-Perochena A, Kishen A, Shrestha A, Bramante CM (2015) Antibacterial Properties Associated with Chitosan Nanoparticle Treatment on Root Dentin and 2 Types of Endodontic Sealers. Journal of endodontics 41: 1353–1358. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.03.020 25958178

37. Du TF, Wang ZJ, Shen Y, Ma JZ, Cao YG, Haapasalo M (2015) Combined Antibacterial Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite and Root Canal Sealers against Enterococcus faecalis Biofilms in Dentin Canals. Journal of Endodontics 41: 1294–1298. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.04.023 26092772

38. Arias-Moliz MT, Camilleri J (2016) The effect of the final irrigant on the antimicrobial activity of root canal sealers. Journal of Dentistry 52: 30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.06.008 27377571

39. Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M (2014) Dentin extends the antibacterial effect of endodontic sealers against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. J Endod 40: 505–508. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.042 24666900

40. Faria-Junior NB, Tanomaru-Filho M, Berbert FL, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM (2013) Antibiofilm activity, pH and solubility of endodontic sealers. Int Endod J 46: 755–762. doi: 10.1111/iej.12055 23441819

41. Alsubait S, Albader S, Alajlan N, Alkhunaini N, Niazy A, Almahdy A (2019) Comparison of the antibacterial activity of calcium silicate- and epoxy resin-based endodontic sealers against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms: a confocal laser-scanning microscopy analysis. Odontology: 107: 513–520. doi: 10.1007/s10266-019-00425-7 30927150

42. Bukhari S, Karabucak B (2019) The Antimicrobial Effect of Bioceramic Sealer on an 8-week Matured Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm Attached to Root Canal Dentinal Surface. J Endod 45: 1047–1052 doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.04.004 31160079

43. Zordan-Bronzel CL, Tanomaru-Filho M, Rodrigues EM, Chavez-Andrade GM, Faria G, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM (2019) Cytocompatibility, bioactive potential and antimicrobial activity of an experimental calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer. Int Endod J 52: 979–986. doi: 10.1111/iej.13086 30702145

44. Willershausen I, Callaway A, Briseno B, Willershausen B (2011) In vitro analysis of the cytotoxicity and the antimicrobial effect of four endodontic sealers. Head & face medicine 7: 15.

45. Ozcan E, Yula E, Arslanoglu Z, Inci M (2013) Antifungal activity of several root canal sealers against Candida albicans. Acta Odontol Scand 71: 1481–1485. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2013.771405 24180589

46. Madani ZS, Sefidgar SA, Rashed Mohasel A, Zabihi E, Mesgarani A, Miri SS (2014) Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial activity of two root canal sealers: MTA Fillapex and AH 26. Minerva Stomatol 63: 267–272. 25299361

47. Nirupama DN, Nainan MT, Ramaswamy R, Muralidharan S, Usha HH, Sharma R, et al. (2014) In Vitro Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Four Endodontic Biomaterials against Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans, and Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Biomater 2014: 383756. doi: 10.1155/2014/383756 25371678

48. Weckwerth PH, Lima FL, Greatti VR, Duarte MA, Vivan RR (2015) Effects of the association of antifungal drugs on the antimicrobial action of endodontic sealers. Braz Oral Res 29.

49. Del Carpio-Perochena A, Kishen A, Felitti R, Bhagirath AY, Medapati MR, Lai C, et al. (2017) Antibacterial Properties of Chitosan Nanoparticles and Propolis Associated with Calcium Hydroxide against Single- and Multispecies Biofilms: An In Vitro and In Situ Study. J Endod 43: 1332–1336. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.017 28578886

50. Colombo M, Poggio C, Dagna A, Meravini MV, Riva P, Trovati F, et al. (2018) Biological and physico-chemical properties of new root canal sealers. J Clin Exp Dent 10: e120–e126. doi: 10.4317/jced.54548 29670728

51. Shin JH, Lee DY, Lee SH (2018) Comparison of antimicrobial activity of traditional and new developed root sealers against pathogens related root canal. J Dent Sci 13: 54–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2017.10.007 30895095

52. Gholamhoseini Z, Alizadeh S, Bolbolian M (2018) IN VITRO EVALUATION OF ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF THREE BIOCERAMIC ENDODONTIC SEALERS AGAINST ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS AND STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS. Annals of Dental Specialty 6: 261–263.

53. Dalmia S, Gaikwad A, Samuel R, Aher G, Gulve M, Kohle S (2018) Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Endodontic Sealers against Enterococcus faecalis: An In vitro Study. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry 8: 104–109.

54. Jafari F, Jafari S, Samadi Kafil H, Momeni T, Jamloo H (2017) Antifungal Activity of Two Root Canal Sealers against Different Strains of Candida. Iran Endod J 12: 98–102. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.20 28179934

55. Jafari F, Samadi Kafil H, Jafari S, Aghazadeh M, Momeni T (2016) Antibacterial Activity of MTA Fillapex and AH 26 Root Canal Sealers at Different Time Intervals. Iran Endod J 11: 192–197. doi: 10.7508/iej.2016.03.009 27471530

56. Poggio C, Trovati F, Ceci M, Colombo M, Pietrocola G (2017) Antibacterial activity of different root canal sealers against Enterococcus faecalis. J Clin Exp Dent 9: e743–e748. doi: 10.4317/jced.53753 28638549

57. Shakya VK, Gupta P, Tikku AP, Pathak AK, Chandra A, Yadav RK, et al. (2016) An Invitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy and Flow Characteristics for AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, CRCS and Gutta Flow 2 Root Canal Sealer. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research JCDR 10: ZC104–108.

58. Hasheminia M, Razavian H, Mosleh H, Shakerian B (2017) In vitro evaluation of the antibacterial activity of five sealers used in root canal therapy. Dental Research Journal 14: 62–67. 28348620

59. Thanish Ahamed S, Geetha RV (2017) Comparative effect of commercially available endodontic sealers against Enterococcus faecalis. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research 44: 186–187.

60. Nejadshamsi P, Bagheri S, Sahranavard M, Bashardoust N (2017) Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial effect of MTA fillapex sealer with two Resin-based sealers. International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research 8: 1056–1060.

61. Omidi S, Hoshyari N, Mirzadeh AR, Hassanabadi ME, Ahajan M, Yazdani Charati J, et al. (2018) Comparison of Antibacterial Activity of Three Endodontic Sealers against Enterococcus faecalis. Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science 6: 413–417.

62. Prathita T, Djauharie NK, Meidyawati R (2019) Antimicrobial activity of mineral trioxide aggregate and calcium hydroxide sealer on enterococcus faecalis strain ATCC29212. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics 11: 123–125.

63. Al-Haddad A, Abu Kasim NH, Che Ab Aziz ZA (2015) Interfacial adaptation and thickness of bioceramic-based root canal sealers. Dent Mater J 34: 516–521. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2015-049 26235718

64. Debelian GJ (2016) The use of premixed bioceramic materials in endodontics. Giornale italiano di endodonzia 30: 70–80.

65. Candeiro GT, Moura-Netto C, D'Almeida-Couto RS, Azambuja-Junior N, Marques MM, Cai S, et al. (2015) Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and antibacterial effectiveness of a bioceramic endodontic sealer. Int Endod J 49: 858–864. doi: 10.1111/iej.12523 26281002

66. Singh G, Gupta I, Elshamy FM, Boreak N, Homeida HE (2016) In vitro comparison of antibacterial properties of bioceramic-based sealer, resin-based sealer and zinc oxide eugenol based sealer and two mineral trioxide aggregates. European journal of dentistry 10: 366–369. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.184145 27403055

67. Singh G, Elshamy FM, Homeida HE, Boreak N, Gupta I (2016) An in vitro Comparison of Antimicrobial Activity of Three Endodontic Sealers with Different Composition. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice [Electronic Resource] 17: 553–556. 27595721

68. Mohammadi Z, Giardino L, Palazzi F, Shalavi S (2012) Antibacterial activity of a new mineral trioxide aggregate-based root canal sealer. International Dental Journal 62: 70–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00090.x 22420474

69. Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru-Filho M, Hotta J, Watanabe E, Ito IY (2008) Antimicrobial activity of endodontic sealers based on calcium hydroxide and MTA. Acta odontologica latinoamericana: AOL 21: 147–151. 19177851

70. Jafari F, Jafari S (2017) Composition and physicochemical properties of calcium silicate based sealers: A review article. J Clin Exp Dent 9: e1249–e1255. doi: 10.4317/jced.54103 29167717

71. Silva Almeida LH, Moraes RR, Morgental RD, Pappen FG (2017) Are Premixed Calcium Silicate-based Endodontic Sealers Comparable to Conventional Materials? A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. J Endod 43: 527–535.

72. Donnermeyer D, Burklein S, Dammaschke T, Schafer E (2019) Endodontic sealers based on calcium silicates: a systematic review. Odontology 107: 421–436 doi: 10.1007/s10266-018-0400-3 30554288

73. Kayaoglu G, Orstavik D (2004) Virulence factors of Enterococcus faecalis: relationship to endodontic disease. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 15: 308–320. 15470268

74. Menezes MM, Valera MC, Jorge AO, Koga-Ito CY, Camargo CH, Mancini MN (2004) In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of irrigants and intracanal medicaments on microorganisms within root canals. Int Endod J 37: 311–319. doi: 10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00799.x 15086752

75. Zehnder M, Guggenheim B (2009) The mysterious appearance of enterococci in filled root canals. Int Endod J 42: 277–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01537.x 19220511

76. Chavez de Paz LE, Hamilton IR, Svensater G (2008) Oral bacteria in biofilms exhibit slow reactivation from nutrient deprivation. Microbiology 154: 1927–1938. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2008/016576-0 18599821

77. Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjogren U (1998) Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 85: 86–93. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(98)90404-8 9474621

78. Donlan RM, Costerton JW (2002) Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 15: 167–193. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.2.167-193.2002 11932229

79. Peciuliene V, Reynaud AH, Balciuniene I, Haapasalo M (2001) Isolation of yeasts and enteric bacteria in root-filled teeth with chronic apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 34: 429–434. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00411.x 11556508

80. Nair PN, Sjogren U, Krey G, Kahnberg KE, Sundqvist G (1990) Intraradicular bacteria and fungi in root-filled, asymptomatic human teeth with therapy-resistant periapical lesions: a long-term light and electron microscopic follow-up study. J Endod 16: 580–588. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80201-9 2094761

81. De Deus G (2012) Editorial. International Endodontic Journal 45: 1063–1064. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02104.x 23167733

82. Lovato KF, Sedgley CM (2011) Antibacterial activity of endosequence root repair material and proroot MTA against clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 37: 1542–1546. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.022 22000459


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 10