#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Selection of valid reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR in Cotesia chilonis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) exposed to different temperatures


Authors: Qiu-Yu Li aff001;  Zi-Lan Li aff001;  Ming-Xing Lu aff001;  Shuang-Shuang Cao aff001;  Yu-Zhou Du aff001
Authors place of work: School of Horticulture and Plant Protection & Institute of Applied Entomology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China aff001;  Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, the Ministry, Yangzhou, China aff002
Published in the journal: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Category: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226139

Summary

In quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), data are normalized using reference genes, which helps to control for internal differences and reduce error among samples. In this study, the expression profiles of eight candidate housekeeping genes, 18S ribosomal (18S rRNA), elongation factor (EF1), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), ribosomal protein L10 (RPL10), ribosomal protein L17 (RPL17), histone 3 (H3), arginine kinase (AK), amd β-Actin (ACTB), were evaluated in the parasitic wasp Cotesia chilonis in response to different temperatures. Specifically, the performance and stabilities of these genes were compared in adult wasps maintained in a growth condition at 27°C (normal storage conditions) and in adults obtained from pupae refrigerated at 4°C for five days (cold storage conditions). Data were analyzed using the ΔCt method, BestKeeper, NormFinder, and geNorm. The optimal numbers and stabilities of reference genes varied between the two temperature treatments (27°C and 4°C). In samples stored at normal developmental temperature (27°C), the requirement for normalization in response to low temperature exposures was three genes (18S, H3, AK), whereas normalization in response to high temperature exposures required only two reference genes (GAPDH, ACTB). In samples stored at cold temperature (4°C), for low temperature exposures two reference genes (RPL17, RPL10) were required for standardization, while following high temperature exposures three reference genes (18S, H3, ACTB) were needed. This study strengthens understanding of the selection of reference genes before qRT-PCR analysis in C. chilonis. The reference genes identified here will facilitate further investigations of the biological characteristics of this important parasitoid.

Keywords:

Gene expression – Insects – Polymerase chain reaction – RNA extraction – Larvae – Ribosomal RNA – Specimen storage – RNA isolation

Introduction

Cotesia chilonis (Matsumura) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) is native to parts of southeastern and eastern Asia [1, 2]. Cotesia chilonis is the dominant parasitoid of the rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae, which is a serious pest in China, particularly in the Yangtze River area and southern regions of China. C. chilonis is also an important biological control agent of some other stem borers and was previously imported into several African countries as a biological control agent [3, 4, 5]. Related biological characteristics of C. chilonis have been studied in previous researches, such as fecundity, parasitism rate, and sex ratio [6, 7]. Besides, there are few studies about the storage methods of C. chilonis, so we want to explore low temperatures to extend its shelf life so that it can be better utilized in the future.

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was initially described in 1992 [8] and has become a widely used approach to analyze gene expression due to it’s accuracy, high reproducibility and sensitivity [9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. Unfortunately, variation in RNA isolation, cDNA quantification, transcription, and amplification can cause qRT-PCR to be error-prone [14, 15, 16, 17]. To correct this problem, reference genes are widely used to normalize qRT-PCR data, which can reduce error among samples and control for internal differences [18, 19]. However, no one gene exhibits constant expression under all test conditions; therefore, computational programs such as BestKeeper [16], NormFinder [20], and geNorm [21] are used to evaluate the performance of reference genes and identify the optimal set of reference genes for normalization for a particular species or biological sample [22, 23].

A number of reference genes are commonly used in the literature, especially housekeeping genes [14, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31] such as 18S (18S rRNA), TUB (encoding tubulin), and ACTB (β-actin). Many of these genes are involved in cellular maintenance and structural functions, and it is often assumed that they are expressed uniformly regardless of test conditions. However, the expression of these reference genes can, in fact, vary depending on test conditions [32, 33]. In this study, we evaluated eight candidate reference genes (18S rRNA, ACTB, GAPDH, EF1, H3, RPL17, RPL10, and AK) for expression stability in C. chilonis samples stored either at 27 oC or 4 oC and subjected to different temperatures. The reference genes identified in this study provide useful information on the ecological adaptation of this parasitoid wasp and will promote future research of gene expression.

Materials and methods

Biological samples

Chilo suppressalis and C. chilonis were collected from a suburb of Yangzhou (32.39°N, 119.42°E) and maintained in a laboratory growth chamber at 27 ± 1°C with a 16:8 h (light/dark) photoperiod and 60–70% RH [7]. Chilo suppressalis larvae were reared on six- to seven-day-old rice plants. The parasitoid wasps, C. chilonis, were reared on C. suppressalis larvae. Adults of both insect species were supplied with 10% honey solution. No specific permission was required for these activities, and the field studies did not involve endangered or protected species.

Temperature treatments

Samples Stored at Normal Temperatures (27°C): cocoons and adults of C. chilonis were reared in a growth chamber maintained at a constant temperature of at 27 ± 1°C. Adults were then exposed to -13, -12, -9, -6, -3, 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, or 36°C for 1 h prior to RNA extraction. Each experimental group contained 20 adults, and all experiments were repeated three times.

Samples Stored at Cold Temperatures (4 oC): cocoons of C. chilonis were stored at 4 oC for five days and then transferred to an environmental growth maintained at 27 ± 1°C. Adults were collected after eclosion, and then exposed to the above temperature. Each experimental group contained 20 adults, and all experiments were repeated three times.

Cloning of selected reference genes

The eight housekeeping genes (18S rRNA, EF1, GAPDH, RPL10, RPL17, H3, AK, and ACTB) were amplified from C. chilonis, cloned, and sequenced (Table 1). Primer Premier 5 software was used to design primer pairs for subsequent amplification of genes from C. chilonis (http://www.premierbiosoft.com/primerdesign/index.html). Sequences for the eight primers, calculation efficiency (E), and Tm values are shown in Table 1.

Tab. 1. Primer sequences and characteristics of amplified reference genes.
Primer sequences and characteristics of amplified reference genes.

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from C. chilonis with the SV Total RNA isolation system (Promega, USA), followed by DNase treatment to eliminate DNA contamination. RNA integrity of the samples was confirmed by comparing the ribosomal RNA bands in ethidium bromide-stained gels. RNA purity was measured by spectrophotometry at A260 and A280 (Eppendorf Biophotometer). To confirm consistent amounts of cDNA, RNA concentrations were measured twice for each sample. Reverse transcription of RNA (0.5 μg) into first strand cDNA was carried out using the Bio-Rad iScriptTM cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, USA). Real-time PCR reactions were performed in a 20 μl reaction volume containing 10 μl Bio-Rad iTaqTM Universal SYBR® Greensupermix (2x) (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Berkeley, USA), 1 μl (10 μM) of each gene-specific primer (Table 1), 2 μl cDNA template and 6 μl of water. Reactions were performed with a Bio-Rad CFX-96 real-time PCR system as follows: 3 min of polymerase activation at 95 oC, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 oC for 30 s, and annealing for 30 s at the Tm for each gene (Table 1). Melting curve analysis from 65 oC to 95 oC was conducted to evaluate the specificity of the amplified PCR products. Each treatment included three replicates, and each reaction was performed in triplicate.

Data analysis

Data were analyzed with Bio-Rad CFX Manager TM 3.1 software. The threshold cycle (Ct value) represents the first cycle where the fluorescence signal is significantly different in comparison with the background. Average Ct values were calculated based on all biological replicates. Expression stability of the eight candidate reference genes was evaluated using the geNorm (http://medgen.ugent.be/jvdesomp/genorm/index.php) [34], ΔCt method [35], NormFinder (http://www.mdl.dk/publicationsnormfinder.htm) [20], and and BestKeeper (http://www.wzw.tum.de/genequantification/bestkeeper.html) [16]. The ΔCt method utilizes relative pair-wise comparisons, and standard deviations (SD) are used to rank the stability. geNorm calculates the expression stability value (M) of each gene and then performs pair-wise comparison (Vn/Vn+1) of individual genes with other genes [34]. NormFinder uses a model-based approach to estimate expression variation in the selection of suitable reference genes [20]. Genes with the lowest values are the most stable. BestKeeper can select the optimal reference gene and sort the genetic stability by inputting the original Ct value and the PCR efficiency E value.

Results

Validation of PCR assays

All PCR assays resulted in production of a single amplicon, ranging in size from 72 to 203 bp, depending on the primer pair used (Table 1). Furthermore, a single, sharp peak was confirmed in melting curve analysis for each amplicon. A standard curve was generated for each gene, using eight, 10-fold serial dilutions (10−0 to 10−7) of the pooled cDNAs with Bio-Rad CFX ManagerTM 3.1 software. All genes displayed efficiency (E values) between 91–106.7% (Table 1).

Expression profiles of candidate reference genes

The mean Ct values of the eight reference genes ranged from 13.25 (18S) to 25.13 (EF1). H3 showed the smallest Ct value among all the experimental samples followed by RPL10, 18S, AK, RPL17, ACTB, GAPDH, and EF1 (Fig 1A). However, in samples stored at 27 oC (normal conditions) and exposed to high and low temperatures, the smallest Ct values were observed for GAPDH (Fig 1B) and H3 (Fig 1C), respectively. In samples stored at 4 oC and exposed to high and low temperatures, H3 (Fig 1D) and RPL10 (Fig 1E) showed the smallest Ct variations, respectively. In summary, no specific reference gene is suitable for all experimental treatments.

Expression stability of candidate reference genes in <i>C</i>. <i>chilonis</i> exposed to different temperatures.
Fig. 1. Expression stability of candidate reference genes in C. chilonis exposed to different temperatures.
(A) All C. chilonis samples (n = 272). Samples stored at 27°C and then exposed to (B) high temperatures (n = 32) or (C) low temperatures (n = 104). Ct values of reference genes in C. chilonis subjected to cold storage (4°C) and then exposed to (D) high temperatures (n = 40) or (E) low temperatures (n = 112). Solid circles denote the mean of duplicate samples and the bars indicate minimum to maximum values.

Gene expression in samples stored at 27 oC

geNorm was used to calculate the mean expression stability (M values) and to plot the effects of different factors by using pairwise comparisons. The most unstable gene showed the highest M value and was subsequently excluded. In samples stored at 27 oC (normal conditions) and then exposed to low temperatures, the ΔCt method showed that the most reference genes with the most stable rates of expression were 18S/ACTB (SD = 1.329) and the least stable reference gene was EF1 (SD = 1.735) (Table 2). However, according to the results of geNorm, the stability ranking from the most to the least stable was 18S+H3 > AK > GAPDH > ACTB > RPL10 > EF1 > RPL17, which was consistent with results obtained with Normfinder. BestKeeper identified H3 as the reference gene with the most stable expression stability at low temperatures (Table 3).

Tab. 2. Ranking of candidate reference genes of Cotesia chilonis stored at 27 oC and then subjected to low temperatures.
Ranking of candidate reference genes of <i>Cotesia chilonis</i> stored at 27 <sup>o</sup>C and then subjected to low temperatures.
Tab. 3. Ranking of candidate reference genes of Cotesia chilonis stored at 27 oC and then exposed to high temperatures.
Ranking of candidate reference genes of <i>Cotesia chilonis</i> stored at 27 <sup>o</sup>C and then exposed to high temperatures.

In samples stored at 27 oC and then exposed to high temperatures, the ΔCt method indicated that GAPDH (SD = 0.330) was the most stable, and RPL17 (SD = 0.637) was the least stable reference genes (Table 3). geNorm analysis ranked reference gene stability as GAPDH+ACTB >18S > RPL10 >H3 > AK > EF1 > RPL17, which was similar to results from Normfinder and BestKeeper.

In conclusion, when samples were stored at 27 oC and then exposed to high temperatures, the most stable reference gene was GAPDH (Table 3). However, when samples were exposed to low temperatures, 18S showed greater expression stability (Table 2).

Gene expression in samples stored at 4 oC

For samples stored at 4 oC and then exposed to low temperatures, geNorm ranked reference gene expression stability as RPL10/RPL17 > H3 > GAPDH > ACTB > AK > 18S > EF1. However, the ranking obtained with BestKeeper was slightly different. According to the ΔCt method, GAPDH (SD = 0.494) was the most stable and EF1 (SD = 0.682) was the least stable reference gene, respectively (Table 4). In samples stored at 4 oC and then exposed to high temperatures, the ΔCt method, geNorm, BestKeeper, and Normfinder all identified H3 as the most stable and AK as least stable reference gene, respectively (Table 5). geNorm ranked the overall expression stability order as 18S+H3 > ACTB > RPL10 > RPL17 > EF1 > GAPDH > AK. In conclusion, under low temperature conditions the most stable reference gene was GAPDH (Table 4), while under high temperature conditions H3 showed more stability (Table 5).

Tab. 4. Ranking of candidate reference genes of Cotesia chilonis stored at 4 oC and then subjected to low temperatures.
Ranking of candidate reference genes of <i>Cotesia chilonis</i> stored at 4 <sup>o</sup>C and then subjected to low temperatures.
Tab. 5. Ranking of candidate reference genes of Cotesia chilonis stored at 4 oC and then subjected to high temperatures.
Ranking of candidate reference genes of <i>Cotesia chilonis</i> stored at 4 <sup>o</sup>C and then subjected to high temperatures.

Optimal numbers of reference genes for normalization

Pairwise variation (Vn/Vn+1) was calculated by geNorm. In samples stored at 27 oC, analysis of exposure to low temperatures showed that pairwise variation values for V3/4 were below the proposed cut-off value of 0.15; therefore, three reference genes were optimal (Fig 2). Interestingly, all V ratios from samples stored at 27 oC and exposed to high temperatures were below the value of 0.15; thus, additional genes were not required. Therefore, in samples at 27 oC, the required number of reference genes for low and high temperatures was three (18S, H3, AK) and two (GAPDH, ACTB), respectively.

Optimal number of reference genes for normalization in <i>C</i>. <i>chilonis</i> stored at 27°C. Pairwise variation (Vn/Vn+1) was analyzed between normalization factors NFn and NFn+1 by geNorm to determine the optimal number of reference genes.
Fig. 2. Optimal number of reference genes for normalization in C. chilonis stored at 27°C. Pairwise variation (Vn/Vn+1) was analyzed between normalization factors NFn and NFn+1 by geNorm to determine the optimal number of reference genes.
When values fell below the 0.15 cut-off value (dashed line), additional genes were not required for normalization of gene expression.

In samples stored at 4 oC and exposed to low temperatures, geNorm analysis indicated V ratios that were above the proposed cut-off value of 0.15 (Fig 3). In contrast, all the pair-wise variation values of samples exposed to high temperatures fell below the 0.15 cut-off, and normalization of these samples required two reference genes (Fig 3). According to the geNorm manual, the threshold of 0.15 must not be taken as an absolute cut-off, and three best reference genes is in most cases a valid normalization strategy. In summary, for samples stored at 4 oC, the requirement for exposure to low and high temperatures was three (RPL17, RPL10, H3) and two (18S, H3) reference genes, respectively.

Optimal number of reference genes for normalization in <i>C</i>. <i>chilonis</i> stored at 4°C.
Fig. 3. Optimal number of reference genes for normalization in C. chilonis stored at 4°C.
Pairwise variation (Vn/Vn+1) was analyzed between normalization factors NFn and NFn+1 by geNorm to determine the optimal number of reference genes. When values fell below the 0.15 cut-off, additional genes were not required for normalization of gene expression.

Discussion

qRT-PCR is an accurate and sensitive technique to semi-quantitative PCR and northern blot hybridizations for gene expression [36,37]; however, in the design of effective qRT-PCR studies it is essential to select the appropriate reference gene [12, 13, 17, 20, 38, 39, 40], and multiple reference genes were used to improve the analysis of gene expression [17, 22, 23, 41]. This is the first study to define suitable reference genes for RT-qPCR in C. chilonis. Here, we used the ΔCt method and three Excel-based algorithms, e.g. geNorm, Normfinder and BestKeeper, to evaluate the stability of eight potential reference genes in C. chilonis stored at 27 or 4 oC.

In C. chilonis stored at 27 oC and exposed to low temperatures, the ideal reference genes were 18S, H3, and AK (according to geNorm), 18S (per Normfinder) and H3, RPL10, AK and 18S (based on BestKeeper). When these results are considered together, 18S emerges as a consensus reference gene for samples exposed to low temperatures. V2/3 values < 0.15 indicated that three stably-expressed genes were required for normalization of samples stored at 27 oC. GAPDH emerged as the most stable reference gene based on the three algorithms when samples stored at 27 oC were exposed to high temperatures.

When C. chilonis was stored at 4 oC and exposed to low temperatures, RPL17 and RPL10 emerged as stable reference genes using geNorm, H3 was identified based on Normfinder, and RPL10 and GAPDH were identified by BestKeeper. Collectively, these results suggest that H3 and RPL17 are the most suitable reference genes for samples stored at 4 oC.

In Apis mellifera, the best reference genes were RPL49, EF1, AK and GAPDH [42,43,44], and AK was found most stable in other insects, such as Bombus lucorum, Spodoptera litura [45, 46]. However, expression of these genes was too unstable to be used for normalization in C. chilonis. In our study, both the identity and number of reference genes were different for samples stored at 27 and 4 oC. EF1 catalyzes GTP-dependent binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to ribosome receptor sites and has been widely used as a reference gene for insects [32, 41, 47]. However, EF1 was not a suitable reference gene in the current study. 18S has long been considered an ideal reference gene due to the fact that the expression level of rRNA varies less than mRNA [9, 48, 49]. Furthermore, in four coccinellid species, 18S was stably expressed throughout the majority of biotic and abiotic conditions. However, in our study, 18S was a useful reference gene for samples stored at 27 oC but was less reliable in experiments conducted with samples stored at 4 oC. This result is consistent with those of earlier studies where 18S was used in different tissues of Bactrocera dorsalis and to study physiological responses in Drosophila melanogaster [50].

In summary, we evaluated the stability of eight candidate reference genes for use in qRT-PCR studies of C. chilonis. This study provides a standardized procedure for quantification of gene expression in C. chilonis and also identifies parameters that must be considered when studying gene expression in this species. Our results will facilitate future qRT-PCR experiments of this parasitoid and will provide valuable data on the most suitable genes to use when the insect is stored at 27 or 4 oC.


Zdroje

1. Huang J, Wu SF, Ye GY. Evaluation of lethal effects of chlorantraniliprole on Chilo suppressalis and its larval parasitoid, Cotesia chilonis. Agr Sci China 2011; 10:1134–1138.

2. Wu SF, Sun FD, Qi YX, Yao Y, Fang Q, Huang J, Stanley D, Ye GY. Parasitization by Cotesia chilonis Influences Gene Expression in Fatbody and Hemocytes of Chilo suppressalis. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e74309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074309 24086331

3. Okech SHO, Overholt WA. Comparative biology of Cotesia chilonis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on selected African gramineous stemborers. Biocontrol Sci. Techn. 1996; 6: 595–602.

4. Hailemichael Y, Schulthess F, Smith J, Overholt W, Chabi-Olaye A. Resource allocation and bionomics of indigenous and exotic Cotesia (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) species reared on Sesamia calamistis B. Entomol. Res. 2008; 98:405–415.

5. Pan DD, Lu MX, Cao SS, Yan WF, Du YZ. Species and occurrence dynamics of parasitic wasps of the rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Yangzhou. Journal of Environmental Entomology. 2016; 38(6): 1106–1113.

6. Kajita H, Drake EF. Biology of Apanteles chilonis and A. flavipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) parasites of Chilo suppressalis. Mushi. 1969.

7. Pan DD, Cao SS, Lu MX, Hang SB, Du YZ. Genes encoding heat shock proteins in the endoparasitoid wasp, Cotesia chilonis, and their expression in response to temperatures. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2018; 17(5): 1012–1022.

8. Higuchi R, Dollinger G, Walsh PS, Griffith R. Simultaneous amplification and detection of specific DNA sequences. Biotech. 1992; 10:413–417.

9. Bustin S. Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays, J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2000; 25: 169–193. doi: 10.1677/jme.0.0250169 11013345

10. Ginzinger DG. Gene quantification using real-time quantitative PCR: an emerging technology hits the mainstream. Exp. Hematol. 2002; 30: 503–512. doi: 10.1016/s0301-472x(02)00806-8 12063017

11. Kubista M, Andrade J.M, Bengtsson M, Forootan A, Jonák J, Lind K, Sindelka R, Sjöback R, Sjögreen B, Strömbom L, Ståhlberg A, Zoric N. The real-time polymerase chain reaction. Mol. Aspects Med. 2006; 27: 95–125. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2005.12.007 16460794

12. VanGuilder HD, Vrana KE, Freeman WM. Twenty-five years of quantitative PCR for gene expression analysis. Biotechniques. 2008; 44: 619–626. doi: 10.2144/000112776 18474036

13. Citri A, Pang Z, Südhof T, Wernig M, Malenka RC. Comprehensive qPCR profiling of gene expression in single neuronal cells. Nat. Protoc. 2012; 7: 118–117.

14. Thellin O, Zorzi W, Lakaye B, De Borman B, Coumans B, Hennen G, Grisar T, Igout A. Heinen E Housekeeping genes as internal standards: use and limits. J. Biotech. 1999; 75: 291–295.

15. Suzuki T, Higgins PJ, Crawford DR. Control selection for RNA quantitation. Biotech. 2000; 29: 332–337.

16. Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: Bestkeeper-Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotech. Lett. 2004; 26: 509–515.

17. Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, Mueller R, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW, Shipley GL, Vandesompele J. The MIQE guidelines: Minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin. Chem. 2009; 55: 611–622. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797 19246619

18. Derveaux S, Vandesompele J, Hellemans J. How to do successful gene expression analysis using real-time PCR. Methods. 2010;50: 227–230. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.11.001 19969088

19. Tunbridge EM, Eastwood SL, Harrison PJ. Changed relative to what? housekeeping genes and normalization strategies human brain gene expression studies. Biol. Psychiatry. 2011; 69: 173–179. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.05.023 20673871

20. Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Ørntoft TF. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 2004;64: 5245–5250. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0496 15289330

21. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol.2011; 3: 1–12.

22. Fu W, Xie W, Zhang Z, Wang SL, Wu QJ, Liu Y, Zhou XM, Zhou XG, Zhang YJ. Exploring valid reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR analysis in Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2013; 9: 792. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.5862 23983612

23. Li R, Xie W, Wang S, Wang S.L, Wu QJ, Liu Y, Zhou XM, Zhou XG, Zhang YJ. Reference gene selection for qRT-PCR analysis in the sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e53006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053006 23308130

24. Jin P, Zhao Y, Ngalame Y, Panelli MC, Nagorsen D, Monsurró V, Smith K, Hu N, Su H, Taylor PR, Marincola FM, Wang E. Selection and validation of endogenous reference genes using a high throughput approach. BMC Genomics. 2004; 5: 55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-5-55 15310404

25. Radonić A, Thulke S, Mackay IM, Landt O, Siegert W, Nitsche A. Guideline to reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004; 313: 856–862 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.11.177 14706621

26. Huggett J, Dheda K, Bustin S, Zumla A. Real-time RT-PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations. Genes Immun. 2005; 6: 279–284 doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6364190 15815687

27. Nicot N, Hausman JF, Hoffmann L, Evers D. Housekeeping gene selection for real-time RT-PCR normalization in potato during biotic and abiotic stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2005; 56: 2907–2914. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri285 16188960

28. Hendriks-Balk MC, Michel MC, Alewijnse AE. Pitfalls in the normalization of real-time polymerase chain reaction data. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2007; 102: 195–197. doi: 10.1007/s00395-007-0649-0 17370033

29. Guénin S, Mauriat M, Pelloux J, Van Wuytswinkel O, Bellini C, Gutierrez L. Normalization of qRT-PCR data: the necessity of adopting a systematic, experimental conditions specific, validation of references. J. Exp. Bot. 2009; 60: 487–493. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern305 19264760

30. Paolacci AR, Tanzarella OA, Porceddu E, Ciaffi M. Identification and validation of reference genes for quantitative RT-PCR normalization in wheat. BMC Mol. Biol. 2009; 10:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-10-11 19232096

31. Xie W, Meng QS, Wu QJ, Wang SL, Yang X, Yang NN, Li RM, Jiao XG, Pan HP, Liu BM, Su Q, Xu BY, Hu SN, Zhou XG, Zhang YJ. Pyrosequencing the Bemisia tabaci transcriptome reveals a highly diverse bacterial community and a robust system for insecticide resistance. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e35181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035181 22558125

32. Zheng YT, Li HB, Lu MX, Du YZ. Evaluation and validation of reference genes for qRT-PCR normalization in Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). PloS one. 2014; 9: e111369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111369 25356721

33. Xu J, Lu MX, Cui YD, Du YZ. Selection and Evaluation of Reference Genes for Expression Analysis Using qRT-PCR in Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2017; doi: 10.1093/jee/tow297

34. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002; 3: 1–12.

35. Xie F, Sun G, Stiller JW, Zhang B. Genome-wide functional analysis of the cotton transcriptome by creating an integrated EST database. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6: e26980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026980 22087239

36. Wong ML, Medrano JF. Real-time PCR for mRNA quantitation. Bio Techniques. 2005; 39: 75–85.

37. Nolan T, Hands RE, Bustin SA. Quantification of mRNA using real-time RT-PCR. Nat Protoc.2006; 1: 1559–1582. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.236 17406449

38. Bustin SA, Benes V, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR–a perspective. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2005; 34 (2005) 597–601.

39. Willems E, Mateizel I, Kemp C, Cauffman G, Sermon K, Leyns L. Selection of reference genes in mouse embryos and in differentiating human and mouse ES cells. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2006; 50:627–635. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.052130ew 16892176

40. Huis R, Hawkins S, Neutelings G. Selection of reference genes for quantitative gene expression normalization in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2010; 10:71. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-71 20403198

41. Cheng D, Zhang Z, He X, Liang GW. Validation of reference genes in Solenopsis invicta in different developmental stages, castes and tissues. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e57718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057718 23469057

42. Lourenco AP, Mackert A, Cristino AS, Simes ZLP. Validation of reference genes for gene expression studies in the honey bee, Apis mellifera, by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Apidologie. 2008; 39: 372–385.

43. Scharlaken B, De Graaf DC, Goossens K, Brunain M, Peelman L, Jacobs FJ. Reference gene selection for insect expression studies using quantitative real-time PCR: The head of the honeybee, Apis mellifera, after a bacterial challenge. J Insect Sci. 2008; 8(33):1–10.

44. Kucharski R, Maleszka R. Arginine kinase is highly expressed in the compound eye of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Gene. 1998; 211(2):343–349. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(98)00114-0 9602169

45. Horňáková D, Matoušková P, Kindl J, Valterová I, Pichová I. Selection of reference genes for real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis in tissues from Bombus terrestris and Bombus lucorum of different ages. Analytical Biochemistry. 2010; 397(1):118–120. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.09.019 19751695

46. Lu YH, Yuan M, Gao XW, Kang TH, Zhan S, Wan H, Li JH. Identification and Validation of Reference Genes for Gene Expression Analysis Using Quantitative PCR in Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(7):e68059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068059 23874494

47. Sun M, Lu MX, Tang XT, Du YZ. Exploring valid reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR analysis in Sesamia inferens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). PloS one. 2015; 10: e0115979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115979 25585250

48. Winnepenninckx B, Backeljau De, Wachtert R. Investigation of molluscan phylogeny on the basis of 18S rRNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 1996; 13 (10): 1306–1317. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025577 8952075

49. Weigand AM, Dinapoli A, Klussmann-Kolb A. Research note 18S rRNA variability map for Gastropoda. J Mollus Stud. 2011; 78(1): 151–156.

50. Shen GM, Jiang HB, Wang XN, Wang JJ. Evaluation of endogenous references for gene expression profiling in different tissues of the oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). BMC Mol. Biol. 2010; 11:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-11-7


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 12
Nejčtenější tento týden
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova

Svět praktické medicíny 1/2024 (znalostní test z časopisu)
nový kurz

Koncepce osteologické péče pro gynekology a praktické lékaře
Autoři: MUDr. František Šenk

Sekvenční léčba schizofrenie
Autoři: MUDr. Jana Hořínková

Hypertenze a hypercholesterolémie – synergický efekt léčby
Autoři: prof. MUDr. Hana Rosolová, DrSc.

Význam metforminu pro „udržitelnou“ terapii diabetu
Autoři: prof. MUDr. Milan Kvapil, CSc., MBA

Všechny kurzy
Kurzy Podcasty Doporučená témata Časopisy
Přihlášení
Zapomenuté heslo

Zadejte e-mailovou adresu, se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.

Přihlášení

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#