Physical space interacts with clonal fragmentation and nutrient availability to affect the growth of Salvinia natans


Autoři: Chao Si aff001;  Yu Jin aff002;  Jing Lin aff002;  Jian-Feng Zhang aff002;  Jin-Song Chen aff003;  Fei-Hai Yu aff001
Působiště autorů: School of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China aff001;  Institute of Wetland Ecology & Clone Ecology, Taizhou University, Taizhou, China aff002;  College of Life Science, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China aff003
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226850

Souhrn

Physical space, clonal fragmentation and nutrient availability can each affect the growth of clonal plants, but their interactive effect has been little studied. We grew un-fragmented (connected) and fragmented (disconnected) ramet pairs of the floating, clonal plant Salvinia natans in cylindrical containers with different diameters and heights (volumes) filled with solutions of two nutrient levels (high vs. low). To simulate competition environments that are commonly confronted by S. natans, we also added two ramets of another floating plants Spirodela polyrrhiza in each container. Biomass (total biomass, floating biomass and submerged biomass) and number of ramets of S. salvinia were higher in the containers with a larger diameter. Compared to the low nutrient level, the high nutrient level increased number of ramets, and altered submerged to floating mass ratio of S. salvinia. The impacts of physical space on floating mass and number of ramets were stronger under the high than under the low nutrient level. Clonal fragmentation positively affected biomass in the containers with a smaller volume (a smaller height and diameter), but had little impact in the containers with a larger volume (a larger height or diameter). Our results suggest that physical space can interact with nutrients and clonal fragmentation to affect the performance of S. salvinia under competition.

Klíčová slova:

Biomass – Ecosystems – Leaves – Plant communities – Plant growth and development – Plant physiology – Fronds – Greenhouses


Zdroje

1. Meerhoff M, Mazzeo N, Moss B, Rodríguez-Gallego L. The structuring role of free-floating versus submerged plants in a subtropical shallow lake. Aquat Ecol. 2003;4: 377–391.

2. Giblin SM, Houser JN, Sullivan JF, Langrehr HA, Rogala JT, Campbell BD. Thresholds in the response of free-floating plant abundance to variation in hydraulic connectivity, nutrients, and macrophyte abundance in a large floodplain river. Wetlands. 2014;3: 413–425.

3. Wang P, Zhang Q, Xu YS, Yu FH. Effects of water level fluctuation on the growth of submerged macrophyte communities. Flora. 2016;223: 83–89.

4. Zhang LM, Alpert P, Si C, Yu FH. Interactive effects of fragment size, nutrients, and interspecific competition on growth of the floating, clonal plant Salvinia natans. Aquat Bot. 2019;153: 81–87.

5. Song MH, Dong M. Clonal plants and plant species diversity in wetland ecosystems in China. J Veg Sci. 2003;2: 237–244.

6. Sosnová M, Diggelen RV, Klimešová J. Distribution of clonal growth forms in wetlands. Aquat Bot. 2010;1: 33–39.

7. Song YB, Yu FH, Keser LH, Dawson W, Fischer M, Dong M, et al. United we stand, divided we fall: a meta-analysis of experiments on clonal integration and its relationship to invasiveness. Oecologia. 2013;2: 317–327.

8. Wei GW, Shu Q, Luo FL, Chen YH, Dong BC, Mo LC, et al. Separating effects of clonal integration on plant growth during submergence and de-submergence. Flora. 2018;246–247: 118–125.

9. Huber H, Visser EJW, Clements G, Peters JL. Flooding and fragment size interact to determine survival and regrowth after fragmentation in two stoloniferous Trifolium species. Aob Plants. 2014;6: u24.

10. Wang P, Xu YS, Dong BC, Xue W, Yu FH. Effects of clonal fragmentation on intraspecific competition of a stoloniferous floating plant. Plant Biol. 2014;6: 1121–1126.

11. Li HL, Xu YS, Wang YY, Yu NQ, Zhang MX, Lei GC, et al. Does clonal fragmentation of the floating plant Eichhornia crassipes affect the growth of submerged macrophyte communities. Folia Geobot. 2015;50: 283–291.

12. Barrat-Segretain MH. Strategies of reproduction, dispersion, and competition in river plants: a review. Vegetatio. 1996;1: 13–37.

13. Zhou J, Li HL, Alpert P, Zhang MX, Yu FH. Fragmentation of the invasive, clonal plant Alternanthera philoxeroides decreases its growth but not its competitive effect. Flora. 2017;228: 17–23.

14. Stuefer JF, Gómez S, van Mölken T. Clonal integration beyond resource sharing: implications for defence signalling and disease transmission in clonal plant networks. Evol Ecol. 2004;5–6: 647–667.

15. Dong BC, Alpert P, Zhang Q, Yu FH. Clonal integration in homogeneous environments increases performance of Alternanthera philoxeroides. Oecologia. 2015;179: 393–403. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3338-y 26009243

16. Lin HF, Alpert P, Zhang Q, Yu FH. Facilitation of amphibious habit by physiological integration in the clonal, perennial, climbing herb Ipomoea aquatica. Sci Total Environ. 2018;618: 262–268. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.025 29128776

17. Dong BC, Alpert P, Guo W, Yu FH. Effects of fragmentation on the survival and growth of the invasive, clonal plant Alternanthera philoxeroides. Biol Invasions. 2012;6: 1101–1110.

18. Nesmith DS, Duval JR. The effect of container size. Horttechnology. 1998;4: 495–498.

19. Grams TEE, Lüttge U. Space as a resource. Prog Bot. 2010;26: 349–370.

20. Si C, Zhang LM, Yu FH. Physical space and nutrients affect intraspecific competition of a floating fern. Aquat Ecol. 2019;2: 295–302.

21. Yiftach V, Nativ D, Leonid M, Lev G, Ravit F, Anny D. Effects of pot size on leaf production and essential oilcontent and composition of Eucalyptus citriodora Hook. (lemon-scentedgum). J Herbs Spic Med Plants. 2009;15: 164–176.

22. Cai ZP, Li YX, Duan SS, Zhu HH. Effects of container and light on the cell growth of two microalgae. J Guangdong Pharm Univ. 2014;5: 583–586.

23. Fox LJ, Struik PC, Appleton BL, Rule JH. Nitrogen phytoremediation by water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms). Water Air Soil Pollut. 2008;1–4: 199–207.

24. Gao Y, Yi N, Wang Y, Ma T, Zhou Q, Zhang ZH, et al. Effect of Eichhornia crassipes on production of N2 by denitrification in eutrophic water. Ecol Eng. 2014;68: 14–24.

25. Lu Q, He ZL, Graetz DA, Stoffella PJ, Yang X. Phytoremediation to remove nutrients and improve eutrophic stormwaters using water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes L.). Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2010;1: 84–96.

26. Saha SD, Jana BB. Nutrient removal potential of emergent (Scirpus articulatus) and floationg (Lemna major) macrophytes. Intern J Environ Studies. 2002;4: 489–502.

27. Jampeetong A, Brix H. Nitrogen nutrition of Salvinia natans: effects of inorganic nitrogen form on growth, morphology, nitrate reductase activity and uptake kinetics of ammonium and nitrate. Aquat Bot. 2009;1: 67–73.

28. Lin Y. Flora of China. Beijing: Science Press. 2000.

29. Święta-Musznicka J, Latałowa M, Szmeja J, Badura M. Salvinia natans in medieval wetland deposits in Gdańsk, northern Poland: evidence for the early medieval climate warming. J Paleolimnol. 2011;3: 369–383.

30. Wu Z, Li H. Flora of China. Beijing: Science Press. 1979.

31. Li Y, Cheng J, Zhong Y, Tang J. Effects of duckweed diversity on purifying eutrophic water. J Southern Agric. 2017; 48: 259–265.

32. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif Agric Exp Stn Circ. 1950;5406: 357–359.

33. Al-Menaie HS, Al-Ragam O, Al-Dosery N, Zalzaleh M, Mathew M, Suresh N. Effect of pot size on plant growth and multiplication of water lilies (Nymphaea sp). American-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci. 2012;2: 148–153.

34. Mccann MJ. Evidence of alternative states in freshwater lakes: a spatially-explicit model of submerged and floating plants. Ecol Model. 2016;337: 298–309.

35. Cahill JF, McNickle GG, Haag JJ, Lamb EG, Nyanumba SM, St Clair CC. Plants integrate information about nutrients and neighbors. Science. 2010;5986: 1657.

36. Chen BJW, During HJ, Vermeulen PJ, Kroon H, Poorter H, Anten NPR. Corrections for rooting volume and plant size reveal negative effects of neighbour presence on root allocation in pea. Funct Ecol. 2015;11: 1383–1391.

37. Semchenko M, Saar S, Lepik A. Plant root exudates mediate neighbour recognition and trigger complex behavioural changes. New Phytol. 2015;3: 631–637.

38. Bloom AJ, Chapin FS III, Mooney HA. Resource limitation in plants—an economic analogy. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1985;16: 363–392.

39. Müller I, Schmid B, Weiner J. The effect of nutrient availability on biomass allocation patterns in 27 species of herbaceous plants. Pers Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 2000;2: 115–127.

40. Liao MJ, Yu FH, Song MH, Zhang SM, Zhang JZ, Dong M. Plasticity in R / S ratio, morphology and fitness-related traits in response to reciprocal patchiness of light and nutrients in the stoloniferous herb, Glechoma longituba L. Acta. Oecologica. 2003;5: 231–239.

41. Mcconnaughay KDM, Coleman JS. Biomass allocation in plants: ontogeny or optimality? A test along three resource gradients. Ecology. 1999;8: 2581–2593.

42. King DA. Allocation of above-ground growth is related to light in temperate deciduous saplings. Funct Ecol. 2003;4: 482–488.

43. Xie YH, Yu D. The significance of lateral roots in phosphorus (P) acquisition of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). Aquat Bot. 2003;4: 311–321.

44. Qin HJ, Yong ZZ, Liu HQ, Liu MH, Wen XZ, Wang Y, et al. Growth characteristics and water purification of two free-floating macrophytes. Environ Sci. 2016;8: 2470–2479.

45. Costa ML, Santos MCR, Carrapiço F, Pereira AL. Anabaena's behaviour in urban wastewater and artificial media-influence of combined nitrogen. Water Res. 2009;15: 3743–3750.

46. Wang A, Jiang XX, Zhang QQ, Zhou J, Li HL, Luo FL, et al. Nitrogen addition increases intraspecific competition in the invasive wetland plant Alternanthera philoxeroides, but not in its native congener Alternanthera sessilis. Plant Spec Biol. 2015;3: 176–183.

47. Barrat-Segretain MH, Bornette G. Regeneration and colonization abilities of aquatic plant fragments: effect of disturbance seasonality. Hydrobiologia. 2000;1: 31–39.

48. Lin HF, Alpert P, Yu FH. Effects of fragment size and water depth on performance of stem fragments of the invasive, amphibious, clonal plant Ipomoea aquatica. Aquat Bot. 2012;99: 34–40.

49. You WH, Fan SF, Yu D, Xie D, Liu CH. An invasive clonal plant benefits from clonal integration more than a co-occurring native plant in nutrient-patchy and competitive environments. Plos One. 2014;5: e97246.

50. Wang P, Alpert P, Yu FH. Clonal integration affects allocation in the perennial herb Alternanthera philoxeroides in N-limited homogeneous environments. Folia Geobot. 2017;52: 303–315.

51. Wang YJ, Müller Schärer H, Van Kleunen M, Cai AM, Zhang P, Yan R, et al. Invasive alien plants benefit more from clonal integration in heterogeneous environments than natives. New Phytol. 2017;216.

52. Li X, Fan Z, Shen Y, Wang Y, Liu Y, Huang Q. Nutrient addition does not increase the benefits of clonal integration in an invasive plant spreading from open patches to plant communities. Plant Biol. 2019;21.

53. Wang N, Yu FH, Li PX, He WM, Liu J, Yu GL, et al. Clonal integration supports the expansion from terrestrial to aquatic environments of the amphibious stoloniferous herb Alternanthera philoxeroides. Plant Biol. 2009;11: 483–489. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00133.x 19470119

54. Chen JS, Lei NF, Dong M. Clonal integration improves the tolerance of Carex praeclara to sand burial by compensatory response. Acta Oecol. 2010;36: 23–28.

55. Zhang YC, Zhang QY. Clonal integration of Fragaria orientalis in reciprocal and coincident patchiness resources: cost-benefit analysis. Plos One. 2013;11: e80623.

56. Kelly CK. Thoughts on clonal integration: facing the evolutionary context. Evol Ecol. 1995;6: 575–585.

57. Martina JP, von Ende C. Increased spatial dominance in high nitrogen, saturated soil due to clonal architecture plasticity of the invasive wetland plant, Phalaris arundinacea. Plant Ecol. 2013;214: 1443–1453.

58. Stuefer JF, Huber H. Differential effects of light quantity and spectral light quality on growth, morphology and development of two stoloniferous Potentilla species. Oecologia. 1998;117: 1–8. doi: 10.1007/s004420050624 28308474

59. Yu FH, Dong M. Effect of light intensity and nutrient availability on clonal growth and clonal morphology of the stoloniferous herb Halerpestes ruthenica. J Integr Plant Biol. 2003;45: 408–416.

60. Klimeš L, Klimešová J. Biomass allocation in a clonal vine: effects of intraspecific competition and nutrient availability. Folia Geobot. 1994;2: 237–244.

61. Zhou J, Dong BC, Alpert P, Li HL, Zhang MX, Lei GC, et al. Effects of soil nutrient heterogeneity on intraspecific competition in the invasive, clonal plant Alternanthera philoxeroides. Ann Bot. 2012;4: 813–818.

62. Roiloa S, Sanchez Rodriguez P, Retuerto R. Heterogeneous distribution of soil nutrients increase intraspecific competition in the clonal plant Glechoma hederacea. Plant Ecol. 2014;215: 863–873.

63. Poorter H, Bühler J, van Dusschoten D, Climent J, Postma J. Pot size matters: a meta-analysis of the effects of rooting volume on plant growth. Funct Plant Biol. 2012;10–11: 839–850.


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 12