Equity in aid allocation and distribution: A qualitative study of key stakeholders in Northern Uganda

Autoři: Primus Che Chi aff001;  Patience Bulage aff003;  Gudrun Østby aff002
Působiště autorů: Department of Health Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya aff001;  Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), Oslo, Norway aff002;  Health Economics and HIV/AIDS Research Division (HEARD), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa aff003
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226612


The Sustainable Development Goals have spurred a growing interest in and focus on equitable development. In theory, donors can play an important role in promoting equity within a country by providing services, influencing government policies and incorporating equity into decision-making. However, we know little about whether this actually happens on the ground. We conduct what we believe is the first study to explore the extent to which equity is prioritised in the allocation and distribution of aid, based on in-depth interviews with government officials, bilateral and international donors, and implementing partners operating in Northern Uganda. We find that a broad category of people are perceived to be marginalised/vulnerable, with a substantial segment largely untargeted by major donor programmes. Various stakeholders employ a wide range of strategies to identify the most vulnerable individuals and groups, including the use of available data and statistics, consultation and engagement with relevant stakeholders, and undertaking primary data collection. The strategies used to incorporate equity in aid allocation and distribution include: targeting the regions of Northern Uganda and Karamoja in particular, targeting both refugees and host populations in refugee-hosting districts, prioritising the critically vulnerable in any aid distribution process, and using specific tools and consultants to ensure that major equity issues are addressed in proposals. Challenges undermining the process include poor understanding of the concept of equity among some implementing partners, lack of comprehensively disaggregated data, corruption, and political interference in choice of aid location from government officials and donors.

Klíčová slova:

Decision making – Disabilities – Elderly – Health statistics – Children – Research grants – Sexual and gender issues – Uganda


1. UNDP. UNDP support to the implementation of sustainable development goal 10: Reducing Inequalities within and among Countries. United Nations Development Programme, New York, USA. 2016. http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/Sustainable%20Development/10_Reducing_Inequality_Jan15_digital.pdf

2. World Health Organization. Equity [Webpage]. Accessed on May 21, 2019 at http://www.who.int/healthsystems/topics/equity/en/

3. EPA. Equitable Development and Environmental Justice. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Last updated Nov 8, 2018. www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/equitable-development-and-environmental-justice.

4. United Nations. The Sustainable Development Agenda. Frequently Asked Questions [Webpage]. Accessed on May 21, 2019 at https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda/

5. OECD. Evaluating Peacebuilding Activities in Settings of Conflict and Fragility: Improving Learning for Results, DAC Guidelines and References Series, OECD Publishing. 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264106802-en

6. Doucouliagos H, Manning E. The Allocation of Development Aid Assistance: Do new donors have old motives?. School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Deakin University; 2009 Jan 1.

7. Alesina A, Dollar D. Who gives foreign aid to whom and why?. Journal of economic growth. 2000 Mar 1;5(1):33–63.

8. Jones H. Equity in development: Why it is important and how to achieve it. Overseas development institute (ODI); 2009. https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/4577.pdf

9. O’Meara C. Scoping study of donor approaches to equity. Mimeo; 2008.

10. Joseph KT, Rice K, Li C. Integrating Equity in a Public Health Funding Strategy. Journal of public health management and practice: JPHMP. 2016 Jan;22(Suppl 1):S68.

11. Bermeo SB. Development and Strategy: Aid Allocation in an Interdependent World (September 22, 2010). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1681104 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1681104

12. Habraken R, Schulpen L, Hoebink P. Putting promises into practice: The New Aid Architecture in Uganda. Development Policy Review. 2017 Nov 1;35(6):779–95.

13. World Bank. Agriculture: A Driver of Growth and Poverty Reduction [Webpage]. KAMPALA, September 20, 2016. Accessed on May 21, 2019 at http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/uganda/publication/uganda-poverty-assessment-agriculture-a-driver-of-growth-and-poverty-reduction

14. World Bank. The Uganda Poverty Assessment Report 2016. Farms, cities and good fortune: assessing poverty reduction in Uganda from 2006 to 2013. Accessed on May 21, 2019 at http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/381951474255092375/pdf/Uganda-Poverty-Assessment-Report-2016.pdf

15. Fukuda-Parr S. Reducing inequality–The missing MDG: A content review of PRSPs and bilateral donor policy statements. IDS Bulletin. 2010 Jan;41(1):26–35

16. Büscher K, Komujuni S, Ashaba I. Humanitarian urbanism in a post-conflict aid town: aid agencies and urbanization in Gulu, Northern Uganda. Journal of Eastern African Studies. 2018 Apr 3;12(2):348–66.

17. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC medical research methodology. 2013 Dec;13(1):117.

18. Chi PC, Bulage P, Urdal H, Sundby J. A qualitative study exploring the determinants of maternal health service uptake in post-conflict Burundi and Northern Uganda. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2015 Dec;15(1):18.

19. Odokonyero T, Marty R, Muhumuza T, Ijjo AT, Owot Moses G. The impact of aid on health outcomes in Uganda. Health Econ. 2018 Apr;27(4):733–745. doi: 10.1002/hec.3632 Epub 2017 Dec 22. 29271088

20. Briggs RC. Does foreign aid target the poorest? International Organization. 2017;71(1):187–206.

21. Briggs RC. Leaving No One Behind? A New Test of Subnational Aid Targeting. Journal of International Development. 2018 Jul;30(5):904–10.

22. Briggs RC. Poor targeting: A gridded spatial analysis of the degree to which aid reaches the poor in Africa. World Development. 2018 Mar 31;103:133–48.

23. Ottersen T, Grépin KA, Henderson K, Pinkstaff CB, Norheim OF, Røttingen JA. New approaches to ranking countries for the allocation of development assistance for health: choices, indicators and implications. Health policy and planning. 2018 Feb 1;33(suppl_1):i31–46. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx027 29415238

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 12
Nejčtenější tento týden