Writing in the air: Facilitative effects of finger writing in older adults


Autoři: Yoshihiro Itaguchi aff001;  Chiharu Yamada aff002;  Kazuyoshi Fukuzawa aff002
Působiště autorů: Department of Computer Science, Shizuoka University, Hamamatsu, Japan aff001;  Department of Psychology, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226832

Souhrn

Kūsho, which refers to a behavior in which one moves the index finger as a substitute for a pen in the air or on a surface, mostly used when trying to recall the shape of a written character or the spelling of a word, has been known to facilitate cognitive task performance among kanji writing-system users. This study investigates whether the facilitative effect of kūsho, the existence of which has been exclusively confirmed in younger adults, is present in old age. Moreover, to further understand the interaction between finger movement and cognitive processing, we analyzed the correlation between the kūsho effect and factors such as age, mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score, and number of years of education. The kūsho effect was assessed by a task where participants mentally assembled a set of kanji subparts to form an actual character. The results showed a significant facilitative effect of kūsho and a strong negative correlation between kūsho effect and education. This study confirms the benefits of finger movement for solving cognitive tasks involving visual processing of written language among older adults and suggests the kūsho effect may be mediated by education.

Klíčová slova:

Behavior – Cognition – Cognitive impairment – Elderly – Fingers – Language – Vision


Zdroje

1. Lichtenberger EO, Kaufman AS. Essentials of WAIS-IV assessment: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.

2. Mayr U. Age differences in the selection of mental sets: the role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychol Aging. 2001;16(1):96. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.96 11302371

3. Bugg JM, DeLosh EL, Davalos DB, Davis HP. Age differences in Stroop interference: Contributions of general slowing and task-specific deficits. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition. 2007;14(2):155–67.

4. Verhaegen C, Poncelet M. Changes in naming and semantic abilities with aging from 50 to 90 years. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2013;19(2):119–26. doi: 10.1017/S1355617712001178 23237304

5. Lindenberger U, Baltes PB. Intellectual functioning in old and very old age: cross-sectional results from the Berlin Aging Study. Psychol Aging. 1997;12(3):410. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.12.3.410 9308090

6. Sasaki M. Why do Japanese write characters in space? International Journal of Behavioral Development. 1987;10(2):135–49.

7. Kess JF, Miyamoto T. Japanese psycholinguistics: A classified and annotated research bibliography: John Benjamins Publishing; 1994.

8. Endo Y. The role of a motoric aspect of representation: Spontaneous writing-like behavior in Japanese. Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues. 1988;2:459–63.

9. Itaguchi Y, Yamada C, Fukuzawa K. Writing in the air: Contributions of finger movement to cognitive processing. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0128419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128419 26061273

10. Itaguchi Y, Yamada C, Yoshihara M, Fukuzawa K. Writing in the air: A visualization tool for written languages. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0178735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178735 28575084

11. Thomas M. "Air writing" and second language learners’ knowledge of Japanese kanji. Japanese Language and Literature. 2013:23–58.

12. Thomas M. Air writing as a technique for the acquisition of Sino‐Japanese characters by second language learners. Language Learning. 2015;65(3):631–59.

13. Kess JF, Miyamoto T. Kanji knowledge as read-only vs. write-only: The effect of the computer age. Japan in the Global Age. 2001:175–87.

14. Yim-Ng RV, Andrade Jackie, Yuet-Yee. Contribution of finger tracing to the recognition of Chinese characters. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2000;35(4):561–71. doi: 10.1080/136828200750001296 11091824

15. Hoosain R. Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese: Psychology Press; 1991.

16. Springer MV, McIntosh AR, Winocur G, Grady CL. The relation between brain activity during memory tasks and years of education in young and older adults. Neuropsychology. 2005;19(2):181. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.19.2.181 15769202

17. Wilson R, Hebert L, Scherr P, Barnes L, De Leon CM, Evans D. Educational attainment and cognitive decline in old age. Neurology. 2009;72(5):460–5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000341782.71418.6c 19188578

18. Colsher PL, Wallace RB. Longitudinal application of cognitive function measures in a defined population of community-dwelling elders. Ann Epidemiol. 1991;1(3):215–30. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(91)90001-s 1669503

19. Stern Y, Albert S, Tang M-X, Tsai W-Y. Rate of memory decline in AD is related to education and occupation Cognitive reserve? Neurology. 1999;53(9):1942-. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.9.1942 10599762

20. Au R, Joung P, Nicholas M, Obler LK, Kass R, Albert ML. Naming ability across the adult life span. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition. 1995;2(4):300–11.

21. Amano S, Kondo T, editors. Estimation of mental lexicon size with word familiarity database. ICSLP; 1998.

22. Maher LM, Clayton MC, Barrett AM, Schober-Peterson D, Rothi LJG. Rehabilitation of a case of pure alexia: Exploiting residual abilities. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998;4(06):636–47.

23. Dejerine J. Sur un cas de cécité verbale avec agraphie suivi d’autopsie. Mémoires de la Société de Biologie. 1891;3:197–201.

24. Goldstein K. Language and language disturbances; aphasic symptom complexes and their significance for medicine and theory of language. 1948.

25. Kashiwagi T, Kashiwagi A. Recovery process of a Japanese alexic without agraphia. Aphasiology. 1989;3(1):75–91.

26. Tanaka S, Katayama M, Ozawa T, Inui T. A case of pure alexia who can read letters by observing others’ writing action. Japanese Journal of Neuropsychology. 2002;18:68–75.

27. Bartolomeo P, Bachoud-Lévi A-C, Chokron S, Degos D. Visually-and motor-based knowledge of letters: evidence from a pure alexic patient. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(8):1363–71. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00209-3 11931940

28. Longcamp M, Anton J-L, Roth M, Velay J-L. Visual presentation of single letters activates a premotor area involved in writing. Neuroimage. 2003;19(4):1492–500. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00088-0 12948705

29. Longcamp M, Zerbato-Poudou M-T, Velay J-L. The influence of writing practice on letter recognition in preschool children: A comparison between handwriting and typing. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005;119(1):67–79.

30. Insel K, Morrow D, Brewer B, Figueredo A. Executive function, working memory, and medication adherence among older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 2006;61(2):P102–P7. doi: 10.1093/geronb/61.2.p102 16497953

31. Cohen RG, Sternad D. State space analysis of timing: exploiting task redundancy to reduce sensitivity to timing. J Neurophysiol. 2012;107(2):618–27. doi: 10.1152/jn.00568.2011 22031769

32. Berryhill ME, Jones KT. tDCS selectively improves working memory in older adults with more education. Neurosci Lett. 2012;521(2):148–51. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.05.074 22684095

33. Stern Y, Gurland B, Tatemichi TK, Tang MX, Wilder D, Mayeux R. Influence of education and occupation on the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease. JAMA. 1994;271(13):1004–10. 8139057

34. Piccinin AM, Muniz-Terrera G, Clouston S, Reynolds CA, Thorvaldsson V, Deary IJ, et al. Coordinated analysis of age, sex, and education effects on change in MMSE scores. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 2012;68(3):374–90.

35. Soldan A, Pettigrew C, Albert M. Evaluating cognitive reserve through the prism of preclinical Alzheimer disease. Psychiatric Clinics. 2018;41(1):65–77. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2017.10.006 29412849

36. Matsuo K, Kato C, Tanaka S, Sugio T, Matsuzawa M, Inui T, et al. Visual language and handwriting movement: functional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 tesla during generation of ideographic characters. Brain Res Bull. 2001;55(4):549–54. doi: 10.1016/s0361-9230(01)00564-0 11543956

37. Verhaeghen P. Aging and vocabulary score: A meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. 2003;18(2):332. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.332 12825780

38. Uttl B. North American Adult Reading Test: age norms, reliability, and validity. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2002;24(8):1123–37. doi: 10.1076/jcen.24.8.1123.8375 12650237

39. Kempler D, Teng EL, Dick M, Taussig IM, Davis DS. The effects of age, education, and ethnicity on verbal fluency. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998;4(6):531–8. doi: 10.1017/s1355617798466013 10050357

40. Michaux N, Masson N, Pesenti M, Andres M. Selective interference of finger movements on basic addition and subtraction problem solving. Exp Psychol. 2013;60(3):197–205. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000188 23261950

41. Bender A, Beller S. Nature and culture of finger counting: Diversity and representational effects of an embodied cognitive tool. Cognition. 2012;124(2):156–82. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.005 22695379


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 12