From social interactions to interpersonal relationships: Influences on ultra-runners’ race experience


Autoři: Brian Harman aff001;  Céline Kosirnik aff002;  Roberta Antonini Philippe aff002
Působiště autorů: Leicester Castle Business School, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom aff001;  Institut des Sciences du Sport, Faculté des Sciences Sociales et Politiques, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225195

Souhrn

Objectives

Ultra-running’s psychological and physiological dimensions have been widely studied. However, the social dimensions of ultra-racing have been largely overlooked. This study aims to identify the different types of social interactions that occur during a multi-day, ultra-race and to understand how these interactions influence ultra-runners’ race experience.

Methods

Athletes competing in Britain’s “Spine Race” were recruited for the current study. Twelve male runners aged between 32 and 66 years (M = 50; SD = 10.01) followed the qualitative protocol designed for the study. Specifically, each participant completed a modified version of the Day Reconstruction Method (DRM) instrument and underwent a post-race, self-confrontation interview. Participants were asked to recall and reconstruct their memories about their (a) actions (e.g., What did you do when you encountered other people?); (b) thoughts (e.g., What were your thoughts when you encountered other people?) and (c) feelings (e.g., What were your feelings when you encountered other people?).

Results

The results show that social interactions and interpersonal relationships are common in ultra-races. Different groups of people play an important role in racers’ motivation and goal achievement: fellow racers, volunteers, medics, friends and family, and even the general public. The resulting social interactions and relationships can occur before, during and after the race in both online and offline environments. These social influences have a powerful influence on the athlete’s race experience.

Conclusion

The vast majority of social interactions reported by runners had a positive effect on their race experience and often led to interpersonal relationships. Ultra-runners should be mindful of the impact that social interactions and relationships can have in shaping their race experience.

Klíčová slova:

Emotions – Facebook – Interpersonal relationships – Memory recall – Social influence – Social media – Social research – Sports


Zdroje

1. Knechtle B. Ultramarathon runners: nature or nurture? International journal of sports physiology and performance. 2012;7(4):310–312. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.7.4.310 23197583

2. Knechtle B, Nikolaidis PT. Physiology and Pathophysiology in Ultra-Marathon Running. Front Physiol. 2018;9:634. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00634 29910741

3. McCormick A, Meijen C, Marcora S. Psychological determinants of whole-body endurance performance. Sports Medicine. 2015;45(7):997–1015. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0319-6 25771784

4. Simpson D, Post PG, Young G, Jensen PR. “It’s not about taking the easy road”: The experiences of ultramarathon runners. The Sport Psychologist. 2014;28(2):176–185.

5. Antonini Philippe R, Rochat N, Crettaz Von Roten F, Hauw D. The Relationship between Trail Running Withdrawals and Race Topography. Fsports. 2017;5(4): 91.

6. Micklewright D, Papadopoulou E, Parry D, Hew-Butler T, Tam N, Noakes T. Perceived exertion influences pacing among ultramarathon runners but post-race mood change is associated with performance expectancy. S Afr J Sports Med. 2010;21(4).

7. Smith RS, Walsh J, Dement W. Sleep deprivation and the race across America. Journal of Sleep. 1998;22(1):303–304.

8. Stevinson CD, Biddle SJ. Cognitive orientations in marathon running and" hitting the wall". British Journal of Sports Medicine. 1998;32(3):229–234. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.32.3.229 9773172

9. Hughes S, Case HS, Stuempfle K, Evans D. Personality profiles of Iditasport ultra-marathon participants. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2003;15(3):256–261.

10. Lane AM, Wilson M. Emotions and trait emotional intelligence among ultra-endurance runners. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2011;14(4):358–362. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.03.001 21440500

11. Acevedo EO, Dzewaltowski DA, Gill DL, Noble JM. Cognitive orientations of ultramarathoners. The Sport Psychologist. 1992;6(3):242–252.

12. Connaughton D, Wadey R, Hanton S, Jones G. The development and maintenance of mental toughness: Perceptions of elite performers. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2007;21:83–95.

13. Jaeschke A-MC, Sachs ML, Dieffenbach KD. Ultramarathon Runners’ Perceptions of Mental Toughness: A Qualitative Inquiry. The Sport Psychologist. 2016;30(3):242–55.

14. Kirkby RJ. Ultraendurance running: A case study. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 1996;27:109–116.

15. Morgan WP, Pollock ML. Psychologic characterization of the elite distance runner. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1977;301(1):382–403.

16. Corrion K, Morales V, Bergamaschi A, Massiera B, Morin J-B, d’Arripe-Longueville F. Psychosocial factors as predictors of dropout in ultra-trailers. PloS One. 2018;13(11):e0206498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206498 30395613

17. Delrue J, Mouratidis A, Haerens L, De Muynck G-J, Aelterman N, Vansteenkiste M. Intrapersonal Achievement Goals and Underlying Reasons among Long Distance Runners: Their Relation with Race Experience, Self-Talk, and Running Time. Psychol Belg. 2016;56(3):288–310. doi: 10.5334/pb.280 30479441

18. Cranmer GA, Sollitto M. Sport Support: Received Social Support as a Predictor of Athlete Satisfaction. Communication Research Reports. 2015;32(3):253–64.

19. Lu FJH, Lee WP, Chang Y-K, Chou C-C, Hsu Y-W, Lin J-H, et al. Interaction of athletes’ resilience and coaches’ social support on the stress-burnout relationship: A conjunctive moderation perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2016;22:202–9.

20. Nikolaidis PT, Knechtle C, Ramirez-Campillo R, Vancini RL, Rosemann T, Knechtle B. Training and Body Composition during Preparation for a 48-Hour Ultra-Marathon Race: A Case Study of a Master Athlete. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 13 2019;16(6).

21. Rüst CA, Knechtle B, Knechtle P, Rosemann T. Similarities and differences in anthropometry and training between recreational male 100-km ultra-marathoners and marathoners. Journal of Sports Sciences. 1 août 2012;30(12):1249‑57. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2012.697182 22724447

22. Schüler J, Knechtle B, Wegner M. Antecedents of Exercise Dependence in Ultra-Endurance Sports: Reduced Basic Need Satisfaction and Avoidance-Motivated Self-Control. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2018 [cité 29 août 2019];9. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01275/full

23. Schüler J, Wegner M, Knechtle B. Implicit Motives and Basic Need Satisfaction in Extreme Endurance Sports. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1 juin 2014;36(3):293‑302. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2013-0191 24918312

24. Waśkiewicz Z, Nikolaidis PT, Chalabaev A, Rosemann T, Knechtle B. Motivation in ultra-marathon runners [Internet]. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. 2018 [cité 29 août 2019]. Available: https://www.dovepress.com/motivation-in-ultra-marathon-runners-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-PRBM

25. Rochat N, Hauw D, Gür G, Seifert L. Understanding Trail Runners’ Activity on Online Community Forums: An Inductive Analysis of Discussion Topics. J Hum Kinet. 2018;61:263–76 doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0125 29599878

26. Antonini Philippe R, Lafrenière AK, Paquet Y, Hauw D. Passion for ski mountaineering and relationship quality: The mediating role of team cohesion. Int. J. Sport Psychol. 2014;45:00–00.

27. Guzzo RA, Yost PR, Campbell RJ, Shea GP. Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British journal of social psychology. 1993;32(1):87–106.

28. Tamminen KA, Gaudreau P. Coping, social support, and emotion regulation in teams. Group dynamics in exercise and sport psychology. 2014;2.

29. Burke SM, Davies KM, Carron AV. Group cohesion in sport and exercise settings. Group dynamics in exercise and sport psychology. 2014;2:147–163.

30. Holt NL, Hoar SD. The multidimensional construct of social support. Literature reviews in sport psychology. 2006;199–225.

31. Berscheid ES, Regan PC. The psychology of interpersonal relationships. Psychology Press; 2016.

32. Kahneman D, Krueger AB, Schkade DA, Schwarz N, Stone AA. A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science. 2004;306(5702):1776–1780. doi: 10.1126/science.1103572 15576620

33. Mangan B. Taking phenomenology seriously: The" fringe" and its implications for cognitive research. Consciousness and cognition. 1993;2(2):89–108.

34. Baruchello G. Angela Ales Bello, Phenomenology of the Human Being (book review). [cité 29 août 2019]; Available: https://www.academia.edu/35366965/Angela_Ales_Bello_Phenomenology_of_the_Human_Being_book_review_

35. Laverty SM. Hermeneutic Phenomenology and Phenomenology: A Comparison of Historical and Methodological Considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2003;2(3):21–35.

36. Antonini Philippe R, Rochat N, Vauthier M, Hauw D. The story of withdrawals during an ultra-trail running race: A qualitative investigation of runners’ courses of experience. The Sport Psychologist. 2016;30(4):361–375.

37. Rochat N, Hauw D, Antonini Philippe R, Crettaz Von Roten F, Seifert L. Comparison of vitality states of finishers and withdrawers in trail running: An enactive and phenomenological perspective. PloS One. 2017;12(3):e0173667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173667 28282421

38. Theureau J. Les entretiens d’auto confrontation et de remise en situation par les traces matérielles et le programme de recherche « cours d’action ». Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances. 2010;4(2):287–322.

39. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.

40. Patton MQ. Qualitative interviewing. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 2002;3:344–347.

41. Nikolaidis PT, Knechtle B. Pacing strategies in the ‘Athens classic marathon’: Physiological and psychological aspects. Frontiers in physiology. 2018;9.

42. Carron AV, Brawley LR, Widmeyer WN. The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. In: Duda J, editor. Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement. Fitness Information Technology. Morgantown, WV; 2011:213–226.

43. Carron AV, Colmán MME, Wheeler JM, Stevens DE. Cohesion and performance in sport: a meta analysis. In 2002.

44. Carron AV, Shapcott KM, Burke SM. Group cohesion in sport and exercise: past, present and future. Group dynamics in exercise and sport psychology. 2007;135–158.

45. Olympiou A, Jowett S, Duda JL. The psychological interface between the coach-created motivational climate and the coach-athlete relationship in team sports. The sport psychologist. 2008;22(4):423–438.

46. Heuzé JP, Sarrazin P, Masiero M, Raimbault N, Thomas JP. The relationships of perceived motivational climate to cohesion and collective efficacy in elite female teams. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2006;18(3):201–218.

47. Horn T, Byrd M, Martin E, Young C. Perceived motivational climate and team cohesion in adolescent athletes. Sport Science Review. 2012;21(3–4):25–48.

48. Carron AV. Cohesiveness in Sport Groups: Interpretations and Considerations. Journal of Sport psychology. 1982;4(2), 123–138.

49. Cox RH. Sport psychology: Concepts and application. 2nd ed. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark;1990.

50. Gill DL. Psychological dynamics of sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetic Books;1986.

51. Carlén U, Maivorsdotter N. Exploring the role of digital tools in running: the meaning making of user-generated data in a social networking site. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health. 2017;9(1), 18–32.

52. Holt NL, Lee H, Kim Y, Klein K. Exploring experiences of running an ultramarathon. The Sport Psychologist. 2014;28(1), 22–35.


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 12