Native speakers like affixes, L2 speakers like letters? An overt visual priming study investigating the role of orthography in L2 morphological processing


Autoři: Laura Anna Ciaccio aff001;  Gunnar Jacob aff001
Působiště autorů: Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany aff001
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226482

Souhrn

In an overt visual priming experiment, we investigate the role of orthography in native (L1) and non-native (L2) processing of German morphologically complex words. We compare priming effects for inflected and derived morphologically related prime-target pairs versus otherwise matched, purely orthographically related pairs. The results show morphological priming effects in both the L1 and L2 group, with no significant difference between inflection and derivation. However, L2 speakers, but not L1 speakers, also showed significant priming for orthographically related pairs. Our results support the claim that L2 speakers focus more on surface-level information such as orthography during visual word recognition. This can cause orthographic priming effects in morphologically related prime-target pairs, which may conceal L1-L2 differences in morphological processing.

Klíčová slova:

Language – Lexical semantics – Lexicons – Linguistic morphology – Natural language – Priming (psychology) – Semantics – Word recognition


Zdroje

1. Clahsen H, Felser C, Neubauer K, Sato M, Silva R (2010) Morphological Structure in Native and Nonnative Language Processing. Lang Learn 60:21–43

2. Feldman LB, Kostić A, Basnight-Brown DM, Đurđević DF, Pastizzo MJ (2010) Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and non-native speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms. Biling Lang Cogn 13:119

3. Rastle K, Davis MH, New B (2004) The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychon Bull Rev 11:1090–1098 doi: 10.3758/bf03196742 15875981

4. Marslen-Wilson WD (2007) Morphological processes in language comprehension. In: Gaskell MG (ed) Oxf. Handb. Psycholinguist. Oxford University Press, pp 175–193

5. Stockall L, Marantz A (2006) A single route, full decomposition model of morphological complexity: MEG evidence. Ment Lex 1:85–123

6. Baayen RH (2007) Storage And Computation In The Mental Lexicon. In: Jarema G, Libben G (eds) Ment. Lex. Core Perspect. Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 81–104

7. Milin P, Feldman LB, Ramscar M, Hendrix P, Baayen RH (2017) Discrimination in lexical decision. PLOS ONE 12:e0171935 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171935 28235015

8. Feldman LB (2000) Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 26:1431–1444 doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1431 11185775

9. Clahsen H, Neubauer K (2010) Morphology, frequency, and the processing of derived words in native and non-native speakers. Lingua 120:2627–2637

10. Neubauer K, Clahsen H (2009) Decomposition of inflected words in a second language: An experimental study of German participles. Stud Second Lang Acquis 31:403–435

11. Coughlin CE, Tremblay A (2015) Morphological decomposition in native and non-native French speakers. Biling Lang Cogn 18:524–542

12. Dal Maso S, Giraudo H (2014) Morphological processing in L2 Italian: Evidence from a masked priming study. Lingvisticæ Investig 37:322–337

13. Diependaele K, Duñabeitia JA, Morris J, Keuleers E (2011) Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. J Mem Lang 64:344–358

14. Foote R (2017) The storage and processing of morphologically complex words in L2 Spanish. Stud Second Lang Acquis 39:735–767

15. Voga M, Anastassiadis-Symeonidis A, Giraudo H (2014) Does morphology play a role in L2 processing?: Two masked priming experiments with Greek speakers of ESL. Lingvisticae Investig 37:338–352

16. Coughlin CE, Fiorentino R, Royle P, Steinhauer K (2019) Sensitivity to Inflectional Morphology in a Non-native Language: Evidence From ERPs. Front Commun. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2019.00021

17. Silva R, Clahsen H (2008) Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Biling Lang Cogn 11:245–260

18. Kırkıcı B, Clahsen H (2013) Inflection and derivation in native and non-native language processing: Masked priming experiments on Turkish. Biling Lang Cogn 16:776–791

19. Jacob G, Heyer V, Veríssimo J (2017) Aiming at the same target: A masked priming study directly comparing derivation and inflection in the second language. Int J Biling. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916688333.

20. Heyer V, Clahsen H (2015) Late bilinguals see a scan in scanner AND in scandal: dissecting formal overlap from morphological priming in the processing of derived words. Biling Lang Cogn 18:543–550

21. Talamas A, Kroll JF, Dufour R (1999) From form to meaning: Stages in the acquisition of second-language vocabulary. Biling Lang Cogn 2:45–58

22. Altarriba J, Mathis KM (1997) Conceptual and Lexical Development in Second Language Acquisition. J Mem Lang 36:550–568

23. Veivo O, Järvikivi J (2013) Proficiency modulates early orthographic and phonological processing in L2 spoken word recognition. Biling Lang Cogn 16:864–883

24. Veivo O, Järvikivi J, Porretta V, Hyönä J (2016) Orthographic Activation in L2 Spoken Word Recognition Depends on Proficiency: Evidence from Eye-Tracking. Front Psychol. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01120 27512381

25. Qu Q, Cui Z, Damian MF (2018) Orthographic effects in second-language spoken-word recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 44:1325–1332 doi: 10.1037/xlm0000520 29283604

26. Basnight-Brown DM, Chen L, Hua S, Kostić A, Feldman LB (2007) Monolingual and bilingual recognition of regular and irregular English verbs: Sensitivity to form similarity varies with first language experience. J Mem Lang 57:65–80 doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.001 19568315

27. Li M, Jiang N, Gor K (2017) L1 and L2 processing of compound words: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Biling Lang Cogn 20:384–402

28. Li J, Taft M, Xu J (2017) The Processing of English Derived Words by Chinese-English Bilinguals. Lang Learn 67:858–884

29. Fiorentino R, Naito-Billen Y, Minai U (2016) Morphological Decomposition in Japanese De-adjectival Nominals: Masked and Overt Priming Evidence. J Psycholinguist Res 45:575–597 doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9349-3 25840671

30. Smolka E, Komlósi S, Rösler F (2009) When semantics means less than morphology: The processing of German prefixed verbs. Lang Cogn Process 24:337–375

31. Feldman LB, Prostko B (2002) Graded Aspects of Morphological Processing: Task and Processing Time. Brain Lang 81:12–27 doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2503 12081378

32. Rastle K, Davis MH, Marslen-Wilson WD, Tyler LK (2000) Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Lang Cogn Process 15:507–537

33. Smolka E, Preller KH, Eulitz C (2014) ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. J Mem Lang 72:16–36

34. Davis CJ (2010) Match Calculator. Retrieved from: http://www.pc.rhul.ac.uk/staff/c.davis/utilities/matchcalc/index.htm.

35. Sassenhagen J, Alday PM (2016) A common misapplication of statistical inference: Nuisance control with null-hypothesis significance tests. Brain Lang 162:42–45 doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.08.001 27543688

36. Forster KI, Forster JC (2003) DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 35:116–124 doi: 10.3758/bf03195503 12723786

37. Ratcliff R (1993) Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychol Bull 114:510–532 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510 8272468

38. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. J Stat Softw. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01

39. R Development Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

40. Schad D. J., Vasishth S., Hohenstein S., & Kliegl R. (2020). How to capitalize on a priori contrasts in linear (mixed) models: A tutorial. Journal of Memory and Language, 110, 104038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104038

41. Baayen RH (2008) Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

42. Matuschek H, Kliegl R, Vasishth S, Baayen H, Bates D (2017) Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. J Mem Lang 94:305–315

43. Grainger J, Beyersmann E (2017) Edge-Aligned Embedded Word Activation Initiates Morpho-orthographic Segmentation. In: Ross BH (ed) Psychol. Learn. Motiv. Academic Press, pp 285–317

44. Aronoff M, Berg K, Heyer V (2016) Some implications of English spelling for morphological processing. Ment Lex 11:164–185

45. Boudelaa S, Marslen-Wilson WD (2015) Structure, form, and meaning in the mental lexicon: evidence from Arabic. Lang Cogn Neurosci 30:955–992 doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1048258 26682237

46. Frost R, Forster KI, Deutsch A (1997) What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 23:829–856 doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.23.4.829 9265076

47. Veríssimo J, Heyer V, Jacob G, Clahsen H (2018) Selective Effects of Age of Acquisition on Morphological Priming: Evidence for a Sensitive Period. Lang Acquis 25:315–326


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 12