The effect of a curriculum-based physical activity intervention on accelerometer-assessed physical activity in schoolchildren: A non-randomised mixed methods controlled before-and-after study

Autoři: Alison L. Innerd aff001;  Liane B. Azevedo aff001;  Alan M. Batterham aff001
Působiště autorů: School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom aff001
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie: Research Article


Classroom-based physical activity (PA) interventions offer the opportunity to increase PA without disrupting the curriculum. We aimed to explore the feasibility and potential effectiveness of a classroom-based intervention on moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) and total PA. The secondary aim was to assess the acceptability and sustainability of the intervention. In a mixed-methods, non-randomised, exploratory controlled before-and-after study, 152 children (10 ± 0.7 years) were recruited from five schools; two intervention (n = 72) and three control (n = 80) schools. School teachers delivered an 8-week classroom-based intervention, comprising of 10 minutes daily MVPA integrated into the curriculum. The control schools maintained their usual school routine. Mean daily MVPA (min), total PA (mean cpm), physical fitness, and health-related quality of life measurements were taken at baseline, end of intervention, and 4-weeks post-intervention (follow-up). Data were analysed using a constrained baseline longitudinal analysis model accounting for the hierarchical data structure. For the primary outcomes (MVPA and total PA) the posterior mean difference and 95% compatibility interval were derived using a semi-Bayesian approach with an explicit prior. The acceptability and sustainability of the intervention was explored via thematic content analysis of focus group discussions with teachers (n = 5) and children (n = 50). The difference in mean daily MVPA (intervention-control) was 2.8 (-12.5 to 18.0) min/day at 8 weeks and 7.0 (-8.8 to 22.8) min/day at follow-up. For total PA, the differences were -2 (-127 to 124) cpm at 8-weeks and 11 (-121 to 143) cpm at follow-up. The interval estimates indicate that meaningful mean effects (both positive and negative) as well as trivial effects are reasonably compatible with the data and design. The intervention was received positively with continuation reported by the teachers and children. Classroom-based PA could hold promise for increasing average daily MVPA, but a large cluster randomised controlled trial is required.

Klíčová slova:

Academic skills – Exercise – Children – Physical activity – Physical fitness – Quality of life – Schools – Teachers


1. Health Survey for England. 2016: Health and Social Care Information Centre Designation. NHS Digital. Available from:

2. Naylor PJ, Nettlefold L, Race D, Hoy C, Ashe MC, Higgins JW et al. Implementation of school based physical activity interventions: a systematic review. Preventive Medicine 2015; 72:95–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.034 25575800

3. Kriemler S, Meyer U, Martin E, van Sluijs EM, Andersen LB, Martin BW. Effect of school-based interventions on physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents: a review of reviews and systematic update. Br.J.Sports Med. 2011; 45:923–30. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090186 21836176

4. Dobbins M, Husson H, DeCorby K, LaRocca RL. School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 28(2).

5. Russ LB, Webster CA, Beets MW et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of multi-component interventions through schools to increase physical activity. J Phys Activity Health. 2015; 12: 1436–46.

6. van Sluijs EMF, McMinn AM, Griffin SJ. Effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity in children and adolescents: systematic review of controlled trials. BMJ 2007; 335: 703. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39320.843947.BE 17884863

7. Hamer M, Aggio D, Knock G, Kipps C, Shanker A, Smith L. Effect of major school playground reconstruction on physical activity and sedentary behaviour: Camden active spaces. BMC Public Health. 2017; 17(7):552–60.

8. Ginja S, Arnott B, Araujo-Soares V, Namdeo A, McColl E. Feasibility of an incentive scheme to promote active travel to school: a pilot cluster randomised trial. Pilot Feasibility Study. 2017; 3:57–70.

9. Jago R, Baranowski T. Non-curricular approaches for increasing physical activity in youth: a review. Prev. Medicine. 2004; 39(1):157–63

10. Jago R, Edwards MJ, Sebire SJ, Tomkinson K, Bird EL, Banfield K et al. Effect and cost of an after-school dance programme on the physical activity of 11–12 year old girls: The Bristol Girls Dance Project, a school-based cluster randomised controlled trial. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2015; 12:128–43. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0289-y 26437720

11. Huberty J, Dinkel D, Coleman J, Beighle A, Apenteng B. The role of schools in children’s physical activity participation: staff perceptions. Health Education Research. 2012; 6:986–95.

12. Honas JJ, Washburn RA, Smith BK, Greene J.L. Energy expenditure of the physical activity across the curriculum intervention. Med. Sci. Sports & Exerc. 2008; 40(8):501–05.

13. Szabo-Reed AN, Willis EA, Lee J, Hillman CH, Washburn RA, Donnelly JE. Impact of Three Years of Classroom Physical Activity Bouts on Time-on-Task Behavior. Med. Sci. Sports & Exerc. 2017; 49 (11):2343–50.

14. Mahar MT, Murphy SK, Rowe DA, Golden J, Shields AT, Raedeke TD. Effects of a classroom-based program on physical activity and on-task behavior. Med. Sci. Sports & Exerc. 2006; 38(12):2086–94.

15. Martin R, Murtagh E. Active Classrooms: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effects of a Movement Integration Intervention on the Physical Activity Levels of Primary School Children. J Phys Act Health. 2016; 29:1–38.

16. Stewart J.A, Dennison DA, Kohl HW, Doyle J.A. Exercise level and energy expenditure in the Take 10! in-class physical activity program. J Sch Health. 2004; 174:397–400.

17. Goh TL, Hannon J, Webster C, Podlog L, Newton M. Effects of a TAKE 10! Classroom-Based Physical Activity Intervention on Third- to Fifth-Grade Children's On-task Behavior. J Phys Act Health. 2016; 13(7):712–18. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2015-0238 26800566

18. Have M, Nielsen JH, Gejl AK, Ernst MT, Fredens K, Støckel JTet al. Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial examining the effect of classroom-based physical activity on math achievement. BMC Public Health. 2016; 16:304–15. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2971-7 27068574

19. Gibson CA, Smith BK, Dubose KD, Greene LJ, Bailey BW, Williams SLet al. Physical activity across the curriculum: year one process evaluation results. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2008; 5: 36–47. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-36 18606013

20. Delk J, Springer AE, Kelder SH, Grayless M. Promoting teacher adoption of physical activity breaks in the classroom: findings of the Central Texas CATCH Middle School Project. J Sch Health. 2014; 84(11): 722–30. doi: 10.1111/josh.12203 25274172

21. Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health 2004; 94: 361–366. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.3.361 14998794

22. Trost SG, Loprinzi PD, Moore R, Pfeiffer KA. Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth. Med. Sci. Sports & Exerc. 2011; 43 (7):1360–68.

23. Matthews C, Hagstro EM, Pober DM, Bowles HR. Best Practices for Using Physical Activity Monitors in Population-Based Research. Med. Sci. Sports & Exerc. 2012; 44:Suppl:68–76.

24. Cain KL, Sallis JF, Conway TL, Van DD, Calhoon L. Using accelerometers in youth physical activity studies: a review of methods. J Phys Act Health. 2013; 10:437–50. doi: 10.1123/jpah.10.3.437 23620392

25. Evenson KR, Catellier DJ, Gill K, Ondrak KS, McMurray RG. Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J Sports Sci. 2008; 26:1557–65. doi: 10.1080/02640410802334196 18949660

26. The KIDSCREEN Group Europe: The KIDSCREEN Questionnaires—Quality of Life Questionnaires for Children and Adolescents. Handbook. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers; 2006.

27. Ramsbottom R, Brewer J, Williams C. A progressive shuttle run test to estimate maximal oxygen uptake. Br J Sports Med.1988; 22:141–44. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.22.4.141 3228681

28. Eurofit: Handbook for the Eurofit tests of physical fitness. Committee of experts on sports research.1998.

29. Hooper R, Forbes A, Hemming K, Takeda A, Beresford L. Analysis of cluster randomised trials with an assessment of outcome at baseline. BMJ (Online). 2018;360

30. Coffman CJ, Edelman D, Woolson RF. To condition or not condition? Analysing 'change' in longitudinal randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open. 2016;6(12).

31. Greenland S. Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research: I. Foundations and basic methods. Int J Epidemiol. 2006; 35(3): 765–775. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi312 16446352

32. Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin, J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med. Sci. Sports & Exerc. 2009; 41:3–12.

33. Burnard PA. Method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today. 1991;11(6):461–66. doi: 10.1016/0260-6917(91)90009-y 1775125

34. Donnelly JE, Hillman CH, Castelli C, Etnier JL, Lee S, Tomporowski P et al. Physical activity, fitness, cognitive function, and academic achievement in children: a systematic review. Med. Sci. Sports & Exerc. 2016;48 (6):1197–22

35. Liu A, Hu X, Ma G, Cui Z, Pan Y, Chang S et al. Evaluation of a classroom-based physical activity promoting programme. Obesity Reviews. 2008; 9(S1):130–34.

36. Medical Research Council. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: New guidance. London: Medical Research Council

37. Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Theorising interventions as events in systems. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2009; 43(3–4): 267–276 doi: 10.1007/s10464-009-9229-9 19390961

38. Katz DL, Cushman D, Reynolds J, Njike V, Treu JA, Walker J et al. Putting physical activity where it fits in the school day: preliminary results of the ABC (Activity Bursts in the Classroom) for fitness program. Prev. Chronic. Disease. 2010; 7(4):82–92.

39. Norris E, van Steen T, Direito A, Stamatakis E. Physically active lessons in schools and their impact on physical activity, educational, health and cognition outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2019; 0: 1–14.

40. Lloyd LK, Cook CL, Kohl HW. A pilot study of teachers' acceptance of a classroom based physical activity curriculum tool: TAKE 10!. J. Spring 2005; 8–11.

41. van den Berg V, Salimi R, de Groot RHM, Jolles J, Chinapaw MJM, Singh AS. "It's a Battle… You Want to Do It, but How Will You Get It Done?": Teachers' and Principals' Perceptions of Implementing Additional Physical activity in School for Academic Performance. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 30:14(10).

42. Quarmby T, Daly-Smith A, Kime N. ‘You get some very archaic ideas of what teaching is…’: primary school teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to physically active lessons. Education. 3–13.

43. Watson DB, Adam J, Azevedo LB, Haighton C. Promoting physical activity with a school-based dance mat exergaming intervention: qualitative findings from a natural experiment. BMC Public Health. 2016; 16:609. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3308-2 27440200

44. Ahamed Y, Macdonald H, Reed K, Naylor PJ, Liu-Ambrose T, McKay H. School-based physical activity does not compromise children's academic performance. Med. Sci. Sports & Exerc. 2007; 39 (2):371–76.

45. Resaland GK, Aadland E, Moe VF, Aadland KN, Skrede T, Stavnsbo M et al. Effects of physical activity on schoolchildren's academic performance: The Active Smarter Kids (ASK) cluster-randomized controlled trial. Prev. Medicine. 2016; 91:322–28.

46. Santana CCA, Azevedo LB, Cattuzzo MT, Hill JO, Andrade LP, Prado WL. Physical fitness and academic performance in youth: a systematic review. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sport. 2016; 27 (6):579–603.

47. Szabo-Reed AN, Willis EA, Lee J, Hillman CH, Washburn RA, Donnelly JE. The Influence of Classroom Physical Activity Participation and Time on Task on Academic Achievement. Translational J. ACSM. 2019; 12(4): 84–95

48. UK Health Survey for England. Physical Activity and Fitness. 2008. Volume 1. 1-20p. The NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care, Leeds.

49. Aubrey S, Bell S, Hughes R, Campbell R. Adolescent perspectives on wearing accelerometers to measure physical activity in population-based trials. Eur J Public Health. 2013; 23(3), 475–480. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks081 23132872

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 12
Nejčtenější tento týden