1. James W. Principles of Psychology. New York: Dover; 1950 [Original work published 1890.]
2. Ross M. The relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychol Rev. 1989;96:341–357.
3. Wilson AE, Ross M. The identity function of autobiographical memory: Time is on our side. Memory. 2003;11(2):137–149. doi: 10.1080/741938210 12820827
4. Higgins ET. Self digest: Self-knowledge serving self-regulatory functions. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;71:1062–1083. doi: 10.1037//0022-35126.96.36.1992 8979379
5. Baumeister RF. The self. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, editors. Handbook of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1998. p. 680–740.
6. Libby LK, Eibach RP. Looking back in time: Self-concept change affects visual perspective in autobiographical memory. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;82:167–179.
7. Kotlewska I, Nowicka A. Present self, past self and close-other: Event-related potential study of face and name detection. Biol Psychol. 2015;110:201–211. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.07.015 26234961
8. Ellemers N, Spears R, Doosje B. Self and social identity. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:161–186. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228 11752483
9. McGarty C, Pedersen A, Leach CW, Mansell T, Waller J, Bliuc AM. Group-based guilt as a predictor of commitment to apology. Br J Soc Psychol. 2005;44:659–680. doi: 10.1348/014466604X18974 16368025
10. Meerholz EW, Spears R, Epstude K. The ‘other’ side of compassion: How the self avoids responsibility for past wrongs. Groningen: University of Groningen, 2018.
11. Zebel S, Doosje B, Spears R. How perspective-taking helps and hinders group-based guilt as a function of group identification. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2009;12(1):61–78.
12. Batson CD, Polycarpou MP, Harmon-Jones E, Imhoff HJ, Mitchener EC, Bednar LL, Klein TR, Highberger L. Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;72(1):105–118. doi: 10.1037//0022-35188.8.131.52 9008376
13. Lazarus RS. Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.
14. Iyer A, Leach CW, Crosby F. White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003;29:117–129. doi: 10.1177/0146167202238377 15272965
15. Batson CD, Dyck JL, Brandt JR, Batson JG, Powell AL, McMaster MR, Griffitt C. Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;55:52–77.
16. Thomas EF, McGarty CA. The role of efficacy and moral outrage norms in creating the potential for international development activism through group-based interaction. Br J Soc Psychol. 2009; 48(1):115–134.
17. Nigro G, Neisser U. Point of view in personal memories. Cogn Psychol. 1983;15:467–482.
18. Fergusson PA. Writing about traumatic events using the third person pronoun: Psychological and health effects. Ontario, Canada: University of Waterloo, 1993.
19. Kross E, Ayduk O. Self-distancing: Theory, research, and current directions. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2017;55:81–136.
20. Kross E, Bruehlman-Senecal E, Park J, Burson A, Dougherty A, Shablack H, et al. Self-talk as a regulatory mechanism: How you do it matters. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014;106:304–324. doi: 10.1037/a0035173 24467424
21. Wallace-Hadrill SMA, Kamboj SK. The impact of perspective change as a cognitive reappraisal strategy on affect: A systematic review. Front Psychol. 2016;7:304–324. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00304
22. Libby LK, Eibach RP. Visual perspective in mental imagery: A representational tool that functions in judgment, emotion, and self-insight. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2011;44:185–245.
23. Libby LK, Valenti G, Pfent A, Eibach RP. Seeing failure in your life: Imagery perspective determines whether self-esteem shapes reactions to recalled and imagined failure. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011;101:1157–1173. doi: 10.1037/a0026105 22059844
24. Hanko K, Crusius J, Mussweiler T. When I and me are different: Assimilation and contrast in temporal self-comparisons. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2010;40(1):160–168.
25. Schimmack U. The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. Psychol Methods. 2012;17:551–566. doi: 10.1037/a0029487 22924598
26. Francis G. The frequency of excess success for articles in Psychological Science. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014;21:1180–1187. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0601-x 24638826
27. Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT. Conceptualizing and evaluating the replication of research results. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2016;66:68–80.
28. Lakens D, Etz AJ. Too true to be bad: When sets of studies with significant and nonsignificant findings are probably true. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017;8:875–881. doi: 10.1177/1948550617693058 29276574
29. Tuk MA, Zhang K, Sweldens S. The propagation of self-control: Self-control in one domain simultaneously improves self-control in other domains. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015;144:639–654. doi: 10.1037/xge0000065 25822462
30. Zhang C, Lakens D, IJsselsteijn WA. The illusion of nonmediation in telecommunication: Voice intensity biases distance judgments to a communication partner. Acta Psychol. 2015;157:101–105.
31. Leach CW, van Zomeren M, Zebel S, Vliek M, Pennekamp SF, Doosje B, Ouwerkerk JP, Spears R. Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;95:144–165. doi: 10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.206 18605857
32. Kuppens T, Easterbrook MJ, Spears R, Manstead ASR. Life at both ends of the ladder: Education-based identification and its association with well-being and social attitudes. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015;4:1260–1275.
33. Doosje B, Branscombe NR, Spears R, Manstead A. Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;75:872–886.
34. Branscombe NR, Slugoski B, Kappen DM. The measurement of collective guilt: What it is and what it is not. In: Branscombe NR, Doosje B, editors. Collective guilt: International perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
35. Iyer A, Schmader T, Lickel B. Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: The role of anger, shame and guilt. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007;33:572–587. doi: 10.1177/0146167206297402 17400836
36. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach.New York, The Guilford Press, 2013.
37. Johnson BT. DSTAT: 1.10: Software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures (Version 1.10). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1993.
38. Thomas J, Graziosi S, Higgins S, Coe R, Torgerson C, Newman M. Teaching meta-analysis using MetaLight. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5(571).
39. Sani F, Bowe M, Herrera M. Perceived collective continuity and social well-being. Eur Rev Soc Psychol.2008;38(2):365–374.
40. Trivers R. The folly of fools: The logic of deceit and self-deception in human life. New York: Basic Books, 2011.