Infant rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) personality and subjective well-being

Autoři: Elizabeth A. Simpson aff001;  Lauren M. Robinson aff002;  Annika Paukner aff004
Působiště autorů: Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, United States of America aff001;  Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria aff002;  Language Research Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America aff003;  Department of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, England, United Kingdom aff004
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226747


Infant temperament is theorized to lay the foundation for adult personality; however, many questions remain regarding personality in infancy, including the number of dimensions, extent to which they are adult-like, and their relation to other outcomes, such as mental and physical health. Here we tested whether adult-like personality dimensions are already present in infancy in a nonhuman primate species. We measured personality and subjective well-being in 7-month-old rhesus macaques (N = 55) using the Hominoid Personality Questionnaire and Subjective Well-Being Questionnaire, both of which were developed for adult primates based on human measures. Multiple human raters, who provided infants with daily care since birth, independently rated each infant. We found high interrater reliability. Results from a parallel analysis and scree plot indicated a five component structure, which, using principal components analysis, we found to be comprised of dimensions relating to Openness (e.g., curiosity, inquisitive, playfulness), Assertiveness (e.g., dominance, bullying, aggressive), Anxiety (e.g., vigilance, fearful), Friendliness (e.g., sociable, affectionate, sympathetic), and Intellect (e.g., organized, not erratic). These components are largely analogous to those in adult macaques, suggesting remarkably stable structural personality components across the lifespan. Infant macaques’ subjective well-being positively correlates with Openness and Assertiveness and negatively correlated with Anxiety, similar to findings in adult macaques and other primates. Together, these findings suggest that, in macaques, infant personality dimensions may be conceptually related to adult personality and challenge the view that infant temperament may be disorganized and not as meaningful as adult personality. Further research is necessary to explore the antecedents, predictive validity, and stability of these personality components across situations and with development.

Klíčová slova:

Adults – Behavior – Macaque – Personality – Personality traits – Primates – Psychometrics – Rhesus monkeys


1. Colombo J, Fagen J. Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability, and prediction. Psychology Press. New York, NY. 1990.

2. Clarke AS, Boinski S. Temperament in nonhuman primates. Am J Primatol. 1995;37(2):103–125. doi: 10.1002/ajp.1350370205

3. Schneider ML, Moore CF, Suomi SJ, Champoux M. Laboratory assessment of temperament and environmental enrichment in rhesus monkey infants (Macaca mulatta). Am J Primatol. 1991;25(3):137–155. doi: 10.1002/ajp.1350250302

4. Weinstein TA, Capitanio JP. Individual differences in infant temperament predict social relationships of yearling rhesus monkeys, Macaca mulatta. Animal Behav. 2008;76(2):455–465. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.01.024 23483039

5. Réale D, Reader SM, Sol D, McDougall PT, Dingemanse NJ. Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol Rev. 2007;82(2):291–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00010.x 17437562

6. Bornstein MH, Putnick DL, Gartstein MA, Hahn CS, Auestad N, O’Connor DL. Infant temperament: stability by age, gender, birth order, term status, and socioeconomic status. Child Dev. 2015;86(3):844–863. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12367 25865034

7. Shiner RL, Buss KA, McClowry SG, Putnam SP, Saudino KJ, Zentner M. What is temperament now? Assessing progress in temperament research on the twenty-fifth anniversary of Goldsmith et al. (1987). Child Dev Perspectives. 2012;6(4):436–444.

8. Zentner M, Bates JE. Child temperament: An integrative review of concepts, research programs, and measures. Int J Dev Sci. 2008;2(1–2):7–37. doi: 10.3233/DEV-2008-21203

9. Diener E. Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Soc Ind Res. 1994; 31(2): 103–157. doi: 10.1007/BF01207052

10. Coffey JK, Warren MT, Gottfried AW. Does infant happiness forecast adult life satisfaction? Examining subjective well-being in the first quarter century of life. J Happiness Stud. 2015;16(6):1401–1421. doi: 10.1007/s10902-014-9556-x

11. McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr, Ostendorf F, Angleitner A, Hřebíčková M, Avia MD, Sanz J, Sánchez-Bernardos ML, Kusdil ME, Woodfield R, Saunders PR, Smith PB. Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and life span development. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;78(1):173–186. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.1.173 10653513

12. Messinger D, Mitsven SG, Ahn YA, Prince EB, Sun L, Rivero-Fernández C. Happiness and Joy. In: Handbook of Emotional Development. 2019. Springer, Cham. pp. 171–198.

13. Soto CJ. Is happiness good for your personality? Concurrent and prospective relations of the big five with subjective well-being. J Personal. 2015;83(1):45–55. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12081 24299053

14. Digman JM. Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Rev of Psychol. 1990;41:417–440. doi: 10.1146/

15. McCrae RR, Costa PT. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Pers and Social Psychol. 1987;52(1):81–90. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81

16. Hahn E, Gottschling J, Spinath FM. Short measurements of personality–Validity and reliability of the GSOEP Big Five Inventory (BFI-S). J Res Personal. 2012;46(3):355–359. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.03.008

17. McCrae RR, Kurtz JE, Yamagata S, Terracciano A. Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Soc Psychol Rev. 2011;15(1):28–50. doi: 10.1177/1088868310366253 20435807

18. Jang KL, Livesley WJ, Vemon PA. Heritability of the big five personality dimensions and their facets: a twin study. Journal of Personal. 1996;64(3):577–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00522.x 8776880

19. Vukasović T, Bratko D. Heritability of personality: a meta-analysis of behavior genetic studies. Psychol Bull. 2015;141(4):769–785. doi: 10.1037/bul0000017 25961374

20. Specht J, Egloff B, Schmukle SC. Stability and change of personality across the life course: The impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the Big Five. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2011;101(4):862–882. doi: 10.1037/a0024950 21859226

21. Wagner J, Lüdtke O, Robitzsch A. Does personality become more stable with age? Disentangling state and trait effects for the big five across the life span using local structural equation modeling. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2019;116(4):666–680. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000203 30714756

22. Poropat AE. A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychol Bull. 2009;135(2):322–338. doi: 10.1037/a0014996 19254083

23. Seibert SE, Kraimer ML. The five-factor model of personality and career success. J Voc Behav. 2001;58(1):1–21. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2000.1757

24. Malouff JM, Thorsteinsson EB, Schutte NS, Bhullar N, Rooke SE. The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. J Res Personal. 2010;44(1):124–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.09.004

25. Sutin AR, Stephan Y, Luchetti M, Artese A, Oshio A, Terracciano A. The five-factor model of personality and physical inactivity: A meta-analysis of 16 samples. J Res Personal. 2016;63:22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.05.001 29056783

26. Strickhouser JE, Zell E, Krizan Z. Does personality predict health and well-being? A metasynthesis. Health Psychol. 2017;36(8), 797–810. doi: 10.1037/hea0000475 28277701

27. Goodman FR, Disabato DJ, Kashdan TB, Kauffman SB. Measuring well-being: A comparison of subjective well-being and PERMA. J. Positive Psychol. 2018;13(4):321–332. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2017.1388434

28. Diener E, Oishi S, Tay L. Advances in subjective well-being research. Nat. Human Behav. 2018;2(4):253–260. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6 30936533

29. Diener E. Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. Am Psychol. 2000;55:34–43. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34 11392863

30. Weiss A, King JE, Enns RM. Subjective well-being is heritable and genetically correlated with dominance in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;83:1141–1149. 12416918

31. Nes RB, Røysamb E, Tambs K, Harris JR, Reichborn-Kjennerud T. Subjective well-being: Genetic and environmental contributions to stability and change. Psychol. Med. 2006;36(7):1033–1042. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706007409 16749947

32. Joshanloo M. Investigating the relationships between subjective well-being and psychological well-being over two decades. Emotion. 2019;19(1):183–187. doi: 10.1037/emo0000414 29494203

33. Lyubomirsky S, King L, Diener E. The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychol Bull. 2005;131(6):803–855. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803 16351326

34. Tugade MM, Fredrickson BL, Barrett L. Psychological resilience and positive emotional granularity: Examining the benefits of positive emotions on coping and health. J of Personality. 2004;72(6):1161–1190. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00294.x 15509280

35. Angleitner A, Ostendorf F. Temperament and the Big Five factors of personality. In: Halverson CF Jr., Kohnstamm GA, Martin RP, editors. The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood. New York: Psychology Press; 1994. pp. 69–90.

36. Abe JAA. The predictive validity of the Five-Factor Model of personality with preschool age children: A nine year follow-up study. J Res in Personal. 2005;39:423–442. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2004.05.002

37. Hagekull B, Bohlin G. Preschool temperament and environmental factors related to the Five-Factor Model of personality in middle childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 1998;44:194–215.

38. Hagekull B, Bohlin G. Early temperament and attachment as predictors of the Five Factor Model of personality. Attachment & Human Dev. 2003;5(1):2–18. doi: 10.1080/1461673031000078643 12745826

39. Wachs TD. Fit, context, and the transition between temperament and personality. In: Halverson CF Jr., Kohnstamm GA, Martin RP, editors. The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1994. pp. 209–220.

40. Lamb ME, Chuang SS, Wessels H, Broberg AG, Hwang CP. Emergence and construct validation of the Big Five factors in early childhood: A longitudinal analysis of their ontogeny in Sweden. Child Dev. 2002;73(5):1517–1524. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00487 12361316

41. Soto CJ. The Little Six personality dimensions from early childhood to early adulthood: Mean-level age and gender differences in parents’ reports. J Personal. 2016;84(4):409–422. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12168 25728032

42. Kjeldsen A, Nilsen W, Gustavson K, Skipstein A, Melkevik O, Karevold EB. Predicting well-being and internalizing symptoms in late adolescence from trajectories of externalizing behavior starting in infancy. J Res Adolescence 2016;26(4):991–1008. doi: 10.1111/jora.12252 28453213

43. Sinn DL, Perrin NA, Mather JA, Anderson RC. Early temperamental traits in an octopus (Octopus bimaculoides). J Comp Psychol. 2001;115(4):351–364. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.115.4.351 11824898

44. Gosling SD, Kwan VS, John OP. A dog’s got personality: A cross-species comparative approach to personality judgments in dogs and humans. J Pers & Soc Psychol. 2003;85(6):1161–1169. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1161 14674821

45. Mayer M, Shine R, Brown GP. Bigger babies are bolder: Effects of body size on personality of hatchling snakes. Behaviour. 2016;153(3):313–323. doi: 10.1163/1568539X-00003343

46. David M, Auclair Y, Cézilly F. Personality predicts social dominance in female zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata, in a feeding context. Animal Behav. 2011;81(1):219–224. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.10.008

47. Walton A, Toth AL. Variation in individual worker honey bee behavior shows hallmarks of personality. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2016;70(7):999–1010. doi: 10.1007/s00265-016-2084-4

48. Úbeda Y, Ortín S, St Leger J, Llorente M, Almunia J. Personality in captive killer whales (Orcinus orca): A rating approach based on the five-factor model. J Comp Psychol. 2019;133(2):252–261. doi: 10.1037/com0000146 30431295

49. Gosling SD. From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychol Bull. 2001;127(1):45–86. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.45 11271756

50. Kay DB, Marsiske M, Suomi SJ, Higley JD. Exploratory factor analysis of human infant temperament in the rhesus monkey. Infant Behav Dev. 2010;33(1):111–114. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2009.11.005 20036777

51. Vazire S, Gosling SD. Bridging psychology and biology with animal research. Am Psychol. 2003;58(5):407–408. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.58.5.407 12971088

52. Koski SE. How to measure animal personality and why does it matter? Integrating the psychological and biological approaches to animal personality. In: Nakagawa N, Makamichi M, Sugiura H, editors. From genes to animal behavior. Tokyo: Springer; 2011. pp. 115–136.

53. Weiss A, Adams MJ, Widdig A, Gerald MS. Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) as living fossils of hominoid personality and subjective well-being. J Compar Psychol. 2011;125:72–83. doi: 10.1037/a0021187 21341912

54. Putnam SP. Stability and instability of childhood traits: Implications for personality development of animals. Dev Psychobiol. 2011;53(6):510–520. doi: 10.1002/dev.20578 21866538

55. Coe CL, Lubach GR, Crispen HR, Shirtcliff EA, Schneider ML. Challenges to maternal wellbeing during pregnancy impact temperament, attention, and neuromotor responses in the infant rhesus monkey. Dev Psychobiol. 2010;52(7):625–637. doi: 10.1002/dev.20489 20882585

56. Kinnally EL, Capitanio JP. Paternal early experiences influence infant development through non-social mechanisms in Rhesus Macaques. Front in Zoology. 2015;12(1):S14. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-12-S1-S14 26816514

57. Kinnally EL, Gonzalez MN, Capitanio JP. Paternal line effects of early experiences persist across three generations in rhesus macaques. Dev Psychobiol. 2018;60(8):879–888. doi: 10.1002/dev.21771 30103289

58. Kohn JN, Snyder-Mackler N, Barreiro LB, Johnson ZP, Tung J, Wilson ME. Dominance rank causally affects personality and glucocorticoid regulation in female rhesus macaques. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016;74:179–188. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.09.005 27639059

59. von Borell CJ, Weiss A, Penke L. Developing individual differences in primate behavior: The role of genes, environment, and their interplay. Behav Ecol & Sociobiol. 2019;73(2):20. doi: 10.1007/s00265-019-2633-8

60. Brenning K, Soenens B, Mabbe E, Vansteenkiste M. Ups and downs in the joy of motherhood: Maternal well-being as a function of psychological needs, personality, and infant temperament. J Happiness Stud. 2019;20(1):229–250. doi: 10.1007/s10902-017-9936-0

61. Luoma I, Tamminen T, Kaukonen P, Laippala P, Puura K, Salmelin R, Almqvist F. Longitudinal study of maternal depressive symptoms and child well-being. J Am Acad Child & Adol Psychiatry. 2001;40(12):1367–1374. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200112000-00006 11765281

62. Freeman HD, Weiss A, Ross SR. Atypical early histories predict lower extraversion in captive chimpanzees. Dev Psychobiol. 2016;58(4):519–527. doi: 10.1002/dev.21395 26814701

63. Capitanio JP, Mason WA, Mendoza SP, DelRosso L, Roberts JA. Nursery rearing and biobehavioral organization. In: Sackett GP, Ruppentahal GC, Elias K, editors. Nursery rearing of nonhuman primates in the 21st century. Boston: Springer; 2006. p. 191–214.

64. Adams M. J., Majolo B., Ostner J., Schülke O., De Marco A., Thierry B., … & Weiss A. Personality structure and social style in macaques. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015;109(2):338–353. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000041 26030054

65. Freeman HD, Gosling SD. Personality in nonhuman primates: A review and evaluation of past research. Am J Primatol. 2010;72(8):653–671. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20833 20568079

66. Latzman RD, Hecht LK, Freeman HD, Schapiro SJ, Hopkins WD. Neuroanatomical correlates of personality in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Associations between personality and frontal cortex. NeuroImage. 2015;123:63–71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.041 26311604

67. Morton FB, Lee PC, Buchanan-Smith HM, Brosnan SF, Thierry B, Paukner A, … Weiss A. (2013). Personality structure in brown capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella): Comparisons with chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), orangutans (Pongo spp.), and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). J Comp Psychol. 2013;127(3):282–298. doi: 10.1037/a0031723 23668695

68. Weiss AA. human model for primate personality. Proc of the Roy Soc B: Biol Sci. 2017;284(1864):20171129. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1129 29021170

69. King JE, Figueredo AJ. The five-factor model plus dominance in chimpanzee personality. J Res Personal. 1997;31(2):257–271. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1997.2179

70. Gosling SD, Vazire S. Are we barking up the right tree? Evaluating a comparative approach to personality. J Res Personal. 2002;36(6):607–614. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00511-1

71. Brent LJ, Semple S, MacLarnon A, Ruiz-Lambides A, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Platt ML. Personality traits in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) are heritable but do not predict reproductive output. Intern J Primatol. 2014;35(1):188–209. doi: 10.1007/s10764-013-9724-6 24659840

72. Papageorgiou KA, Ronald A. “He who sees things grow from the beginning will have the finest view of them” a systematic review of genetic studies on psychological traits in infancy. Neurosci & Behav Rev. 2013;37(8):1500–1517. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.04.013 23644044

73. Capitanio JP. Personality dimensions in adult male rhesus macaques: Prediction of behaviors across time and situation. Am J Primatol. 1999;47(4):299–320. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1999)47:4<299::AID-AJP3>3.0.CO;2-P 10206208

74. Robinson LM, Coleman K, Capitanio JP, Gottlieb DH, Handel IG, Adams MJ, … & Weiss A. Rhesus macaque personality, dominance, behavior, and health. Am J of Primatol. 2018;80(2):e22739. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22739 29457637

75. Inoue-Murayama M, Yokoyama C, Yamanashi Y, Weiss A. Common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) personality, subjective well-being, hair cortisol level and AVPR1a, OPRM1, and DAT genotypes. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):10255. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28112-7 29980755

76. Robinson LM, Waran NK, Leach MC, Morton FB, Paukner A, Lonsdorf E, Handel I, Wilson VA, Brosnan SF, Weiss A. Happiness is positive welfare in brown capuchins (Sapajus apella). Applied Anim Behav Sci. 2016;181:145–151. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.05.029

77. Robinson LM, Altschul DM, Wallace EK, Úbeda Y, Llorente M, Machanda Z, … Weiss A. Chimpanzees with positive welfare are happier, extraverted, and emotionally stable. App Anim Behav Sci. 2017;191:90–97. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.008

78. Schaefer SA, Steklis HD. Personality and subjective well-being in captive male western lowland gorillas living in bachelor groups. Am J Primatol. 2014;76(9):879–89. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22275 24677279

79. Weiss A, King JE, Perkins L. Personality and subjective well-being in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus and Pongo abelii). J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006;90:501–511. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.501 16594834

80. King JE, Landau VI. Can chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) happiness be estimated by human raters? J Research Pers. 2003;37:1–15. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00527-5

81. Schneider ML, Suomi SJ. Neurobehavioral assessment in rhesus monkey neonates (Macaca mulatta): Developmental changes, behavioral stability, and early experience. Infant Behav & Dev. 1992;15(2):155–177. doi: 10.1016/0163-6383(92)80021-L

82. Garstein MA, Rothbart MK. Studying infant temperament via the Revised Infant Behavior Quesitonnaire. Infant Behav & Dev. 2003;26:64–86. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00169-8

83. Pauli-Pott U, Mertesacker B, Bade U, Haverkock A, Beckmann D. Parental perceptions and infant temperament development. Infant Behav & Dev. 2003;26(1):27–48. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00167-4

84. King JE, Weiss A, Sisco MM. Aping humans: Age and sex effects in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and human (Homo sapiens) personality. J Comp Psychol. 2008;122(4):418. doi: 10.1037/a0013125 19014265

85. Stevenson-Hinde J, Stillwell-Barnes R, Zunz M. Individual differences in young rhesus monkeys: Consistency and change. Primates. 1980;21:498–509.

86. Stevenson-Hinde J, Zunz M. Subjective assessment of individual rhesus monkeys. Primates. 1978;19:473–482.

87. Uher J, Asendorpf JB, Call J. Personality in the behaviour of great apes: Temporal stability, cross-situational consistency and coherence in response. Animal Behaviour. 2008;75:99–112.

88. Simpson EA, Nicolini Y, Shetler M, Suomi SJ, Ferrari PF, Paukner A. Experience-independent sex differences in newborn macaques: Females are more social than males. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19669. doi: 10.1038/srep19669 26794858

89. Simpson EA, Miller GM, Ferrari PF, Suomi SJ, Paukner A. Neonatal imitation and early social experience predict gaze following abilities in infant macaques. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20233.

90. Simpson EA, Suomi SJ, Paukner A. Evolutionary relevance and experience contribute to face discrimination in infant macaques (Macaca mulatta). J Cog Dev. 2016;17(2):285–299. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2015.1048863 27212893

91. Kaburu SS, Paukner A, Simpson EA, Suomi SJ, Ferrari PF. Neonatal imitation predicts infant rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) social and anxiety-related behaviours at one year. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34997. doi: 10.1038/srep34997 27725768

92. Weiss A, Inoue-Murayama M, Hong KW, Inoue E, Udono T, Ochiai T, Matsuzawa T, Hirata S, King JE. Assessing chimpanzee personality and subjective well-being in Japan. Am J Primatol. 2009;71(4):283–292. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20649 19199350

93. Hominoid Personality Questionnaire. In: Weiss A, King JE, Murray L. Personaltiy and Temperament in Nonhuman Primates. New York: Springer. 2011;

94. Subjective Well-Being Questionnaire. In: Weiss A, King JE, Murray L. Personaltiy and Temperament in Nonhuman Primates. New York: Springer. 2011;

95. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2018.

96. Revelle W. Psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA. 2018; Version=1.8.12.

97. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–428. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420 18839484

98. Dinno A. paran: Horn’s test of principal components/factors. 2012.

99. Horn JL. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1965;30(2):179–185. doi: 10.1007/BF02289447 14306381

100. Robinson LM, Morton FB, Gartner MC, Widness J, Paukner A, Essler JL, … Weiss A. Divergent personality structures of brown (Sapajus apella) and white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). J Comp Psychol. 2016;130(4):305–312. doi: 10.1037/com0000037 27841454

101. Weiss A. Exploring factor space (and other adventures) with the Hominoid Personality Questionnaire. In: Vonk J, Weiss A, Kuczaj S, editors. Personality in nonhuman animals. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2017. pp. 19–38.

102. Gorsuch RL. Factor analysis. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1983.

103. Weiss A, Staes N, Pereboom JJ, Inoue-Murayama M, Stevens JM, Eens M. Personality in bonobos. Psychol Sci. 2015;26(9):1430–1439. doi: 10.1177/0956797615589933 26209530

104. De Pauw SS, Mervielde I. Temperament, personality and developmental psychopathology: A review based on the conceptual dimensions underlying childhood traits. Child Psychiatry & Human Dev. 2010;41(3):313–329. doi: 10.1007/s10578-009-0171-8 20238477

105. Rothbart MK, Ahadi SA, Hershey KL, Fisher P. Investigations of temperament at three to seven years: The Children’s Behavior Questionnaire. Child Dev. 2001;72(5):1394–1408. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00355 11699677

106. Chess S, Thomas A. Temperamental individuality from childhood to adolescence. J Am Acad Child Psychiat. 1977;16(2):218–226. doi: 10.1016/S0002-7138(09)60038-8

107. Altschul DM, Terrace HS, Weiss A. Serial cognition and personality in macaques. Animal Behav and Cogn. 2016;3(1):46–64. doi: 10.12966/abc.02.04.2016 27158661

108. de Waal FB, Luttrell LM. The formal hierarchy of rhesus macaques: an investigation of the bared-teeth display. Am J Primatol. 1985; 9(2): 73–85. doi: 10.1002/ajp.1350090202

109. Reebye P. Aggression during early years—infancy and preschool. The Canadian Child & Adol Psychiatry Rev. 2005;14(1):16–20.

110. Bastian ML, Sponberg AC, Sponberg AC, Suomi SJ, Higley JD. Long-term effects of infant rearing condition on the acquisition of dominance rank in juvenile and adult rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Dev Psychobiol. 2003;42(1):44–51. doi: 10.1002/dev.10091 12471635

111. Altschul DM, Robinson LM, Coleman K, Capitanio JP, Wilson VAD. An exploration of the relationships among facial dimensions, age, sex, dominance status, and personality in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Int J Primatol. 2019;1–21. Advance Online Publication. doi: 10.1007/s10764-019-00104-y

112. Wooddell LJ, Simpson EA, Murphy AM, Dettmer AM, Paukner A. Interindividual differences in neonatal sociality and emotionality predict juvenile social status in rhesus monkeys. Dev Sci. 2019b;22(2):e12749. doi: 10.1111/desc.12749 30171780

113. von Borell C, Kulik L, Widdig A. Growing into the self: the development of personality in rhesus macaques. Animal Behav. 2016;122:183–195. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.10.013

114. Barlow DH, Ellard KK, Sauer-Zavala S, Bullis JR, Carl JR. The origins of neuroticism. Perspectives on Psychological Sci. 2014;9(5):481–496. doi: 10.1177/1745691614544528 26186755

115. Capitanio JP, Widaman KF. Confirmatory factor analysis of personality structure in adult male rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Am J Primatol. 2005;65:289–294. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20116 15772988

116. Sclafani V, Del Rosso LA, Seil SK, Calonder LA, Madrid JE, Bone KJ, … Parker KJ. Early predictors of impaired social functioning in male rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). PLoS ONE 2016;11(10):e0165401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165401 27788195

117. Feczko EJ, Bliss-Moreau E, Walum H, Pruett JR Jr, Parr LA. The macaque social responsiveness scale (MSRS): A rapid screening tool for assessing variability in the social responsiveness of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). PLoS ONE 2016;11(1):e0145956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145956 26731103

118. Eisenberg N, Duckworth AL, Spinrad TL, Valiente C. Conscientiousness: Origins in childhood? Dev Psychol. 2014;50(5):1331–1329. doi: 10.1037/a0030977 23244405

119. Weiss A, Bates TC, Luciano M. Happiness is a personal(ity) thing: The genetics of personality and well-being in a representative sample. Psychol Sci. 2008;19:205–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02068.x 18315789

120. Steel P, Schmidt J, Shultz J. Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychol Bull. 2008;134:138–161. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138 18193998

121. Coffey JK. Cascades of infant happiness: Infant positive affect predicts childhood IQ and adult educational attainment. Emotion. 2019. Advance Online Publication. doi: 10.1037/emo0000640 31259588

122. Workman AD, Charvet CJ, Clancy B, Darlington RB, Finlay BL. Modeling transformations of neurodevelopmental sequences across mammalian species. J Neurosci. 2013;33: 7368–7383. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5746-12.2013 23616543

123. Gerson SA, Simpson EA, Paukner A. Drivers of social cognitive development in human and non-human primate infants. In Sommerville J, Decety J, editors. Social Cognition. New York: Routledge;2016. p. 116–146.

124. von Borell C. J., Weiss A., & Penke L. (2019). Developing individual differences in primate behavior: the role of genes, environment, and their interplay. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 73(2), 20. doi: 10.1007/s00265-019-2633-8

125. Pijl MKJ, Bussu G, Charman T, Johnson MH, Jones EJH, Pasco G, … & BASIS Team. Temperament as an early risk marker for Autism Spectrum Disorders? A longitudinal study of high-risk and low-risk infants. J Autism and Dev Disord. 2019;49(5):1825–1836. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3855-8 30607781

126. McClowry SG, Rodriguez ET, Koslowitz R. Temperament-based intervention: Re-examining goodness of fit. Int J Dev Sci. 2008;2(1–2):120–135. doi: 10.3233/DEV-2008-21208

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 12