Important features of retail shoes for women with rheumatoid arthritis: A Delphi consensus survey


Autoři: Peta Ellen Tehan aff001;  William J. Taylor aff003;  Matthew Carroll aff002;  Nicola Dalbeth aff004;  Keith Rome aff002
Působiště autorů: School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia aff001;  School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand aff002;  Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand aff003;  School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand aff004;  Department of Rheumatology, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand aff005
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226906

Souhrn

Objectives

Footwear management aims to preserve foot function, reduce the burden of foot pain and maintain joint mobility in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Whilst retail footwear is commonly recommended by health professionals, there is no current consensus on recommended features of retail footwear for women with RA. This study aimed to determine consensus from health professionals about the important features of retail footwear for women with RA.

Methods

An international Delphi exercise using online survey software was conducted with 39 participants from health care backgrounds. Three iterative rounds were conducted. In the first round, participants listed features of retail footwear that would be important for women with RA. Responses of the first round, combined with results of a scoping review of patient-reported outcome measures used in assessing footwear in arthritis and a qualitative analysis of female patients’ perspectives of retail footwear in RA were used to create items for the second round. Items were scored by a 9-point rating scale with consensus defined by the RAND/UCLA disagreement index. The third round consisted of items which did not reach consensus or scored >1 on the RAND/UCLA disagreement index from round two.

Results

Fifty-eight items (n = 58) were generated for rating and at the end of three iterative rounds, there was agreement that thirty-eight items were important, that two were not important, and there was no agreement for a further eighteen items. Item themes reaching consensus included footwear characteristics and acceptability and psychosocial aspects of footwear. Footwear characteristics related to heel height, shape, cushioning, toe box size, adjustable fastening, removable insoles, mid-foot support and soft accommodative uppers. Acceptability and psychosocial aspects included affordability, comfort, aesthetic, style, colour and impact on femininity.

Conclusion

This consensus exercise has identified the important features of retail footwear for women with RA.

Klíčová slova:

Feet – Psychological and psychosocial issues – Psychological attitudes – Rheumatoid arthritis – Rheumatology – Surveys – Toes – Self-consciousness


Zdroje

1. Scott D, Wolfe F., Huizinga TWJ Rheumatoid Arthritis. The Lancet 2010, 376(9746):1094–1108.

2. Grondal L, Tengstrand B., Nordmark B, Wretenberg P., Startk A.: The foot: still the most important reason for walking incapacity in rheumatoid arthritis: Distribution of symptomatic joints in 1,000 RA patients. Acta Orthop 2008, 79(2):257–261.

3. Williams AE NC, Ravey MI: Rheumatoid arthritis pateints’ experiences of wearing therapeutic footwear—a qualitiative investigation. BMC Musculoskeletal disorders 2007, 8(1):104–114.

4. Dahmen R BS, Siemonsma PC, Boers M, Lankhorst GJ, Roorda LD: Use and effects of custom-made therapeutic footwear on lower extremity related pain and acitivty limitations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rehab Med 2014, 46(6):561–567.

5. Williams A, Davies S, Graham A, Dagg A, Longrigg K Lyons C, Bowen C.: Guidelines fot he management of the foot health problems associated with rheumatoid arthrtis. Musculoskeletal Care 2011, 9(2):86+92. doi: 10.1002/msc.200 21259413

6. Williams AE MK: Shoes in the cupboard: The fate of prescribed footwear? Prosthetics Orthotics International 2001, 25(1):53–59. doi: 10.1080/03093640108726569 11411006

7. van Netten JJ, Francis A, Morphet A, Fortington LV, Postema K, Williams A: Communication techniques for improved acceptance and adherence with therapeutic footwear. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 2017, 41(2):201–204. doi: 10.1177/0309364616650080 27280641

8. Tehan PE, Morpeth T, Williams AE, Dalbeth N, Rome K: "Come and live with my feet and you'll understand"—a qualitative study exploring the experiences of retail footwear in women with rheumatoid arthritis. J Foot Ankle Res 2019, 12:15. doi: 10.1186/s13047-019-0328-z 30911335

9. Naidoo S. AS, Mills J., Parsons S., Breeden S., Bevan E., Edwards C., Otter S: “I could cry, the amount of shoes I can’t get into”: A qualitative exploration of the factors that influence footwear selection in women with rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2011, 4(21).

10. Hendry GJ, Gibson KA, Pile K, Taylor L, Du Toit V, Burns J, Rome K: "They just scraped off the calluses": a mixed methods exploration of foot care access and provision for people with rheumatoid arthritis in south-western Sydney, Australia. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2013, 6(1):34. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-6-34 23938103

11. Dando C, Cherry L, Jones L, Bowen C: The clinical diagnosis of symptomatic forefoot neuroma in the general population: a Delphi consensus study. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2017, 10(1):59.

12. Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M, Sibony O, Alberti C: Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review. PLOS ONE 2011, 6(6):e20476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020476 21694759

13. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H: Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2000, 32(4):1008–1015. 11095242

14. Jones J HD: Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 1995, 311(7001):376–380. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376 7640549

15. Tehan PE, Carroll M, Dalbeth N, Rome K: How Footwear Is Assessed in Patient Reported Measures for People with Arthritis: A Scoping Review. PM&R, 0(0).

16. Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, Burnand B, LaCalle JR: The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user's manual. In.: RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CA; 2001.

17. Goodacre L CF: “If I didn’t have RA I wouldn’t give them house room’: the relationship between RA, footwear and clothing choices. Rheumatology 2011, 50:513–517. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq347 21071478

18. Silvester R, Williams AE, Dalbeth N., Rome K.: ‘Choosing Shoes’: a preliminary study into the challenges facing clinicians in assessing footwear for rheumatoid patients. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2010, 3(24).

19. Menz HB, Sherrington C: The Footwear Assessment Form: a reliable clinical tool to assess footwear characteristics of relevance to postural stability in older adults. Clinical Rehabilitation 2000, 14(6):657–664. doi: 10.1191/0269215500cr375oa 11128742


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 12