Plant-mediated community structure of spring-fed, coastal rivers

Autoři: Matthew V. Lauretta aff001;  William E. Pine, III aff002;  Carl J. Walters aff003;  Thomas K. Frazer aff004
Působiště autorů: National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Miami, FL, United States of America aff001;  Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America aff002;  Fisheries Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada aff003;  School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America aff004
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219236


Quantifying ecosystem-level processes that drive community structure and function is key to the development of effective environmental restoration and management programs. To assess the effects of large-scale aquatic vegetation loss on fish and invertebrate communities in Florida estuaries, we quantified and compared the food webs of two adjacent spring-fed rivers that flow into the Gulf of Mexico. We constructed a food web model using field-based estimates of community absolute biomass and trophic interactions of a highly productive vegetated river, and modeled long-term simulations of vascular plant decline coupled with seasonal production of filamentous macroalgae. We then compared ecosystem model predictions to observed community structure of the second river that has undergone extensive vegetative habitat loss, including extirpation of several vascular plant species. Alternative models incorporating bottom-up regulation (decreased primary production resulting from plant loss) versus coupled top-down effects (compensatory predator search efficiency) were ranked by total absolute error of model predictions compared to the empirical community observations. Our best model for predicting community responses to vascular plant loss incorporated coupled effects of decreased primary production (bottom-up), increased prey search efficiency of large-bodied fishes at low vascular plant density (top-down), and decreased prey search efficiency of small-bodied fishes with increased biomass of filamentous macroalgae (bottom-up). The results of this study indicate that the loss of vascular plants from the coastal river ecosystem may alter the food web structure and result in a net decline in the biomass of fishes. These results are highly relevant to ongoing landscape-level restoration programs intended to improve aesthetics and ecosystem function of coastal spring-fed rivers by highlighting how the structure of these communities can be regulated both by resource availability and consumption. Restoration programs will need to acknowledge and incorporate both to be successful.

Klíčová slova:

Biomass – Food web structure – Freshwater fish – Invertebrates – Marine fish – Predation – Rivers – Vascular plants


1. Duarte CM. The future of seagrass meadows. Environmental conservation. 2002 Jun;29(2):192–206.

2. Orth RJ, Carruthers TJ, Dennison WC, Duarte CM, Fourqurean JW, Heck KL, et al. A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems. Bioscience. 2006 Dec 1;56(12):987–96.

3. Waycott M, Duarte CM, Carruthers TJ, Orth RJ, Dennison WC, Olyarnik S, et al. Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences. 2009 Jul 28;106(30):12377–81.

4. Duarte CM. Submerged aquatic vegetation in relation to different nutrient regimes. Ophelia. 1995 Feb 1;41(1):87–112.

5. Carpenter SR, Lodge DM. Effects of submersed macrophytes on ecosystem processes. Aquatic botany. 1986 Jan 1;26:341–70.

6. Jeppesen E, Sondergaard M, Sondergaard M, Christofferson K, editors. The structuring role of submerged macrophytes in lakes. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012 Dec 6.

7. Hauxwell J, Frazer TK, Osenberg CW. An annual cycle of biomass and productivity of Vallisneria americana in a subtropical spring-fed estuary. Aquatic Botany. 2007 Jul 1;87(1):61–8.

8. Barko JW, James WF. Effects of submerged aquatic macrophytes on nutrient dynamics, sedimentation, and resuspension. InThe structuring role of submerged macrophytes in lakes 1998 (pp. 197–214). Springer, New York, NY.

9. Caraco N, Cole J, Findlay S, Wigand C. Vascular plants as engineers of oxygen in aquatic systems. BioScience. 2006 Mar 1;56(3):219–25.

10. Gregg W. W., and Rose F. L. 1982. The effects of aquatic macrophytes in the stream micro-environment. Aquatic Botany 14:309–324.

11. Dodds WK, Biggs BJ. Water velocity attenuation by stream periphyton and macrophytes in relation to growth form and architecture. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 2002 Mar 1;21(1):2–15.

12. Power ME. Top‐down and bottom‐up forces in food webs: do plants have primacy. Ecology. 1992 Jun;73(3):733–46.

13. Savino JF, Stein RA. Predator‐prey interaction between largemouth bass and bluegills as influenced by simulated, submersed vegetation. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 1982 May 1;111(3):255–66.

14. Huffaker C. Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia. 1958 Aug 1;27(14):343–83.

15. Crowder LB, Cooper WE. Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology. 1982 Dec 1;63(6):1802–13.

16. Harrison SS, Bradley DC, Harris IT. Uncoupling strong predator–prey interactions in streams: the role of marginal macrophytes. Oikos. 2005 Mar;108(3):433–48.

17. Camp EV, Staudhammer CL, Pine WE, Tetzlaff JC, Frazer TK. Replacement of rooted macrophytes by filamentous macroalgae: effects on small fishes and macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia. 2014 Jan 1;722(1):159–70.

18. Heffernan JB, Liebowitz DM, Frazer TK, Evans JM, Cohen MJ. Algal blooms and the nitrogen‐enrichment hypothesis in Florida springs: evidence, alternatives, and adaptive management. Ecological Applications. 2010 Apr 1;20(3):816–29. doi: 10.1890/08-1362.1 20437966

19. Burghart SE, Jones DL, Peebles EB. Variation in estuarine consumer communities along an assembled eutrophication gradient: implications for trophic instability. Estuaries and coasts. 2013 Sep 1;36(5):951–65.

20. Odum HT. Factors controlling marine invasion into Florida fresh waters. Bulletin of Marine Science. 1953 Mar 1;3(2):134–56.

21. Herald ES, Strickland RR. An annotated list of the fishes of Homosassa Springs, Florida. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences. 1948 Dec 1;11(4):99–109.

22. Odum HT. Primary Production Measurements in Eleven Florida Springs and a Marine Turtle‐Grass Community 1. Limnology and Oceanography. 1957 Apr;2(2):85–97.

23. Yobbi DK, Knochenmus LA. Salinity and flow relations and effects of reduced flow in the Chassahowitzka River and Homosassa River estuaries, Southwest Florida. Water-Resources Investigations Report. 1989;88:4044.

24. Yobbi DK. Effects of tidal stage and ground-water levels on the discharge and water quality of springs in coastal Citrus and Hernando Counties, Florida. Water-Resources Investigations Report. 1992;92:4069.

25. Katz BG. Sources of nitrate contamination and age of water in large karstic springs of Florida. Environmental Geology. 2004 Oct 1;46(6–7):689–706.

26. Camp EV, Gwinn DC, Pine WE III, Frazer TK. Changes in submersed aquatic vegetation affect predation risk of a common prey fish Lucania parva (Cyprinodontiformes: Fundulidae) in a spring‐fed coastal river. Fisheries Management and Ecology. 2012 Jun;19(3):245–51.

27. Frazer TK, Notestein SK, Pine WE Jr. Changes in the physical, chemical and vegetative characteristics of the Homosassa, Chassahowitzka and Weeki Wachee Rivers. Final Report. Prepared for the Southwest Florida Water Management District. Brooksville, FL. 2006 Aug.

28. Stevenson RJ, Pinowska A, Albertin A, Sickman JO. Ecological condition of algae and nutrients in Florida springs: the synthesis report. Tallahassee, Florida: Florida Department of Environmental Protection; 2007 Oct 31.

29. Liebowitz DM, Cohen MJ, Heffernan JB, Korhnak LV, Frazer TK. Environmentally‐mediated consumer control of algal proliferation in Florida springs. Freshwater biology. 2014 Oct;59(10):2009–23.

30. Mumma MT, Cichra CE, Sowards JT. Effects of recreation on the submersed aquatic plant community of Rainbow River, Florida. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management. 1996 Jul 1;34:53–6.

31. Buckingham CA, Lefebvre LW, Schaefer JM, Kochman HI. Manatee response to boating activity in a thermal refuge. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 1999 Jul 1:514–22.

32. King JM, Heinen JT. An assessment of the behaviors of overwintering manatees as influenced by interactions with tourists at two sites in central Florida. Biological Conservation. 2004 May 1;117(3):227–34.

33. Scott TM, Means GH, Meegan RP, Means RC, Upchurch S, Copeland RE, Jones J, Roberts T, Willet A. Springs of Florida. Tallahassee, Florida; Florida Geological Survey; 2004.

34. Hoyer M, Frazer T, Notestein S. Vegetative characteristics of three low-lying Florida coastal rivers in relation to flow, light, salinity and nutrients. Hydrobiologia. 2004 Oct 1;528(1–3):31–43.

35. Frazer TK, Pine WE III, Lauretta MV, Warren G, Nagid E, Strong W, Tuten T. Increased nutrient loading of spring-fed coastal rivers: effects on habitat and faunal communities. Final report. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, FL. 2011.

36. Lauretta MV, Camp EV, Pine WE III, Frazer TK. Catchability model selection for estimating the composition of fishes and invertebrates within dynamic aquatic ecosystems. Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences. 2013 Jan 3;70(3):381–92.

37. Camp EV, Gwinn DC, Lauretta MV, Pine WE, Frazer TK. Use of recovery probabilities can improve sampling efficiency for throw traps in vegetated habitats. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 2011 Mar;140(1):164–9.

38. Walters C, Martell SJ, Christensen V, Mahmoudi B. An Ecosim model for exploring Gulf of Mexico ecosystem management options: implications of including multistanza life-history models for policy predictions. Bulletin of Marine Science. 2008 Jul 1;83(1):251–71.

39. Kevrekidis T, Kourakos G, Boubonari T. Life history, reproduction, growth, population dynamics and production of Gammarus aequicauda (Crustacea: Amphipoda) at extremely low salinities in a Mediterranean lagoon. International Review of Hydrobiology. 2009 Jun;94(3):308–25.

40. Subida MD, Cunha MR, Moreira MH. Life history, reproduction, and production of Gammarus chevreuxi (Amphipoda: Gammaridae) in the Ria de Aveiro, northwestern Portugal. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 2005 Mar;24(1):82–100.

41. Robertson AI. The relationship between annual production: biomass ratios and lifespans for marine macrobenthos. Oecologia. 1979 Jan 1;38(2):193–202. doi: 10.1007/BF00346563 28308889

42. Dittel AI, Epifanio CE, Fogel ML. Trophic relationships of juvenile blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) in estuarine habitats. Hydrobiologia. 2006 Sep 1;568(1):379–90.

43. Reichmuth JM, Roudez R, Glover T, Weis JS. Differences in prey capture behavior in populations of blue crab (Callinectes sapidus Rathbun) from contaminated and clean estuaries in New Jersey. Estuaries and Coasts. 2009 Mar 1;32(2):298–308.

44. Seitz RD, Lipcius RN, Seebo MS. Food availability and growth of the blue crab in seagrass and unvegetated nurseries of Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2005 Jun 1;319(1–2):57–68.

45. Mascaró M, Castillo AM, Simoes N, Chiappa-Carrara X. Variations in the feeding habits of Callinectes rathbunae in Las Palmas lagoon (southern Gulf of Mexico) on three temporal scales. Crustaceana. 2007 Feb 1:139–60.

46. Rosas C, Lazaro-Chavez E, Bückle-Ramirez F. Feeding habits and food niche segregation of Callinectes sapidus, C. rathbunae, and C. similis in a subtropical coastal lagoon of the Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Crustacean Biology. 1994 Apr 1;14(2):371–82.

47. Gutiérrez-Yurrita PJ, Sancho G, Bravo MA, Baltanas A, Montes C. Diet of the red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii in natural ecosystems of the Donana National Park temporary fresh-water marsh (Spain). Journal of Crustacean Biology. 1998 Jan 1;18(1):120–7.

48. Kneib RT, Weeks CA. Intertidal distribution and feeding habits of the mud crab, Eurytium limosum. Estuaries. 1990 Dec 1;13(4):462–8.

49. Collins PA. Feeding of Palaemonetes argentinus (Decapoda: Palaemonidae) from an oxbow lake of the Paraná River, Argentina. Journal of Crustacean Biology. 1999 Jul 1;19(3):485–92.

50. Morgan MD. Grazing and predation of the grass shrimp Palaemonetes pugio 1. Limnology and Oceanography. 1980 Sep;25(5):896–902.

51. Costantini ML, Rossi L. Laboratory study of the grass shrimp feeding preferences. Hydrobiologia. 2001 Jan 1;443(1–3):129–36.

52. MacNeil C, Dick JT, Elwood RW. The trophic ecology of freshwater Gammarus spp.(Crustacea: Amphipoda): problems and perspectives concerning the functional feeding group concept. Biological Reviews. 1997 Aug;72(3):349–64.

53. Duffy JE, Harvilicz AM. Species-specific impacts of grazing amphipods in an eelgrass-bed community. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2001 Nov 28;223:201–11.

54. Chipps SR, Garvey JE. Assessment of food habits and feeding patterns. Analysis and interpretation of freshwater fisheries data. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. 2007:473–514.

55. Walters C, Christensen V, Pauly D. Structuring dynamic models of exploited ecosystems from trophic mass-balance assessments. Reviews in fish biology and fisheries. 1997 Jun 1;7(2):139–72.

56. Pauly D, Christensen V, Walters C. Ecopath, Ecosim, and Ecospace as tools for evaluating ecosystem impact of fisheries. ICES journal of Marine Science. 2000 Jun 1;57(3):697–706.

57. Christensen V, Walters CJ. Ecopath with Ecosim: methods, capabilities and limitations. Ecological modelling. 2004 Mar 1;172(2–4):109–39.

58. Walters CJ, Martell SJ. Fisheries ecology and management. Princeton University Press; 2004 Nov 7.

59. Bettoli PW, Maceina MJ, Noble RL, Betsill RK. Piscivory in largemouth bass as a function of aquatic vegetation abundance. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 1992 Aug;12(3):509–16.

60. Kornijów R, Measey GJ, Moss B. The structure of the littoral: effects of waterlily density and perch predation on sediment and plant‐associated macroinvertebrate communities. Freshwater biology. 2016 Jan;61(1):32–50.

61. Wood KA, O'hare MT, McDonald C, Searle KR, Daunt F, Stillman RA. Herbivore regulation of plant abundance in aquatic ecosystems. Biological Reviews. 2017 May;92(2):1128–41. doi: 10.1111/brv.12272 27062094

62. Bettoli PW, Maceina MJ, Noble RL, Betsill RK. Response of a reservoir fish community to aquatic vegetation removal. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 1993 Feb 1;13(1):110–24.

63. Deegan LA, Wright A, Ayvazian SG, Finn JT, Golden H, Merson RR, Harrison J. Nitrogen loading alters seagrass ecosystem structure and support of higher trophic levels. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 2002 Mar;12(2):193–212.

64. Coll M, Schmidt A, Romanuk T, Lotze HK. Food-web structure of seagrass communities across different spatial scales and human impacts. PloS one. 2011 Jul 21;6(7):e22591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022591 21811637

65. Sass GG, Kitchell JF, Carpenter SR, Hrabik TR, Marburg AE, Turner MG. Fish community and food web responses to a whole‐lake removal of coarse woody habitat. Fisheries. 2006 Jul;31(7):321–30.

66. Dobson A, Lodge D, Alder J, Cumming GS, Keymer J, McGlade J, Mooney H, Rusak JA, Sala O, Wolters V, Wall D. Habitat loss, trophic collapse, and the decline of ecosystem services. Ecology. 2006 Aug;87(8):1915–24. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1915:hltcat];2 16937628

67. Roberts E, Kroker J, Körner S, Nicklisch A. The role of periphyton during the re-colonization of a shallow lake with submerged macrophytes. Hydrobiologia. 2003 Nov 1;506(1–3):525–30.

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 12