Bridge to neuroscience workshop: An effective educational tool to introduce principles of neuroscience to Hispanics students

Autoři: Alexandra Colón-Rodríguez aff001;  Chelsea T. Tiernan aff003;  Eileen S. Rodriguez-Tapia aff004;  William D. Atchison aff001
Působiště autorů: Comparative Medicine and Integrative Biology Program, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America aff001;  Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America aff002;  Department of Translational Science & Molecular Medicine, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States of America aff003;  Neuroscience Program, College of Natural Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America aff004
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie: Research Article


Neuroscience as a discipline is rarely covered in educational institutions in Puerto Rico. In an effort to overcome this deficit we developed the Bridge to Neuroscience Workshop (BNW), a full-day hands-on workshop in neuroscience education. BNW was conceived as an auxiliary component of a parent recruitment program called Bridge to the PhD in Neuroscience Program (BPNP). The objectives of BNW are to identify promising students for BPNP, and to increase awareness of neuroscience as a discipline and a career option. BNW introduces basic concepts in neuroscience using a variety of educational techniques, including mini-lectures, interactive discussions, case studies, experimentation, and a sheep brain dissection. Since its inception in 2011 BNW has undergone a series of transformations that continue to improve upon an already successful and influential educational program for underrepresented minorities. As of Fall 2018, we have presented 21 workshops, impacting 200 high school and 424 undergraduate students. BNW has been offered at University of Puerto Rico (UPR)-Arecibo, UPR-Cayey, UPR-Humacao, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Ponce, and Universidad Interamericana de Puerto Rico-Arecibo. A pre-and post evaluation was given to evaluate material comprehension and thus measure effectiveness of our one-day interactive workshop. Our results suggest that both high school and undergraduate students have little prior knowledge of neuroscience, and that participation in BNW improves not only understanding, but also enthusiasm for the discipline. Currently, our assessment has only been able to evaluate short-term effects (e.g. comprehension and learning). Therefore, our current focus is developing methods capable of determining how participation in BNW impacts future academic and career decisions.

Klíčová slova:

Graduates – Human learning – Lectures – Neurons – Neuroscience – Schools – Undergraduates – Workshops


1. Census US. U.S. Census Bureau: State and Country Quick Facts. 2014.

2. Nelson D, Brammer C, Rhoads H. A national analysis of minorities in science and engineering faculties at research universities. Oklahoma Universiy Diversity in Science Association. 2010;2(1–53):1.

3. Fiegener M. Doctorate recipients from U.S. universities: 2013 digest. National Science Foundation, 2015.

4. Rico DdEdP. Política pública sobre la organización y la oferta curricular del programa de ciencias para los niveles elemental, intermedio y superior de las escuelas públicas de Puerto Rico. In: Rico DdEdP, editor. Departamento de Education Del Estado Libre Asociado de Puero Rico, Carta circular2014.

5. Chudler, EH. Neuroscience for kids. 2011;

6. Marzullo T, Gage G. The SpikerBox: A low cost, open-source bioamplifier for increasing public participation in neuroscience inquiry. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(3).

7. Weekes N. Diversity in neuroscience. We know the problem. Are we really still debating the solutions? 2012; 11(1):a52–54.

8. Lucariello J, Nastasi B, Anderman E, Dwyer C, Ormiston H, Skiba R. Science supports education: The behavioral research base for psychology's top 20 principles for enhancing teaching and learning Mind, Brain and Education. 2016;10(1):55–67.

9. Michael J. Where's the evidence that active learning works?. Advances in Physiology Education. 2006;30:159–67. doi: 10.1152/advan.00053.2006 17108243

10. Romero-Calderon R, O’Hare E, Suthana N, Scott-Van Zeeland A, Rizk-Jackson A, Attar A, et al. Project brainstorm: Using neuroscience to connect college students with local schools. PLoS Biology. 2012;10(4):2–5.

11. Hammond C, Karlin D, Thimonier J. Creative research science experiences for high school students. PLoS Biology. 2010;8(9):9–11.

12. Fitzakerley J, Michlin M, Paton J, Dubinsky J. Neuroscientists’ classroom visits positively impact student attitudes. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12):e84035—e. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084035 24358325

13. Porter S, Umbach P. College major choice: An analysis of person–environment fit. Research in Higher Education. 2006;47.4:429–49.

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 12
Nejčtenější tento týden