The effects of kinesiology taping on experimentally-induced thermal and mechanical pain in otherwise pain-free healthy humans: A randomised controlled repeated-measures laboratory study


Autoři: Gourav Banerjee aff001;  Michelle Briggs aff002;  Mark I. Johnson aff001
Působiště autorů: Centre for Pain Research, School of Clinical and Applied Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, England, United Kingdom aff001;  Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, England, United Kingdom aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226109

Souhrn

Background

Kinesiology taping (KT) is used to manage musculoskeletal-related pain. There is a paucity of physiological studies evaluating the effect of KT on stimulus-evoked experimental pain.

Objective

To investigate the effect of KT (applied to lumbar region) on cutaneous somatosensation to noxious and innocuous stimuli in humans with a non-sensitised normally functioning nociceptive system using quantitative sensory testing (QST).

Methods

Fifty-four participants were randomised to one of three interventions: (i) KT (ii) standard ‘rigid’ taping (ST) (iii) sham taping (ShT). QST measurements were taken at lumbar sites pre-intervention (T1), during-intervention (T2) and during-intervention (T3) in the following sequence: warm-detection-threshold (WDT), heat-pain-threshold (HTPh), heat-pain-tolerance (HPTo), mechanical-detection-threshold (MDT), mechanical-pain-threshold (MPT) and pressure-pain-threshold (PPT).

Results

Mixed ANOVA revealed statistically significant interaction between Intervention and Time on MDT (p < .0005) and MPT (p < .0005) but not on WDT (p = .09), HPTh (p = .09), HPTo (p = .51) and PPT (p = .52) datasets. There was no significant simple main effect of Intervention on MDT at T2 (p = .68) and T3 (p = .24), and MPT at T2 (p = .79) and T3 (p = .54); post-hoc tests found KT and ST groups had higher (but non-significant) MDT and MPT than the ShT group. There was a significant simple main effect of Time on MDT and MPT for KT (p < .0005) and ST (p < .0005) groups; post-hoc tests found significant increases in MDT and MPT at T3 and T2 compared with T1 in both KT and ST groups. There was no significant simple main effect of Time on MDT (p = .13) nor MPT (p = .08) for the ShT group.

Conclusion

Taping, irrespective of the elasticity, may modulate cutaneous mechanosensation. KT, ST and ShT seemed to have similar influence on cutaneous thermal and deep pressure nociception.

Klíčová slova:

Analysis of variance – Convolution – Mathematical functions – Pain management – Pain sensation – Sensory perception – Mechanoreceptors – Somatosensory system


Zdroje

1. Desjardins-Charbonneau A, Roy JS, Dionne CE, Desmeules F. The Efficacy of Taping for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10:420–433. 26346114

2. Lim ECW, Tay MGX. Kinesio taping in musculoskeletal pain and disability that lasts for more than 4 weeks: is it time to peel off the tape and throw it out with the sweat? A systematic review with meta-analysis focused on pain and also methods of tape application. British journal of sports medicine. 2015;49:1558–1566. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094151 25595290

3. Li X, Zhou X, Howe Liu NC, Liang J, Yang X, Zhao G, et al. Effects of elastic therapeutic taping on knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging and Disease. 2018;9:296–308. doi: 10.14336/AD.2017.0309 29896418

4. Li Y, Yin Y, Jia G, Chen H, Yu L, Wu D. Effects of kinesiotape on pain and disability in individuals with chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical rehabilitation. 2019;33:596–606. doi: 10.1177/0269215518817804 30526011

5. Zhang XF, Liu L, Wang BB, Liu X, Li P. Evidence for kinesio taping in management of myofascial pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical rehabilitation. 2019;33:865–874. doi: 10.1177/0269215519826267 30712369

6. Pamuk U, Yucesoy CA. MRI analyses show that kinesio taping affects much more than just the targeted superficial tissues and causes heterogeneous deformations within the whole limb. Journal of Biomechanics. 2015;48:4262–4270. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.10.036 26556717

7. Cimino S, Beaudette S, Brown S. Kinesio taping influences the mechanical behaviour of the skin of the low back: A possible pathway for functionally relevant effects. J Biomech. 2018;67:150–156. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.12.005 29276069

8. Williams S, Whatman C, Hume PA, Sheerin K. Kinesio taping in treatment and prevention of sports injuries. Sports Medicine. 2012;42:153–164. doi: 10.2165/11594960-000000000-00000 22124445

9. Mostafavifar M, Wertz J, Borchers J. A systematic review of the effectiveness of kinesio taping for musculoskeletal injury. The Physician and Sportsmedicine. 2012;40:33–40. doi: 10.3810/psm.2012.11.1986 23306413

10. Montalvo AM, Cara E, Myer GD. Effect of kinesiology taping on pain in individuals with musculoskeletal injuries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Sportsmed. 2014;42:48–57. doi: 10.3810/psm.2014.05.2057 24875972

11. D'mello R, Dickenson A. Spinal cord mechanisms of pain. British journal of Anaesthesia. 2008;101:8–16. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen088 18417503

12. Rolke R, Magerl W, Campbell KA, Schalber C, Caspari S, Birklein F, et al. Quantitative sensory testing: a comprehensive protocol for clinical trials. European Journal of Pain. 2006;10:77–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.02.003 16291301

13. Olesen AE, Andresen T, Staahl C, Drewes A.M. Human experimental pain models for assessing the therapeutic efficacy of analgesic drugs. Pharmacological reviews. 2012;64:722–779. doi: 10.1124/pr.111.005447 22722894

14. Bae SH, Lee YS, Kim GD, Kim KY. The Effects of Kinesio-taping Applied to Delayed Onset Muscle on Changes in Pain. International Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-Technology. 2014;6:133–142.

15. Boguszewski D, Oko B, Adamczyk JG, Białoszewski D. Evaluation of the effectiveness of kinesiotaping in reducing delayed onset muscle soreness of the biceps brachii. Biomedical Human Kinetics. 2016;8:88–94.

16. Krejci, A. The immediate effects of thearapeutic taping on musculoskeletal pain. Published Thesis Master of Science, University of Northern Iowa, USA. 2016

17. Kruszyniewicz J, Skonieczna-Żydecka K, Sroka R, Adler G. The analgesic efficacy of Kinesiology taping in delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine. 2016;1:73–79.

18. Merino-Marban R, Mayorga-Vega D, Fernandez-Rodriguez E. Effect of kinesio tape application on calf pain and ankle range of motion in duathletes. Journal of human kinetics. 2013;37:129–135. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2013-0033 24146713

19. Ozmen T, Aydogmus M, Dogan H, Acar D, Zoroglu T, Willems M. The effect of kinesio taping on muscle pain, Sprint performance, and flexibility in recovery from squat exercise in young adult women. Journal of sport rehabilitation. 2016;25:7–12. 25559694

20. Boobphachart D, Manimmanakorn N, Manimmanakorn A, Thuwakum W, Hamlin MJ. Effects of elastic taping, non-elastic taping and static stretching on recovery after intensive eccentric exercise. Research in Sports Medicine. 2017;25:181–190. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2017.1282360 28121177

21. Chong PST, Cros DP. Technology literature review: quantitative sensory testing. Muscle & nerve. 2004;29:734–747.

22. Angst MS, Tingle M, Phillips NG, Carvalho B. Determining heat and mechanical pain threshold in inflamed skin of human subjects. Journal of visualized experiments. 2009;23:p.e1092.

23. Arendt-Nielsen L, Yarnitsky D. Experimental and clinical applications of quantitative sensory testing applied to skin, muscles and viscera. The Journal of Pain. 2009;10:556–572. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.02.002 19380256

24. Dyck PJ, Edwards RR, Freeman R, Gracely R, Haanpaa MH, Hansson P, et al. Value of quantitative sensory testing in neurological and pain disorders: NeuPSIG consensus. Pain. 2013;154:1807–1819. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.05.047 23742795

25. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods. 2007;39:175–191. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146 17695343

26. United Kingdom Office for National Statistics. Ethnic Group: What is the Recommended Ethnic Group Question for use on a survey in England. https://www.ons.gov.uk/methodology/classificationsandstandards/measuringequality/ethnicgroupnationalidentityandreligion. Accessed 15 June 2019.

27. Cruz-Almeida Y, Fillingim RB. Can quantitative sensory testing move us closer to mechanism-based pain management? Pain medicine. 2014;15:61–72. doi: 10.1111/pme.12230 24010588

28. Yarnitsky D, Pud D. Quantitative sensory testing. In: Binnie CD, Cooper R, Mauguie`re F, Osselton JW, Prior PF, Tedman BM, et al., editors. Clinical Neurophysiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V; 2004. p. 305–32.

29. Dubin A, Patapoutian A. Nociceptors: the sensors of the pain pathway. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:3760–72. doi: 10.1172/JCI42843 21041958

30. Mücke M, Cuhls H, Radbruch L, Baron R, Maier C, Tölle T, et al. Quantitative sensorische Testung. Der Schmerz. 2014;28:635–648. doi: 10.1007/s00482-014-1485-4 25403802

31. Kase K, Wallis J, Kase T, Kinesio Taping Association International, McDuffie M. Clinical Therapeutic Applications of the Kinesio Taping Method - 3rd Edition, Kinesio USA, LLC; 2013

32. RockTape: Taping Videos & Application Guides [Online]. Campbell, California, USA: RockTape. 2017. http://www.rocktape.com/videos/taping-guides. Accessed 24 August 2017.

33. Kawamura H, Nishigami T, Yamamoto A, Tsujishita M, Ito K, Ohya N, et al. Comparison of the pain-relieving effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation applied at the same dermatome levels as the site of pain in the wrist joint. Journal of physical therapy science. 2017;29:1996–1999. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1996 29200643

34. Laerd Statistics. (2018). Statistical tutorials and software guides [Online]. Lund Research Ltd. 2018. https://statistics.laerd.com. Accessed 10 August 2017.

35. Richardson JT. Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review. 2011;6:135–147.

36. Constantinou M, Brown M. Therapeutic taping for Musculoskeletal Conditions. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010

37. Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain. 2011;152:S2–S15. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.030 20961685

38. Patestas MA, Gartner LP. A textbook of neuroanatomy (Chapter 10 Ascending Sensory Pathways), John Wiley & Sons; 2016.

39. Meireles Filho A, Da Silva Machado R, Cardoso TP, Costa MS, Teles RHG, Dutra YM, et al. Kinesio Taping Reduces Cold-Induced Pain in Young Healthy Individuals Independent of the Applied Tension on the Tape. International Archives of Medicine. 2015;8.

40. Hansson P, Backonja M, Bouhassira D. Usefulness and limitations of quantitative sensory testing: clinical and research application in neuropathic pain states. Pain. 2007;129:256–259. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.03.030 17451879

41. Bartley EJ, Fillingim RB. Sex differences in pain: a brief review of clinical and experimental findings. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2013;111:52–58. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet127 23794645


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 12