Social anxiety changes the way we move—A social approach-avoidance task in a virtual reality CAVE system


Autoři: Bastian Lange aff001;  Paul Pauli aff001
Působiště autorů: Department of Psychology, Biological Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Psychotherapy, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany aff001;  Center of Mental Health, Medical Faculty, University of Würzburg, Germany aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226805

Souhrn

Investigating approach-avoidance behavior regarding affective stimuli is important in broadening the understanding of one of the most common psychiatric disorders, social anxiety disorder. Many studies in this field rely on approach-avoidance tasks, which mainly assess hand movements, or interpersonal distance measures, which return inconsistent results and lack ecological validity. Therefore, the present study introduces a virtual reality task, looking at avoidance parameters (movement time and speed, distance to social stimulus, gaze behavior) during whole-body movements. These complex movements represent the most ecologically valid form of approach and avoidance behavior. These are at the core of complex and natural social behavior. With this newly developed task, the present study examined whether high socially anxious individuals differ in avoidance behavior when bypassing another person, here virtual humans with neutral and angry facial expressions. Results showed that virtual bystanders displaying angry facial expressions were generally avoided by all participants. In addition, high socially anxious participants generally displayed enhanced avoidance behavior towards virtual people, but no specifically exaggerated avoidance behavior towards virtual people with a negative facial expression. The newly developed virtual reality task proved to be an ecological valid tool for research on complex approach-avoidance behavior in social situations. The first results revealed that whole body approach-avoidance behavior relative to passive bystanders is modulated by their emotional facial expressions and that social anxiety generally amplifies such avoidance.

Klíčová slova:

Analysis of variance – Behavior – Emotions – Face – Questionnaires – Social anxiety disorder – Virtual reality – Anxiolytics


Zdroje

1. Lang PJ, Bradley MM. Emotion and the motivational brain. Biological psychology. 2010;84(3):437–450. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.10.007 19879918

2. Phaf RH, Mohr SE, Rotteveel M, Wicherts JM. Approach, avoidance, and affect: a meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks. Frontiers in psychology. 2014;5:378. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00378 24847292

3. Chen M, Bargh JA. Consequences of Automatic Evaluation: Immediate Behavioral Predispositions to Approach or Avoid the Stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1999;25(2):215–224. doi: 10.1177/0146167299025002007

4. Eder AB, Rothermund K. When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of experimental psychology General. 2008;137(2):262–281. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.262 18473659

5. de Houwer J, Crombez G, Baeyens F, Hermans D. On the generality of the affective Simon effect. Cognition & Emotion. 2001;15(2):189–206. doi: 10.1080/02699930125883

6. Markman AB, Brendl CM. Constraining theories of embodied cognition. Psychological science. 2005;16(1):6–10. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00772.x 15660844

7. Rinck M, Becker ES. Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry. 2007;38(2):105–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.001 17126289

8. Saraiva AC, Schuur F, Bestmann S. Emotional valence and contextual affordances flexibly shape approach-avoidance movements. Frontiers in psychology. 2013;4:933. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00933 24379794

9. Seidel EM, Habel U, Kirschner M, Gur RC, Derntl B. The impact of facial emotional expressions on behavioral tendencies in women and men. Journal of experimental psychology Human perception and performance. 2010;36(2):500–507. doi: 10.1037/a0018169 20364933

10. Marsh AA, Ambady N, Kleck RE. The effects of fear and anger facial expressions on approach- and avoidance-related behaviors. Emotion (Washington, DC). 2005;5(1):119–124. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.119

11. Roelofs K, Elzinga BM, Rotteveel M. The effects of stress-induced cortisol responses on approach-avoidance behavior. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005;30(7):665–677. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.02.008 15854783

12. Stins JF, Roelofs K, Villan J, Kooijman K, Hagenaars MA, Beek PJ. Walk to me when I smile, step back when I’m angry: emotional faces modulate whole-body approach-avoidance behaviors. Experimental brain research. 2011;212(4):603–611. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2767-z 21698468

13. Laham SM, Kashima Y, Dix J, Wheeler M. A meta-analysis of the facilitation of arm flexion and extension movements as a function of stimulus valence. Cognition & Emotion. 2015;29(6):1069–1090. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.968096

14. Heuer K, Rinck M, Becker ES. Avoidance of emotional facial expressions in social anxiety: The Approach-Avoidance Task. Behaviour research and therapy. 2007;45(12):2990–3001. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.08.010 17889827

15. Roelofs K, van Peer J, Berretty E, Jong Pd, Spinhoven P, Elzinga BM. Hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis hyperresponsiveness is associated with increased social avoidance behavior in social phobia. Biological psychiatry. 2009;65(4):336–343. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.08.022 18947821

16. Roelofs K, Putman P, Schouten S, Lange WG, Volman I, Rinck M. Gaze direction differentially affects avoidance tendencies to happy and angry faces in socially anxious individuals. Behaviour research and therapy. 2010;48(4):290–294. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.11.008 19962692

17. Fehm L, Pelissolo A, Furmark T, Wittchen HU. Size and burden of social phobia in Europe. European neuropsychopharmacology: the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005;15(4):453–462. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2005.04.002

18. Furmark T. Social phobia: Overview of community surveys. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2002;105(2):84–93. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.1r103.x 11939957

19. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of general psychiatry. 2005;62(6):593–602. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593 15939837

20. Ruscio AM, Brown TA, Chiu WT, Sareen J, Stein MB, Kessler RC. Social fears and social phobia in the USA: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Psychological medicine. 2008;38(1):15–28. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707001699 17976249

21. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV-TR. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.; 2000.

22. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-V. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.; 2013.

23. Beck AT, Emery G, Greenberg RL. Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. Basic Books; 1985.

24. Clark DM, Wells A. A cognitive model of social phobia. In: Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press; 1995. p. 69–93.

25. Eysenck MW, Derakshan N, Santos R, Calvo MG. Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion (Washington, DC). 2007;7(2):336–353. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336

26. Mathews A, Mackintosh B. A Cognitive Model of Selective Processing in Anxiety. Cognitive Therapy & Research. 1998;22(6):539–560. doi: 10.1023/A:1018738019346

27. Rapee RM, Heimberg RG. A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1997;35(8):741–756. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(97)00022-3 9256517

28. Beidel DC, Turner SM, Dancu CV. Physiological, cognitive and behavioral aspects of social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1985;23(2):109–117. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(85)90019-1 4004691

29. Wieser MJ, Pauli P, Grosseibl M, Molzow I, Mühlberger A. Virtual social interactions in social anxiety–the impact of sex, gaze, and interpersonal distance. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking. 2010;13(5):547–554. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0432 20950179

30. Koch S, Holland RW, Hengstler M, van Knippenberg A. Body locomotion as regulatory process: stepping backward enhances cognitive control. Psychological science. 2009;20(5):549–550. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02342.x 19476588

31. Adler LL, Iverson MA. Interpersonal distance as a function of task difficulty, praise, status orientation, and sex of partner. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1974;39(2):683–692. doi: 10.2466/pms.1974.39.2.683

32. Aiello JR. A further look at equilibrium theory: Visual interaction as a function of interpersonal distance. Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior. 1977;1(2):122–140. doi: 10.1007/BF01145461

33. Uzzell D, Horne N. The influence of biological sex, sexuality and gender role on interpersonal distance. The British journal of social psychology / the British Psychological Society. 2006;45(Pt 3):579–597. doi: 10.1348/014466605X58384

34. Hayduk LA. Personal space: Where we now stand. Psychological Bulletin. 1983;94(2):293–335. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.94.2.293

35. Bombari D, Schmid Mast M, Canadas E, Bachmann M. Studying social interactions through immersive virtual environment technology: Virtues, pitfalls, and future challenges. Frontiers in psychology. 2015;6:869. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00869 26157414

36. Kuhlen AK, Brennan SE. Language in dialogue: When confederates might be hazardous to your data. Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2013;20(1):54–72. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0341-8

37. Blascovich J, Loomis J, Beall AC, Swinth KR, Hoyt CL, Bailenson JN. Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology. Psychological Inquiry. 2002;13(2):103–124. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1302_01

38. McCall C, Blascovich J. How, When, and Why to Use Digital Experimental Virtual Environments to Study Social Behavior. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2009;3(5):744–758. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00195.x

39. Parsons TD, Gaggioli A, Riva G. Virtual Reality for Research in Social Neuroscience. Brain sciences. 2017;7(4). doi: 10.3390/brainsci7040042 28420150

40. Garau M, Slater M, Pertaub DP, Razzaque S. The Responses of People to Virtual Humans in an Immersive Virtual Environment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 2005;14(1):104–116. doi: 10.1162/1054746053890242

41. Hoyt CL, Blascovich J, Swinth KR. Social Inhibition in Immersive Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 2003;12(2):183–195. doi: 10.1162/105474603321640932

42. James LK, Lin CY, Steed A, Swapp D, Slater M. Social anxiety in virtual environments: results of a pilot study. Cyberpsychology & behavior: the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society. 2003;6(3):237–243. doi: 10.1089/109493103322011515

43. Kane HS, McCall C, Collins NL, Blascovich J. Mere presence is not enough: Responsive support in a virtual world. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2012;48(1):37–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.001

44. McCall C, Hildebrandt LK, Hartmann R, Baczkowski BM, Singer T. Introducing the Wunderkammer as a tool for emotion research: Unconstrained gaze and movement patterns in three emotionally evocative virtual worlds. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;59:93–107. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.028

45. Parsons TD, Rizzo AA. Affective outcomes of virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and specific phobias: a meta-analysis. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry. 2008;39(3):250–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2007.07.007 17720136

46. Rinck M, Rörtgen T, Lange WG, Dotsch R, Wigboldus DHJ, Becker ES. Social anxiety predicts avoidance behaviour in virtual encounters. Cognition & Emotion. 2010;24(7):1269–1276. doi: 10.1080/02699930903309268

47. Ahrens LM, Muhlberger A, Pauli P, Wieser MJ. Impaired visuocortical discrimination learning of socially conditioned stimuli in social anxiety. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience. 2015;10(7):929–937. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu140 25338634

48. Reutter M, Hewig J, Wieser MJ, Osinsky R. The N2pc component reliably captures attentional bias in social anxiety. Psychophysiology. 2017;54(4):519–527. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12809 28111770

49. Wieser MJ, Moscovitch DA. The Effect of Affective Context on Visuocortical Processing of Neutral Faces in Social Anxiety. Frontiers in psychology. 2015;6:1824. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01824 26648889

50. Laux L, Glanzmann P, Schaffner P, Spielberger CD. Das State-Trait-Angstinventar (STAI): Theoretische Grundlagen und Handanweisung. Weinheim: Beltz Test GmbH; 1981.

51. Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry. 1994;25(1):49–59. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9 7962581

52. Schubert T, Friedmann F, Regenbrecht H. Embodied Presence in Virtual Environments. In: Paton R, Neilson I, editors. Visual Representations and Interpretations. London: Springer London; 1999. p. 269–278.

53. Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG. Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method for Quantifying Simulator Sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 1993;3(3):203–220. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3

54. Fydrich T. SPAI—Soziale Phobie und Angst Inventar. In: Brähler E, Schumacher J, Strauß B, editors. Diagnostische Verfahren in der Psychotherapie. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2002. p. 335–338.

55. Ekman P, Friesen WV. Manual for the Facial Action Coding System. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1978.

56. Ekman P, Friesen WV, Hager JC. Facial action coding system. Salt Lake City, UT: A Human Face; 2002.

57. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological). 1995;57(1):289–300. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x

58. Batty M, Taylor MJ. Early processing of the six basic facial emotional expressions. Cognitive Brain Research. 2003;17(3):613–620. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00174-5 14561449

59. Green MJ, Phillips ML. Social threat perception and the evolution of paranoia. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. 2004;28(3):333–342. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.006 15225975

60. Lundqvist D, Juth P, Öhman A. Using facial emotional stimuli in visual search experiments: The arousal factor explains contradictory results. Cognition & Emotion. 2014;28(6):1012–1029. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.867479

61. Palermo R, Rhodes G. Are you always on my mind? A review of how face perception and attention interact. Neuropsychologia. 2007;45(1):75–92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.025 16797607

62. Hall ET. The Hidden Dimension. Leonardo. 1966;6.

63. Teneggi C, Canzoneri E, Di Pellegrino G, Serino A. Social modulation of peripersonal space boundaries. Current biology. 2013;23(5):406–411. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.043 23394831

64. Dotsch R, Wigboldus DHJ. Virtual prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2008;44(4):1194–1198. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.003

65. Wilcox LM, Allison RS, Elfassy S, Grelik C. Personal space in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception. 2006;3(4):412–428. doi: 10.1145/1190036.1190041

66. Cohen P, Cohen J, Kasen S, Velez CN, Hartmark C, Johnson J, et al. An Epidemiological Study of Disorders in Late Childhood and Adolescence? I. Age- and Gender-Specific Prevalence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 1993;34(6):851–867. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1993.tb01094.x 8408371

67. McLean CP, Asnaani A, Litz BT, Hofmann SG. Gender differences in anxiety disorders: Prevalence, course of illness, comorbidity and burden of illness. Journal of psychiatric research. 2011;45(8):1027–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.03.006 21439576

68. Furmark T, Tillfors M, Everz PO, Marteinsdottir I, Gefvert O, Fredrikson M. Social phobia in the general population: Prevalence and sociodemographic profile. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 1999;34(8):416–424. doi: 10.1007/s001270050163 10501711

69. Turk CL, Heimberg RG, Orsillo SM, Holt CS, Gitow A, Street LL, et al. An Investigation of Gender Differences in Social Phobia. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 1998;12(3):209–223. doi: 10.1016/s0887-6185(98)00010-3 9653680

70. Stiefelhagen R, Zhu J. Head orientation and gaze direction in meetings. In: Terveen L, Wixon D, editors. CHI’02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computer systems—CHI’02. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press; 2002. p. 858.


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 12