Development of visual perception of others’ actions: Children’s judgment of lifted weight


Autoři: Alessandra Sciutti aff001;  Laura Patanè aff002;  Giulio Sandini aff002
Působiště autorů: Cognitive Architecture for Collaborative Technologies (CONTACT) Unit, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy aff001;  Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(11)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224979

Souhrn

Humans are excellent at perceiving different features of the actions performed by others. For instance, by viewing someone else manipulating an unknown object, one can infer its weight–an intrinsic feature otherwise not directly accessible through vision. How such perceptual skill develops during childhood remains unclear. To confront this gap, the current study had children (N:63, 6–10 years old) and adults (N:21) judge the weight of objects after observing videos of an actor lifting them. Although 6-year-olds could already discriminate different weights, judgment accuracy had not reached adult-like levels by 10 years of age. Additionally, children’s stature was a more reliable predictor of their ability to read others’ actions than was their chronological age. This paper discusses the results in light of a potential link between motor development and action perception.

Klíčová slova:

Adults – Age groups – Children – Kinematics – Motor system – Musculoskeletal system – Sports – Vision


Zdroje

1. Ambrosini E, Pezzulo G, Costantini M. The eye in hand: Predicting others’ behavior by integrating multiple sources of information. J Neurophysiol. 2015. doi: 10.1152/jn.00464.2014 25568158

2. Sartori L, Becchio C, Castiello U. Cues to intention: the role of movement information. Cognition. 2011;119: 242–52. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.014 21349505

3. Tidoni E, Borgomaneri S, di Pellegrino G, Avenanti A. Action Simulation Plays a Critical Role in Deceptive Action Recognition. J Neurosci. 2013;33: 611–623. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2228-11.2013 23303940

4. Tomeo E, Cesari P, Aglioti SM, Urgesi C. Fooling the kickers but not the goalkeepers: behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of fake action detection in soccer. Cereb Cortex. 2013;23: 2765–78. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs279 22941722

5. Aglioti SM, Cesari P, Romani M, Urgesi C. Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11: 1109–1116. doi: 10.1038/nn.2182 19160510

6. Hamilton AF de C, Joyce DW, Flanagan JR, Frith CD, Wolpert DM. Kinematic cues in perceptual weight judgement and their origins in box lifting. Psychol Res. 2007;71: 13–21. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0032-4 16311765

7. Sciutti A, Patanè L, Nori F, Sandini G. Understanding object weight from human and humanoid lifting actions. IEEE Trans Auton Ment Dev. 2014;6: 80–92. doi: 10.1109/TAMD.2014.2312399

8. Shim J, Hecht H, Lee J-E, Yook D-W, Kim J-T. The limits of visual mass perception. Q J Exp Psychol. 2009;62: 2210–2221. doi: 10.1080/17470210902730597 19391043

9. Runeson S, Frykholm G. Visual perception of lifted weight. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981;7: 733–740. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.7.4.733 6457088

10. Falck-Ytter T, Gredebäck G, von Hofsten C. Infants predict other people’s action goals. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9: 878–879. doi: 10.1038/nn1729 16783366

11. Kanakogi Y, Itakura S. Developmental correspondence between action prediction and motor ability in early infancy. Nat Commun. 2011;2: 341. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1342 21654641

12. Meltzoff AN. Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Dev Psychol. 1995;31: 838–850. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.31.5.838 25147406

13. Warneken F, Tomasello M. The roots of human altruism. Br J Psychol. 2009;100: 455–71. doi: 10.1348/000712608X379061 19063815

14. Sciutti A, Lohan KS, Gredebäck G, Koch B, Rohlfing KJ. Language Meddles with Infants’ Processing of Observed Actions. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 2016. p. 46. Available: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frobt.2016.00046

15. Lohan KS, Griffiths SS, Sciutti A, Partmann TC, Rohlfing KJ. Co-development of manner and path concepts in language, action, and eye-gaze behavior. Top Cogn Sci. 2014;6: 492–512. doi: 10.1111/tops.12098 24934106

16. Marshall PJ, Saby JN, Meltzoff AN. Infant brain responses to object weight: Exploring goal-directed actions and self-experience. Infancy. 2013;18: 942–960. doi: 10.1111/infa.12012 24311970

17. Wang Z, Williamson RA, Meltzoff AN. Social Learning Promotes Understanding of the Physical World: Preschool Children’s Imitation of Weight Sorting. J Exp Child Psychol. 2011;109: 158–173. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.01.008

18. Wang Z, Williamson RA, Meltzoff AN. Imitation as a mechanism in cognitive development: a cross-cultural investigation of 4-year-old children's rule learning. Front Psychol. 2015;6: 1–8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00001

19. Runeson S, Frykholm G. Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1983. pp. 585–615. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.112.4.585

20. Kaiser MK, Proffitt DR. The development of sensitivity to causally relevant dynamic information. Child Dev. 1984;55: 1614–1624. 6488965

21. Poliakoff E, Galpin a. J, Dick JPR, Tipper SP. Does Parkinson’s disease affect judgement about another person’s action? Exp Brain Res. 2010;204: 327–331. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1976-1 19690842

22. O’Reilly E, Steger JA. Children’s use of context in judgment of weight. Child Dev. 1970;41: 1095–1101. 5496257

23. Brainard DH. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis. 1997;10: 433–436. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357 9176952

24. Pelli DG. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis. 1997;10: 437–442. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00366 9176953

25. Jazayeri M, Shadlen MN. Temporal context calibrates interval timing. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13: 1020–6. doi: 10.1038/nn.2590 20581842

26. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27: 169–192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230 15217330

27. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2: 661–670. doi: 10.1038/35090060 11533734

28. Hamilton AF de C, Wolpert D, Frith U. Your Own Action Influences How You Perceive Another Person ‘ s Action. Curr Biol. 2004;14: 493–498. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.007 15043814

29. Hamilton AF de C, Wolpert D, Frith U, Grafton S. Where does your own action influence your perception of another person’s action in the brain? Neuroimage. 2006;29: 524–35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.037 16112877

30. Alaerts K, Swinnen SP, Wenderoth N. Observing how others lift light or heavy objects: Which visual cues mediate the encoding of muscular force in the primary motor cortex? Neuropsychologia. 2010;48: 2082–2090. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.029 20381505

31. Senot P, D’Ausilio A, Franca M. Effect of weight-related labels on corticospinal excitability during observation of grasping: a TMS study. Exp Brain Res. 2011;211: 161–167. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2635-x 21533701

32. Finisguerra A, Amoruso L, Makris S, Urgesi C. Dissociated representations of deceptive intentions and kinematic adaptations in the observer’s motor system. Cereb Cortex. 2018;28: 33–47. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw346 29253254

33. Pobric G, Hamilton A de CF. Action understanding requires the left inferior frontal cortex. Curr Biol. 2006;16: 524–529. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.033 16527749

34. Dum RP, Strick PL. Frontal lobe inputs to the digit representations of the motor areas on the lateral surface of the hemisphere. J Neurosci. 2005;25: 1375–1386. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3902-04.2005 15703391

35. Smits-Engelsman BCM, Westenberg Y, Duysens J. Development of isometric force and force control in children. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003;17: 68–74. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00081-8 12763193

36. Forssberg H, Eliasson a. C, Kinoshita H, Johansson RS, Westling G. Development of human precision grip I: Basic coordination of force. Exp Brain Res. 1991;85: 451–457. doi: 10.1007/bf00229422 1893993

37. Gori M, Squeri V, Sciutti A, Masia L, Sandini G, Konczak J. Motor commands in children interfere with their haptic perception of objects. Exp Brain Res. 2012;223: 149–157. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3248-8 23064882

38. Mounoud P. Cognitive and motor skills in a developmental perspective. In: Wade MG, t HTA, editors. Motor Development in Children: Aspects of Coordination and Control. 1986.

39. Jansen-Osmann P, Richter S, Konczak J, Kalveram K-T. Force adaptation transfers to untrained workspace regions in children: evidence for developing inverse dynamic motor models. Exp brain Res. 2002;143: 212–20. doi: 10.1007/s00221-001-0982-8 11880897

40. Malmström J-E, Lindström L. Propagation velocity of muscle action potentials in the growing normal child. Muscle Nerve. 1997;20: 403–410. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199704)20:4<403::aid-mus1>3.0.co;2-e 9121496

41. Müller K, Hömberg V. Development of speed of repetitive movements in children is determined by structural changes in corticospinal efferents. Neurosci Lett. 1992;144: 57–60. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(92)90715-j 1436714

42. Alaerts K, Senot P, Swinnen SP, Craighero L, Wenderoth N, Fadiga L. Force requirements of observed object lifting are encoded by the observer’s motor system: A TMS study. Eur J Neurosci. 2010;31: 1144–1153. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07124.x 20377627

43. Cacciari E, Milani S, Balsamo A, Spada E, Bona G, Cavallo L, et al. Italian cross-sectional growth charts for height, weight and BMI (2 to 20 yr). J Endocrinol Invest. 2006;29: 581–593. Available: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03344156 16957405

44. Bingham G. Kinematic form and scaling: further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1987;13: 155–177. Available: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xhp/13/2/155/ doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.13.2.155 2953848

45. Palinko O, Sciutti A, Patanè L, Rea F, Nori F, Sandini G. Communicative Lifting Actions in Human-Humanoid Interaction. IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots. Madrid; 2014.

46. Manning C, Aagten-Murphy D, Pellicano E. The development of speed discrimination abilities. Vision Res. 2012;70: 27–33. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.08.004 22903088

47. Droit-volet S, Wearden J. Speeding up an internal clock in children? Effects of visual flicker on subjective duration. Q J Exp Psychol Sect B. 2002;55B: 193–211. doi: 10.1080/0272499014300025

48. Ahmed IJ, Lewis TL, Ellemberg D, Maurer D. Discrimination of speed in 5-year-olds and adults: Are children up to speed? Vision Res. 2005;45: 2129–2135. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.036 15845244

49. Gavazzi G, Bisio A, Pozzo T. Time perception of visual motion is tuned by the motor representation of human actions. Sci Rep. 2013;3: 1168. doi: 10.1038/srep01168 23378903

50. Shim J, Carlton L, Kim J. Estimation of lifted weight and produced effort through perception of point-light display. Perception. 2004;33: 277–291. doi: 10.1068/p3434 15176613

51. Bingham GP. Scaling Judgments of Lifted Weight: Lifter Size and the Role of the Standard. Ecological Psychology. 1993. pp. 31–64. doi: 10.1207/s15326969eco0501_2

52. Cicchini GM, Arrighi R, Cecchetti L, Giusti M, Burr DC. Optimal encoding of interval timing in expert percussionists. J Neurosci. 2012;32: 1056–60. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3411-11.2012 22262903

53. Sciutti A, Burr D, Saracco A, Sandini G, Gori M. Development of context dependency in human space perception. Exp Brain Res. 2014;232: 3965–3976. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4021-y 25183158

54. Gershkoff-Stowe L, Thelen E. U-shaped changes in behavior: A dynamic systems perspective. Journal of Cognition and Development. 2004. doi: 10.1207/s15327647jcd0501_2

55. Gori M, Giuliana L, Sandini G, Burr D. Visual size perception and haptic calibration during development. Dev Sci. 2012; no-no. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01183.x

56. Gori M, Sciutti A, Burr D, Sandini G. Direct and indirect haptic calibration of visual size judgments. PLoS One. 2011;6: e25599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025599 22022420

57. Gallahue DL. Understanding motor development in children. Boston, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1982.


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 11