Assessing the impact of the “one-child policy” in China: A synthetic control approach

Autoři: Stuart Gietel-Basten aff001;  Xuehui Han aff002;  Yuan Cheng aff003
Působiště autorů: Division of Social Sciences, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, PRC aff001;  Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, Beijing, PRC aff002;  Population Research Institute, LSE-Fudan Research Centre for Global Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, PRC aff003
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(11)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220170


There is great debate surrounding the demographic impact of China’s population control policies, especially the one-birth restrictions, which ended only recently. We apply an objective, data-driven method to construct the total fertility rates and population size of a ‘synthetic China’, which is assumed to be not subjected to the two major population control policies implemented in the 1970s. We find that while the earlier, less restrictive ‘later-longer-fewer’ policy introduced in 1973 played a critical role in driving down the fertility rate, the role of the ‘one-child policy’ introduced in 1979 and its descendants was much less significant. According to our model, had China continued with the less restrictive policies that were implemented in 1973 and followed a standard development trajectory, the path of fertility transition and total population growth would have been statistically very similar to the pattern observed over the past three decades.

Klíčová slova:

Comparators – Fertility rates – Human families – Children – China – Life expectancy – Rural areas – Sex ratio


1. Zeng Y, Hesketh T, The effects of China's universal two-child policy. Lancet. 388, 1930–1938 (2016). doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31405-2 27751400

2. Wang Z, Yang M, Zhang J, Chang J, Ending an era of population control in China: Was the One‐Child Policy ever needed? Am. J. Econ. Sociol. 75, 929–979 (2016).

3. Festini F, de Martino M, Twenty five years of the one child family policy in China: Problems and future prospects. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 58, 358–359 (2004). doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.017335 15082728

4. Hesketh T, Zhu XM, The one child family policy: the good, the bad, and the ugly. BMJ 314, 1685–1687 (1997). doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7095.1685 9193296

5. Jiang Q, Liu Y, Li S, Gietel-Basten S, Rational persuasion, coercion or manipulation? The role of abortion in China’s family planning policies. Ann. Sci. Polit. 5, 5–16 (2016).

6. Brown TAI, Forced abortions and involuntary sterilization in China: Are the victims of coercive population control measures eligible for asylum in the United States. San Diego Law Rev. 32 (1995).

7. Gietel-Basten S, Jiang Q, China’s family planning policies: Recent reforms and future prospects. Stud. Fam. Plann. 45, 493–509 (2014). doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00003.x 25469931

8. Abrahamson P, End of an era? China’s One‐Child Policy and its unintended consequences. Asian Soc. Work Policy Rev. 10, 326–338 (2016).

9. Zhu XZ, Lu L, Hesketh T, China’s excess males, sex selective abortion, and one child policy: analysis of data from 2005 national intercensus survey. Bmj 338, b1211—b1211 (2009). doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1211 19359290

10. Ebenstein A, The “missing girls” of China and the unintended consequences of the one child policy. J. Human Resources. 45, 87–115 (2010).

11. Wei Y, Jiang Q, Gietel-Basten S, The well-being of bereaved parents in an only-child society. Death Stud. 40, 22–31 (2016). doi: 10.1080/07481187.2015.1056563 26073691

12. Goodkind DM, “Estimates of averted Chinese births, 1971–1990: Comparisons of fertility decline, family planning policy, and development in six Confucian societies” (1992).

13. McElroy M, Yang DT, Carrots and sticks: fertility effects of China’s population policies, American Economic Review, 90:389–392 (2000). 18478649

14. Stephenson J, Newman K, Mayhew S, Population dynamics and climate change: what are the links? J. Public Health (Oxf). 32, 150–6 (2010).

15. The Economist. The deepest cuts. The Economist (online version) (2014).

16. Goodkind DM, The astonishing population averted by China’s birth restrictions: Estimates, nightmares, and reprogrammed ambitions. Demography 54, 1375–1400 (2017). doi: 10.1007/s13524-017-0595-x 28762036

17. Wang F, Zhao L, Zhao Z, China’s Family Planning Policies and Their Labor Market Consequences, IZA Discussion Paper 9746 (2016)

18. Zhang J, The Evolution of China’s One-Child Policy and Its Effects on Family Outcomes, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31:141–160 (2017)

19. Wang F, Cai Y, Gu B, Population, policy, and politics: How will history judge China’s one-child policy? Population and Development Review, 38: 115–129 (2013)

20. Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J, Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program. J Am Stat Assoc. 105, 493–505 (2012).

21. Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J, Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 59, 495–510 (2015).

22. Billmeier A, Nannicini T, Assessing economic liberalization episodes: A Synthetic control approach. Rev Econ Stat. 95, 983–1001 (2013).

23. Ferrara EL, Chong A, and Duryea S, Soap Operas and Fertility: Evidence from Brazil, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4: 1–31 (2012).

24. Lavely W, Freedman R, The origins of the Chinese fertility decline. Demography 27, 357 (1990). 2397818

25. Whyte MK, Gu S, Popular response to China’s fertility transition. Popul. Dev. Rev. 13, 471–493 (1987).

26. Peng X, China's Demographic History and Future Challenges. Science. 333, 581–587 (2011). doi: 10.1126/science.1209396 21798939

27. Wang C, History of the Chinese family planning program: 1970–2010. Contraception 85, 563–569 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.10.013 22176797

28. Wang C, Trends in contraceptive use and determinants of choice in China: 1980–2010. Contraception 85, 570–579 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.10.014 22176789

29. Liao PJ, The one-child policy: a macroeconomic analysis. Journal of Development Economics 101, 49–62 (2013).

30. Gu B, Wang F, Guo Z, and Zhang E, China’s local and national fertility policies at the end of the twentieth century. Population and Development Review 33, 129–147 (2007).

31. Howden D, Zhou Y, Why did China’s population grow so quickly? The Independent Review 20, 227–248 (2015).

32. Gietel-Basten S, Jiang Q, China’s family planning policies: recent reforms and future prospects. Studies in Family Planning 45, 493–509 (2014). doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00003.x 25469931

33. Bloomberg News. China signals end to child birth limits by 2020 at latest. Bloomberg. [Online] Available from: [Accessed 28 September 2018] (2018).

34. Keilman N, Pham D, Hetland A, Norway’s uncertain demographic future. Working Paper in Statistics Norway, Oslo (2001).

35. Cheng Y, Han X, Does large volatility help?—stochastic population forecasting technology in explaining real estate price process. Journal of Population Economics 26, 323–356 (2013).

36. Galor O, Unified Growth Theory. New Jersey: Princeton University Press (2011).

37. Chipman A, Morrison E, The impact of sex ratio and economic status on local birth rates. Biology Letters 9. Available from: [Accessed 28 September 2018] (2013).

38. Willis RJ, A new approach to the economic theory of fertility behavior. Journal of Political Economy 81, S14–64 (1973).

39. Galor O, Weil D, The gender gap, fertility, and growth. The American Economic Review 86, 374–387 (1996).

40. Song Z, Storesletten K, Wang Y and Zilibotti F, Sharing High Growth Across Generations: Pensions and Demographic Transition in China, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 7: 1–39 (2015)

41. Curtis CC, Lugauer S, Mark NC, Demographic Patterns and Household Savings in China, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 7: 58–94 (2015).

42. Lugauer S, Ni J, and Yin Z, Chinese Household Saving and Dependent Children: Theory and Evidence, China Economic Review, forthcoming.



45. Visaria L, Jejeebhoy S, Merrick T, From family planning to reproductive health: challenges facing India. International Family Planning Perspectives 25, S44–S49 (1999).

46. Underwood C, Islamic precepts and family planning: the perceptions of Jordanian religious leaders and their constituents. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 26, 110–117 (2010).

47. Rosenfield A, Min CJ, Freedman LP, Making motherhood safe in developing countries. N Engl J Med 356, 1395–1397 (2007). doi: 10.1056/NEJMp078026 17409320

48. Robinson WC, El-Zanaty FH, The evolution of population policies and programs in the Arab Republic of Egypt. In: Robinson W.C., Ross J.A. The global family planning revolution. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank (2007).

49. Kim TI, Ross JA, The Korean breakthrough. In: Robinson W.C., Ross J.A. The global family planning revolution. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank (2007).

50. Booth A, Initial conditions and miraculous growth: Why is South East Asia fifferent from Taiwan and South Korea? World Dev. 27, 301–321 (1999).

51. Ringen S, The Korean state and social policy: How South Korea lifted itself from poverty and dictatorship to affluence and democracy (Oxford University Press, 2011).

52. DiMoia JP, Let’s Have the Proper Number of Children and Raise Them Well!: Family planning and nation-building in South Korea, 1961–1968. East Asian Sci. Technol. Soc. an Int. J. 2, 361–379 (2009).

53. Hesketh T, Zhang W, Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: Causes and consequences. PANS.103 (36) 13271–13275 (2006).

54. Wei Y, Jiang Q, Gietel-Basten S, The well-being of bereaved parents in an only-child society, Death Studies, 40:1, 22–31(2016). doi: 10.1080/07481187.2015.1056563 26073691

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 11