Land use change, carbon stocks and tree species diversity in green spaces of a secondary city in Myanmar, Pyin Oo Lwin

Autoři: Helen aff001;  Marcin Pawel Jarzebski aff002;  Alexandros Gasparatos aff002
Působiště autorů: Graduate Program in Sustainability Science-Global Leadership Initiative, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Kashiwa City, Japan aff001;  Institute for Future Initiatives, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(11)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225331


Myanmar undergoes rapid urban expansion and experiences its negative impacts, often due to the loss of urban green spaces. National and local authorities lack sufficient knowledge, capacity and plans on how to preserve urban green spaces and benefit from their ecosystem services, with such gaps being particularly pronounced in the smaller secondary cities. This study focuses in such as secondary city, Pyin Oo Lwin, and analyzes land use and land cover (LULC) change, tree diversity and carbon stored in aboveground and belowground biomass, and soil. We focus on the main green spaces of the city, which contain different configurations of urban forest, grassland and agricultural land. Remote sensing analysis tracked LULC change between 1988 and 2018, and showed the extensive increase of built-up area, and the decline of urban forests and urban farms. Even though a substantial amount of green spaces has been converted to built-up land, the remaining urban green spaces are still serving as an important habitat for many different tree species, with a total of 82 species from 35 families observed in the different green spaces. Furthermore, these green spaces contain significant carbon stocks, which are, however, highly variable: botanical garden (383.67 t/ha), coffee farms (355.64 t/ha), monasteries (277.14 t/ha), golf course (208.45 t/ha), and seasonal farms (123.22 t/ha). Nevertheless, the extensive LULC change has reduced carbon stocks from 2.41 Mt (1988) to 1.65 Mt (2018). The findings of this study provide a better understanding of LULC change in secondary cities of Myanmar, and build an evidence base on how urban green spaces preservation and green infrastructure development can contribute to green economic transitions, and sustainable, resilient, and low-carbon cities in the country.

Klíčová slova:

Agriculture – Farms – Forests – Land use – Myanmar – Species diversity – Trees – Urban ecology


1. United Nations. World urbanization prospects: The 2018 revision [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Jan 27]. Available from:

2. UNEP. Sustainable urban infrastructure transitions in the ASEAN region: a resource perspective summary for policymakers [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Jan 3]. Available from:

3. Chen M, Sui Y, Liu W, Liu H, Huang Y. Urbanization patterns and poverty reduction: A new perspective to explore the countries along the Belt and Road. Habitat Int [Internet]. 2019 Jan 3 [cited 2019 Jan 3]; Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.03.010 31217651

4. World Bank Group. East Asia’s changing urban landscape measuring a decade of spatial growth [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 Jan 3]. Available from:

5. Ministry of Labour Immigration and Population. 2014 Myanmar population and housing census policy brief on migration and urbanization [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Jan 3]. Available from:

6. UN-Habitat. The Republic of the Union of Myanmar Rapid Urban Dianostic Report: Prepared for Department of Urban and Housing Development, Ministry of Construction With technical assistance from UN Habitat [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 Jan 30]. Available from:

7. UN-Habitat. The Republic of the Union of Myanmar National Urban Policy Framework: Prepared for Department of Urban and Housing Development, Ministry of Construction With technical assistance from UN Habitat [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 Jan 4]. Available from:

8. Dobermann T. Urban Myanmar Policy note [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 Dec 26]. Available from:

9. Freeman J, O’Connor, Taylor, and Zongollowicz A. Urbanization and conflict in Myanmar: A briefing paper. 2017.

10. Fox S, Ney D, Verrucci E. Liberalisation, urban governance and gridlock: Diagnosing Yangon’s mobility crisis ☆. Cities [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Mar 14];84:83–95. Available from:

11. Ministry of Transport and Communications. Country report on sustainable urban transport UNESCAP planning and assessment of urban transportation systems [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 Mar 22]. Available from:

12. Zaw M, Kudo T. A Study on Economic Corridors and Industrial Zones, Ports and Metropolitan and Alternative Roads in Myanmar: A study on economic corridors and industrial zones, ports, and metropolitan and alternative roads in Myanmar. In 2011 [cited 2019 Mar 22]. Available from:

13. Richards DR, Passy P, Oh RRY. Impacts of population density and wealth on the quantity and structure of urban green space in tropical Southeast Asia. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Mar 14];157:553–60. Available from:

14. Oxford Business Group. U Han Zaw, Minister of Construction: Interview | Myanmar 2019 | Oxford Business Group [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Mar 14]. Available from:

15. Aung W-Y, Noguchi M, Pan-Nu Yi E-E, Thant Z, Uchiyama S, Win-Shwe T-T, et al. Preliminary assessment of outdoor and indoor air quality in Yangon city, Myanmar. Atmos Pollut Res [Internet]. 2018 Nov 23 [cited 2019 Jan 28]; Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.apr.2018.05.003 30740016

16. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation. Building resilient, inclusive, and sustainable cities and towns in Myanmar [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Feb 2]. Available from:

17. Ministry of Construction. National Habitat Report: Prepared in anticipation of the United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development, Quito, Ecuador, 17–20 October 2016 [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 Mar 19]. Available from:

18. WWF. Assessing Climate Risk in Myanmar: A contribution to planning and decision-making in Myanmar [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Jan 28]. Available from:

19. Global Green Growth Institute. Green Growth Potential Assessment–Myanmar Country Report [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Mar 14]. Available from:

20. UN-Habitat. State of the World’s Cities 2016: Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures, United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). International Journal. 2016.

21. Prakash A. The Economic Transition in Myanmar: Towards inclusive, people centered and sustainable economic growth [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2019 Mar 20]. Available from:

22. Miyazawa I, Usui K. Enhancing readiness for green growth: A preliminary assessment of Myanmar’s policies and institutions [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2019 Mar 20]. Available from:

23. GGGI. Green Growth Potential Assessment Myanmar-Summary for NDC Implementation [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Mar 20]. Available from:

24. WWF. Unveiling a green economy in Myanmar [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Mar 20]. Available from:

25. Green Lotus. Myanmar action plan for green growth. 2015.

26. Gómez-Baggethun E, Gren Å, Barton DN, Langemeyer J, McPhearson T, O’Farrell P, et al. Urban Ecosystem Services. In: Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities [Internet]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2013 [cited 2019 Mar 20]. p. 175–251. Available from:

27. Gasparatos A, Willis KJ. Biodiversity in the green economy [Internet]. Routledge; 2015 [cited 2019 Mar 22]. Available from:

28. UNEP. Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2019 Mar 22]. Available from:

29. Baró F, Haase D, Gómez-Baggethun E, Frantzeskaki N. Mismatches between ecosystem services supply and demand in urban areas: A quantitative assessment in five European cities. Ecol Indic [Internet]. 2015 Aug 1 [cited 2019 Jan 4];55:146–58. Available from:

30. Elmqvist T, Setälä H, Handel S, van der Ploeg S, Aronson J, Blignaut J, et al. Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas. Curr Opin Environ Sustain [Internet]. 2015 Jun 1 [cited 2019 Mar 20];14:101–8. Available from:

31. Gratani L, Varone L, Bonito A. Carbon sequestration of four urban parks in Rome. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 2016 Sep 1 [cited 2019 Mar 22];19:184–93. Available from:

32. Nowak DJ, Crane DE. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environ Pollut [Internet]. 2002 Mar 1 [cited 2019 Jan 30];116(3):381–9. Available from: doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00214-7 11822716

33. Liu C, Li X. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban forests in Shenyang, China. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 2012 Jan 1 [cited 2019 Jan 29];11(2):121–8. Available from:

34. Bae J, Ryu Y. Land use and land cover changes explain spatial and temporal variations of the soil organic carbon stocks in a constructed urban park. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 2015 Apr 1 [cited 2019 Jan 4];136:57–67. Available from:

35. García Sánchez F, Solecki WD, Ribalaygua Batalla C. Climate change adaptation in Europe and the United States: A comparative approach to urban green spaces in Bilbao and New York City. Land use policy [Internet]. 2018 Dec 1 [cited 2019 Mar 20];79:164–73. Available from:

36. Govindarajulu D. Urban green space planning for climate adaptation in Indian cities. Urban Clim [Internet]. 2014 Dec 1 [cited 2019 Mar 20];10:35–41. Available from:

37. Nath TK, Zhe Han SS, Lechner AM. Urban green space and well-being in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 2018 Dec 1 [cited 2019 Jan 4];36:34–41. Available from:

38. Nero B, Callo-Concha D, Denich M. Structure, Diversity, and Carbon Stocks of the Tree Community of Kumasi, Ghana. Forests [Internet]. 2018 Aug 29 [cited 2019 Aug 13];9(9):519. Available from:

39. Wang Y-C, Liu W-Y, Ko S-H, Lin J-C. Tree Species Diversity and Carbon Storage in Air Quality Enhancement Zones in Taiwan. Aerosol Air Qual Res [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 Aug 10];15:1291–9. Available from:

40. Zhao S, Tang Y, Chen A. Carbon Storage and Sequestration of Urban Street Trees in Beijing, China. Front Ecol Evol [Internet]. 2016 May 12 [cited 2019 Aug 10];4:53. Available from:

41. Kanniah KD. Quantifying green cover change for sustainable urban planning: A case of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 2017 Oct 1 [cited 2019 Jan 4];27:287–304. Available from:

42. Devi R. Carbon storage by trees in urban parks: A case study of Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 2017;2(4):250–3.

43. Intasen M, Hauer RJ, Werner LP, Larsen E. Urban forest assessment in Bangkok, Thailand. J Sustain For [Internet]. 2017 Feb 17 [cited 2019 Jan 2];36(2):148–63. Available from:

44. Agbelade A D., Onyekwelu J C., Apogbona O. Assessment of Urban Forest Tree Species Population and Diversity in Ibadan, Nigeria. Environ Ecol Res [Internet]. 2016 Jul [cited 2019 Aug 11];4(4):185–92. Available from:

45. Useni Sikuzani Y, Malaisse F, Cabala Kaleba S, Kalumba Mwanke A, Yamba AM, Nkuku Khonde C, et al. Tree diversity and structure on green space of urban and peri-urban zones: The case of Lubumbashi City in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 2019 May 1 [cited 2019 Aug 12];41:67–74. Available from:

46. Hobbs ER. Species richness of urban forest patches and implications for urban landscape diversity [Internet]. Vol. 1, Landscape Ecology. SPB Academic Publishing; 1988 [cited 2019 Aug 11]. Available from:

47. Yilmaz H, Irmak AM, Yilmaz S, Toy S, Akif Irmak M. The International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management Species diversity of four major urban forest types under extreme climate conditions in Erzurum, Turkey Species diversity of four major urban forest types under extreme climate conditions in Erzurum, Turkey. 2010 [cited 2019 Aug 12]; Available from:

48. Anandan G et al. Estimation of Tree Species Diversity in Four Campuses of Roever Institutions using Simpsons Diversity Index. J Biodivers Endanger Species [Internet]. 2014 Jul 30 [cited 2019 Aug 12];02(04):1–3. Available from:

49. Talal ML, Santelmann M V. Plant Community Composition and Biodiversity Patterns in Urban Parks of Portland, Oregon. Front Ecol Evol [Internet]. 2019 Jun 4 [cited 2019 Aug 12];7:201. Available from:

50. Nagendra H, Gopal D. Tree diversity, distribution, history and change in urban parks: studies in Bangalore, India. [cited 2019 Aug 12]; Available from:

51. Lepczyk CA, Aronson MFJ, Evans KL, Goddard MA, Lerman SB, MacIvor JS. Biodiversity in the City: Fundamental Questions for Understanding the Ecology of Urban Green Spaces for Biodiversity Conservation. Bioscience [Internet]. 2017 Sep 1 [cited 2019 Sep 26];67(9):799–807. Available from:

52. Li E, Parker SS, Pauly GB, Randall JM, Brown B V., Cohen BS. An Urban Biodiversity Assessment Framework That Combines an Urban Habitat Classification Scheme and Citizen Science Data. Front Ecol Evol [Internet]. 2019 Jul 17 [cited 2019 Sep 26];7:277. Available from:

53. Ne Oo H, Phyu AP, Oo Eain T, Hnin Htun H. Analysis of Environmental and Climate Change for Pyin Oo Lwin using Geographic Information System (GIS). Vol. Volume 7. 2018.

54. Wang Y-C, Hu BKH, Myint SW, Feng C-C, Chow WTL, Passy PF. Patterns of land change and their potential impacts on land surface temperature change in Yangon, Myanmar. Sci Total Environ [Internet]. 2018 Dec 1 [cited 2019 Jan 4];643:738–50. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.209 29957438

55. Wai ATP, Nitivattananon V, Kim SM. Multi-stakeholder and multi-benefit approaches for enhanced utilization of public open spaces in Mandalay city, Myanmar. Sustain Cities Soc [Internet]. 2018 Feb 1 [cited 2019 Apr 17];37:323–35. Available from:

56. Khaing Lwin K, Hayashi K. Comparative Spatial Assessment of Regulating and Supporting Ecosystem Services in Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar MAKOTO OOBA [Internet]. IJERD-International Journal of Environmental and Rural Development. 2015 [cited 2019 Apr 17]. Available from:

57. Ali G, Pumijumnong N, Cui S. Valuation and validation of carbon sources and sinks through land cover/use change analysis: The case of Bangkok metropolitan area. Land use policy [Internet]. 2018 Jan 1 [cited 2019 Jan 4];70:471–8. Available from:

58. Goldblatt R, Deininger K, Hanson G. Utilizing publicly available satellite data for urban research: Mapping built-up land cover and land use in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Dev Eng [Internet]. 2018 Jan 1 [cited 2019 Jan 4];3:83–99. Available from:

59. Saksena S, Fox J, Spencer J, Castrence M, DiGregorio M, Epprecht M, et al. Classifying and mapping the urban transition in Vietnam. Appl Geogr [Internet]. 2014 Jun 1 [cited 2019 Jan 4];50:80–9. Available from:

60. Tor-ngern P, Puangchit L. Effects of varying soil and atmospheric water deficit on water use characteristics of tropical street tree species. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 2018 Dec 1 [cited 2019 Jan 4];36:76–83. Available from:

61. Muthulingam U, Thangavel S. Density, diversity and richness of woody plants in urban green spaces: A case study in Chennai metropolitan city. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 2012 Jan 1 [cited 2019 Jan 4];11(4):450–9. Available from:

62. Chow WTL, Roth M. Temporal dynamics of the urban heat island of Singapore. Int J Climatol [Internet]. 2006 Dec 1 [cited 2019 Jan 4];26(15):2243–60. Available from:

63. Ministry of Labour Immigration and Population. The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census Mandalay Region Census Report Volume 3-l Department of Population Ministry of Immigration and Population THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2018 Dec 5]. Available from:

64. Gianna BY, Herrera G, Shrestha M. Cities and climate diplomacy in the Asia Pacific. 2015.

65. Zaw M. New Initiatives for Greening Cities in Myanmar. In: Asia LEDS Partnership Forum [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 Dec 5]. Available from:

66. Winston E, Op De Laak J, Marsh T, Lempke H, Aung O, Nyunt T, et al. Arabica coffee manual for Myanmar [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2019 Jan 5]. Available from:

67. Taylor L, Hochuli DF. Defining greenspace: Multiple uses across multiple disciplines. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 2017 Feb 1 [cited 2019 Sep 26];158:25–38. Available from:

68. Khaing T. Urbanization: The structures of sustainable urban landscape of Myanmar. In 2015 [cited 2018 Dec 4]. Available from:

69. USGS. Landsat collection 1 level 1 product definition [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 Dec 5]. Available from:

70. Obodai J, Adjei KA, Odai SN, Lumor M. Land use/land cover dynamics using landsat data in a gold mining basin-the Ankobra, Ghana. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ [Internet]. 2019 Jan [cited 2018 Dec 6];13:247–56. Available from:

71. Gilmore S, Saleem A, Dewan A. Effectiveness of DOS (Dark-Object Subtraction) method and water index techniques to map wetlands in a rapidly urbanising megacity with Landsat 8 data [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2018 Dec 6]. Available from:

72. Deng L, Yan Y, Gong H, Duan F, Zhong R. The effect of spatial resolution on radiometric and geometric performances of a UAV-mounted hyperspectral 2D imager. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens [Internet]. 2018 Oct [cited 2018 Dec 6];144:298–314. Available from:

73. Richards JA. Supervised Classification Techniques. Remote Sens Digit Image Anal [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2018 Dec 5];247–318. Available from:

74. Sisodia PS, Tiwari V, Kumar A. Analysis of Supervised Maximum Likelihood Classification for remote sensing image. In: International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE-2014) [Internet]. IEEE; 2014 [cited 2018 Dec 5]. p. 1–4. Available from:

75. Akinyemi FO. Land change in the central Albertine rift: Insights from analysis and mapping of land use-land cover change in north-western Rwanda. Appl Geogr [Internet]. 2017 Oct 1 [cited 2019 Jan 1];87:127–38. Available from:

76. Banko G. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data and of methods including remote sensing data in forest inventory [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2018 Dec 7]. Available from:

77. Lekha SLS, Kumar SS. Classification and mapping of land use land cover change in Kanyakumari District with remote sensing and GIS techniques. Int J Appl Eng Res [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 3];13(1):158–66. Available from:

78. Hernández-Guzmán R, Ruiz-Luna A, González C. Assessing and modeling the impact of land use and changes in land cover related to carbon storage in a western basin in Mexico. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ [Internet]. 2019 Jan 1 [cited 2019 Jan 31];13:318–27. Available from:

79. FAO. Assessing carbon stocks and modelling win-win scenarios of carbon sequestration through land-use changes [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2018 Dec 7]. Available from:

80. Aynekulu E., Carletto C., Gourlay S., Shepherd K. Soil sampling in household surveys:Experience from Ethiopia [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 Dec 8]. Available from:

81. Preston FW. The Commonness, And Rarity, of Species. Ecology [Internet]. 1948 Jul 1 [cited 2018 Nov 24];29(3):254–83. Available from:

82. Spellerberg IF, Fedor PJ. A tribute to Claude Shannon (1916–2001) and a plea for more rigorous use of species richness, species diversity and the “Shannon-Wiener” Index [Internet]. Vol. 12, Global Ecology & Biogeography. 2003 [cited 2018 Dec 8]. Available from:

83. Bibi F, Ali Z. Measurement of Diversity Indices of Avian communities at Tausa Barrage Wildlife Sanctuary, Parkistan. J Anim Plant Sci [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2018 Dec 8];23(2):469–74. Available from:

84. Zomer RJ, Neufeldt H, Xu J, Ahrends A, Bossio D, Trabucco A, et al. Global Tree Cover and Biomass Carbon on Agricultural Land: The contribution of agroforestry to global and national carbon budgets OPEN. Nat Publ Gr [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 Dec 8];(4). Available from:

85. IPCC. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme Published by the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) for the IPCC [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2018 Nov 24]. Available from:

86. Prichett, W.L. and Ohn TT. Manual of laboratory procedures for the analyses of soil and plants, technical document No. 6, Forest Research Institute, Yezin. 1981.

87. Sakin Erdal. Organic carbon organic matter and bulk density relationships in arid-semi arid soils in Southeast Anatolia region. AFRICAN J Biotechnol [Internet]. 2012 Jan 19 [cited 2019 Mar 22];11(6). Available from:

88. Kavinchan N, Wangpakapattanawong P, Elliott S, Chairuangsri S, Pinthong J. Soil organic carbon stock in restored and natural forests in Northern Thailand. Asia-Pacific J Sci Technol. 2015;

89. Department Forest. Statistics of visitors and income from Kandawgyi botanical gardens, Pyin Oo lwin (Unpublished). 2017.

90. Government of Myanmar. Economic policy of the Union of Myanmar [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 May 29]. Available from:

91. Mexia T, Vieira J, Príncipe A, Anjos A, Silva P, Lopes N, et al. Ecosystem services: Urban parks under a magnifying glass. Environ Res [Internet]. 2018 Jan 1 [cited 2019 Apr 17];160:469–78. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.023 29078140

92. Velasco E, Roth M, Norford L, Molina LT. Does urban vegetation enhance carbon sequestration? Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 2016 Apr 1 [cited 2019 Apr 17];148:99–107. Available from:

93. Selhorst AL, Lal R. Carbon Sequestration in golf course turfgrass systems and recommendations for the enhancement of climate change mitigation potential. In: Carbon Sequestration in Urban Ecosystems [Internet]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2012 [cited 2019 Apr 17]. p. 249–63. Available from:

94. UNEP-WCMC. The relationship between biodiversity, carbon storage and the provision of other ecosystem services [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2019 Apr 17]. Available from:

95. Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature [Internet]. 2012 Jun 7 [cited 2019 Apr 17];486(7401):59–67. Available from: doi: 10.1038/nature11148 22678280

96. Strohbach MW, Arnold E, Haase D. The carbon footprint of urban green space—A life cycle approach. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 2012 Feb 1 [cited 2019 May 24];104(2):220–9. Available from:

97. Wilkes P, Disney M, Vicari MB, Calders K, Burt A. Estimating urban above ground biomass with multi-scale LiDAR. Carbon Balance Manag [Internet]. 2018 Dec 26 [cited 2019 May 24];13(1):10. Available from: 29943069

98. Kulak M, Graves A, Chatterton J. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions with urban agriculture: A Life Cycle Assessment perspective. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 2013 Mar 1 [cited 2019 May 24];111:68–78. Available from:

99. Tidåker P, Wesström T, Kätterer T. Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions from turf management of two Swedish golf courses. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 2017 Jan 1 [cited 2019 May 24];21:80–7. Available from:

100. Larondelle N, Haase D, Kabisch N. Mapping the diversity of regulating ecosystem services in European cities. Glob Environ Chang [Internet]. 2014 May 1 [cited 2019 May 24];26:119–29. Available from:

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 11