1. Mareth T, Thome AM T, Scavarda LF, Oliveira FLC. Technical efficiency in dairy farms; research framework, literature classification and research agenda. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2017; 66: 380–404.
2. Jaenicke EC, Lengnick LL. A soil-quality index and its relationship to efficiency and productivity growth measures: two decompositions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1999; 81: 881–893.
3. Nalley LL, Barkley AP, Featherstone AM. The genetic and economic impact of the CIMMYT wheat breeding program on local producers in the Yaqui Valley, Sonora, Mexico. Agricultural Economics. 2010; 41: 453–462.
4. Babcock BA, Foster WE. Measuring the potential contribution of plant breeding to crop yields: Flue-cured Tobacco, 1954–87. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1991; 73: 850–859.
5. VanRaden PM. Net merit as a measure of lifetime profit: 2017 revision. USDA. https://www.aipl.arsusda.gov/reference/nmcalc-2017.htm# Derivation of economicvalues.
6. Pryce JE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. 2012. Novel Strategies to Minimize Progeny Inbreeding While Maximizing Genetic Gain Using Genomic Information. Journal of Dairy Science 95(1): 377–88. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4254 22192217
7. Bogetoft P, Otto L. Benchmarking with DEA, SFR, and R. New York: Springer, 2011.
8. Richards TJ, Jeffrey SR. Establishing indices of genetic merit using hedonic pricing: An application to dairy bulls in Alberta. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1996; 44: 1–26.
9. Amer PR, Fox GC. Imputing input characteristic values from optimal commercial breed or variety choice decisions: Comment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1994; 77: 1054–58.
10. Amer PR, Fox GC, Smith C. Economic weights from profit equations: Appraising their accuracy in the long fun. Animal Production. 1994; 58: 11–18.
11. Kerr AW. Selective breeding, heritable characteristics and genetic-based technological change in the Canadian beef cattle industry. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1984; 9: 14–28.
12. Shanks RD, Freeman AE. Choosing progeny-tested Holstein sires that meet genetic goals at minimum semen costs. Journal of Dairy Science. 1979; 62: 1429–1434
13. Amer PR, Fox GC. Estimation of economic weights in genetic improvement using neoclassical production theory: An alternative to rescaling. Animal Production. 1992; 54: 341–50.
14. Atsbeha DM, Kristofersson D, Rickertsen K. “Broad breeding goals and production costs in dairy farming.” Journal of Productivity Analysis. 2015; 43: 403–415.
15. Atsbeha DM, Kristofersson D, Rickertsen K. Animal breeding and productivity growth on dairy farms. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2012; 94: 996–1012.
16. Weigel K. Understanding genomics and its applications on a commercial dairy farm. High Plains Dairy Conference.2010 http://highplainsdairy.org/2010/21_Weigel_Understanding%20Genomics_FINAL.pdf
17. Holstein Foundation. Understanding Genetics.2017 http://www.holsteinfoundation.org/pdf_doc/workbooks/Gen_Sire_WKBK.pdf.
18. Cole J, Wiggans G, VanRaden P, Miller R. Stillbirth (co)variance components for a sire-maternal grandsire threshold model and development of a calving ability index for sire selection. Journal of Dairy Science. 2007; 90: 2489–2496. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-436 17430953
19. Brown G, Patterson T, Cain N. The devil in the details: non-convexities in ecosystem service provision. Resource and Energy Economics. 2001; 33: 355–365.
20. Chavas JP. On the productive value of biodiversity. Environmental and Resource Economics. 2019; 42: 109–131.
21. Simar L, Wilson P. Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science. 1998; 44: 49–61.
22. Tauer LW. Input aggregation and computed technical efficiency. Applied Economics Letters. 2001; 8: 295–207.