1. Beers PJ, Geerling-Eiff F. Networks as policy instruments for innovation. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. 2014 Aug 8;20:363–79.
2. Schut M, Soares NC, van de Ven G, Slingerland M. Multi-actor governance of sustainable biofuels in developing countries: The case of Mozambique. Energy Policy. 2014;65:631–43.
3. Schut M, Klerkx L, Sartas M, Lamers D, Campbell MM, Ogbonna I, et al. Innovation platforms: experiences with their institutional embedding in agricultural research for development. Ex Agric. 2016 Oct;52:537–61.
4. Faysse N. Troubles on the way: An analysis of the challenges faced by multi‐stakeholder platforms. Nat Resour Forum. 2006;30:219–29.
5. Warner J. Multi-stakeholder platforms: integrating society in water resource management? Ambiente & sociedade. 2006;8:4–28.
6. Kaiser DB, Köhler T, Weith T. Knowledge management in sustainability research projects: Concepts, effective models, and examples in a multi-stakeholder environment. Applied Environmental Education & Communication. 2016 Jan 2;15:4–17.
7. McHugh M, Shi Y, McClellan SR, Shortell SM, Fareed N, Harvey J, et al. Using multi-stakeholder alliances to accelerate the adoption of health information technology by physician practices. Healthc [Amst]. 2016 Jun;4:86–91. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.01.004 27343156
8. Reypens C, Lievens A, Blazevic V. Leveraging value in multi-stakeholder innovation networks: A process framework for value co-creation and capture. Industrial Marketing Management. 2016 Jul;56:40–50.
9. Spielman DJ, Hartwich F, Grebmer K. Public–private partnerships and developing‐country agriculture: Evidence from the international agricultural research system. Public Administration and Development. 2010;30:261–76.
10. Muñoz-Erickson TA, Cutts BB. Structural dimensions of knowledge-action networks for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2016 Feb;18:56–64.
11. Verhagen J, Butterworth J, Morris M. Learning alliances for integrated and sustainable innovations in urban water management. Waterlines. 2008 Apr;27:116–24.
12. Bawden RJ. Systems approaches to agricultural development: The Hawkesbury experience. Agric Syst. 1992 Jan;40[1–3]:153–76.
13. Hall A, Clark N. What do complex adaptive systems look like and what are the implications for innovation policy? Journal of International Development: The Journal of the Development Studies Association. 2010;22:308–24.
14. Foran T, Butler JRA, Williams LJ, Wanjura WJ, Hall A, Carter L, et al. Taking Complexity in Food Systems Seriously: An Interdisciplinary Analysis. World Dev. 2014 Sep;61:85–101.
15. Martin A, Chancellor T, Posthumus H. A systematic review on the impacts of capacity strengthening of agricultural research systems for development and the conditions of success. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London; 2013.
16. Klerkx L, van Mierlo B, Leeuwis C. Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: concepts, analysis and interventions. In: Darnhofer I, Gibbon D, Dedieu B, editors. Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2012. p. 457–83.
17. Norman DW. The farming systems approach: A historical perspective. International Farming Systems Association; 2002. p. 17–20.
18. Hemmati M. Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainability: beyond deadlock and conflict. Routledge; 2012.
19. Sartas M, Schut M, Leeuwis C. Learning System for Agricultural Research for Development Interventions [LESARD]—Effective Documenting, Reporting and Analysis of Performance Factors in Multistakeholder Processes. Integrated Systems Research for Sustainable Intensification of Smallholder Agriculture Ibadan: Earthscan. 2016.
20. Thiele G, Devaux A, Reinoso I, Pico H, Montesdeoca F, Pumisacho M, et al. Multi-stakeholder platforms for linking small farmers to value chains: evidence from the Andes. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 2011;9:423–33.
21. Biermann F, Man-san Chan AM, Pattberg P. 11. Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: does the promise hold? Partnerships, governance and sustainable development: Reflections on theory and practice. 2007;239.
22. Turnhout E, Van Bommel S, Aarts MNC. How participation creates citizens: participatory governance as performative practice. Ecology and Society. 2010;15:26–41.
23. Sartas M. Do multi-stakeholder platforms work?: contributions of multi-stakeholder platforms to the performance of research for development interventions [Doctoral dissertation]. 2018.
24. Amerasinghe P, Cofie OO, Labri TO, Drechsel P. Facilitating outcomes: multi-stakeholder processes for influencing policy change on urban agriculture in selected West African and South Asian cities. International Water Management Institute [IWMI].; 2013.
25. Lamers D, Schut M, Klerkx L, van Asten P. Compositional dynamics of multilevel innovation platforms in agricultural research for development. Sci and Pub Pol. 2017 Dec 1;44:739–52.
26. Kongo VM, Kosgei JR, Jewitt GPW, Lorentz SA. Establishment of a catchment monitoring network through a participatory approach in a rural community in South Africa. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2010;14:2507–25.
27. Roloff J. Learning from Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue-Focussed Stakeholder Management. J Bus Ethics. 2008 Sep;82:233–50.
28. Johnson NL, Lilja N, Ashby JA. Measuring the impact of user participation in agricultural and natural resource management research. Agricultural systems. 2003;78:287–306.
29. García-Barrios LE, Speelman EN, Pimm MS. An educational simulation tool for negotiating sustainable natural resource management strategies among stakeholders with conflicting interests. Ecol Modell. 2008 Jan;210[1–2]:115–26.
30. Bowen S, Martens PJ. A model for collaborative evaluation of university-community partnerships. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Oct;60:902–7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.040881 16973540
31. Klintenberg P, Seely M. Land degradation monitoring in namibia: A first approximation. Environ Monit Assess. 2004 Jan;99[1–3]:5–21. 15641368
32. Armstrong MJ, Payne AIL, Deas B, Catchpole TL. Involving stakeholders in the commissioning and implementation of fishery science projects: experiences from the U.K. Fisheries Science Partnership. J Fish Biol. 2013 Oct;83:974–96. doi: 10.1111/jfb.12178 24090558
33. Curtis A, Coomber K, Droste N, Hyder S, Palmer D, Miller PG. Effectiveness of community-based interventions for reducing alcohol-related harm in two metropolitan and two regional sites in Victoria, Australia. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2017 Apr 20;36:359–68. doi: 10.1111/dar.12501 28429402
34. Wang L, Hu G, Zhou T. Semantic analysis of learners’ emotional tendencies on online MOOC education. Sustainability. 2018 Jun 8;10:1921.
35. Ali MK, Wharam F, Kenrik Duru O, Schmittdiel J, Ackermann RT, Albu J, et al. Advancing Health Policy and Program Research in Diabetes: Findings from the Natural Experiments for Translation in Diabetes [NEXT-D] Network. Curr Diab Rep. 2018 Nov 20;18:146. doi: 10.1007/s11892-018-1112-3 30456479
36. Cole CB, Pacca J, Mehl A, Tomasulo A, van der Veken L, Viola A, et al. Toward communities as systems: a sequential mixed methods study to understand factors enabling implementation of a skilled birth attendance intervention in Nampula Province, Mozambique. Reprod Health. 2018 Aug 3;15:132. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0574-8 30075791
37. Delisle H, Roberts JH, Munro M, Jones L, Gyorkos TW. The role of NGOs in global health research for development. Health Res Policy Syst. 2005 Feb 21;3:3. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-3-3 15723694
38. Laws S, Harper C, Jones N, Marcus R. Research for development: A practical guide. Sage; 2013.
39. Abate T, Shiferaw B, Gebeyehu S, Amsalu B, Negash K, Assefa K, et al. A systems and partnership approach to agricultural research for development. Outlook Agric. 2011 Sep;40:213–20.
40. Ashby J. Introduction: uniting science and participation in the process of innovation–research for development. Managing natural resources for sustainable livelihoods. Routledge; 2013. p. 21–39.
41. Davis J, Whittington D. “Participatory” research for development projects: A comparison of the community meeting and household survey techniques. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 1998;47:73–94.
42. Nuyens Y. Setting priorities for health research: lessons from low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Apr;85:319–21. doi: 10.2471/BLT.06.032375 17546314
43. Rosenfield PL. The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Soc Sci Med. 1992 Dec;35:1343–57. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90038-r 1462174
44. Steins NA, Edwards VM. Platforms for collective action in multiple-use common-pool resources. Agriculture and human values. 1999;16:241–55.
45. Röling NG, Woodhill AJ. From Paradigms to Practice: Foundations, Principles and Elements for Dialogue, Water, Food and the Environment. the Consortium Dialogue on Water, Food and the Environment; 2001.
46. Abbott KW. Engaging the public and the private in global sustainability governance. Int Aff. 2012 May;88:543–64.
47. Eggersdorfer M, Bird JK. How to Achieve Transparency in Public-Private Partnerships Engaged in Hunger and Malnutrition Reduction. World Rev Nutr Diet. 2016 May 19;115:224–32. doi: 10.1159/000442109 27198563
48. Hall A. Public-private sector partnerships in an agricultural system of innovation: concepts and challenges. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development. 2006;5:3–20.
49. Yildirim O, Gottwald M, Schüler P, Michel MC. Opportunities and Challenges for Drug Development: Public-Private Partnerships, Adaptive Designs and Big Data. Front Pharmacol. 2016 Dec 6;7:461. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00461 27999543
50. Dror I, Cadilhon J-J, Schut M, Misiko M, Maheshwari S. Innovation platforms for agricultural development: evaluating the mature innovation platforms landscape. Routledge; 2015.
51. Hermans F, Sartas M, van Schagen B, van Asten P, Schut M. Social network analysis of multi-stakeholder platforms in agricultural research for development: Opportunities and constraints for innovation and scaling. PLoS ONE. 2017 Feb 6;12:e0169634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169634 28166226
52. Sanyang S, Taonda SJ-B, Kuiseu J, Coulibaly N, Konaté L. A paradigm shift in African agricultural research for development: the role of innovation platforms. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 2016 Apr 2;14:187–213.
53. Tenywa MM, Rao KPC, Tukahirwa JB, Buruchara RA, Adekunle AA, Mugabe J, et al. Agricultural innovation platform as a tool for development-oriented research: Lessons and challenges in the formation and operationalization. World Applied Sciences. 2011;16:981–8.
54. Zuurbier PJP. Sustainability and certification in the biofuels sector: some critical observations. Wageningen University; 2010.
55. Kachel U, Jennings G. Exploring tourists’ environmental learning, values and travel experiences in relation to climate change: A postmodern constructivist research agenda. Tourism and Hospitality Research. 2010;10:130–40.
56. Adekunle AA, Fatunbi AO. Approaches for setting-up multi-stakeholder platforms for agricultural research and development. World Appl Sci J. 2012;16:981–8.
57. Giuliani E. Network dynamics in regional clusters: Evidence from Chile. Research Policy. 2013 Sep;42:1406–19.
58. Bäckstrand K. Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. Eur Env. 2006 Sep;16:290–306.
59. Derak M, Taiquib L, Aledoc A, Cortina J. Similarities in stakeholder identification of restoration targets in a semiarid area. J Arid Environ. 2016 May;128:30–9.
60. Reed M, Evely AC, Cundill G, Fazey IRA, Glass J, Laing A, et al. What is social learning? Ecology and society. 2010;
61. Hermans FLP, Haarmann WMF, Dagevos JFLMM. Evaluation of stakeholder participation in monitoring regional sustainable development. Reg Environ Change. 2011 Dec;11:805–15.
62. Hämäläinen RP, Kettunen E, Ehtamo H, Marttunen M. Evaluating a Framework for Multi-Stakeholder Decision Support in Water Resources Management. Group Decis Negot. 2001;10:331–53.
63. Prell C, Hubacek K, Reed M. Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour. 2009 Jun 4;22:501–18.
64. Walker B, Sayer J, Andrew NL, Campbell B. Should enhanced resilience be an objective of natural resource management research for developing countries? Crop Sci. 2010;50[Supplement_1]:S-10.
65. Kasonde JM, Campbell S. Creating a Knowledge Translation Platform: nine lessons from the Zambia Forum for Health Research. Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Oct 3;10:31. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-31 23034056
66. Whitworth JAG, Kokwaro G, Kinyanjui S, Snewin VA, Tanner M, Walport M, et al. Strengthening capacity for health research in Africa. Lancet. 2008 Nov 1;372:1590–3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61660-8 18984193
67. Barlow J, Bayer S, Curry R. Implementing complex innovations in fluid multi-stakeholder environments: Experiences of ‘telecare.’ Technovation. 2006 Mar;26:396–406.
68. Bebbington A, Farrington J. Governments, NGOs and agricultural development: Perspectives on changing inter‐organisational relationships. Journal of Development Studies. 1993 Jan;29:199–219.
69. Roloff J. A life cycle model of multi-stakeholder networks. Bus Ethics Eur Rev. 2008 Jul;17:311–25.
70. de Zeeuw H. Cities farming for the future—multi-stakeholder policy formulation and action planning on urban agriculture in developing countries. Acta Hortic. 2010 Nov;:97–109.
71. Fleury P, Petit S, Dobremez L, Schermer M, Kirchengast C, De Ros G, et al. Implementing sustainable agriculture and rural development in the european alps. Mt Res Dev. 2008 Aug;28[3/4]:226–32.
72. Thompson GD, Dutton R, Sparks TC. Spinosad–a case study: an example from a natural products discovery programme. Pest Management Science: formerly Pesticide Science. 2000;56:696–702.
73. Pretty JN, Noble AD, Bossio D, Dixon J, Hine RE, Penning de Vries FWT, et al. Resource-Conserving Agriculture Increases Yields in Developing Countries. Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Feb;40:1114–9. doi: 10.1021/es051670d 16572763
74. Bosher L, Dainty A, Carrillo P, Glass J, Price A. Attaining improved resilience to floods: a proactive multi‐stakeholder approach. Disaster Prev and Management. 2009 Feb 20;18:9–22.
75. Meyer S, Glaser B, Quicker P. Technical, economical, and climate-related aspects of biochar production technologies: a literature review. Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Nov 15;45:9473–83. doi: 10.1021/es201792c 21961528
76. Saysel AK, Barlas Y, Yenigün O. Environmental sustainability in an agricultural development project: a system dynamics approach. J Environ Manage. 2002 Mar;64:247–60. doi: 10.1006/jema.2001.0488 12040958
77. Warner J. The beauty of the beast: Multi-stakeholder participation for integrated catchment management. Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated water management. Routledge; 2016. p. 17–36.
78. Fliervoet JM, van den Born RJG, Meijerink SV. A stakeholder’s evaluation of collaborative processes for maintaining multi-functional floodplains: a Dutch case study. International Journal of River Basin Management. 2017 Apr 3;15:175–86.
79. Agarwal B. Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: an analysis for south asia and a conceptual framework. World Dev. 2001 Oct;29:1623–48.
80. Magesa SM, Lengeler C, deSavigny D, Miller JE, Njau RJA, Kramer K, et al. Creating an “enabling environment” for taking insecticide treated nets to national scale: the Tanzanian experience. Malar J. 2005 Jul 22;4:34. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-4-34 16042780
81. Yasuoka J, Levins R. Impact of deforestation and agricultural development on anopheline ecology and malaria epidemiology. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Mar;76:450–60. 17360867
82. Berti PR, Krasevec J, FitzGerald S. A review of the effectiveness of agriculture interventions in improving nutrition outcomes. Public Health Nutr. 2004 Aug;7:599–609. doi: 10.1079/PHN2003595 15251050
83. Huang X, Faysse N, Ren X. A multi-stakeholder platform involving a mining company and neighbouring villages in China: Back to development issues. Resources Policy. 2017 Mar;51:243–50.
84. Mayangsari L, Novani S. Multi-stakeholder co-creation Analysis in Smart city Management: An Experience from Bandung, Indonesia. Procedia Manufacturing. 2015;4:315–21.
85. Beall J, Todes A. Gender and integrated area development projects: lessons from Cato Manor, Durban. Cities. 2004 Aug;21:301–10.
86. Balan V, Chiaramonti D, Kumar S. Review of US and EU initiatives toward development, demonstration, and commercialization of lignocellulosic biofuels. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. 2013;7:732–59.
87. Badibanga T, Ragasa C, Ulimwengu J. Assessing the effectiveness of multistakeholder platforms: agricultural and rural management councils in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Intl Food Policy Res Inst; 2013.
88. Leeuwis C. Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: towards a negotiation approach. Development and change. 2000;31:931–59.
89. Sumberg J. Systems of innovation theory and the changing architecture of agricultural research in Africa. Food policy. 2005;30:21–41.
90. Cook T, Boote J, Buckley N, Vougioukalou S, Wright M. Accessing participatory research impact and legacy: developing the evidence base for participatory approaches in health research. Educational Action Research. 2017 Aug 8;25:473–88.
91. Edquist C. Systems of innovation perspectives and challenges. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development. 2010;2:14–45.
92. Richardson J, Grose J. An action learning approach to partnership in community development: a reflection on the research process. Action Learning: Research and Practice. 2013 Nov;10:254–63.
93. Comby E, Le Lay Y-F, Piégay H. The achievement of a decentralized water management through stakeholder participation: An example from the Drome River catchment area in France [1981–2008]. Environmental management. 2014;54:1074–89. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0378-8 25257044
94. Nikitina E, Ostrovskaya E, Fomenko M. Towards better water governance in river basins: some lessons learned from the Volga. Regional Environmental Change. 2010;10:285–97.
95. Verma D, Ramirez-Marquez J. From TRL to SRL: The concept of systems readiness levels. boardmansauser.com; 2006.
96. Aw-Hassan AA. Strategies for out-scaling participatory research approaches for sustaining agricultural research impacts. Development in Practice. 2008;18[4–5]:564–75.
97. Hale TN, Mauzerall DL. Thinking globally and acting locally: can the johannesburg partnerships coordinate action on sustainable development? The Journal of Environment & Development. 2004 Sep;13:220–39.
98. Joy KJ, Paranjape S, Kulkarni S. Multi-stakeholder participation, collaborative policy making and water governance: The need for a normative framework. Governance of Water: Institutional Alternatives and Political Economy. 2008;269.
99. Head BW. Assessing network-based collaborations: effectiveness for whom? Public Management Review. 2008;10:733–49.
100. Hekkert MP, Suurs RAA, Negro SO, Kuhlmann S, Smits REHM. Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2007 May;74:413–32.
101. Zornes D, Ferkins L, Piggot-Irvine E. Action research networks: role and purpose in the evaluation of research outcomes and impacts. Educational Action Research. 2016 Jan 2;24:97–114.
102. Raford N. Online foresight platforms: Evidence for their impact on scenario planning & strategic foresight. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2015 Aug;97:65–76.
103. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82:581–629. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x 15595944
104. Hall A, Rasheed Sulaiman V, Clark N, Yoganand B. From measuring impact to learning institutional lessons: an innovation systems perspective on improving the management of international agricultural research. Agric Syst. 2003 Nov;78:213–41.
105. Lamb JN, Moore KM, Norton J, Omondi EC, Laker-Ojok R, Sikuku DN, et al. A social networks approach for strengthening participation in technology innovation: lessons learnt from the Mount Elgon region of Kenya and Uganda. International journal of agricultural sustainability. 2016;14:65–81.
106. Boogaard BK, Schut M, Klerkx L, Leeuwis C, Duncan AJ, Cullen B. Critical issues for reflection when designing and implementing research for development in innovation platforms. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen UR; 2013.
107. CGIAR. Proposal for integrated systems for Humid Tropics Research Program. 2012 [cited 2018 Dec 12]; Available from: http://library.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10947/2554/crp_1.2_humid_tropics_proposal_jan24_2012.pdf?sequence=1
108. Fazey I, Bunse L, Msika J, Pinke M, Preedy K, Evely AC, et al. Evaluating knowledge exchange in interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder research. Global Environmental Change. 2014 Mar;25:204–20.
109. Kilelu CW, Klerkx L, Leeuwis C. Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme. Agricultural systems. 2013;118:65–77.
110. Barrientos S, McClenaghan S, Orton L. Stakeholder participation, gender, and codes of conduct in South Africa. Development in Practice. 2001;11:575–86.
111. Aaltonen K, Jaakko K, Tuomas O. Stakeholder salience in global projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2008 Jul;26:509–16.
112. Assaye A, Melak A, Ayalew B, Teshale D, Mazengia Y. Assessment of seed systems in North Western Ethiopia; with special emphasis on community based seed multiplication scheme. World Scientific News. 2015;12:100–10.
113. Bizikova L, Nijnik M, Kluvanková-Oravská T. Sustaining multifunctional forestry through the developing of social capital and promoting participation: A case of multiethnic mountain communities. Small-scale Forestry. 2012 Sep;11:301–19.
114. Payne SL, Calton JM. Towards a managerial practice of stakeholder engagement: Developing multi-stakeholder learning dialogues. Unfolding stakeholder thinking. Routledge; 2017. p. 121–35.
115. Akpo E, Crane TA, Vissoh PV, Tossou RC. Co-production of Knowledge in Multi-stakeholder Processes: Analyzing Joint Experimentation as Social Learning. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. 2015 Aug 8;21:369–88.
116. Svendsen AC, Laberge M. Convening stakeholder networks: A new way of thinking, being and engaging. Journal of Corporate Citizenship. 2005;:91–104.
117. European Commission. Horizon 2020 work programme 2014–2015. 19 General annexes revised. 2014;
118. Markard J, Truffer B. Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy. 2008 May;37:596–615.
119. Wei WW. Time series analysis. The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods in Psychology: Vol 2. 2006.
120. IBM Corporation. IBM SPSS Forecasting. IBM; 2012.
121. Yang H. The case for being automatic: introducing the automatic linear modeling [LINEAR] procedure in SPSS statistics. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints. 2013;39:27–37.
122. Chambers R. The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Dev. 1994 Jul;22:953–69.
123. Tacoli C. Rural-urban interactions: a guide to the literature. Environ Urban. 1998 Apr;10:147–66.
124. North D, Smallbone D. Innovative activity in SMEs and rural economic development: Some evidence from England. European Planning Studies. 2000;8:87–106.
125. Eloy L, Bilbao B A., Mistry J, Schmidt IB. From fire suppression to fire management: Advances and resistances to changes in fire policy in the savannas of Brazil and Venezuela. Geogr J. 2019 Mar;185:10–22.
126. Carter SE, Currie-Alder B. Scaling-up natural resource management: insights from research in Latin America. Dev Pract. 2006 Apr;16:128–40.
127. Benjaminy S, Macdonald I, Bubela T. “Is a cure in my sight?” Multi-stakeholder perspectives on phase I choroideremia gene transfer clinical trials. Genet Med. 2014 May;16:379–85. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.148 24071795
128. Gupta S. Worlds apart? Challenges of multi-agency partnership in participatory watershed development in Rajasthan, India. Development Studies Research An Open Access Journal. 2014;1:100–12.
129. Sautier M, Piquet M, Duru M, Martin-Clouaire R. Exploring adaptations to climate change with stakeholders: A participatory method to design grassland-based farming systems. Journal of environmental management. 2017;193:541–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.050 28262418
130. Ohe Y. Evaluating the complementarity of the educational function in agriculture. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. 2010;131:247–55.