Numerical study on the start and unstart phenomena in a scramjet inlet-isolator model


Autoři: Jaewon Lee aff001;  Sang Hun Kang aff002
Působiště autorů: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea aff001;  Department of Aerospace System Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(11)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224994

Souhrn

Inlet unstart and buzz in scramjet engines must be prevented for the stable operation of the engines. In the present study, the characteristics of the inlet start, unstart and buzz phenomena in a scramjet engine inlet model are investigated using numerical analysis with the RANS-based OpenFOAM solver. The results for the inlet start case with a small computational domain that includes only the inlet-isolator part are in good agreement with existing numerical and experimental results. However, for the inlet unstart case, the computational domain must be wide enough to consider the interactions between the upstream of the inlet and the internal flow of the inlet to predict the inlet unstart and buzz phenomena in the inlet test model. The present results show fairly good agreement with existing experimental results with the buzz phenomenon. The effects of boundary layer profiles on the buzz oscillation frequency and amplitude are also addressed.

Klíčová slova:

Combustion – Engines – High pressure – Normal distribution – Numerical analysis – Reflection – Velocity – Viscosity


Zdroje

1. Murthy SNB, Curran ET. Scramjet propulsion. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics. 2001; 189: 447–511. https://doi.org/10.2514/4.866609.

2. Van Wie DM, D’Alessio SM, White ME. Hypersonic airbreathing propulsion. Johns Hopkins APL Tech Dig. 2005; 26(4): 430–437.

3. Walker SH, Rodgers FC, Esposita AL. The hypersonic collaborative Australia/United States experiment(HyCAUSE). 13th AIAA/CIRA International Space Planes and Hypersonics Systems and Technologies Conference; 2005 May 16–20; Capua, Italy; 2005. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2005-3254.

4. Walker SH, Rodgers FC, Paull A, Van Wie DM. HyCAUSE flight test program. 15th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, AIAA paper 2008–2580. Dayton, Ohio, 2008: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2008-2580.

5. Lewis M. X-51 scrams into the future. Aerosp Am. 2010; 48(9): 27–31.

6. Dora M. High-speed air-breathing propulsion. Aerosp Am. 2011; 49: 1–11.

7. Tan HJ, Sun S, Yin ZL. Oscillatory flows of rectangular hypersonic inlet unstart caused by downstream mass-flow choking. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2009; 25(1): 138–147. doi: 10.2514/1.37914

8. Chang J, Li N, Xu K, Bao W, Yu D. Recent research progress on unstart mechanism, detection and control of hypersonic inlet. Progress in Aerospace Sciences. 2017; 89: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.12.001.

9. Li N, Chang J, Xu K, Yu D, Bao W, Song Y. Prediction dynamic model of shock train with complex background waves. Phys Fluids. 2017; 29: 116103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5000876.

10. Li N, Chang J, Xu K, Yu D, Bao W, Song Y. Oscillation of the shock train in an isolator with incident shocks. Phys Fluids. 2018; 30: 116102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5053451.

11. Xu K, Chang J, Zhou W, Yu D. Mechanism and prediction for occurrence of Shock-train sharp forward movement. AIAA J. 2016; 54(4): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J054577.

12. Jiao X, Chang J, Wang Z, Yu D. Mechanism study on local unstart of hypersonic inlet at high Mach number. AIAA J. 2015; 53(10): 3102–3112. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053913.

13. Qin B, Chang J, Jiao X, Bao W. Unstart margin characterization method of scramjet considering isolator-combustor interactions. AIAA J. 2015; 53(2): 493–500. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053547.

14. Chang J, Zheng R, Wang L, Bao W, Yu D. Backpressure unstart detection for a scramjet inlet based on information fusion. Acta Astronaut. 2014; 95: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.10.010.

15. Lu PJ, Jain LT. Numerical investigation of inlet buzz flow. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 1998; 14(1): 90–100. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5254.

16. Trapier S, Deck S, Duveau P. Delayed detached-eddy simulation and analysis of supersonic inlet buzz. AIAA J. 2008; 46(1): 118–131. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.32187.

17. Trapier S, Duveau P, Deck S. Experimental study of supersonic inlet buzz. AIAA J. 2006; 44(10): 2354–2365. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.20451.

18. Trimpi R. A theory for stability and buzz pulsation amplitude in ramjets and an experimental investigation including scale effects. NACA Report 1956–1265. 1956: 1–24.

19. Do H, Im S, Mungal MG, Cappelli MA. Visualizing supersonic inlet duct unstart using planar laser Rayleigh scattering. Exp Fluids. 2011; 50(6): 1651–1657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-1028-4.

20. Do H, Im S, Mungal MG, Cappelli MA, The influence of boundary layers on supersonic inlet flow unstart induced by mass injection. Exp Fluids. 2011; 51(3): 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-011-1077-3.

21. Koo H, Raman V. Large-eddy simulation of a supersonic inlet-isolator. AIAA J. 2012; 50(7): 1596–1613. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051568.

22. Wagner JL, Experimental studies of unstart dynamics in inlet/isolator configurations in a Mach 5 flow [dissertation]. University of Texas, Austin; 2009.

23. Chang J, Yu D, Bao W, Xie Z, Fan Y. A CFD assessment of classifications for hypersonic inlet start/unstart phenomena. The Aeronautical Journal. 2008; 113(1142): 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000002931.

24. Burns RA, Koo H, Raman V, Clemens NT. Improved large-eddy simulation validation methodology: application to supersonic inlet/isolator flow. AIAA J. 2015; 53(4): 817–831. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053049.

25. Openfoam.com [internet]. The open source CFD toolbox; [accessed 2019]. Available from: http://www.openfoam.com/.

26. Menter FR, Kuntz M, Langtry R. Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model. 4th Internal Symposium of Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer. Antalya, Turkey, 2003; 625–632.

27. Greenshields CJ, Weller HG, Gasparini L, Reese JM. Implementation of semi-discrete, non-staggered central schemes in a colocated, polyhedral, finite volume framework, for high-speed viscous flows. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 2010; 63: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.2069.

28. Kurganov A, Noelle S, Petrova G. Semi-discrete central-upwind schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws and Hamilton-Jacobi equations. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2001; 160: 241–282. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1064827500373413.

29. Sutherland W. The viscosity of gases and molecular force. Philosophical Magazine Series 5, 1893; 36(223): 507–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786449308620508.

30. Dorofeeva O, Novikov VP, Neumann DB. NIST-JANAF thermochemical tables. I. ten organic molecules related to atmospheric chemistry. J Phys Chem Ref Data. 2001; 30(2): 475–513. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1364518.

31. Wilcox DC. Turbulent modeling for CFD second edition, DCW Industries Inc. La Canada, CA, USA, 1998;

32. Shin H, Park SH, Byun YH, A two-dimensional numerical analysis of the unstart process in an inlet/isolator model. 2017 KSPE Spring Conference, Conference paper. Jeju, Korea, 2017; 341–345.

33. Jeon SE, Park SH, Byun YH, Effects of turbulence model and eddy viscosity in shock wave/boundary layer interaction. Journal of computational fluids engineering. 2013; 18(2): 56–65. https://doi.org/10.6112/kscfe.2013.18.2.056.

34. Sinha K, Mahesh K, Candler GV. Modeling the effect of shock unsteadiness in shock-wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions. 42nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA paper. Reno, NV, USA, 2004; 2004–1129. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.8611

35. Bertin JJ, Cummings RM. Aerodynamics for engineers. 5th ed. London: Pearson Education International; 2009.


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 11