Prosocial perceptions of taxation predict support for taxes

Autoři: Emily M. Thornton aff001;  Lara B. Aknin aff001;  Nyla R. Branscombe aff002;  John F. Helliwell aff003
Působiště autorů: Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada aff001;  Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America aff002;  Vancouver School of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada aff003
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(11)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225730


Many people report disliking taxes despite the fact that tax funds are used to provide essential services for the taxpayer and fellow citizens. In light of past research demonstrating that people are more likely to engage in prosocial action when they recognize how their assistance positively impacts the recipient, we examine whether recognition of how one’s tax contributions help other citizens–perceived prosocial taxation–predicts more supportive views of taxation and greater engagement. We conducted three correlational studies using North American samples (N = 902, including a nationally representative sample of over 500 US residents) in which we find that perceived prosocial taxation is associated with greater enjoyment paying taxes, willingness to continue paying taxes, and larger financial contributions in a tax-like payment. Findings hold when controlling for several demographic variables, participants’ general prosocial orientation, and the perception that tax dollars are being put to good use. In addition, we examined data from six waves of the World Values Survey (N > 474,000 across 107 countries). We find that people expressing trust in their government and civil service–thereby indicating some confidence that their taxes will be used in prosocial ways–are significantly more likely to state that it is never justifiable to cheat on taxes. Together, these studies offer a new and optimistic perspective on taxation; people may hold more positive views and be more willing to contribute if they believe their contribution benefits others.

Klíčová slova:

Finance – Governments – Payment – Prosocial behavior – Taxation – Taxes – Undergraduates


1. CNN. Poll: Most Americans say tax dollars are wasted. CNN. 15 Apr 2010.

2. Sussman AB, Olivola CY. Axe the tax: Taxes are disliked more than equivalent costs. JMR. 2011; 48, S91–S101.

3. OECD. Revenue statistics: Comparative tables; 2019. Database: OECD Tax Statistics.

4. Mettler S. The submerged state: How invisible government policies undermine American democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2019.

5. Alm J. Measuring, explaining, and controlling tax evasion: Lessons from theory, experiments, and field studies. Int Tax and Public Finance. 2012; 19, 54–77.

6. Cobham A, Janský P. Measurement of illicit financial flows. UNODC-UNCTAD expert consultation on the SDG Indicator on illicit financial flows: Background paper prepared for UNCTAD: Benefits and Costs of the IFF Targets. 2017; 187–238.

7. Penner LA, Dovidio JF, Piliavin JA, Schroeder DA. Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annu Rev Psychol. 2005; 56, 365–392. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141 15709940

8. Klein N, Grossman I, Uskul AK, Kraus A, Epley N. It pays to be nice, not really nice: Asymmetric evaluations of prosociality across seven cultures. Judgm Decis Mak. 2015; 10, 355–364.

9. Henrich J, Henrich N. Culture, evolution and the puzzle of human cooperation. Cogn Syst Res. 2006; 7, 220–245.

10. Aknin LB, Barrington-Leigh CP, Dunn EW, Helliwell JF, Burns J, Biswas-Diener R, et al. Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013; 104, 635–652. doi: 10.1037/a0031578 23421360

11. Aknin L. Whillans AV, Norton MI, Dunn EW. Happiness and prosocial behaviour: An evaluation of the evidence. In: Helliwell J, Layard R, Sachs K, editors. World Happiness Report 2019, New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network; 2019.

12. Brizi A, Giacomantonio M, Schumpe BM, Mannetti L. Intention to pay taxes or to avoid them: The impact of social value orientation. J Econ Psychol. 2015; 50, 22–31.

13. Andriani L. Tax morale and prosocial behaviour: Evidence from a Palestinian survey. Cambridge J Econ. 2015; 40, 821–841.

14. Whillans AV, Wispinski NJ, Dunn EW. Seeing wealth as a responsibility improves attitudes towards taxation. J Econ Behav Organ. 2016; 127, 146–154.

15. Grant AM, Campbell EM, Chen G, Cottone K, Lapedis D, Lee K. Impact and the art of motivation maintenance: The effects of contact with beneficiaries on persistence behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2007; 103, 53–67.

16. Small DA, Loewenstein G. Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability. J Risk Uncertain. 2003; 26, 5–16.

17. Barone G, Mocetti S. Tax morale and public spending inefficiency. Int Tax and Public Finance. 2011; 18, 724–749.

18. World Values Survey. (2019). On-line data analysis. Retrieved in October 2019, from

19. Andreoni J, Erard B, Feinstein J. Tax compliance. J Econ Lit. 1998; 36(2), 818–860.

20. Fortin B, Lacroix G, Villeval MC. Tax evasion and social interactions. J Public Econ. 2007; 91, 2089–2112.

21. Lefebvre M, Pestieau P, Riedl A, Villeval MC. Tax evasion and social information: An experiment in Belgium, France, and the Netherlands. Int Tax and Public Finance. 2015; 22, 401–425.

22. Bobek DD, Roberts RW, Sweeney JT. The social norms of tax compliance: Evidence from Australia, Singapore, and the United States. J Bus Ethics. 2007; 74, 49–64.

23. Ferrer-i-Carbonell A, Gërxhani K. Tax evasion and well-being: A study of the social and institutional context in Central and Eastern Europe. Eur J Polit Econ. 2016; 45, 149–159.

24. Kettle S, Hernandez M, Ruda, S, Sanders M. Behavioral interventions in tax compliance: Evidence from Guatemala. In Policy Research Working Paper 7690. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2016.

25. Fraley RC, Vazire S. The N-pact factor: Evaluating the quality of empirical journals with respect to sample size and statistical power. PloS one. 2014, 10, e109019.

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 11