Influences on surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis decision making by surgical craft groups, anaesthetists, pharmacists and nurses in public and private hospitals

Autoři: Courtney Ierano aff001;  Karin Thursky aff001;  Trisha Peel aff001;  Arjun Rajkhowa aff001;  Caroline Marshall aff001;  Darshini Ayton aff007
Působiště autorů: National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence: National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship (NCAS), Peter Doherty Research Institute for Infection and Immunity Melbourne, Victoria, Australia aff001;  Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia aff002;  Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia aff003;  Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Alfred Health/Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia aff004;  Infection Prevention and Surveillance Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia aff005;  Victorian Infectious Diseases Service (VIDS), Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia aff006;  Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia aff007
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(11)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225011



Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is a leading indication for antibiotic use in the hospital setting, with demonstrated high rates of inappropriateness. Decision-making for SAP is complex and multifactorial. A greater understanding of these factors is needed to inform the design of targeted antimicrobial stewardship interventions and strategies to support the optimization of SAP and its impacts on patient care.


A qualitative case study exploring the phenomenon of SAP decision-making. Focus groups were conducted with surgeons, anaesthetists, theatre nurses and pharmacists across one private and two public hospitals in Australia. Thematic analysis was guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capabilities, Opportunities, Motivators-Behaviour (COM-B) model.


Fourteen focus groups and one paired interview were completed. Ten of the fourteen TDF domains were identified as relevant. Thematic analysis revealed six significant themes mapped to the COM-B model, and subthemes mapped to the relevant TDF domains in a combined framework. Key themes identified were: 1) Low priority for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis prescribing skills; 2) Prescriber autonomy takes precedence over guideline compliance; 3) Social codes of prescribing reinforce established practices; 4) Need for improved communication, documentation and collection of data for action; 5) Fears and perceptions of risk hinder appropriate SAP prescribing; and 6) Lack of clarity regarding roles and accountability.


SAP prescribing is a complex process that involves multiple professions across the pre-, intra- and post-operative surgical settings. The utilisation of behaviour change frameworks to identify barriers and enablers to optimal SAP prescribing supports future development of theory-informed antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Interventions should aim to increase surgeon engagement, enhance the prioritisation of and accountability for SAP, and address the underlying social factors involved in SAP decision-making, such as professional hierarchy and varied perceptions or risks and fears.

Klíčová slova:

Antibiotics – Decision making – Nurses – Orthopedic surgery – Pharmacists – Plastic surgery and reconstructive techniques – Surgeons – Surgical and invasive medical procedures


1. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Antimicrobial prescribing practice in Australia: results of the 2015 National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey2016. Available from:

2. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Antimicrobial prescribing practice in Australia: results of the 2014 National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey2015. Available from:

3. Abdel-Aziz A, El-Menyar A, Al-Thani H, Zarour A, Parchani A, Asim M, et al. Adherence of surgeons to antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines in a tertiary general hospital in a rapidly developing country. Advances in Pharmacological Sciences. 2013;2013:842593. doi: 10.1155/2013/842593 PMC3885161. 24454349

4. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Surgical National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey: results of the 2016 pilot2017. Available from:

5. Bull AL, Russo PL, Friedman ND, Bennett NJ, Boardman CJ, Richards MJ. Compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis–reporting from a statewide surveillance programme in Victoria, Australia. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2006;63:140–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.01.018 S0195670106000600. 16621135

6. Pittalis S, Ferraro F, Piselli P, Ruscitti LE, Grilli E, Lanini S, et al. Appropriateness of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the Latium Region of Italy, 2008: a multicenter study. Surgical Infections. 2013;14(4):381–4. doi: 10.1089/sur.2012.189 23848414

7. Mousavi S, Zamani E, Bahrami F. An audit of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis: compliance with the international guidelines. Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice. 2017;6(2):126. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_16_164 28616437

8. Kaya S, Aktas S, Senbayrak S, Tekin R, Oztoprak N, Aksoy F, et al. An evaluation of surgical prophylaxis procedures in Turkey: a multi-center point prevalence study. The Eurasian Journal of Medicine. 2016;48(1):24–8. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2015.15222 PMC4792492. 27026760

9. Oh AL, Goh LM, Azim NAN, Tee CS, Phung CWS. Antibiotic usage in surgical prophylaxis: a prospective surveillance of surgical wards at a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2014;8(02):193–201. doi: 10.3855/jidc.3076 24518629

10. O’Neill J. Antimicrobial resistance: tackling a crisis for the health and wealth of nations. Review on antimicrobial resistance. London, United Kingdom; 2014.

11. World Health Organization. Global Framework for Development & Stewardship to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance. Draft Roadmap. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2017.

12. World Health Organisation. Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2015.

13. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard2014. Available from:

14. Cotta MO, Chen C, Tacey M, James RS, Buising KL, Marshall C, et al. What are the similarities and differences in antimicrobial prescribing between Australian public and private hospitals? Internal Medicine Journal. 2016:n/a-n/a. doi: 10.1111/imj.13209 27515491

15. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Admitted patient care 2014–15: Australian hospital statistics.2016. Available from:

16. Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation Science. 2012;7(1):1–17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37 22530986

17. Michie S, Atkins L, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a guide to designing interventions: Great Britain Silverback Publishing, 2014.; 2014.

18. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation science. 2011;6(1):42.

19. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655 18824488

20. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.

21. Michie S, editor The Behaviour Change Wheel, Theoretical Domains Framework. Behaviour Change Techniques In KT Terminology Meeting Ottawa, Canada: Conference proceedings; 2012.

22. The Joint Commission. Universal protocol for preventing wrong site, wrong procedure, wrong person surgery. 2019 [cited 2019 20 June]. Available from:

23. World Health Organisation. WHO guidelines for safe surgery 2009. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2009.

24. Stahel PF, Mehler PS, Clarke TJ, Varnell J. The 5 th anniversary of the" Universal Protocol": pitfalls and pearls revisited. BioMed Central; 2009.

25. Hunter JG. Extend the universal protocol, not just the surgical time out. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2007;205(4):e4–e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.318 17903718

26. Broom J, Broom A, Kirby E, Post JJ. Improvisation versus guideline concordance in surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: a qualitative study. Infection. 2018:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s15010-017-1070-8

27. Charani E, Tarrant C, Moorthy K, Sevdalis N, Brennan L, Holmes AH. Understanding antibiotic decision making in surgery- a qualitative analysis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2017;23(10):752–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.03.013 28341492

28. Jayasuriya-Illesinghe V, Guruge S, Gamage B, Espin S. Interprofessional work in operating rooms: a qualitative study from Sri Lanka. BMC Surgery. 2016;16(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0177-7 27596281

29. Antibiotic Expert Groups. Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited; 2019.

30. Broom A, Broom J, Kirby E. Cultures of resistance? A Bourdieusian analysis of doctors' antibiotic prescribing. Social Science & Medicine. 2014;110:81–8.

31. Broom A, Broom J, Kirby E, Adams J. The social dynamics of antibiotic use in an Australian hospital. Journal of Sociology. 2016;52(4):824–39.

32. Livorsi D, Comer A, Matthias MS, Perencevich EN, Bair MJ. Factors influencing antibiotic-prescribing decisions among inpatient physicians: a qualitative investigation. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 2015;36(09):1065–72.

33. De Souza V, MacFarlane A, Murphy AW, Hanahoe B, Barber A, Cormican M. A qualitative study of factors influencing antimicrobial prescribing by non-consultant hospital doctors. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2006;58(4):840–3. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl323 16885179

34. Charani E, Castro-Sanchez E, Sevdalis N, Kyratsis Y, Drumright L, Shah N, et al. Understanding the Determinants of Antimicrobial Prescribing Within Hospitals: The Role of “Prescribing Etiquette”. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2013;57(2):188–96. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit212 23572483

35. Charani E, Edwards R, Sevdalis N, Alexandrou B, Sibley E, Mullett D, et al. Behavior Change Strategies to Influence Antimicrobial Prescribing in Acute Care: A Systematic Review. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2011;53(7):651–62. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir445 21890770

36. Rawson TM, Moore LS, Hernandez B, Charani E, Castro-Sanchez E, Herrero P, et al. A systematic review of clinical decision support systems for antimicrobial management: are we failing to investigate these interventions appropriately? Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.02.028 28268133

37. Fukushima R, Kaibori M. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery: Springer Singapore; 2018.

38. Moffatt‐Bruce SD, Hilligoss B, Gonsenhauser I. ERAS: Safety checklists, antibiotics, and VTE prophylaxis. Journal of surgical oncology. 2017;116(5):601–7. doi: 10.1002/jso.24790 28846138

39. Shinnick JK, Short HL, Heiss KF, Santore MT, Blakely ML, Raval MV. Enhancing recovery in pediatric surgery: a review of the literature. Journal of Surgical Research. 2016;202(1):165–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.12.051 27083963

40. Fiore JF Jr, Bejjani J, Conrad K, Niculiseanu P, Landry T, Lee L, et al. Systematic review of the influence of enhanced recovery pathways in elective lung resection. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2016;151(3):708–15. e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.09.112 26553460

41. Latter S, Blenkinsopp A, Smith A, Chapman S, Tinelli M, Gerard K, et al. Evaluation of nurse and pharmacist independent prescribing. 2011.

42. Poh EW, McArthur A, Stephenson M, Roughead EE. Effects of pharmacist prescribing on patient outcomes in the hospital setting: a systematic review. JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports. 2018;16(9):1823–73. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003697 30204671

43. Pharmacy Board of Australia. Pharmacist precribing forum report. Melbourne: Pharmacy Board of Australia, 2018.

44. Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. Registrant data reporting period: 1 January 2019–31 March 2019. Canberra: Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia,; 2019 [cited 2019 27 July]. Available from:

45. Buckley T, Cashin A, Stuart M, Browne G, Dunn SV. Nurse practitioner prescribing practices: the most frequently prescribed medications. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2013;22(13–14):2053–63. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12086 23346963

46. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Antimicrobial Stewardship in Australian Health Care 20182018.

47. Hains T, Turner C, Strand H. Practice audit of the role of the Non‐medical surgical assistant in Australia, an online survey. International journal of nursing practice. 2016;22(6):546–55. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12462 27492643

48. Hains T, Turner C, Gao Y, Strand H. Valuing the role of the non‐medical surgical assistant in Australia. ANZ journal of surgery. 2017;87(4):222–3. doi: 10.1111/ans.13900 28371035

49. Spence BG, Ricci J, McCuaig F. Nurse Practitioners in Orthopaedic Surgical Settings: A Review of the Literature. Orthopaedic Nursing. 2019;38(1):17–24. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000514 30676571

50. Tong E, Roman C, Mitra B, Yip G, Gibbs H, Newnham H, et al. Partnered pharmacist charting on admission in the General Medical and Emergency Short‐stay Unit–a cluster‐randomised controlled trial in patients with complex medication regimens. Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics. 2016;41(4):414–8. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12405 27255463

51. Khalil V, Declifford J, Lam S, Subramaniam A. Implementation and evaluation of a collaborative clinical pharmacist's medications reconciliation and charting service for admitted medical inpatients in a metropolitan hospital. Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics. 2016;41(6):662–6. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12442 27578624

52. Hale A, Coombes I, Stokes J, McDougall D, Whitfield K, Maycock E, et al. Perioperative medication management: expanding the role of the preadmission clinic pharmacist in a single centre, randomised controlled trial of collaborative prescribing. BMJ open. 2013;3(7):e003027. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003027 23847268

53. Taylor S, Hale A, Lewis R, Rowland J. Collaborative doctor–pharmacist prescribing in the emergency department and admissions unit: a study of accuracy and safety. Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research. 2019;49(2):176–8.

54. Nguyen AD, Lam A, Banakh I, Lam S, Crofts T. Improved Medication Management With Introduction of a Perioperative and Prescribing Pharmacist Service. Journal of pharmacy practice. 2018:0897190018804961.

55. Zhou M, Desborough J, Parkinson A, Douglas K, McDonald D, Boom K. Barriers to pharmacist prescribing: a scoping review comparing the UK, New Zealand, Canadian and Australian experiences. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2019.

56. Charani E, Ahmad R, Rawson TM, Castro-Sanchèz E, Tarrant C, Holmes AH. The Differences in Antibiotic Decision-making Between Acute Surgical and Acute Medical Teams: An Ethnographic Study of Culture and Team Dynamics. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2018. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy844 30445453

57. Lyu H, Xu T, Brotman D, Mayer-Blackwell B, Cooper M, Daniel M, et al. Overtreatment in the United States. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(9):e0181970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181970 28877170

58. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Buidling respect, improving patient safety. Australia: Royal Australasian College of Surgeons; 2015.

59. Broom JK, Broom AF, Kirby ER, Post JJ. How do professional relationships influence surgical antibiotic prophylaxis decision making? A qualitative study. American Journal of Infection Control. 2017.

60. Broom J, Broom A. Fear and hierarchy: critical influences on antibiotic decision making in the operating theatre. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2017;99(2):124–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.12.007 29248505

61. Phillips CJ, Marshall AP, Chaves NJ, Jankelowitz SK, Lin IB, Loy CT, et al. Experiences of using the Theoretical Domains Framework across diverse clinical environments: a qualitative study. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2015;8:139–46. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S78458 PMC4370908. 25834455

62. Lipworth W, Taylor N, Braithwaite J. Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions? BMC Health Services Research. 2013;13(1):530. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-530 24359085

63. Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R, O’Connor D, Patey A, Ivers N, et al. A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implementation Science. 2017;12(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9 28637486

64. Mosavianpour M, Sarmast HH, Kissoon N, Collet J-P. Theoretical domains framework to assess barriers to change for planning health care quality interventions: a systematic literature review. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2016;9:303. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S107796 27499628

65. Davey P, Peden C, Charani E, Marwick C, Michie S. Time for action- Improving the design and reporting of behaviour change interventions for antimicrobial stewardship in hospitals: Early findings from a systematic review. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2015;45(3):203–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.11.014 25630430

66. Davey P, Marwick CA, Scott CL, Charani E, McNeil K, Brown E, et al. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients. The Cochrane Library. 2017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4 28178770

67. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2005;14(1):26–33. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155 15692000

68. Lorencatto F, Charani E, Sevdalis N, Tarrant C, Davey P. Driving sustainable change in antimicrobial prescribing practice: how can social and behavioural sciences help? Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2018;73(10):2613–24. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky222 30020464

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 11