Longevity and marginal bone loss of narrow-diameter implants supporting single crowns: A systematic review


Autoři: Lucas Henrique Telles aff001;  Fernando Freitas Portella aff001;  Elken Gomes Rivaldo aff001
Působiště autorů: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia, Universidade Luterana do Brasil, Canoas, RS, Brazil aff001;  Universidade Feevale, Novo Hamburgo, RS, Brazil aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(11)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225046

Souhrn

Purpose

To compare the longevity and marginal bone loss of narrow-diameter (≤3.3-mm) versus standard-diameter implants supporting single crowns.

Material and methods

The MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, and SciELO databases were searched for relevant publications. In addition, the scientific references provided by each of the implant companies that appeared in the search were reviewed. Intervention studies comparing longevity and bone loss between narrow-diameter and standard-diameter implants were included.

Results

The search was limited to in vivo studies in humans. The query returned 1931 results, of which 4 met the inclusion criteria. The implant success rate ranged from 93.8% to 100% over a maximum follow-up of 3 years, with no difference between narrow- and standard-diameter implants. Meta-analysis of all included studies showed greater bone loss in narrow-diameter implants as compared with standard ones; however, when analysis was restricted to randomized trials, no such difference was present.

Conclusion

The meta-analysis showed no difference in longevity between narrow implants and standard implants when supporting single crowns. However, narrow-diameter implants may be associated with greater marginal bone loss. These findings should be regarded cautiously due to the short follow-up duration and methodological heterogeneity of the primary studies.

Klíčová slova:

Biomaterial implants – Database searching – Maxilla – Medical implants – Randomized controlled trials – Systematic reviews – Titanium implants


Zdroje

1. Klein MO, Schiegnitz E, Al-Nawas B. Systematic review on success of narrow-diameter dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:43–54.

2. Vigolo P, Givani A, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Clinical evaluation of small-diameter implants in single-tooth and multiple-implant restorations: a 7-year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(5):703–709. 15508986

3. Bae M-S, Sohn D-S, Ahn M-R, Lee H-W, Jung H-S, Shin I-H. Retrospective multicenter evaluation of tapered implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface at 1 to 4 years of function. Implant Dent. 2011;20(4):280–284. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318218123b 21778892

4. Andersen E, Saxegaard E, Knutsen BM, Haanaes HR. A prospective clinical study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of narrow-diameter threaded implants in the anterior region of the maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16(2):217–224. 11324210

5. Zinsli B, Sägesser T, Mericske E, Mericske-Stern R. Clinical evaluation of small-diameter ITI implants: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(1):92–99. 14982361

6. Allum SR, Tomlinson RA, Joshi R. The impact of loads on standard diameter, small diameter and mini implants: a comparative laboratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(6):553–559. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01395.x 18474061

7. Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M, Corsi E, Anello T. Titanium-zirconium alloy narrow-diameter implants (Straumann Roxolid((R))) for the rehabilitation of horizontally deficient edentulous ridges: prospective study on 18 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(10):1136–1141. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02296.x 22092806

8. Gi B, Go G, Mokti M, Chf H, H-p W, Re J. Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular- diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 1-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40(11):1052–1061. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12156 24015975

9. Ebler S, Jung RE, Thoma DS, Thoma DS. Prospective randomized controlled clinical study comparing two types of two-piece dental implants supporting fixed reconstructions–results at 1 year of loading. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(9):1169–1177. doi: 10.1111/clr.12721 26459570

10. King P, Maiorana FC, Luthardt DDSRG, Sondell K, Øland J. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of a Small-Diameter Dental Implant Used for the Restoration of Patients with Permanent Tooth Agenesis (Hypodontia) in the Maxillary Lateral Incisor and Mandibular Incisor Regions: A 36-Month Follow-Up. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29(2):147–153. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4444 26929953

11. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1.

12. Ioannidis A, German O, Ronald E, Christoph HF, Goran I. Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular- diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 3- year results of a randomized controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(11):1060–1070. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12468 26440201

13. de Souza AB, Sukekava F, Tolentino L, César-Neto JB, Garcez-Filho J, Araújo MG. Narrow- and regular-diameter implants in the posterior region of the jaws to support single crowns: A 3-year split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(1):100–107. doi: 10.1111/clr.13076 28994192

14. Santing HJ, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, den Hartog L, Meijer HJ. Performance of the Straumann Bone Level Implant system for anterior single-tooth replacements in aug- mented and nonaugmented sites: A prospective cohort study with 60 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(8):941–948. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02486.x 22540833

15. Saleh MHA, Ravidà A, Suárez-López Del Amo F, Lin GH, Asa'ad F, Wang HL. The effect of implant-abutment junction position on crestal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(4):617–633. doi: 10.1111/cid.12600 29575584

16. Di Girolamo M, Calcaterra R, Di Gianfilippo R, Arcuri C, Baggi L. Bone level changes around platform switching and platform matching implants: A systematic review with meta-analysis. ORAL Implantol. 2016;9(1):1–10.

17. Weber HP, Morton D, Gallucci GO, Roccuzzo M, Cordaro L, Grutter L. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding loading protocols. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:180–3.

18. Nhan V Van, Son L Van, Tuan TA, Son NT, Hai TD, Lanh LD, et al. A New Technique in Alveolar Cleft Bone Grafting for Dental Implant Placement in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(2):180–188. doi: 10.1177/1055665617723633 29351041

19. Pellicer-Chover H, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Aloy-Prosper A, Canullo L, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha-Oltra D. Does Apico-Coronal Implant Position Influence Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss? A 36-Month Follow-Up Randomized Clinical Trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77(3):515–527. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.11.002 30529378

20. Altuna P, Lucas-Taule E, Gargallo-Albiol J, Figueras-Alvarez O, Hernandez-Alfaro F, Nart J. Clinical evidence on titanium-zirconium dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(7):842–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.01.004 26852292

21. Alrabiah M. Comparison of survival rate and crestal bone loss of narrow diameter dental implants versus regular dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Investig Clin Dent. 2019;10(1):e12367. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12367 30414262

22. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Maghaireh H, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(3):CD003878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003878.pub5 23543525

23. Schiegnitz E, Al-Nawas B. Narrow-diameter implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29 Suppl 16:21–40.

24. Leão RS, Moraes SLD, Vasconcelos BCE, Lemos CAA, Pellizzer EP. Splinted and unsplinted overdenture attachment systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45(8):647–656. doi: 10.1111/joor.12651 29761853

25. Galindo-Moreno P, Nilsson P, King P, Worsaae N, Schramm A, Padial-Molina M, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of early loaded narrow-diameter implants: 5-year follow-up of a multicenter prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(12):1584–1591. doi: 10.1111/clr.13029 28626888


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 11