Development and validation of LC-MS/MS method for imatinib and norimatinib monitoring by finger-prick DBS in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients

Autoři: Valentina Iacuzzi aff001;  Bianca Posocco aff001;  Martina Zanchetta aff001;  Marcella Montico aff004;  Elena Marangon aff001;  Ariana Soledad Poetto aff001;  Mauro Buzzo aff001;  Sara Gagno aff001;  Angela Buonadonna aff006;  Michela Guardascione aff001;  Bruno Casetta aff001;  Giuseppe Toffoli aff001
Působiště autorů: Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy aff001;  Doctoral School in Nanotechnology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy aff002;  Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy aff003;  Scientific Directorate, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy aff004;  Doctoral School in Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy aff005;  Medical Oncology Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy aff006;  Polo Tecnologico Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy aff007
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(11)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225225


The introduction of imatinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as first-line standard therapy in patients with unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent gastro-intestinal stromal tumor (GIST), strongly improved their treatment outcomes. However, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended for this drug due to the large inter-individual variability in plasma concentration when standard dose is administered. A Cmin higher than 760 ng/mL was associated with a longer progression free survival. Thus, a LC-MS/MS method has been developed and fully validated to quantify imatinib and its active metabolite, norimatinib, in finger-prick dried blood spot (DBS). The influence of hematocrit, sample homogeneity, and spot size and the correlation between finger-prick and venous DBS measurements were also assessed. The method showed a good linearity (R2 > 0,996) between 50–7500 ng/mL for imatinib and 10–1500 ng/mL for norimatinib. Analytes were extracted from DBS samples by simply adding to 3 mm-discs 150 μL of acidified methanol containing IMA-D8. The collected extract was then injected on a LC Nexera system in-house configured for the on-line cleanup, coupled with an API-4000 QT. The chromatographic separation was conducted on a Synergi Fusion-RP column (4 μm, 2x50 mm) while the trapping column was a POROS R1/20 (20 μm, 2x30 mm). The total run time was 8.5 min. DBSs stored at room temperature in plastic envelopes containing a silica-gel drying bag were stable up to 16 months.

The proposed method was applied to 67 clinical samples, showing a good correlation between patients’ finger-prick DBS and plasma concentrations, measured by the reference LC-MS/MS method, internally validated. Imatinib and norimatinib concentrations found in finger-prick DBS were adjusted by hematocrit or by an experimental correction factor to estimate the corresponding plasma measurements. At the best of our knowledge, the proposed LC-MS/MS method is the first analytical assay to measure imatinib and norimatinib in DBS samples.

Klíčová slova:

Blood – Blood plasma – Drug administration – Filter paper – Hematocrit – Quality control – Formic acid – Therapeutic drug monitoring


1. O’Brien SG, Guilhot F, Larson RA, Gathmann I, Baccarani M, Cervantes F, Cornelissen JJ, Fischer T, Hochhaus A, Hughes T, Lechner K, Nielsen JL, Rousselot P, Reiffers J, Saglio G, Shepherd J, Simonsson B, Gratwohl A, Goldman JM, Kantarjian H, Taylor K, Verhoef G, Bolton AE, Capdeville R, Druker BJ, IRIS Investigators (2003) Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 348:994–1004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022457 12637609

2. van Oosterom AT, Judson I, Verweij J, Stroobants S, Donato di Paola E, Dimitrijevic S, Martens M, Webb A, Sciot R, Van Glabbeke M, Silberman S, Nielsen OS, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (2001) Safety and efficacy of imatinib (STI571) in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a phase I study. Lancet Lond Engl 358:1421–1423

3. Wolf D, Rumpold H (2009) A benefit-risk assessment of imatinib in chronic myeloid leukaemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Drug Saf 32:1001–1015. doi: 10.2165/11314600-000000000-00000 19810774

4. Demetri GD, Wang Y, Wehrle E, Racine A, Nikolova Z, Blanke CD, Joensuu H, von Mehren M (2009) Imatinib plasma levels are correlated with clinical benefit in patients with unresectable/metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 27:3141–3147. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.4818 19451435

5. Widmer N, Bardin C, Chatelut E, Paci A, Beijnen J, Levêque D, Veal G, Astier A (2014) Review of therapeutic drug monitoring of anticancer drugs part two–Targeted therapies. Eur J Cancer 50:2020–2036. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.04.015 24928190

6. Yu H, Steeghs N, Nijenhuis CM, Schellens JHM, Beijnen JH, Huitema ADR (2014) Practical guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of anticancer tyrosine kinase inhibitors: focus on the pharmacokinetic targets. Clin Pharmacokinet 53:305–325. doi: 10.1007/s40262-014-0137-2 24566736

7. Bouchet S, Titier K, Moore N, Lassalle R, Ambrosino B, Poulette S, Schuld P, Belanger C, Mahon F-X, Molimard M (2013) Therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: experience from 1216 patients at a centralized laboratory. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 27:690–697. doi: 10.1111/fcp.12007 23113675

8. Eechoute K, Fransson MN, Reyners AK, de Jong FA, Sparreboom A, van der Graaf WTA, Friberg LE, Schiavon G, Wiemer EAC, Verweij J, Loos WJ, Mathijssen RHJ, De Giorgi U (2012) A long-term prospective population pharmacokinetic study on imatinib plasma concentrations in GIST patients. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res 18:5780–5787. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0490 22850565

9. le Coutre P, Kreuzer K-A, Pursche S, Bonin M v, Leopold T, Baskaynak G, Dörken B, Ehninger G, Ottmann O, Jenke A, Bornhäuser M, Schleyer E (2004) Pharmacokinetics and cellular uptake of imatinib and its main metabolite CGP74588. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 53:313–323. doi: 10.1007/s00280-003-0741-6 14658008

10. Adaway JE, Keevil BG (2012) Therapeutic drug monitoring and LC-MS/MS. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 883–884:33–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.09.041 21992751

11. Lakshmy R (2008) Analysis of the Use of Dried Blood Spot Measurements in Disease Screening. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2:242–243 doi: 10.1177/193229680800200211 19885349

12. Wilhelm AJ, den Burger JCG, Swart EL (2014) Therapeutic drug monitoring by dried blood spot: progress to date and future directions. Clin Pharmacokinet 53:961–973. doi: 10.1007/s40262-014-0177-7 25204403

13. Kralj E, Trontelj J, Paji T, Kristl A (2012) Simultaneous measurement of imatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib in dried blood spot by ultra high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B 903:150–156. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.07.011 22857863

14. Antunes MV, Raymundo S, Wagner SC, Mattevi VS, Vieira N, Leite R, Reginato F, Capra MZ, Fogliatto L, Linden R (2015) DBS sampling in imatinib therapeutic drug monitoring: from method development to clinical application. Bioanalysis 7:2105–2117. doi: 10.4155/bio.15.101 26327189

15. Delbaldo C, Chatelut E, Ré M, Deroussent A, Séronie-Vivien S, Jambu A, Berthaud P, Le Cesne A, Blay J-Y, Vassal G (2006) Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of imatinib and its main metabolite in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res 12:6073–6078. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2596 17062683

16. von Mehren M, Widmer N (2011) Correlations between imatinib pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, adherence, and clinical response in advanced metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): an emerging role for drug blood level testing? Cancer Treat Rev 37:291–299. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.10.001 21078547

17. European Medicines Agency (2011) Guideline on bioanalytical method validation. Accessed 26th June

18. Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) (2018) Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidance for Industry. Accessed 26th June

19. Timmerman P, White S, Globig S, Lüdtke S, Brunet L, Smeraglia J (2011) EBF recommendation on the validation of bioanalytical methods for dried blood spots. Bioanalysis 3:1567–1575. doi: 10.4155/bio.11.132 21749218

20. Tang N, Pahalawatta V, Frank A, Bagley Z, Viana R, Lampinen J, Leckie G, Huang S, Abravaya K, Wallis CL (2017) HIV-1 viral load measurement in venous blood and fingerprick blood using Abbott RealTime HIV-1 DBS assay. J Clin Virol Off Publ Pan Am Soc Clin Virol 92:56–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2017.05.002 28531553

21. Mohammed BS, Cameron GA, Cameron L, Hawksworth GH, Helms PJ, McLay JS (2010) Can finger-prick sampling replace venous sampling to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of oral paracetamol? Br J Clin Pharmacol 70:52–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03668.x 20642547

22. Passing H, Bablok W (1984) Comparison of several regression procedures for method comparison studies and determination of sample sizes. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in Clinical Chemistry, Part II. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem Z Klin Chem Klin Biochem 22:431–445

23. Rowland M, Emmons GT (2010) Use of dried blood spots in drug development: pharmacokinetic considerations. AAPS J 12:290–293. doi: 10.1208/s12248-010-9188-y 20383669

24. Antunes MV, Charão MF, Linden R (2016) Dried blood spots analysis with mass spectrometry: Potentials and pitfalls in therapeutic drug monitoring. Clin Biochem 49:1035–1046. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.05.004 27179588

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 11