Behavioural evidence for segments as subordinate units in Chinese spoken word production: The form-preparation paradigm revisited

Autoři: Jie Wang aff001;  Andus Wing-Kuen Wong aff002;  Yiu-Kei Tsang aff003;  Suiping Wang aff004;  Hsuan-Chih Chen aff005
Působiště autorů: Department of Psychology, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R., China aff001;  Nam Shan Psychology Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R., China aff002;  Department of Education Studies, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong S.A.R., China aff003;  School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China aff004;  Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R., China aff005
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(11)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225718


It is widely acknowledged that phonemic segments are primary phonological units, processed serially, in spoken word production of Germanic languages. However, evidence for a behavioural effect of single-segment overlap on Chinese spoken word production is lacking. The current study adopted the form-preparation paradigm to investigate the effects of segment predictability and segment repetition separately, which were mixed in previous studies. Native Mandarin Chinese speakers named pictures in the following conditions: predictable, unpredictable, and no segment repetition. Different positions in words (i.e., the onset and the rhyme) were examined at the same time. Results revealed a facilitation effect of onset predictability masked by an inhibition tendency of onset repetition, indicating Chinese speakers’ ability to prepare the predictable onset. In contrast, rhyme predictability showed a non-significant effect. This pattern of results did not change no matter whether the conditions of unpredictable onset repetition and unpredictable rhyme repetition were mixed in the same context (Experiment 1) or extracted from different blocked contexts (Experiment 2). The finding provides essential support to the claim that phonemic segments are functionally engaged in Chinese spoken word production, and thus adds original evidence to the universal aspect of spoken word production.

Klíčová slova:

Behavior – Consonants – Languages – Linguistics – Phonology – Semantics – Survey research – Syllables


1. Dell GS. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychol Rev. 1986;93:283–321. 3749399

2. Levelt WJM. Models of word production. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999;3(6):223–232. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01319-4 10354575

3. Meyer AS. The time course of phonological encoding in language production: The encoding of successive syllables of a word. J Mem Lang. 1990;29(5):524–545.

4. Meyer AS. The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable. J Mem Lang. 1991;30:69–89.

5. Levelt WJM, Roelofs A, Meyer AS. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behav Brain Sci. 1999;22:1–75. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x99001776 11301520

6. Damian MF, Bowers JS. Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm. J Mem Lang. 2003;49(1):119–132.

7. O’Seaghdha PG, Chen JY, Chen TM. Proximate units in word production: Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English. Cognition. 2010;115(2):282–302. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.001 20149354

8. Alario FX, Perre L, Castel C, Ziegler JC. The role of orthography in speech production revisited. Cognition. 2007;102(3):464–475. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.02.002 16545792

9. Damian MF, Dumay N. Exploring phonological encoding through repeated segments. Lang Cogn Process. 2009;24(5):685–712.

10. Schiller NO. The masked onset priming effect in picture naming. Cognition. 2008;106(2):952–962. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.007 17442296

11. Chen JY, Chen TM, Dell GS. Word-form encoding in Mandarin Chinese as assessed by the implicit priming task. J Mem Lang. 2002;46(4):751–781.

12. Wong AWK, Huang J, Chen H-C. Phonological units in spoken word production: Insights from Cantonese. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048776 23144965

13. Kureta Y, Fushimi T, Tatsumi IF. The functional unit in phonological encoding: Evidence for moraic representation in native Japanese speakers. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006;32(5):1102–1119. 16938049

14. Wong AWK, Chen H-C. Processing segmental and prosodic information in Cantonese word production. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008;34(5):1172–1190. 18763899

15. Wong AWK, Chen H-C. What are effective phonological units in Cantonese spoken word planning? Psychon B Rev. 2009;16(5):888–892.

16. Wong AWK, Chen H-C. Processing segmental and prosodic information in spoken word planning: Further evidence from Cantonese Chinese. Jpn Psychol Res. 2015;57(1):69–80.

17. Verdonschot RG, Lai J, Chen F, Tamaoka K, Schiller NO. Constructing initial phonology in Mandarin Chinese: Syllabic or subsyllabic? A masked priming investigation. Jpn Psychol Res. 2015;57(1):61–68.

18. Wang J, Wong AWK, Chen H-C. Time course of syllabic and sub-syllabic processing in Mandarin word production: Evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm. Psychon B Rev. 2018;25(3):1147–1152.

19. Wang J, Wong AWK, Wang S, Chen H-C. Primary phonological planning units in spoken word production are language-specific: Evidence from an ERP study. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):5815. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06186-z 28724982

20. Wong AWK, Chiu HC, Wang J, Wong SS, Chen H-C. Electrophysiological evidence for the time course of syllabic and sub-syllabic encoding in Cantonese spoken word production. Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2019;34(6):677–688.

21. Wong AWK., Wang J, Wong SS, Chen H-C. Syllable retrieval precedes sub-syllabic encoding in Cantonese spoken word production. PloS One. 2018;13(11):e0207617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207617 30458036

22. Zhang Q, Damian MF. Syllables constitute proximate units for Mandarin speakers: Electrophysiological evidence from a masked priming task. Psychophysiology. 2019;56(4):e13317. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13317 30657602

23. Li C, Wang M, Idsardi W. The effect of orthographic form-cuing on the phonological preparation unit in spoken word production. Mem Cognition. 2015;43(4):563–578.

24. Qu Q, Damian MF, Kazanina N. Sound-sized segments are significant for Mandarin speakers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(35):14265–14270. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200632109 22891321

25. Yu M, Mo C, Mo L. The role of phoneme in Mandarin Chinese production: Evidence from ERPs. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e106486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106486 25191857

26. Breining B, Nozari N, Rapp B. Does segmental overlap help or hurt? Evidence from blocked cyclic naming in spoken and written production. Psychon B Rev. 2016;23(2):500–506.

27. Costa A, Strijkers K, Martin C, Thierry G. The time course of word retrieval revealed by event-related brain potentials during overt speech. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(50):21442–21446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908921106 19934043

28. Howard D, Nickels L, Coltheart M, Cole-Virtue J. Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: Experimental and computational studies. Cognition. 2006;100(3):464–482. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.006 16413014

29. Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Mem Lang. 2008;59(4):390–412.

30. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walke S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67(1):1–48.

31. R development core team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018.

32. Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw. 2017;82(13):1–26.

33. Belke E, Meyer AS, Damian MF. Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. Q J Exp Psychol. 2005;58(4):667–692.

34. Cousineau D. Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2005;1(1):42–45.

35. Li C, Wang M, Davis JA. The phonological preparation unit in spoken word production in a second language. Biling (Camb Engl). 2017;20(2):351–366.

36. Zhang Q. Phonological encoding in monosyllabic and bisyllabic Mandarin word production: implicit priming paradigm study. Xin Li Xue Bao. 2008;40(3):253–262.

37. Oppenheim GM, Dell GS, Schwartz MF. The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition. 2010;114(2):227–252. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007 19854436

38. Roelofs A. Modeling of phonological encoding in spoken word production: From Germanic languages to Mandarin Chinese and Japanese. Jpn Psychol Res. 2015;57(1):22–37.

39. Roelofs A. The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition. 1997;64(3):249–284. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(97)00027-9 9426503

40. O’Seaghdha PG, Frazer AK. The exception does not rule: Attention constrains form preparation in word production. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014;40(3):797–810. 24548328

41. Sulpizio S, Job R. The segment-to-frame association in word reading: Early effects of the interaction between segmental and suprasegmental information. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01612 26539149

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 11