1. Nugent D, Sovacool BK. Assessing the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions from solar PV and wind energy: A critical meta-survey. Energy Policy. 2014 Feb 1;65:229–44.
2. Resolution on the approval of the national energy independence strategy, 2012. Seimas of the republic of Lithuania. Approved 26 June 2012 No XI-2133, Vilnius. Available from: https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/TAIS.432271
3. Cellura MA, Cirrincione G, Marvuglia A, Miraoui A. Wind speed spatial estimation for energy planning in Sicily: Introduction and statistical analysis. Renewable energy. 2008 Jun 1;33(6):1237–50.
4. Cowell R. Wind power, landscape and strategic, spatial planning—the construction of ‘acceptable locations’ in Wales. Land use policy. 2010 Apr 1;27(2):222–32.
5. Aydin NY, Kentel E, Duzgun S. GIS-based environmental assessment of wind energy systems for spatial planning: A case study from Western Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2010 Jan 1;14(1):364–73.
6. Hoover SL, Morrison ML. Behavior of red‐tailed hawks in a wind turbine development. The Journal of wildlife management. 2005 Jan;69(1):150–9.
7. Barrios L, Rodriguez A. Behavioural and environmental correlates of soaring‐bird mortality at on‐shore wind turbines. Journal of applied ecology. 2004 Feb;41(1):72–81.
8. Wang S, Wang S, Smith P. Ecological impacts of wind farms on birds: Questions, hypotheses, and research needs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015 Apr 1;44:599–607.
9. Rydell J, Engström H, Hedenström A, Larsen JK, Pettersson J, Green M. The effect of wind power on birds and bats. A synthesis. Report. 2012 Aug;6511.
10. Langston RHW, Pullan JD. Windfarms and birds: an analysis of the effects of wind farms on birds, and guidance on environmental assessment criteria and site selection issues. Report T-PVS/Inf, BirdLife International to the Council of Europe, Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats. RSPB/BirdLife in the UK, 2003. Available from: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Langston%20and%20Pullan%202003.pdf
11. Bright J, Langston R, Bullman R, Evans R, Gardner S, Pearce-Higgins J. Map of bird sensitivities to wind farms in Scotland: a tool to aid planning and conservation. Biological Conservation. 2008 Sep 1;141(9):2342–56.
12. Bright JA, Langston R, Anthony S. Mapped and written guidance in relation to birds and onshore wind energy development in England. RSPB; 2009.
13. Developing and testing the methodology for assessing and mapping the sensitivity of migratory birds to wind energy development. Strix. 2012. Available from: https://www.strix.pt/index.php/en/projects/projects-sustainability/developing-and-testing-the-methodology-for-assessing-and-mapping-the-sensitivity-of-migratory-birds-to-wind-energy-development
14. Liechti F, Guélat J, Komenda-Zehnder S. Modelling the spatial concentrations of bird migration to assess conflicts with wind turbines. Biological Conservation. 2013 Jun 1;162:24–32.
15. Aarts B, Bruinzeel L. De nationale windmolenrisicokaart voor vogels. SOVON Vogelonderzoek Nederland; 2009.
16. Everaert J. Site selection for new wind farms in Flanders: new dynamic decision-instrument for birds and bats. Presentation on Conference on Wind energy and Wildlife impacts. 2011. Available from: https://cww2011.nina.no/Portals/cww2011/DynamicForms_Uploads/6857324d-36e3-4832-88a5-a7237ab42ce4.pdf
17. Arnett EB, May RF. Mitigating wind energy impacts on wildlife: approaches for multiple taxa. Human–Wildlife Interactions. 2016;10(1):5.
18. Energy Zones Mapping Tool. 2019. Available from: https://ezmt.anl.gov
19. Van Haaren R, Fthenakis V. GIS-based wind farm site selection using spatial multi-criteria analysis (SMCA): Evaluating the case for New York State. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews. 2011 Sep 1;15(7):3332–40.
20. National Land Service under the Ministry of Agriculture; 2016. Available from: https://zis.lt/ariamoji-zeme-uzima-puse-lietuvos-teritorijos/ (in Lithuanian).
21. Official Portal of Statistics of Lithuania. 2017. Available from: https://vstt.lrv.lt/lt/saugomu-teritoriju-sistema/saugomu-teritoriju-statistika
22. The Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Lithuania. GRPK—Spatial Data Set of (GEO) Reference Base Cadastre. Available from: https://www.geoportal.lt/metadata-catalog/catalog/search/resource/details.page?uuid=%7B9F44EFEC-709F-1696-7D93-B0EA850A2D0E%7D
23. Atlas of the breeding birds of Lithuania, 2006. Ed. Kurlavičius P.. Kaunas: Lututė, 256 p. (in Lithuanian)
24. Rodrigues L, Bach L, Dubourg-Savage MJ, Goodwin J, Harbusch C. Guidelines for consideration of bats in wind farm projects. 2008:51.
25. Gualtieri G., Secci S, 2012. Gualtieri G, Secci S. Methods to extrapolate wind resource to the turbine hub height based on power law: A 1-h wind speed vs. Weibull distribution extrapolation comparison. Renewable Energy. 2012 Jul 1;43:183–200.
26. Database of the project VENBIS. 2017. Available from: http://corpi.lt/venbis/index.php/home/database (in Lithuanian).
27. Information System of the Protected Species of Lithuania under the Ministry of Environment. 2017. Available only with permissions from: https://sris.am.lt (in Lithuanian).
28. McGuinness S, Muldoon C, Tierney N, Cummins S, Murray A, Egan S, et al. Bird sensitivity mapping for wind energy developments and associated infrastructure in the Republic of Ireland. BirdWatch Ireland, Kilcoole, Wicklow. 2015.
29. Žalakevičius M. Paukščių migracijos. Vilnius, Mokslas; 1986.
30. Retief EF, Diamond M, Anderson MD, Smit HA, Jenkins A, Brooks M, et al. Avian wind farm sensitivity map for South Africa: criteria and procedures used. Unpublished Report. 2013.