Individual and community level determinants of short birth interval in Ethiopia: A multilevel analysis

Autoři: Desalegn Markos Shifti aff001;  Catherine Chojenta aff002;  Elizabeth G. Holliday aff003;  Deborah Loxton aff002
Působiště autorů: Saint Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia aff001;  Priority Research Centre for Generational Health and Ageing, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia aff002;  Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia aff003
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 15(1)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227798



The World Health Organization recommends a minimum of 33 months between two consecutive live births to reduce the risk of adverse maternal and child health outcomes. However, determinants of short birth interval have not been well understood in Ethiopia.


The aim of this study was to assess individual- and community-level determinants of short birth interval among women in Ethiopia.


A detailed analysis of the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey data was performed. A total of 8,448 women were included in the analysis. A two-level multilevel logistic regression analysis was used to identify associated individual- and community-level factors and estimate between-community variance.


At the individual-level, women aged between 20 and 24 years at first marriage (AOR = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.18–1.60), women aged between 25 and 29 years at first marriage (AOR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.20–2.25), having a husband who attended higher education (AOR = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.01–1.73), being unemployed (AOR = 1.16; 95% CI: 1.03–1.31), having an unemployed husband (AOR = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.04–1.45), being in the poorest wealth quintile (AOR = 1.82; 95% CI: 1.39–2.39), being in the poorer wealth quintile (AOR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.21–2.06), being in the middle wealth quintile (AOR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.24–2.10), being in the richer wealth quintile (AOR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.19–2.00), increased total number of children born before the index child (AOR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.03–1.10) and death of the preceding child (AOR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.59–2.45) were associated with increased odds of short birth interval. At the community-level, living in a pastoralist region (AOR = 2.01; 95% CI: 1.68–2.39), being a city dweller (AOR = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.38–2.22), high community-level female illiteracy (AOR = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.05–1.45) and increased distance to health facilities (AOR = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.11–1.56) were associated with higher odds of experiencing short birth interval. Random effects showed significant variation in short birth interval between communities.


Determinants of short birth interval are varied and complex. Multifaceted intervention approaches supported by policy initiatives are required to prevent short birth interval.

Klíčová slova:

Behavioral and social aspects of health – Birth – Educational attainment – Ethiopia – Child health – Literacy – Regression analysis – Socioeconomic aspects of health


1. Rutstein SO. Effects of preceding birth intervals on neonatal, infant and under‐five years mortality and nutritional status in developing countries: evidence from the demographic and health surveys. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2005;89(S1).

2. Fallahzadeh H, Farajpour Z, Emam Z. Duration and determinants of birth interval in Yazd, Iran: a population study. Iranian journal of reproductive medicine. 2013;11(5):379. 24639769

3. Yoder PS, Joe L. Lugalla P., Richard F. Sambaiga. Determinants of the Duration of Birth Intervals in Tanzania: Regional Contrasts and Temporal Trends. DHS Qualitative Research Studies No 19 Calverton, Maryland, USA: ICF International. 2013.

4. World Health Organization. Report of a WHO Technical Consultation on Birth Spacing. Geneva, Switzerland 13–15 June 2005.

5. Grisaru-Granovsky S, Gordon E-S, Haklai Z, Samueloff A, Schimmel MM. Effect of interpregnancy interval on adverse perinatal outcomes—a national study. Contraception. 2009;80(6):512–8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.06.006 19913144

6. Adam I, Ismail MH, Nasr AM, Prins MH, Smits LJ. Low birth weight, preterm birth and short interpregnancy interval in Sudan. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2009;22(11):1068–71.

7. Chen I, Jhangri GS, Chandra S. Relationship between interpregnancy interval and congenital anomalies. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2014;210(6):564. e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.02.002 24508646

8. Kwon S, Lazo-Escalante M, Villaran M, Li C. Relationship between interpregnancy interval and birth defects in Washington State. Journal of Perinatology. 2012;32(1):45. doi: 10.1038/jp.2011.49 21546941

9. Cheslack-Postava K, Liu K, Bearman PS. Closely spaced pregnancies are associated with increased odds of autism in California sibling births. Pediatrics. 2011;127:246–53. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2371 21220394

10. Hussaini KS, Ritenour D, Coonrod DV. Interpregnancy intervals and the risk for infant mortality: a case control study of Arizona infants 2003–2007. Maternal and child health journal. 2013;17(4):646–53. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1041-8 22581416

11. DaVanzo J, Razzaque A, Rahman M, Hale L, Ahmed K, Khan MA, et al. The effects of birth spacing on infant and child mortality, pregnancy outcomes, and maternal morbidity and mortality in Matlab, Bangladesh. Technical Consultation and Review of the Scientific Evidence for Birth Spacing. 2004.

12. Setty-Venugopal V, Upadhyay UD. Birth spacing: three to five saves lives. Population Reports Series L: Issues in World Health. 2002(13):1–23.

13. Abdel-Tawab N, Lūzā SF, Zaki A. Helping Egyptian women achieve optimal birth spacing intervals through fostering linkages between family planning and maternal/child health services: Citeseer; 2008.

14. Rutstein SO. Trends in Birth Spacing. DHS Comparative Reports No 28 Calverton, Maryland, USA: ICF Macro. 2011.

15. Rutstein SO. Further evidence of the effects of preceding birth intervals on neonatal infant and under-five-years mortality and nutritional status in developing countries: Evidence from the Demographic and Health Surveys. Macro International Inc. 2008.

16. RamaRao S, Townsend J, Askew I. Correlates of inter-birth intervals: implications of optimal birth spacing strategies in Mozambique. 2006.

17. Central Statistical Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia] and ICF. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: CSA and ICF. 2016.

18. Yohannes S, Wondafrash M, Abera M, Girma E. Duration and determinants of birth interval among women of child bearing age in Southern Ethiopia. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2011;11(1):38.

19. Hailu D, Gulte T. Determinants of Short Interbirth Interval among Reproductive Age Mothers in Arba Minch District, Ethiopia. International journal of reproductive medicine. 2016;2016.

20. Tsegaye D, Shuremu M, Bidira K. Practice of child spacing and its associated factors among women of child bearing age (15 to 49 years) in Illubabor zone, South West Ethiopia. International Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2017;9(7):102–8.

21. Begna Z, Assegid S, Kassahun W, Gerbaba M. Determinants of inter birth interval among married women living in rural pastoral communities of southern Ethiopia: a case control study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2013;13(1):116.

22. Sallis JF, Owen N, Fisher E. Ecological models of health behavior. Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice. 2015;5:43–64.

23. McLaren L, Hawe P. Ecological perspectives in health research. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2005;59(1):6–14.

24. Violence Prevention Alliance. The ecological Framework. 2018 [Available from:

25. Salihu HM, Wilson RE, King LM, Marty PJ, Whiteman VE. Socio-ecological model as a framework for overcoming barriers and challenges in randomized control trials in minority and underserved communities. International Journal of MCH and AIDS. 2015;3(1):85. 27621990

26. De Jonge HC, Azad K, Seward N, Kuddus A, Shaha S, Beard J, et al. Determinants and consequences of short birth interval in rural Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2014;14(1):427.

27. Tessema GA, Zeleke BM, Ayele TA. Birth interval and its predictors among married women in Dabat District, Northwest Ethiopia: A retrospective follow up study. African journal of reproductive health. 2013;17(2):39–45. 24069750

28. Bassey G, Nyengidiki TK, Dambo ND. Determinants of interpregnancy interval among parturient in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Sahel Medical Journal. 2016;19(4):180.

29. Chirwa TF, Mantempa JN, Kinziunga FL, Kandala JD, Kandala N-B. An exploratory spatial analysis of geographical inequalities of birth intervals among young women in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC): a cross-sectional study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2014;14(1):271.

30. Exavery A, Mrema S, Shamte A, Bietsch K, Mosha D, Mbaruku G, et al. Levels and correlates of non-adherence to WHO recommended inter-birth intervals in Rufiji, Tanzania. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2012;12(1):152.

31. Karkee R, Lee AH. Birth spacing of pregnant women in Nepal: a community-based study. Frontiers in Public Health. 2016;4:205. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00205 27699165

32. FMoH. Health System Special Support. 2015 [Available from:

33. Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models. 4th ed: UK, University of Bristol; 2011.

34. Merlo J, Chaix B, Ohlsson H, Beckman A, Johnell K, Hjerpe P, et al. A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(4):290–7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.029454 16537344

35. Merlo J. Multilevel analytical approaches in social epidemiology: Measures of health variation compared with traditional measures of association. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2003; 57(8):550–1. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.8.550 12883048

36. Raykov T, Marcoulides GA. Intraclass correlation coefficients in hierarchical design studies with discrete response variables: A note on a direct interval estimation procedure. Educational and psychological measurement. 2015;75(6):1063–70. doi: 10.1177/0013164414564052 29795853

37. Merlo J, Chaix B, Yang M, Lynch J, Råstam L. A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: linking the statistical concept of clustering to the idea of contextual phenomenon. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2005;59(6):443–9.

38. Merlo J, Yang M, Chaix B, Lynch J, Råstam L. A brief conceptual tutorial on multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: investigating contextual phenomena in different groups of people. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2005;59(9):729–36.

39. Vrieze SI. Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychological methods. 2012;17(2):228. doi: 10.1037/a0027127 22309957

40. Gagné P, Dayton CM. Best regression model using information criteria. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 2002;1(2):57.

41. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike: Springer; 1974. p. 215–22.

42. Carter JV, Pan J, Rai SN, Galandiuk S. ROC-ing along: Evaluation and interpretation of receiver operating characteristic curves. Surgery. 2016;159(6):1638–45. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.12.029 26962006

43. MacQuarrie KLD. Marriage and Fertility Dynamics: The Influence of Marriage Age on the Timing of First Birth and Birth Spacing. DHS Analytical Studies No 56 Rockville, Maryland, USA: ICF International. 2016.

44. Padmadas SS, Hutter I, Willekens F. Compression of women's reproductive spans in Andhra Pradesh, India. International family planning perspectives. 2004:12–9. doi: 10.1363/3001204 15082412

45. van Soest A, Saha UR. Relationships between infant mortality, birth spacing and fertility in Matlab, Bangladesh. PloS one. 2018;13(4):e0195940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195940 29702692

46. Wang W, Mallick L. Understanding the relationship between family planning method choices and modern contraceptive use: an analysis of geographically linked population and health facilities data in Haiti. BMJ Global Health. 2019;4(Suppl 5):e000765. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000765 31321089

47. Shiferaw S, Spigt M, Seme A, Amogne A, Skrøvseth S, Desta S, et al. Does proximity of women to facilities with better choice of contraceptives affect their contraceptive utilization in rural Ethiopia? PloS one. 2017;12(11):e0187311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187311 29131860

48. Silumbwe A, Nkole T, Munakampe MN, Milford C, Cordero JP, Kriel Y, et al. Community and health systems barriers and enablers to family planning and contraceptive services provision and use in Kabwe District, Zambia. BMC health services research. 2018;18(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3136-4 29855292

49. Yitbarek K, Abraham G, Morankar S. Contribution of women’s development army to maternal and child health in Ethiopia: a systematic review of evidence. BMJ open. 2019;9(5):e025937. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025937 31122974

50. Damtew ZA, Karim AM, Chekagn CT, Zemichael NF, Yihun B, Willey BA, et al. Correlates of the Women’s Development Army strategy implementation strength with household reproductive, maternal, newborn and child healthcare practices: a cross-sectional study in four regions of Ethiopia. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2018;18(1):373.

51. Caglia J, Kearns A, Langer A. Health Extension Workers in Ethiopia: Delivering Community-based Antenatal and Postnatal Care. Boston, MA: Maternal Health Task Force. 2014.

Článek vyšel v časopise


2020 Číslo 1