Physiology education for intensive care medicine residents: A 15-minute interactive peer-led flipped classroom session


Autoři: Bjoern Zante aff001;  Wolf E. Hautz aff002;  Joerg C. Schefold aff001
Působiště autorů: Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland aff001;  Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 15(1)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228257

Souhrn

Introduction

In acute care medicine, knowledge of the underlying (patho)-physiology is of paramount importance. This may be especially relevant in intensive care medicine, where individual competence and proficiency greatly depend on knowledge and understanding of critical care physiology. In settings with time constraints such as intensive care units (ICUs), time allotted to education is often limited. We evaluated whether introduction of a short, interactive, peer-led flipped classroom session is feasible and can provide ICU residents with a better understanding of critical care physiology.

Materials and methods

Using the flipped classroom concept, we developed a 15-minute peer-led interactive “physiology education” session to introduce a total of 44 residents to critical care physiology. Using a nine-item electronic survey with open questions and a five-point Likert scale, we analysed the overall concept with regard to feasibility, motivation, and subjective learning of critical care physiology.

Results

The overall rate of response to the survey was 70.5% (31/44). The residents reported that these sessions sparked their interest (p = 0.005, Chi square 10.52), and that discussion and interaction during these sessions had promoted their knowledge and understanding. Both novice and experienced residents reported that new knowledge was imparted (both p<0.0001, Chi-square 32.97 and 25.04, respectively).

Conclusions

In an environment with time constraints such as the ICU, a 15-minute, interactive, peer-led flipped classroom teaching session was considered feasible and generally appeared useful for teaching critical care physiology to ICU residents. Responses to questions on questionnaires indicated that teaching sessions sparked interest and increased motivation. This approach may theoretically induce a modification in professional behaviour and promote self-directed learning. We therefore support the use of peer-led flipped classroom training sessions in the ICU. Whether these sessions result in improved ICU care should be addressed in subsequent studies.

Klíčová slova:

Bioassays and physiological analysis – Critical care and emergency medicine – Human learning – Intensive care units – Learning – Medical education – Questionnaires – Teachers


Zdroje

1. Vincent J-L, De Backer D. From Early Goal-Directed Therapy to Late(r) Scvo2 Checks. Chest. 2018;154(6):1267–9. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.07.020 30526962

2. Sefton AJ. Charting a global future for education in physiology. Advances in physiology education. 2005;29(4):189–93. doi: 10.1152/advan.00001.2005 16298954.

3. Smits PB, Verbeek JH, Nauta MC, Ten Cate TJ, Metz JC, van Dijk FJ. Factors predictive of successful learning in postgraduate medical education. Medical education. 2004;38(7):758–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01846.x 15200400.

4. Legan SJ. Multiple-format sessions for teaching endocrine physiology. Advances in physiology education. 2001;25(1–4):228–32. doi: 10.1152/advances.2001.25.4.228 11824203.

5. Colthorpe KL, Abe H, Ainscough L. How do students deal with difficult physiological knowledge? Advances in physiology education. 2018;42(4):555–64. Epub 2018/09/08. doi: 10.1152/advan.00102.2018 30192189.

6. Michael J. What makes physiology hard for students to learn? Results of a faculty survey. Advances in physiology education. 2007;31(1):34–40. Epub 2007/03/01. doi: 10.1152/advan.00057.2006 17327580.

7. Qiao YQ, Shen J, Liang X, Ding S, Chen FY, Shao L, et al. Using cognitive theory to facilitate medical education. BMC medical education. 2014;14:79. Epub 2014/04/16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-79 24731433; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3989791.

8. Young JQ, Van Merrienboer J, Durning S, Ten Cate O. Cognitive Load Theory: implications for medical education: AMEE Guide No. 86. Medical teacher. 2014;36(5):371–84. Epub 2014/03/07. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.889290 24593808.

9. von Anrep G. On the part played by the suprarenals in the normal vascular reactions of the body. The Journal of physiology. 1912;45(5):307–17. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1912.sp001553 16993158.

10. Beard DA, Feigl EO. Understanding Guyton's venous return curves. American journal of physiology Heart and circulatory physiology. 2011;301(3):H629–33. Epub 2011/06/15. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00228.2011 21666119; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3191500.

11. Sunagawa K. Guyton's venous return curves should be taught at medical schools (complete English translation of Japanese version). The journal of physiological sciences: JPS. 2017;67(4):447–58. Epub 2017/03/30. doi: 10.1007/s12576-017-0533-0 28349325.

12. Joyce MF, Berg S, Bittner EA. Practical strategies for increasing efficiency and effectiveness in critical care education. World J Crit Care Med. 2017;6(1):1–12. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v6.i1.1 28224102; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5295164.

13. Tainter CR, Wong NL, Bittner EA. Innovative strategies in critical care education. J Crit Care. 2015;30(3):550–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.02.001 25702843.

14. Croley WC, Rothenberg DM. Education of trainees in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(2 Suppl):S117–21. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000252917.25301.18 17242600.

15. Ten Cate O, Durning S. Dimensions and psychology of peer teaching in medical education. Medical teacher. 2007;29(6):546–52. Epub 2007/11/06. doi: 10.1080/01421590701583816 17978967.

16. Moust JHC, Schmidt HG. Facilitating small-group learning: A comparison of student and staff tutors' behavior. Instructional Science. 1994;22(4):287–301. doi: 10.1007/BF00891782

17. Lockspeiser TM, O'Sullivan P, Teherani A, Muller J. Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence. Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice. 2008;13(3):361–72. Epub 2006/11/25. doi: 10.1007/s10459-006-9049-8 17124627.

18. Vygotsky LS. Mind in society: The development of Higher Psychological Process. Cambridge, Mass: Havard University Press; 1978.

19. Topping KJ. Trends in Peer Learning. Educational Psychology. 2005;25(6):631–45. doi: 10.1080/01443410500345172

20. Sarbin TR. Cross-age tutoring and social identity. In: Allen VL, editor. Children as teachers. New York: Academic Press; 1976.

21. Srivastava TK, Waghmare LS, Mishra VP, Rawekar AT, Quazi N, Jagzape AT. Peer Teaching to Foster Learning in Physiology. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2015;9(8):Jc01–6. Epub 2015/10/06. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/15018.6323 26435969; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4576561.

22. Ernst H, Colthorpe K. The efficacy of interactive lecturing for students with diverse science backgrounds. Advances in physiology education. 2007;31(1):41–4. doi: 10.1152/advan.00107.2006 17327581.

23. Bruner JS. The act of discovery. Havard Educ Rev. 1961;31:21–32.

24. De Grave WS, Boshuizen HPA, Schmidt HG. Problem based learning: Cognitive and metacognitive processes during problem analysis. Instructional Science. 1996;24(5):321–41. doi: 10.1007/BF00118111

25. Allen RSF V. L. Children as Teachers. New York: Academic Press; 1976.

26. Ten Cate O, Durning S. Peer teaching in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Medical teacher. 2007;29(6):591–9. Epub 2007/10/09. doi: 10.1080/01421590701606799 17922354.

27. Knowles EFH M.S., Swanson R.A. The Adult Learner: the Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. Seventh ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier; 2011.

28. Wlodkowski RJ. Enhancing Adult Motivation to Learn: a Comprehensive Guide for Teaching All Adults. Third ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008.

29. Dennick R. Constructivism: reflections on twenty five years teaching the constructivist approach in medical education. Int J Med Educ. 2016;7:200–5. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5763.de11 27344115; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4939219.

30. Brandon AF, All AC. Constructivism theory analysis and application to curricula. (1536–5026 (Print)).

31. Candela L. Theoretical foundations of teaching and learning. In: Billings DM, editor. Teaching in Nursing: a Guide for Faculty. Third ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2015.

32. Takala J. Hypoxemia due to increased venous admixture: influence of cardiac output on oxygenation. Intensive care medicine. 2007;33(5):908–11. Epub 2007/03/08. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0546-x 17342520.

33. Funk DJ, Jacobsohn E, Kumar A. The role of venous return in critical illness and shock-part I: physiology. Critical care medicine. 2013;41(1):255–62. Epub 2012/12/28. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182772ab6 23269130.

34. Curley G, Laffey JG, Kavanagh BP. Bench-to-bedside review: carbon dioxide. Critical care (London, England). 2010;14(2):220. Epub 2010/05/26. doi: 10.1186/cc8926 20497620; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2887152.

35. Pfortmueller CA, Uehlinger D, von Haehling S, Schefold JC. Serum chloride levels in critical illness-the hidden story. Intensive care medicine experimental. 2018;6(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40635-018-0174-5 29654387; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5899079.

36. Miranda M, Balarini M, Caixeta D, Bouskela E. Microcirculatory dysfunction in sepsis: pathophysiology, clinical monitoring, and potential therapies. American journal of physiology Heart and circulatory physiology. 2016;311(1):H24–35. Epub 2016/04/24. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00034.2016 27106039.

37. Walley KR. Use of central venous oxygen saturation to guide therapy. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2011;184(5):514–20. Epub 2010/12/24. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201010-1584CI 21177882.

38. Magder S. Bench-to-bedside review: An approach to hemodynamic monitoring—Guyton at the bedside. Critical care (London, England). 2012;16(5):236. Epub 2012/10/31. doi: 10.1186/cc11395 23106914; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3682240.

39. Kimmoun A, Novy E, Auchet T, Ducrocq N, Levy B. Hemodynamic consequences of severe lactic acidosis in shock states: from bench to bedside. Critical care (London, England). 2015;19:175. Epub 2015/04/19. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0896-7 25887061; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4391479.

40. Takala J. Pulmonary capillary pressure. Intensive care medicine. 2003;29(6):890–3. Epub 2003/05/09. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1749-4 12736776.

41. Piagnerelli M, Boudjeltia KZ, Vanhaeverbeek M, Vincent JL. Red blood cell rheology in sepsis. Intensive care medicine. 2003;29(7):1052–61. Epub 2003/06/13. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1783-2 12802488.

42. Vassilakopoulos T. Understanding wasted/ineffective efforts in mechanically ventilated COPD patients using the Campbell diagram. Intensive care medicine. 2008;34(7):1336–9. Epub 2008/04/05. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1095-7 18389218.

43. Schefold JC, Filippatos G, Hasenfuss G, Anker SD, von Haehling S. Heart failure and kidney dysfunction: epidemiology, mechanisms and management. Nature reviews Nephrology. 2016;12(10):610–23. Epub 2016/08/31. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.113 27573728.

44. Chen F, Lui AM, Martinelli SM. A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. Medical education. 2017;51(6):585–97. Epub 2017/05/11. doi: 10.1111/medu.13272 28488303.

45. Prakash ES. Explicit constructivism: a missing link in ineffective lectures? Advances in physiology education. 2010;34(2):93–6. doi: 10.1152/advan.00025.2010 20522904.

46. Michael JA, Richardson D, Rovick A, Modell H, Bruce D, Horwitz B, et al. Undergraduate students' misconceptions about respiratory physiology. The American journal of physiology. 1999;277(6 Pt 2):S127–35. Epub 2000/01/22. doi: 10.1152/advances.1999.277.6.S127 10644238.

47. Rovick AA, Michael JA, Modell HI, Bruce DS, Horwitz B, Adamson T, et al. How accurate are our assumptions about our students' background knowledge? The American journal of physiology. 1999;276(6 Pt 2):S93–101. Epub 2005/10/08. doi: 10.1152/advances.1999.276.6.S93 16211673.

48. Kruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1999;77(6):1121–34. Epub 2000/01/08. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1121 10626367.

49. Vansteenkiste M, Zhou M, Lens W, Soenens B. Experiences of Autonomy and Control Among Chinese Learners: Vitalizing or Immobilizing? Journal of Educational Psychology. 2005;97(3):468–83. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.468

50. Orsini C, Evans P, Jerez O. How to encourage intrinsic motivation in the clinical teaching environment?: a systematic review from the self-determination theory. Journal of educational evaluation for health professions. 2015;12:8. Epub 2015/04/10. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.8 25855386; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4397857.

51. Cook DA, Artino AR Jr. Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories. Medical education. 2016;50(10):997–1014. Epub 2016/09/16. doi: 10.1111/medu.13074 27628718; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5113774.

52. Robbins SB, Lauver K, Le H, Davis D, Langley R, Carlstrom A. Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin. 2004;130(2):261–88. Epub 2004/02/26. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261 14979772.

53. Kusurkar RA, Ten Cate TJ, van Asperen M, Croiset G. Motivation as an independent and a dependent variable in medical education: a review of the literature. Medical teacher. 2011;33(5):e242–62. Epub 2011/04/27. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.558539 21517676.

54. Chen F, Lui AM, Martinelli SM. A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. (1365–2923 (Electronic)).

55. Kiani Q, Umar S, Iqbal M. What do medical students expect in a teacher? The clinical teacher. 2014;11(3):203–8. Epub 2014/05/08. doi: 10.1111/tct.12109 24802922.

56. Mahler D, Grossschedl J, Harms U. Does motivation matter?—The relationship between teachers' self-efficacy and enthusiasm and students' performance. PloS one. 2018;13(11):e0207252. Epub 2018/11/22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207252 30462713; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6248951.

57. Dybowski C, Harendza S. "Teaching is like nightshifts …": a focus group study on the teaching motivations of clinicians. Teaching and learning in medicine. 2014;26(4):393–400. Epub 2014/10/16. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2014.910467 25318036.

58. Vari RC, Borg KE, McCleary VL, McCormack JT, Ruit KG, Sukalski KA, et al. Endocrine physiology in a patient-centered learning curriculum. Advances in physiology education. 2001;25(1–4):241–8. doi: 10.1152/advances.2001.25.4.241 11824205.

59. Dickinson BL, Lackey W, Sheakley M, Miller L, Jevert S, Shattuck B. Involving a real patient in the design and implementation of case-based learning to engage learners. Advances in physiology education. 2018;42(1):118–22. doi: 10.1152/advan.00174.2017 29357269.

60. Custers EJ, Ten Cate OT. Very long-term retention of basic science knowledge in doctors after graduation. Medical education. 2011;45(4):422–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03889.x 21401691.

61. Eva KW. Broadening the debate about quality in medical education research. Med Educ. 2009;43(4):294–6. Epub 2009/04/02. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03342.x 19335567.

62. Regehr G. It's NOT rocket science: rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):31–9. Epub 2010/01/19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03418.x 20078754.


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2020 Číslo 1