Development and use of a scale to assess gender differences in appraisal of mistreatment during childbirth among Ethiopian midwifery students


Autoři: Rena Bakker aff001;  Ephrem D. Sheferaw aff001;  Jelle Stekelenburg aff001;  Tegbar Yigzaw aff002;  Marlou L. A. de Kroon aff004
Působiště autorů: Department of Health Sciences, Global Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands aff001;  Jhpiego Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia aff002;  Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leeuwarden Medical Centre, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands aff003;  Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands aff004
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 15(1)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227958

Souhrn

Mistreatment during childbirth occurs across the globe and endangers the well-being of pregnant women and their newborns. A gender-sensitive approach to mistreatment during childbirth seems relevant in Ethiopia, given previous research among Ethiopian midwives and patients suggesting that male midwives provide more respectful maternity care, which is possibly mediated by self-esteem and stress. This study aimed a) to develop a tool that assesses mistreatment appraisal from a provider’s perspective and b) to assess gender differences in mistreatment appraisal among Ethiopian final-year midwifery students and to analyze possible mediating roles of self-esteem and stress. First, we developed a research tool (i.e. a quantitative scale) to assess mistreatment appraisal from a provider’s perspective, on the basis of scientific literature and the review of seven experts regarding its relevance and comprehensiveness. Second, we utilized this scale, the so-called Mistreatment Appraisal Scale, among 390 Ethiopian final-year midwifery students to assess their mistreatment appraisal, self-esteem (using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale), stress (using the Perceived Stress Scale) and various background characteristics. The scale’s internal consistency was acceptable (α = .75), corrected item-total correlations were acceptable (.24 - .56) and inter-item correlations were mostly acceptable (.07 - .63). Univariable (B = 3.084, 95% CI [-.005, 6.173]) and multivariable (B = 1.867, 95% CI [-1.472, 5.205]) regression analyses did not show significant gender differences regarding mistreatment appraisal. Mediation analyses showed that self-esteem (a1b1 = -.030, p = .677) and stress (a2b2 = -.443, p = .186) did not mediate the effect of gender on mistreatment appraisal. The scale to assess mistreatment appraisal appears to be feasible and reliable. No significant association between gender and mistreatment appraisal was observed and self-esteem and stress were not found to be mediators. Future research is needed to evaluate the scale’s criterion validity and to assess determinants and consequences of mistreatment during childbirth from various perspectives.

Klíčová slova:

Ethiopia – Ethnicities – Labor and delivery – Midwives – Neonates – Psychological stress – Psychometrics – Research assessment


Zdroje

1. World Health Organization. Maternal deaths Data by WHO region [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2017 Jul 8]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.GSWCAH01REG?lang=en

2. World Health Organization. Number of deaths (thousands) Data by WHO region [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2017 Jul 8]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.CM1300N

3. World Health Organization. Maternal mortality fact sheet No. 348. Geneva; 2014.

4. The World Bank. Mortality rate, neonatal (per 1,000 live births) [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 Mar 28]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.DYN.NMRT

5. The World Bank. Maternal mortality ratio (modeled estimate, per 100,000 live births) [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2018 Mar 28]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.STA.MMRT

6. World Health Organization. Optimizing health worker roles to improve access to key maternal and newborn health interventions through task shifting. Geneva; 2012.

7. Central Statistical Agency, ICF. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016: Key Indicators Report. Addis Ababa; 2016.

8. World Health Organization. Skilled attendants at birth [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Oct 4]. Available from: http://www.who.int/gho/maternal_health/skilled_care/skilled_birth_attendance_text

9. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP. Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Reprod Health [Internet]. 2014;11:71. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=medl&AN=25238684 http://sfx.scholarsportal.info/uhn?sid=OVID:medline&id=pmid:25238684&id=doi:10.1186%2F1742-4755-11-71&issn=1742-4755&isbn=&volume=11&issue=1&spage=71&pages=71&date=2014 25238684

10. Bowser D, Hill K. Exploring Evidence for Disrespect and Abuse in Facility-Based Childbirth Report of a Landscape Analysis. Harvard School of Public Health University Research Co., LLC. 2010.

11. Rominski SD, Lori J, Nakua E, Dzomeku V, Moyer CA. When the baby remains there for a long time, it is going to die so you have to hit her small for the baby to come out": justification of disrespectful and abusive care during childbirth among midwifery students in Ghana. Health Policy Plan. 2017 Mar;32(2):215–24. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw114 28207054

12. Freedman LP, Ramsey K, Abuya T, Bellows B, Ndwiga C, Warren CE, et al. Defining disrespect and abuse of women in childbirth: a research, policy and rights agenda. Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Dec 1;92(12):915–7. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.137869 25552776

13. World Health Organization. The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. Geneva; 2014.

14. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, et al. The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):1–32.

15. D’Oliveira AFPL Diniz SG, Schraiber LB. Violence against women in health-care institutions: An emerging problem. Lancet. 2002;359(9318):1681–5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08592-6

16. Sheferaw ED, Bazant E, Gibson H, Fenta HB, Ayalew F, Belay TB, et al. Respectful maternity care in Ethiopian public health facilities. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0323-4 28511685

17. Burrowes S, Holcombe SJ, Jara D, Carter D, Smith K. Midwives’ and patients’ perspectives on disrespect and abuse during labor and delivery care in Ethiopia: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1183-6

18. Sheferaw ED, Mengesha TZ, Wase SB. Development of a tool to measure women’s perception of respectful maternity care in public health facilities. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2016;16(1):67. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4810502&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract

19. The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Health. HSTP Health Sector Transformation Plan. Addis Ababa; 2015.

20. Filby A, McConville F, Portela A. What prevents quality midwifery care? A systematic mapping of barriers in low and middle income countries from the provider perspective. PLoS One. 2016;11(5).

21. Yigzaw T, Ayalew F, Kim YM, Gelagay M, Dejene D, Gibson H, et al. How well does pre-service education prepare midwives for practice: Competence assessment of midwifery students at the point of graduation in Ethiopia. BMC Med Educ. 2015;

22. Ethiopian Midwives Association. The state of Ethiopia’s midwifery 2012. Addis Ababa; 2012.

23. Yousuf J, Ayalew M, Seid F. Maternal health beliefs, attitudes and practices among Ethiopian Afar. Exch HIV / AIDS Sex Gend [Internet]. 2011;(1):12–3. Available from: http://www.kit.nl/net/KIT_Publicaties_output/ShowFile2.aspx?e=1840

24. Denton M, Prus S, Walters V. Gender differences in health: A Canadian study of the psychosocial, structural and behavioural determinants of health. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(12):2585–600. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.008 15081207

25. Kling KC, Hyde JS, Showers CJ, Buswell BN, Garvey A, Glassburn D, et al. Gender Differences in Self-Esteem: A Meta-Analysis. Psychol Bull. 1999;125(4):470–500. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.4.470 10414226

26. Ndwiga C, Warren C, Abuya T, Kanya L, Maranga A, Ochieng C, et al. Respectful Maternity Care Resource Package: Facilitator’s Guide. New York; 2014.

27. Folkman S. Stress: Appraisal and Coping. Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. New York: Springer; 2013. 1913–1915 p.

28. Hughes BM. Self-esteem and changes in heart rate during laboratory-based stress. Psicologica. 2003;24(1):79–91.

29. Haggstrom E, Mbusa E, Wadensten B. Nurses’ Workplace Distress and Ethical Dilemmas in Tanzanian Health Care. Nurs Ethics. 2008;15(4):478–91. doi: 10.1177/0969733008090519 18515437

30. Leão ER, Dal Fabbro DR, de Oliveira RB, dos Santos IR, da Silva Victor E, Aquarone RL, et al. Stress, self-esteem and well-being among female health professionals: A randomized clinical trial on the impact of a self-care intervention mediated by the senses. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0172455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172455 28241070

31. McVicar A. Workplace stress in nursing: A literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2003;44(6):633–42. doi: 10.1046/j.0309-2402.2003.02853.x 14651686

32. Markos K. The Effectiveness Of Solution~ Focused Brief Group Counseling For Psychological Problems Of Sexually Abused Children: The Case Of Godanaw Rehabilitation Integrated Project. Addis Ababa University; 2010.

33. Natnael T. Perceived Stress, Coping, and Resilience of Ethiopian Women Labor Migrant Returnees from the Middle East Countries. 2015.

34. Rosenberg M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1965.

35. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385–96. 6668417

36. Sterne JAC, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: Potential and pitfalls. BMJ (Online). 2009.

37. Greenland S, Pearce N. Statistical Foundations for Model-Based Adjustments. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015;36(1):89–108.

38. Nunnally J. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1978.

39. Clark L.A. & Watson D. Constructing Validity:Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(3):309–19.

40. The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Health. Ethiopian TVET System Revised Model Curriculum Midwifery Level IV Based on Ethiopian Occupational Standard (EOS). Adama; 2016.

41. Sheferaw ED, Bazant E, Gibson H, Fenta HB, Ayalew F, Belay TB, et al. Respectful maternity care in Ethiopian public health facilities. Reprod Health [Internet]. 2017;14(1):60. Available from: doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0323-4 28511685

42. Armitage CJ, Christian J. From attitudes to behaviour: Basic and applied research on the theory of planned behaviour. Curr Psychol. 2003;22(3):187–95.

43. Sheeran P. Intention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2002;12(1):1–36.

44. Hatzenbuehler ML, Phelan JC, Link BG. Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalities. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(5):813–21. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301069 23488505

45. The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. Education Sector Development Programme V (2008–2012 E.C.; 2015/16–2019/20 G.C.). Addis Ababa; 2015.

46. Moser CON. Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice and Training. Fem Rev. 1993;(49):117–9.

47. Cross SE, Madson L. Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychol Bull. 1997;122(1):5–37. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.5 9204777

48. Sedikides C, Gaertner L, Huajian C. On the Panculturality of Self-enhancement and Self-protection Motivation: The Case for the Universality of Self-esteem. Adv Motiv Sci. 2015 Jan 1;2:185–241.

49. Schmitt DP, Allik J. Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale in 53 nations: Exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;89(4):623–42. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.623 16287423

50. Heine SJ, Markus HR, Lehman DR, Kitayana S. Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychol Rev. 1999;106(4):766–94. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.766 10560328

51. Hofstede G. Country Comparison Ethiopia [Internet]. [cited 2018 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/ethiopia/

52. Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quiñonez HR, Young SL. Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer. Front Public Heal. 2018;

53. Fearon JD. Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. J Econ Growth. 2003;8(2):195–222.

54. Tunçalp Ӧ, Were W, MacLennan C, Oladapo O, Gülmezoglu A, Bahl R, et al. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns-the WHO vision. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2015 Jul [cited 2017 Jun 5];122(8):1045–9. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/1471-0528.13451


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2020 Číslo 1