Psychometric validation of Czech version of the Sport Motivation Scale

Autoři: Martin Komarc aff001;  Ivana Harbichová aff002;  Lawrence M. Scheier aff003
Působiště autorů: Department of Methodology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic aff001;  Department of Psychology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic aff002;  LARS Research Institute, Inc, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America aff003
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 15(1)
Kategorie: Research Article


The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS) is a widely used instrument that assesses motivational processes within sport and exercise environments. The scale has demonstrated validity and reliability in multiple cultures, however, there is yet no empirical evidence regarding its psychometric properties in the Czech population. In this study we therefore set out to examine the reliability and construct validity of the SMS in a sample of Czech university-aged athletes. We first examined the SMS factor structure using a nonparametric item response theory model (Mokken monotone homogeneity model) and identified six items violating the unidimensionality of the particular subscales. Remaining items were then subjected to test of hypothesized seven-factor structure and several different forms of measurement invariance examined based on gender, competition level and type of sport (individual vs team sports). The hypothesized seven-factor fit well and there was sufficient evidence supporting full invariance across the examined groups. All SMS subscales had adequate internal consistencies ranging from 0.66 to 0.89. Results of correlational analysis among the SMS subscales and between the SMS and two outcomes of interest further supported validity of the scale. Observed differences in SMS subscales between males and females, recreational and competitive athletes, as well as between individual and team-based sport activities, comported with prior empirical studies using a self-determination theory framework. In conclusion, results reinforce the utility and performance of the SMS in a sample of Czech university athletes. The SMS may therefore be recommended for measurement of the multidimensional motivational processes taking place in the exercise and sport domain.

Klíčová slova:

Behavior – Human performance – Motivation – Physical activity – Psychology – Psychometrics – Research validity – Sports


1. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “what”and “why”of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychologcal inquiry. 2000;11:227–68.

2. Deci EL, Ryan RM, Vallerand RJ, Pelletier LG. Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective. Educational Psychologist. 1991;26(3–4):325–46.

3. Gagné M, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2005;26(4):331–62.

4. Ng JYY, Ntoumanis N, Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, Deci EL, Ryan RM, Duda JL, et al. Self-Determination Theory Applied to Health Contexts: A Meta-Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7(4):325–40. doi: 10.1177/1745691612447309 26168470

5. Joussemet M, Landry R, Koestner R. A self-determination theory perspective on parenting. Canadian Psychology. 2008;49(3):194–200.

6. Scheier LM, Grenard JL, Holtz KD. An empirical assessment of the above the Influence advertising campaign. Journal of Drug Education. 2011;41(4):431–61. doi: 10.2190/DE.41.4.f 22455104

7. Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD. The trans-contextual model of motivation. In: Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD, editors. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics; 2007. p. 53–70.

8. Treasure DC, Lemyre PM, Kuczka KK, Standage M. Motivation in elite sport: A self-determination perspective. In: Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD, editors. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport. Champaign, Illinois: Human kinetics; 2007. p. 153–65.

9. Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD, editors. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination theory in exercise and sport. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2007.

10. Vallerand RJ, Blssonnette R. Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivational Styles as Predictors of Behavior: A Prospective Study. Journal of Personality. 1992;60(3):599–620.

11. Ntoumanis N. A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2001;71(2):225–42.

12. Ntoumanis N. Empirical links between achievement goal theory and self-determination theory in sport. Journal of sports sciences. 2001;19(6):397–409. doi: 10.1080/026404101300149357 11411776

13. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist. 2000;55(1):68–78. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 11392867

14. Pelletier LG, Sarrazin P. Measurement issues in self-determination theory and sport. In: Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD, editors. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination theory in exercise and sport. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics; 2007. p. 143–52.

15. Chatzisarantis NLD, Hagger MS, Biddle SJH, Smith B, Wang JCK. A meta-analysis of perceived locus of causality in exercise, sport, and physical education contexts. Journal of sport and exercise psychology. 2003;25:284–306.

16. Clancy RB, Herring MP, MacIntyre TE, Campbell MJ. A review of competitive sport motivation research. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2016;27:232–42.

17. Keegan RJ, Spray CM, Harwood CG, Lavallee D. A qualitative investigation of the motivational climate in elite sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2014;15(1):97–107.

18. Holmberg PM, Sheridan DA. Self-determined motivation as a predictor of burnout among college athletes. Sport Psychologist. 2013;27(2):177–87.

19. Barkoukis V, Lazuras L, Tsorbatzoudis H, Rodafinos A. Motivational and sportspersonship profiles of elite athletes in relation to doping behavior. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2011;12(3):205–12.

20. Hodge K, Hargreaves EA, Gerrard D, Lonsdale C. Psychological mechanisms underlying doping attitudes in sport: Motivation and moral disengagement. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2013;35(4):419–32. doi: 10.1123/jsep.35.4.419 23966451

21. Rockafellow BD, Saules KK. Substance use by college students: The role of intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation for athletic involvement. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2006;20(3):279–87. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.20.3.279 16938065

22. Longbottom JL, Grove JR, Dimmock JA. Trait perfectionism, self-determination, and self-presentation processes in relation to exercise behavior. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2012;13(2):224–35.

23. Stoeber J, Becker C. Perfectionism, achievement motives, and attribution of success and failure in female soccer players. International Journal of Psychology. 2008;43(6):980–7. doi: 10.1080/00207590701403850 22022841

24. Chan DKC, Hagger MS. Self-determined forms of motivation predict sport injury prevention and rehabilitation intentions. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2012;15(5):398–406. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.03.016 22721861

25. Podlog L, Eklund RC. Return to sport after serious injury: A retrospective examination of motivation and psychological outcomes. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2005;14(1):20–34.

26. Pelletier LG, Fortier M, Vallerand RJ, Briére NM, Tuson KM, R BM. Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and amotivation in sports: The sport motivation scale (SMS). Journal of sport and exercise psychology. 1995;17:35–53.

27. Clancy RB, Herring MP, Campbell MJ. Motivation measures in sport: A critical review and bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017;8(MAR).

28. Briere NM, Vallerand RJ, Blais MR, Pelletier LG. Développement et validation d’une mesure de motivation intrinsèque, extrinsèque et d’amotivation en contexte sportif: L’échelle de motivation dans les sports (ÉMS) [Development and validation of a scale on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and lack of motivation in sports: The scale on motivation in sports]. International journal of sport psychology. 1995;26:465–89.

29. Fortier MS, Vallerand RJ, Brière NM, Provencher RJ. Competitive and recreational sport structures and gender: A test of their relationship with sport motivation. International journal of sport psychology. 1995;26:24–39.

30. Pelletier LG, Rocchi MA, Vallerand RJ, Deci EL, Ryan RM. Validation of the revised sport motivation scale (SMS-II). Psychology of sport and exercise. 2013;14:329–41.

31. Zahariadis P, Tsorbatzoudis H, Alexandris K. Self-determination in sport commitment. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2006;102(2):405–20. doi: 10.2466/pms.102.2.405-420 16826662

32. Chantal Y, Guay F, Dobreva-Martinova T, Vallerand RJ. Motivation and elite performance: An exploration investigation with Bulgarian athletes. International journal of sport psychology. 1996;27:173–82.

33. Sarrazin P, Vallerand RJ, Guillet E, Pelletier LG, Cury F. Motivation and dropout in female handballers: A 21-month prospective study. European journal of social psychology. 2001;32:395–418.

34. Li F, Harmer P. Testing the simplex assumption underlying the sport motivation scale: A structural equation modeling analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1996;67(4):396–405. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1996.10607971 9016481

35. Pelletier LG, Vallerand RJ, Sarrazin P. The revised six-factor sport motivation scale (Mallet, Kawabata, Newcombe, Otero-Forero, & Jackson, 2007): Something old, something new, and something borrowed. Psychology of sport and exercise. 2007;8:615–21.

36. Martens MP, Webber SN. Psychometric properties of the sport motivation scale: An evaluation with college varsity athletes from the U.S. Journal of sport and exercise psychology. 2002;24:254–70. doi: 10.1123/jsep.24.3.254 28682201

37. De Pero R, Amici S, Benvenuti C, Minganti C, Capranica L, Pesce C. Motivation for sport participation in older Italian athletes: The role of age, gender and competition level. Sport sciences for health. 2009;5(2):61–9.

38. Riemer HA, Fink JS, Fitzgerald MP. External validity of the sport motivation scale. Avante. 2002; 8:57–66.

39. Shaw KL, Ostrow A, Beckstead J. Motivation and the senior athlete: An examination of the psychometric properties of the sport motivation scale. Topics in geriatric rehabilitation. 2005;21(3):206–14.

40. Mallet CJ, Kawabata M, Newcombe P, Otero-Forero A, Jackson S. Sport motivation scale– 6 (SMS-6): A revised six-factor sport motivation scale. Psychology of sport and exercise. 2007;8:600–14.

41. Lonsdale C, Hodge K, Rose EA. The behavioral regulation in sport questionnaire (BRSQ): Instrument development and initial validity evidence. Journal of sport and exercise psychology. 2008;30(3):323–55. doi: 10.1123/jsep.30.3.323 18648109

42. Lonsdale C, Hodge K, Hargreaves EA, Ng JYY. Comparing sport motivation scales: A response to Pelletier et al. Psychology of sport and exercise. 2014;15:446–52.

43. Doganis G. Development of a Greek version of the Sport Motivation Scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2000;90(2):505–12. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.90.2.505 10833747

44. Núñez JL, Martín-Albo J, Navarro JG, González VM. Preliminary validation of a Spanish version of the sport motivation scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2006;102(3):919–30. doi: 10.2466/pms.102.3.919-930 16916172

45. Burtscher J, Furtner M, Sachse P, Burtscher M. Validation of a German version of the sport motivation scale (SMS-28) and motivation analysis in competitive mountain runners. Perceptual and motor skills. 2011;112(3):807–20. doi: 10.2466/05.06.25.PMS.112.3.807-820 21853770

46. Filho MB, Andrade D, Miranda R, Núñez JL, Martín-Albó J, Ribas PR. Preliminary validation of a brazilian version of the sport motivation scale. Universitas Psychologica. 2011;10(2):557–66.

47. Marjanović A, Mladenovic M. Some differences in sports motivation of young football players from Russia, Serbia and Montenegro. SportLogia. 2011;7(2):246–60.

48. Candela F, Zucchetti G, Villosio C. Preliminary validation of the Italian version of the original sport motivation scale. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2014;9(1):136–47.

49. Bayyat MM, Almoghrabi AH, Ay KM. Preliminary validation of an Arabic version of the sport motivation scale (SMS-28). Asian Social Science. 2016;12(7):186–96.

50. Paic R, Kajos A, Meszler B, Prisztóka G. Validation of the hungarian sport motivation scale (H-SMS). Cognition, Brain, Behavior An Interdisciplinary Journal. 2017;21(4):275–91.

51. Kazak Z. A study on reliabilizy and validity of the Sport motivation scale for Turkish athletes. Hacettepe journal of sport sciences. 2004;15(4):191–206.

52. Martín-Albo J, Núñez JL, Navarro JG, Leite M, Almirón M, Glavinich N. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the sport motivation scale in Paraguay. Revista Mexicana de Psicologia. 2007;24(1):43–52.

53. López-Fernández I, Merino-Marbán R, Fernández-Rodríquez E. Examining the relationship between sex and motivation in triathletes. Perceptual and motor skills: Exercise and sport. 2014;119(1):42–9.

54. Chin NS, Khoo S, Low WY. Self-Determination and goal orientation in track and field. Journal of human kinetics. 2012;33:151–61. doi: 10.2478/v10078-012-0054-0 23486244

55. Teo EW, Khoo S, Wong R, Wee EH, Lim BH, Rengasamy SS. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation among adolescent ten-pin bowlers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Journal of human kinetics. 2015;45:241–51. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0025 25964827

56. Ryan RM. Attribution, instrinsic motivation, and athletes: A replication and extension. In: Nadeau CH, Halliwell WR, Newell KM, Roberts GC, editors. Psychology of motor behavior and sport. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics; 1980. p. 19–26.

57. Cremades JG, Flournoy B, Gomez CB. Scholarship status and gender differences in motivation among U.S. collegiate track and field athletes. International journal of sport science and coaching. 2012;7:333–44.

58. Kingston KM, Horrorrocks CS, Hanton S. Do multidimensional intrinsic and extrinsic motivation profiles discriminate between athlete scholarship status and gender? European journal of sport science. 2006;6:53–63.

59. Brodkin P, Weiss MR. Developmental differences in motivation for participating in competitive swimming. Journal of sport and exercise psychology. 1990;12:248–63.

60. Schumacher Dimech A, Seiler R. Extra-curricular sport participation: A potential buffer against social anxiety symptoms in primary school children. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2011;12(4):347–54.

61. Eime RM, Young JA, Harvey JT, Charity MJ, Payne WR. A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for adults: Informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2013;10.

62. Nielsen G, Wikman JM, Jensen CJ, Schmidt JF, Gliemann L, Andersen TR. Health promotion: The impact of beliefs of health benefits, social relations and enjoyment on exercise continuation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. 2014;24(SUPPL.1):66–75.

63. Wikman JM, Elsborg P, Nielsen G, Seidelin K, Nyberg M, Bangsbo J, et al. Are team sport games more motivating than individual exercise for middle-aged women? A comparison of levels of motivation associated with participating in floorball and spinning. Kinesiology. 2018;50(1):34–42.

64. Dimitrov DM. Testing for Factorial Invariance in the Context of Construct Validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 2010;43(2):121–49.

65. van de Schoot R, Lugtig P, Hox J. A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2012;9(4):486–92.

66. Venuti L. Strategies of translation. In: Baker M, editor. Encyclopedia of translation studies. London: Routledge; 1998. p. 240–4.

67. Behling O, Law KS. Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: Problems and solutions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2000.

68. Harbichova I. Motivace ve sportu: Vztah k celkové sebeúctě a tělesnému sebevnímání. [Motivation in sport: Relationship to global self-esteem and physical self-perception]. [Dissertation]. Prague: Charles University; 2014.

69. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press; 1985.

70. Standage M, Gillison F, Treasue DC. Self-determination and motivation in physical education. In: Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD, editors. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination theory in exercise and sport. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics; 2007. p. 71–85.

71. Thogersen-Ntoumani C, Ntoumani N. The role of self-determined motivation in the understanding of exercise-related behaviours, cognitions and physical self-evaluations. Journal of sport sciences. 2006;24(4):393–404.

72. Fox KR, Corbin CB. The physical self-perception profile: Development and preliminary validation. Journal of sport and exercise psychology. 1989;11(4):408–30.

73. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univestity Press; 1965.

74. Harbichová I, Komarc M. Víceskupinová analýza faktorové struktury inventáře sociální tělesné úzkosti. Studia kinanthropologica: vědecký časopis pro kinantropologii. 2012;13(3):205–10.

75. Tomešová E, Štochl J. Cross-cultural validity and reliability of Czech version of physical self-perception profile. Acta universitatis carolinae, Kinanthropologica. 2006; 42(1):52–62.

76. Osecká L, Blatný M. Struktura globálního vztahu k sobě: analýza Rosenbergovy škály sebehodnocení—replikace. Československá psychologie. 1997;41(6):481–6.

77. Byrne BM. Measuring self-concept across life span: Issues and instrumentation. Washington, DC: American Psychologist Association; 1996.

78. Motl RW, Conroy DE. Validity and factorial invariance of the social physique anxiety scale. Medicine, science, sports and exercise. 2000;32:1007–17.

79. Tafarodi RW, Swann WB. Self-liking and self-competence as dimensions of global self-esteem: Initial validation of a measure. Journal of personality assessment. 1995;65(2):322–42. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6502_8 8656329

80. Sijtsma K, Verweij A.C. Mokken Scale Analysis: Theoretical Considerations and an Application to Transitivity Tasks 1992. 355–73 p.

81. Sijtsma K, van der Ark LA. A tutorial on how to do a Mokken scale analysis on your test and questionnaire data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 2017;70(1):137–58. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12078 27958642

82. Stochl J, Jones PB, Croudace TJ. Mokken scale analysis of mental health and well-being questionnaire item responses: A non-parametric IRT method in empirical research for applied health researchers. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2012;12.

83. Kuijpers RE, van der Ark LA, Croon MA, Sijtsma K. Bias in Point Estimates and Standard Errors of Mokken’s Scalability Coefficients. Applied Psychological Measurement. 2016;40(5):331–45. doi: 10.1177/0146621616638500 29881057

84. van der Ark LA. Mokken Scale Analysis in R. 2007. 2007;20(11):19.

85. van Schuur WH. Mokken Scale Analysis: Between the Guttman Scale and Parametric Item Response Theory. Political Analysis. 2003;11(2):139–63.

86. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 1998.

87. Wirth RJ, Edwards MC. Item factor analysis: current approaches and future directions. Psychological methods. 2007;12(1):58–79. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.58 17402812

88. Brown T. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research (Second Edition). New York: The Guilford Press; 2015.

89. Asparouhov T, Muthén B. Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling. 2009;16(3):397–438.

90. Aitkin M, Aitkin I. Bayesian inference for factor scores. Contemporary Psychometrics: A Festschrift for Roderick PMcDonald 2013. p. 207–21.

91. Browne M, Cudek R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993. p. 136–62.

92. Bentler PM. Comparative fit index structural models. Psychological bulletin. 1990;107:238–46. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 2320703

93. Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin. 1980;88:588–606.

94. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55.

95. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guildford press; 2011.

96. McDonald RP. Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1999.

97. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling. 2002;9(4):599–620.

98. Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling. 2002;9(2):233–55.

99. Ottesen L, Jeppesen RS, Krustrup BR. The development of social capital through football and running: studying an intervention program for inactive women. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2010;20 Suppl 1:118–31.

100. Wang MT, Chow A, Amemiya J. Who Wants to Play? Sport Motivation Trajectories, Sport Participation, and the Development of Depressive Symptoms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2017;46(9):1982–98. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0649-9 28299495

Článek vyšel v časopise


2020 Číslo 1
Nejčtenější tento týden