Niche modeling reveals life history shifts in birds at La Brea over the last twenty millennia


Autoři: Robert M. Zink aff001;  Sebastián Botero-Cañola aff002;  Helen Martinez aff005;  Katelyn M. Herzberg aff005
Působiště autorů: School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America aff001;  School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America aff002;  Nebraska State Museum, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America aff003;  Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America aff004;  College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America aff005
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 15(1)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227361

Souhrn

A species presence at a particular site can change over time, resulting in temporally dynamic species pools. Ecological niche models provide estimates of species presence at different time intervals. The avifauna of La Brea includes approximately 120 species dating to approximately 15,000 years ago. Niche models predicted presence at the Last Glacial Maximum for over 90% of 89 landbird species. This confirms that niche modeling produces sensible range estimates at the Last Glacial Maximum. For 97 currently local species that are as yet undocumented at La Brea over 90% were predicted to occur; absence is due to insufficient study, lack of the ecological niche, transient occurrence or a behavioral ability to avoid entrapment. Our 366 niche models provide a prospective checklist of the landbird fauna of La Brea. The models indicate fluidity in life history strategies and a higher proportion of resident birds at the LGM (88% to 60%). We evaluated a subset of 103 species in breeding and winter periods using two climate models (MIROC−ESM, CCSM4) with a variety of differing parameters, finding differences in 5% of the niche models. Niche breadths in bark-foraging birds changed little between the present and LGM, suggesting that greater species diversity at the LGM was due to greater niche availability rather than contractions of niche breadths (i.e., niche partitioning).

Klíčová slova:

Animal migration – Animal sexual behavior – Birds – Ecological niches – Seasons – Species diversity – Winter – Woodpeckers


Zdroje

1. Lynch JF, Johnson NK. Turnover and equilibria in insular avifaunas, with special reference to the California Channel Islands. Condor 1974; 76:370–384.

2. Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK. Estimating species richness. Biol. Div.: frontiers in measurement and assessment 2011; 12:39–54.

3. Peterson AT. Predicting species’ geographic distributions based on ecological niche modeling. Condor 2011; 103:599–605.

4. Peterson AT, Soberón J, Pearson RG, Anderson RP, Martínez-Meyer E, Nakamura M, et al. Ecological niches and geographic distributions. (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press; 2011.

5. Maguire KC, Nieto-Lugilde D, Fitzpatrick MC, Williams JW, Blois JL. Modeling species and community responses to past, present, and future episodes of climatic and ecological change. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst, 2015; 46:343–368.

6. Ribeiro V, Werneck FP, Machado RB. Distribution dynamics of South American savanna birds in response to Quaternary climate change. Austral Ecol. 2016; 41:768–777.

7. Yannic G, Pellissier L, Ortego J, Lecomte N, Couturier S, Cuyler C, et al. Genetic diversity in caribou linked to past and future climate change. Nat Clim Change 2014; 4:132.

8. Myers CE, Stigall AL, Lieberman BS. PaleoENM: applying ecological niche modeling to the fossil record. Paleobio. 2015; 41: 226–244.

9. Howard H. A census of the Pleistocene birds of Rancho La Brea from the collections of the Los Angeles Museum. Condor 1930; 32:81–88.

10. Howard H. Further studies upon the birds of the Pleistocene of Rancho La Brea. Condor 1936; 38:32–36.

11. Howard H. A comparison of avian assemblages from individual pits at Rancho La Brea, California. Contributions in Science. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co. 1962; 58:1e24.

12. Miller AH. A new genus of icterid from Rancho La Brea. Condor 1947; 49:22–24.

13. Miller AH. The passerine remains from Rancho La Brea in the paleontological collections of the University of California. Univ. Cal. Pub., Bull. Dep. Geol. Sci. 19, 1–22 (1929).

14. Dawson WR. Records of fringillids from the Pleistocene of Rancho La Brea. Condor 1948; 50:57–63.

15. Campbell KE Jr., Bochenski ZM. A new genus for the extinct Late Pleistocene owl Strix brea Howard (Aves: Strigiformes) from Rancho La Brea, California. In Proceedings of the VII International Meeting of the Society of Avian Paleontology and Evolution, ed. W. E. Boles and T. H. Worthy. Records of the Australian Museum 2010; 62:123–144.

16. Johnston DW. The biosystematics of American crows. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1961.

17. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2005; 25:1965–1978.

18. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 2006; 190:231–259.

19. Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudık M, Chee YE, Yates CJ. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions 2011; 17:43–57.

20. Hijmans RJ, Guarino L, Bussink C, Mathur P, Cruz M, Barrentes I, et al. DIVA-GIS. Version 7.1.7. A geographic information system for the analysis of species distribution data. Manual http://www.diva-gis.org/ (2004).

21. Nakazawa Y, Peterson AT, Martínez-Meyer E, Navarro-Sigüenza AG. Seasonal niches of Nearctic-Neotropical migratory birds: implications for the evolution of migration. Auk 2004; 121:610–618.

22. Peña-Peniche A, Ruvalcaba-Ortega I, Rojas-Soto O. Climate complexity in the migratory cycle of Ammodramus bairdii. PLoS ONE 2018; 13(8): e0202678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202678 30148886

23. Pérez-Moreno H, Martínez-Meyer E, Soberón J, Rojas-Soto O. Climatic patterns in the establishment of wintering areas by North American migratory birds. 2016. Ecol. an Evol; 6:2022–2033.

24. Varela S, Lima-Ribeiro MS, Terribile LC. A short guide to the climatic variables of the last glacial maximum for biogeographers. PloS one 2015;, 10e0129037.

25. Title PO, Bemmels JB. ENVIREM: an expanded set of bioclimatic and topographic variables increases flexibility and improves performance of ecological niche modeling. Ecography 2018; 4:291–307.

26. Escalante T, Morrone JJ, Rodríguez-Tapia G. Biogeographic regions of North American mammals based on endemism. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2013; 110:485–499.

27. Zink RM, Gardner AS. Glaciation as a migratory switch. Science advances 2017; 3p.e1603133.

28. Aiello‐Lammens ME, Boria RA, Radosavljevic A, Vilela B, Anderson RP. spThin: an R package for spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models. Ecography 2015; 38:541–545.

29. Grinnell J. The role of the “accidental”. Auk 1922; 39:373–380.

30. Levins R. Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explorations. Princeton Univ. Press. Princeton, 1968.

31. Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M. ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography 2010; 33:607–611.

32. Glor RE, Warren DL. Testing the ecological basis of biogeographic boundaries. Evolution 2011; 65:673–683.

33. Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 2008; 62:2868–2883. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00482.x 18752605

34. Nakazato T, Warren DL, Moyle LC. Ecological and geographic modes of species divergence in wild tomatoes. Am. J. Bot. 2010; 97:680–693. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0900216 21622430

35. Simpson GG. Mammals and the nature of continents. Am. J. Sci. 1943; 24:1–31.

36. Peterson AT, Soberon J, Sanchez-Cordero V. Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 1999; 285:1265–1267. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5431.1265 10455053

37. Zink RM. Homage to Hutchinson, and the role of ecology in lineage divergence and speciation. J. Biogeog. 2014; 41:999–1006.

38. Fragomeni A. Prothero D.R. Stasis in late Quaternary birds from the La Brea tar pits during the last glacial-interglacial cycle. New Mexico Mus. Nat. Hist. Bull. 2011; 53:511–516.

39. Heusser L. Direct correlation of millennial‐scale changes in western North American vegetation and climate with changes in the California Current system over the past∼ 60 kyr. Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology 1998; 13:252–262.

40. Prothero DR, Syverson VJ, Raymond KR, Madan M, Molina S, Fragomeni A, et al. Size and shape stasis in late Pleistocene mammals and birds from Rancho La Brea during the Last Glacial–Interglacial cycle. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2012; 56:1–10.

41. Barve N, Barve V, Jiménez-Valverde A, Lira-Noriega A, Maher SP, Peterson AT, et al. The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecol. Model. 2011; 222:1810–1819.

42. Warren DL, Wright AN, Seifert SN, Shaffer HB. Incorporating model complexity and spatial sampling bias into ecological niche models of climate change risks faced by 90 California vertebrate species of concern. Diver. Distrib. 2014; 20:334–343.

43. Kramer‐Schadt S, Niedballa J, Pilgrim JD, Schröder B, Lindenborn J, Reinfelder V, et al. The importance of correcting for sampling bias in MaxEnt species distribution models. Diversity Distrib. 2013; 19:1366–1379.

44. Norris D. Model thresholds are more important than presence location type: Understanding the distribution of lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris) in a continuous Atlantic forest of southeast Brazil. Tropical Cons. Sci. 2014; 7:529–547.


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2020 Číslo 1