Survival of medial versus lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

Autoři: Seung-Beom Han aff001;  Sang-Soo Lee aff002;  Kyoung-Ho Kim aff003;  Jung-Taek Im aff004;  Phil-Sun Park aff004;  Young-Soo Shin aff005
Působiště autorů: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea aff001;  Institute for Skeletal Aging & Orthopedic Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart hospital, Hallym University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea aff002;  Department of Orthopedic surgery, Armed Forces Daejeon Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea aff003;  Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea aff004;  Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart hospital, Hallym University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea aff005
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 15(1)
Kategorie: Research Article


Many studies have found associations between unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and implant survival, but controversy still exists regarding the relative survival of medial versus lateral UKA over mid-to long-term follow-up. The purpose of this study was to compare survival and clinical outcomes of medial and lateral UKAs. In this meta-analysis, we reviewed studies that assessed implant survival in patients who underwent medial or lateral UKA with short- to mid-term (<10years) or long-term (>10years) follow-up, and that used assessments, such as pain and function scores, to compare postoperative scores on knee outcome scales. A total of eight studies (33,999 knees with medial UKA and 2,853 with lateral UKA) met the inclusion criteria and was analyzed in detail. There were no significant differences between medial and lateral UKA in pain score (95% CI: -0.37 to 0.88; P = 0.42), function score (95% CI: -0.19 to 0.60; P = 0.31), short- to mid-term survival (medial, 32,083/33,483; lateral, 2,636/2,726; OR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.48;P = 0.91), or long-term survival (medial, 479/516; lateral, 110/127; OR 2.51, 95% CI:0.67 to 9.43; P = 0.17). In addition, both groups had substantial proportions of knees with short- to mid-term survival (95.6% by medial UKA and 94.6% by lateral UKA) and long-term survival (92.8% by medial UKA and 86.6% by lateral UKA). This meta-analysis found no significant differences in short- to mid-term and long-term survival of medial and lateral UKAs. Similarly, patients treated with medial UKA showed no difference in pain relief or functional improvement compared to patients treated with lateral UKA. These results suggest that both UKA techniques are viable treatment options for patients with unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis over long-term follow-up, although further high-quality studies are needed to address some remaining uncertainties regarding the clinical benefits of these procedures.

Klíčová slova:

Arthroplasty – Kinematics – Knees – Medical implants – Metaanalysis – Orthopedic surgery – Osteoarthritis – Surgical and invasive medical procedures


1. Kim KT. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2018;30:1–2. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.18.014 29482300

2. Liddle AD, Judge A, Pandit H, Murray DW. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet. 2014;384:1437–1445. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60419-0 25012116

3. Felson DT, Niu JB, Gross KD, Englund M, Sharma L, Cooke TDV, et al. Valgus Malalignment Is a Risk Factor for Lateral Knee Osteoarthritis Incidence and Progression Findings From the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study and the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2013;65:355–362. doi: 10.1002/art.37726 23203672

4. Johal S, Nakano N, Baxter M, Hujazi I, Pandit H, Khanduja V. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: The Past, Current Controversies, and Future Perspectives. J Knee Surg. 2018;31:992–998. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1625961 29514367

5. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Howell RE, Turnbull NJJCOP. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a current review. 2015;26:243–246.

6. van der List JP, McDonald LS, Pearle AD. Systematic review of medial versus lateral survivorship in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2015;22:454–460. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.09.011 26507286

7. Argenson JN, Parratte S, Bertani A, Flecher X, Aubaniac JM. Long-term results with a lateral unicondylar replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2686–2693. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0351-z 18574650

8. Demange MK, Von Keudell A, Probst C, Yoshioka H, Gomoll AH. Patient-specific implants for lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2015;39:1519–1526. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2678-x 25645437

9. Ollivier M, Abdel MP, Parratte S, Argenson JN. Lateral unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA): contemporary indications, surgical technique, and results. Int Orthop. 2014;38:449–455. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2222-9 24337799

10. Sah AP, Scott RD. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty through a medial approach. Study with an average five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1948–1954. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01457 17768191

11. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5 10 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available from

12. Baker PN, Jameson SS, Deehan DJ, Gregg PJ, Porter M, Tucker K. Mid-term equivalent survival of medial and lateral unicondylar knee replacement: an analysis of data from a National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:1641–1648. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B12.29416 23188905

13. Gioe TJ, Killeen KK, Hoeffel DP, Bert JM, Comfort TK, Scheltema K, et al. Analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a community-based implant registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000093004.90435.d1111-119

14. Heyse TJ, Khefacha A, Peersman G, Cartier P. Survivorship of UKA in the middle-aged. Knee. 2012;19:585–591. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.09.002 21962908

15. Lustig S, Paillot JL, Servien E, Henry J, Ait Si Selmi T, Neyret P. Cemented all polyethylene tibial insert unicompartimental knee arthroplasty: a long term follow-up study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2008.04.001 19251232

16. O'Rourke MR, Gardner JJ, Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, Goetz DD, Vittetoe DA, et al. The John Insall Award: unicompartmental knee replacement: a minimum twenty-one-year followup, end-result study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:27–37. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000185451.96987.aa 16239780

17. Liebs TR, Herzberg W. Better quality of life after medial versus lateral unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:2629–2640. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2966-y 23568676

18. John J, Mauffrey C, May P. Unicompartmental knee replacements with Miller-Galante prosthesis: two to 16-year follow-up of a single surgeon series. Int Orthop. 2011;35:507–513. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1006-8 20419454

19. Scott RD. Lateral unicompartmental replacement: a road less traveled. Orthopedics. 2005;28:983–984. 16190078

20. Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Barker K, Dodd CA, Murray DW. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:198–204. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.25767 21282759

21. Argenson JN, Parratte S. The unicompartmental knee: design and technical considerations in minimizing wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:137–142. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000229358.19867.60 16906108

22. Argenson JN, Parratte S, Flecher X, Aubaniac JM. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: technique through a mini-incision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:32–36. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180986da7 17534185

23. Kim KT, Lee S, Lee JS, Kang MS, Koo KH. Long-Term Clinical Results of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Younger than 60 Years of Age: Minimum 10-Year Follow-up. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2018;30:28–33. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.17.025 29298463

24. Zambianchi F, Digennaro V, Giorgini A, Grandi G, Fiacchi F, Mugnai R, et al. Surgeon's experience influences UKA survivorship: a comparative study between all-poly and metal back designs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:2074–2080. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2958-9 24682516

25. Berend KR, Kolczun MC 2nd, George JW Jr., Lombardi AV Jr. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty through a lateral parapatellar approach has high early survivorship. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012.470:77–83. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2005-9 21822570

26. Xing Z, Katz J, Jiranek W. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: factors influencing the outcome. J Knee Surg. 2012;25:369–373. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299666 23150345

27. Kim SG, Kim HG, Lee SY, Lim HC, Bae JH. Redislocation after Bearing Exchange for the Treatment of Mobile Bearing Dislocation in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2018;30:234–240. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.17.085 30157591

Článek vyšel v časopise


2020 Číslo 1
Nejčtenější tento týden