Kinematic analysis of motor learning in upper limb body-powered bypass prosthesis training

Autoři: Conor Bloomer aff001;  Sophie Wang aff001;  Kimberly Kontson aff001
Působiště autorů: Division of Biomedical Physics, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America aff001;  Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 15(1)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226563


Motor learning and compensatory movement are important aspects of prosthesis training yet relatively little quantitative evidence supports our current understanding of how motor control and compensation develop in the novel body-powered prosthesis user. The goal of this study is to assess these aspects of prosthesis training through functional, kinematic, and kinetic analyses using a within-subject paradigm compared across two training time points. The joints evaluated include the left and right shoulders, torso, and right elbow. Six abled-bodied subjects (age 27 ± 3) using a body-powered bypass prosthesis completed the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test and the targeted Box and Blocks Test after five training sessions and again after ten sessions. Significant differences in movement parameters included reduced times to complete tasks, reduced normalized jerk for most joints and tasks, and more variable changes in efficiency and compensation parameters for individual tasks and joints measured as range of motion, maximum angle, and average moment. Normalized jerk, joint specific path length, range of motion, maximum angle, and average moment are presented for the first time in this unique training context and for this specific device type. These findings quantitatively describe numerous aspects of motor learning and control in able-bodied subjects that may be useful in guiding future rehabilitation and training of body-powered prosthesis users.

Klíčová slova:

Body limbs – Elbow – Kinematics – Learning – Musculoskeletal system – Prosthetics – Shoulders – Skeletal joints


1. Postema SG, van der Sluis CK, Waldenlov K, Norling Hermansson LM. Body structures and physical complaints in upper limb reduction deficiency: a 24-year follow-up study. PloS one. 2012;7(11):e49727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049727 23226218

2. Ostlie K, Franklin RJ, Skjeldal OH, Skrondal A, Magnus P. Musculoskeletal pain and overuse syndromes in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2011;92(12):1967–73.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.026 22133243

3. Cirstea MC, Levin MF. Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain. 2000;123(5):940.

4. Levin MF, Liebermann DG, Parmet Y, Berman S. Compensatory Versus Noncompensatory Shoulder Movements Used for Reaching in Stroke. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 2016;30(7):635–46. doi: 10.1177/1545968315613863 26510934

5. Li J, Pan B, Jin T, Huang Z, Ye S, Wu J, et al. A single task assessment system of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Technol Health Care. 2016;24 Suppl 2:S707–15.

6. Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM. Changes in performance over time while learning to use a myoelectric prosthesis. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation. 2014.

7. Bernshtein NA. The co-ordination and regulation of movements. 1967.

8. Muratori LM, Lamberg EM, Quinn L, Duff SV. Applying principles of motor learning and control to upper extremity rehabilitation. Journal of hand therapy: official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists. 2013;26(2):94–102; quiz 3.

9. Metzger AJ, Dromerick AW, Holley RJ, Lum PS. Characterization of compensatory trunk movements during prosthetic upper limb reaching tasks. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2012;93(11):2029–34. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.03.011 22449551

10. Cowley J, Resnik L, Wilken J, Smurr Walters L, Gates D. Movement quality of conventional prostheses and the DEKA Arm during everyday tasks. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017;41(1):33–40. doi: 10.1177/0309364616631348 26932980

11. Shishov N, Melzer I, Bar-Haim S. Parameters and Measures in Assessment of Motor Learning in Neurorehabilitation; A Systematic Review of the Literature. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2017;11:82. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00082 28286474

12. Schwarz A, Kanzler CM, Lambercy O, Luft AR, Veerbeek JM. Systematic Review on Kinematic Assessments of Upper Limb Movements After Stroke. Stroke. 2019:Strokeaha118023531.

13. Chang JJ, Tung WL, Wu WL, Huang MH, Su FC. Effects of robot-aided bilateral force-induced isokinetic arm training combined with conventional rehabilitation on arm motor function in patients with chronic stroke. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2007;88(10):1332–8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.016 17908578

14. Colombo R, Pisano F, Micera S, Mazzone A, Delconte C, Carrozza MC, et al. Assessing mechanisms of recovery during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper limb. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 2008;22(1):50–63. doi: 10.1177/1545968307303401 17626223

15. Bloomer CWS, Kontson K. Creating a standardized, quantitative training protocol for upper limb bypass prostheses. Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Research. 2018. 31172033

16. Huinink LH, Bouwsema H, Plettenburg DH, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM. Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0197-7 27716254

17. Kontson KL, Marcus IP, Myklebust BM, Civillico EF. An Integrated Movement Analysis Framework to Study Upper Limb Function: A Pilot Study. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering: a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2017;25(10):1874–83.

18. Kontson KL, Wang S, Barovsky S, Bloomer C, Wozniczka L, Civillico EF. Assessing kinematic variability during performance of Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test. Journal of Hand Therapy.

19. Kristianslund E, Krosshaug T, Mok KM, McLean S, van den Bogert AJ. Expressing the joint moments of drop jumps and sidestep cutting in different reference frames—does it matter? Journal of biomechanics. 2014;47(1):193–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.09.016 24161796

20. Kloosterman MG, Buurke JH, de Vries W, Van der Woude LH, Rietman JS. Effect of power-assisted hand-rim wheelchair propulsion on shoulder load in experienced wheelchair users: A pilot study with an instrumented wheelchair. Medical engineering & physics. 2015;37(10):961–8.

21. Thies SB, Kenney LP, Sobuh M, Galpin A, Kyberd P, Stine R, et al. Skill assessment in upper limb myoelectric prosthesis users: Validation of a clinically feasible method for characterising upper limb temporal and amplitude variability during the performance of functional tasks. Medical engineering & physics. 2017;47:137–43.

22. Resnik LJ, Borgia ML, Acluche F, Cancio JM, Latlief G, Sasson N. How do the outcomes of the DEKA Arm compare to conventional prostheses? PloS one. 2018;13(1):e0191326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191326 29342217

23. Atkins D.J., M RH. Adult Upper-Limb Prosthetic Training. Comprehensive Management of the Upper-Limb Amputee. New York, NY: Springer; 1989. p. 39–59.

24. VA/DoD. The Management of Upper Extremity Amputation Rehabilitation. VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guidelines2014.

25. Silcox DH 3rd, Rooks MD, Vogel RR, Fleming LL. Myoelectric prostheses. A long-term follow-up and a study of the use of alternate prostheses. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 1993;75(12):1781–9. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199312000-00007 8258548

26. Biddiss E, Chau T. Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation. 2007;86(12):977–87.

27. Davids JR, Wagner LV, Meyer LC, Blackhurst DW. Prosthetic management of children with unilateral congenital below-elbow deficiency. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 2006;88(6):1294–300. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00982 16757763

28. Egermann M, Kasten P, Thomsen M. Myoelectric hand prostheses in very young children. International orthopaedics. 2009;33(4):1101–5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0615-y 18636257

29. Ostlie K, Lesjo IM, Franklin RJ, Garfelt B, Skjeldal OH, Magnus P. Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(4):294–303. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2011.635405 22112174

30. Ostlie K, Lesjo IM, Franklin RJ, Garfelt B, Skjeldal OH, Magnus P. Prosthesis use in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees: patterns of wear, prosthetic skills and the actual use of prostheses in activities of daily life. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(6):479–93. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2011.653296 22315926

31. Kontson K, Marcus I, Myklebust B, Civillico E. Targeted box and blocks test: Normative data and comparison to standard tests. PloS one. 2017;12(5):e0177965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177965 28542374

32. Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1969;50(6):311–9. 5788487

33. Upper body modeling with Plug-in Gait Vicon Documentation: Vicon; 2019

34. IA M. Determining upper limb kinematics and dynamics during everyday tasks. Department of Mechanical, Materials, and Manufacturing Engineering. 1999.

35. Cutti AG, Paolini G, Troncossi M, Cappello A, Davalli A. Soft tissue artefact assessment in humeral axial rotation. Gait & posture. 2005;21(3):341–9.

36. Stagni RF, S PG, Tronscossi M, Cappello A, Davalli A. Third Siamoc congress: propagation of skin motion artefacts to knee joint kinematics. Gait & posture. 2005;21(3):341–9.

37. Murphy MA, H C.K. Kinematic analysis of the upper extremity after stroke—how far have we reached and what have we grasped? Physical Therapy Reviews. 2015;20(3).

38. Choi A, Joo SB, Oh E, Mun JH. Kinematic evaluation of movement smoothness in golf: relationship between the normalized jerk cost of body joints and the clubhead. Biomedical engineering online. 2014;13(1):20. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-20 24571569

39. Jayaraman C, Beck CL, Sosnoff JJ. Shoulder pain and jerk during recovery phase of manual wheelchair propulsion. Journal of biomechanics. 2015;48(14):3937–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.018 26472307

40. Yan JH H R, Payne VG, Thomas JR. Normalized jerk: a measure to capture developmental characteristics of young girl’s overarm throwing. Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 2000;16:196–203.

41. Teulings HL, Contreras-Vidal JL, Stelmach GE, Adler CH. Parkinsonism reduces coordination of fingers, wrist, and arm in fine motor control. Experimental neurology. 1997;146(1):159–70. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1997.6507 9225749

42. Carey SL, Jason Highsmith M, Maitland ME, Dubey RV. Compensatory movements of transradial prosthesis users during common tasks. Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon). 2008;23(9):1128–35.

43. Freddolini M, Esposito F, Latella L, Marcucci M, Corvi A. Shoulder joint loadings in post total hip replacement surgery patients during assisted walking: The influence of the crutch setup. Journal of biomechanics. 2018;72:46–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.02.021 29510857

44. Lighthall Haubert L, Mulroy SJ, Requejo PS, Maneekobkunwong S, Gronley JK, Rankin JW, et al. Effect of reverse manual wheelchair propulsion on shoulder kinematics, kinetics and muscular activity in persons with paraplegia. The journal of spinal cord medicine. 2019:1–13.

45. Tsai CY, Boninger ML, Bass SR, Koontz AM. Upper-limb biomechanical analysis of wheelchair transfer techniques in two toilet configurations. Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon). 2018;55:79–85.

Článek vyšel v časopise


2020 Číslo 1