Modelling the number of antenatal care visits in Bangladesh to determine the risk factors for reduced antenatal care attendance


Autoři: Kakoli Rani Bhowmik aff001;  Sumonkanti Das aff002;  Md. Atiqul Islam aff003
Působiště autorů: Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands aff001;  Department of Quantitative Economics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands aff002;  Department of Statistics, Shahjalal University of Science & Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh aff003;  Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia aff004
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 15(1)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228215

Souhrn

The existence of excess zeros in the distribution of antenatal care (ANC) visits in Bangladesh raises the research question of whether there are two separate generating processes in taking ANC and the frequency of ANC. Thus the main objective of this study is to identify a proper count regression model for the number of ANC visits by pregnant women in Bangladesh covering the issues of overdispersion, zero-inflation, and intra-cluster correlation with an additional objective of determining risk factors for ANC use and its frequency. The data have been extracted from the nationally representative 2014 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey, where 22% of the total 4493 women did not take any ANC during pregnancy. Since these zero ANC visits can be either structural or sampling zeros, two-part zero-inflated and hurdle regression models are investigated along with the standard one-part count regression models. Correlation among response values has been accounted for by incorporating cluster-specific random effects in the models. The hurdle negative binomial regression model with cluster-specific random intercepts in both the zero and the count part is found to be the best model according to various diagnostic tools including likelihood ratio and uniformity tests. The results show that women who have poor education, live in poor households, have less access to mass media, or belong to the Sylhet and Chittagong regions are less likely to use ANC and also have fewer ANC visits. Additionally, women who live in rural areas, depend on family members’ decisions to take health care, and have unintended pregnancies had fewer ANC visits. The findings recommend taking both cluster-specific random effects and overdispersion and zero-inflation into account in modelling the ANC data of Bangladesh. Moreover, safe motherhood programmes still need to pay particular attention to disadvantaged and vulnerable subgroups of women.

Klíčová slova:

Antenatal care – Bangladesh – Decision making – Mass media – Medical risk factors – Pregnancy – Sexual and gender issues – Urban areas


Zdroje

1. Alkema L, Chou D, Hogan D, Zhang S, Moller AB, Gemmill A, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group. The Lancet. 2016; 387(10017): 462–474.

2. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Health, Population and Nutrition Sector Program 2017–2022. Government of Bangladesh: MOHFW. 2017.

3. National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDRB), and MEASURE Evaluation. Bangladesh Maternal Mortality and Health Care Survey 2016: Preliminary Report. Dhaka, Bangladesh, and Chapel Hill, NC, USA: NIPORT, ICDDRB, and MEASURE Evaluation. 2017.

4. World Health Organization. Integrated Management of Pregnancy and Child Birth: Standard of Maternal and Neonatal Care. Geneva, Switzerland: Department of Making Pregnancy Safer. 2007.

5. NIPORT, Mitra and Associates, & ICF International. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Dhaka, Bangladesh and Rockville, Maryland, U.S.A.: NIPORT, Mitra and Associates, and ICF International. 2016.

6. Rahman M, Islam R, Islam AZ. Rural-urban differentials of utilization of ante-natal health-care services in Bangladesh. health policy and development. 2008; 6(3): 117–125.

7. Anwar I, Nababan HY, Mostari S, Rahman A, Khan JA. Trends and inequities in use of maternal health care services in Bangladesh, 1991–2011. PloS one. 2015; 10(3): e0120309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120309 25799500

8. Jahan M, Jahan E. Socio-demographic determinants influencing antenatal care seeking behaviour among women in Bangladesh: an application of factor analysis. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. 2017; 3(4): 925–930.

9. Ali N, Sultana M, Sheikh N, Akram R, Mahumud RA, Asaduzzaman M, et al. Predictors of Optimal Antenatal Care Service Utilization Among Adolescents and Adult Women in Bangladesh. Health services research and managerial epidemiology. 2018; 5: 2333392818781729. doi: 10.1177/2333392818781729 30083573

10. Ali MM. Microeconometric Analysis on Determinants of Antenatal Care in Bangladesh: A Finite Mixture Modelling Approach. The Indian Economic Journal. 2012; 60(3): 91–107.

11. Hossain B, Hoque AA. Women empowerment and antenatal care utilization in Bangladesh. The Journal of Developing Areas. 2015; 49(2): 109–124.

12. Amrin A. An Analysis of the Status of Antenatal Care in Bangladesh. International Journal of Science and Research Methodology. 2016; 5(2): 49–57.

13. Islam MM, Masud MS. Determinants of frequency and contents of antenatal care visits in Bangladesh: Assessing the extent of compliance with the WHO recommendations. PloS one. 2018; 13(9): e0204752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204752 30261046

14. Sepehri A, Sarma S, Simpson W, Moshiri S. How important are individual, household and commune characteristics in explaining utilization of maternal health services in Vietnam?. Social science & medicine. 2008; 67(6): 1009–1017.

15. Babalola S, Fatusi A. Determinants of use of maternal health services in Nigeria-looking beyond individual and household factors. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2009; 9(1): 43.

16. Beeckman K, Louckx F, Putman K. Determinants of the number of antenatal visits in a metropolitan region. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10(1): 527.

17. Hinde J, Demétrio CG. Overdispersion: models and estimation. Computational statistics & data analysis. 1998; 27(2): 151–170.

18. Staub KE, Winkelmann R. Consistent estimation of zero-inflated count models. Health economics. 2013; 22(6): 673–686. doi: 10.1002/hec.2844 22623339

19. Min Y, Agresti A. Random effect models for repeated measures of zero-inflated count data. Statistical modelling. 2005; 5(1): 1–19.

20. Hall D. Zero-inflated Poisson and binomial regression with random effects: a case study. Biometrics. 2000; 56: 1030–39. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.01030.x 11129458

21. Yau KK, Lee AH. Zero-inflated Poisson regression with random effects to evaluate an occupational injury prevention programme. Statistics in Medicine. 2001; 20: 2907–20. doi: 10.1002/sim.860 11568948

22. Guliani H, Sepehri A, Serieux J. Determinants of prenatal care use: evidence from 32 low-income countries across Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. Health policy and planning. 2013; 29(5): 589–602. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt045 23894068

23. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK. Essentials of count data regression. A companion to theoretical econometrics. 2001; 331.

24. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH., et al. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in ecology & evolution. 2009; 24(3): 127–135.

25. Hua HE, Wan TANG, Wenjuan WANG, Paul CC. Structural zeroes and zero-inflated models. Shanghai archives of psychiatry. 2014; 26(4): 236. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2014.04.008 25317011

26. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK. Regression analysis of count data. 2nd edition, Econometric Society Monograph No.53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2013.

27. Mamun MAA. Zero-inflated regression models for count data: an application to under-5 deaths. Master Thesis, Ball State University Muncie, Indiana. 2014.

28. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. Approximations to the log-likelihood function in the nonlinear mixed-effects model. Journal of computational and Graphical Statistics. 1995; 4(1): pp.12–35.

29. Rizopoulos D. Generalized Linear Mixed Models using Adaptive Gaussian Quadrature (GLMMAdaptive). 2019. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=GLMMadaptive.

30. Hartig F. DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi-Level/Mixed) Regression Models. R Package. 2018. https://cran.r-project.org/package=DHARMa, Version 0.2.0.

31. Vuong QH. Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. 1989; 307–333.

32. Das S, Chambers R. Robust mean‐squared error estimation for poverty estimates based on the method of Elbers, Lanjouw and Lanjouw. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society). 2017; 180(4): 1137–1161.

33. Rahman MM, Rahman MM, Tareque MI, Ferdos J, Jesmin SS. Maternal pregnancy intention and professional antenatal care utilization in Bangladesh: a nationwide population-based survey. PloS one. 2016; 11(6): e0157760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157760 27309727

34. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Preliminary Report on Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2016. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Statistics and Informatics Division (SID), Ministry of Planning, The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS); 2017.

35. Islam MR, Odland JO. Determinants of antenatal and postnatal care visits among Indigenous people in Bangladesh: a study of the Mru community. Rural & Remote Health. 2011; 11(2).

36. Rahman A, Nisha MK, Begum T, Ahmed S, Alam N, Anwar I. Trends, determinants and inequities of 4+ ANC utilisation in Bangladesh. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition. 2017; 36(1): 2.

37. Shahabuddin ASM, Delvaux T, Abouchadi S, Sarker M, De Brouwere V. Utilization of maternal health services among adolescent women in Bangladesh: A scoping review of the literature. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2015; 20(7): 822–829.

38. Kamal SM. Factors affecting utilization of skilled maternity care services among married adolescents in Bangladesh. Asian Pop Studies 2009; 5: 153–170.

39. Shahjahan M, Chowdhury HA, Al-Hadhrami AY, Harun GD. Antenatal and postnatal care practices among mothers in rural Bangladesh: A community based cross-sectional study. Midwifery. 2017; 52: 42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.05.011 28599136

40. Haque M. Individual’s characteristics affecting maternal health services utilization: married adolescents and their use of maternal health services in Bangladesh. The Internet Journal of Health. 2009; 8(2): 1–11.

41. Rahman M, Islam R, Rahman M. Antenatal Care Seeking Behaviour among Slum Mothers: A Study of Rajshahi City Corporation, Bangladesh. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal. 2010; 10(1): 50. 21509081

42. Kabir R, Khan H. Utilization of Antenatal care among pregnant women of Urban Slums of Dhaka City, Bangladesh. IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science. 2013; 2(2).

43. Das S, Rahman A, Ahamed A, Rahman ST. Multi-level models can benefit from minimizing higher-order variations: an illustration using child malnutrition data. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. 2019; 89(6): 1090–1110.


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2020 Číslo 1